RaceRocks.com
Coastal Map Index Green-Blue Spaces Metchosin First Nations Links sitemap Home
Forage Fish in the Coastal Areas of Metchosin

In November 2008, Ramona de Graaf, a biologist with the Public Education Program at the Bamfield Marine Station gave a presentation in the Talk and Walk series sponsored by the Blue-Green Spaces Committee of MEASC. On the Saturday after the presentation, we rejoined for a walk and a session on the process involved in sampling for Forage Fish on Taylor Beach. Ramonna is also the principal and founding marine scientist of Emerald Sea Research and Consulting.

Moralea and Ramona
A group of Metchosinites go to Taylor Beach for a demonstration of beach sampling for forage fish eggs . Ramona checking for sand lance egg locations A 30 metre line is laid out a metre below the strand line Small trowel samples are taken of the pea gravel.
Several samples make a collection to be examined A set of sieves which can be home-made like these are used to sort the sand. Wen-Ling Liao, marine biologist PEP BMSC panning for forage fish eggs. The end sample in the .5mm sieve will be examined with a microscope.
Our thanks from the Blue-Green Spaces committee to Ramona and Wen-Ling for this informative session on the importance of monitoring and preserving forage fish habitat.
Small eggs of the forage fish roll on the sand surface. Wen-Ling Liao cleaning equipment after sampling.
Forage Fish Egg Sampling On December 6, 2008, a group of 6 volunteers met again with Ramona de Graaf down on Taylor Beach for another session of training. We intend to do sampling every two weeks in order to establish whether or not forage fish use the local beaches , and if so at what time of year. In this file are the maps and data sheets;
Forage Fish of Metchosin and Beyond by Moralea Milne March 12 2009
with an article by Briony Penn from the March 2009 FOCUS magazine .

Moralea also documents a second training session by Ramona on Taylor Beach in March of 2009. Inclued is an article she wrote for the January Issue of Thr Metchosin Muse.

We are gratetful to Ramona de Graaf and the "Forage Fish Matter Initiative" for providing all the following references for this topic which has significant implications for the Coastal Ecosystems of Metchosin.
          Power Point Presentation

 Click on this link to the power point presentation called Forage Fish Matter !









     Throughout the Strait of Georgia, fish stocks have dramatically declined. Lingcod, rockfish and some Pacific salmon species are only some of the major commercial fish species in decline. Seabird populations throughout British Columbia and Washington State are also decreasing. As well, marine species such as the southern resident killer whale, dependent on salmon runs, have been listed as endangered. Many of these species depend on bait or “forage” fishes as prey. Spawning habitat of forage fishes is located in nearshore marine environments, an environment heavily impacted by human development.

            Documenting and protecting forage fish spawning habitats must be a priority for the Metchosin Coastline.

There is little information on the current extent and health of the spawning habitats of herring and no information on the spawning habitat of surf smelt and Pacific sand lance. Surf smelt and sand lance spawn in gravel/sand beach habitats in the upper one third of the intertidal zone (Figure 1). Current spawning habitats of surf smelt and sand lance have been documented throughout the US coasts of the Juan de Fuca Strait, San Juan Islands, and Puget Sound (Penttila 2000, 2001). In Canada, eelgrass beds are protected as critical fish habitat under Fisheries and Oceans Canada “no-net” loss policy (Federal Fisheries Act). Protecting forage fish spawning and rearing habitats will have positive benefits by protecting a vital food source for numerous marine predators. Fisheries and Oceans Canada recognizes the need to obtain information on the habitat requirements of forage fishes in Coastal areas.

Figure 1. Intertidal zone spawning locations.
WHAT ARE WE CONCERNED ABOUT WITH METCHOSIN'S BEACHES?

Diversion of sediment-bearing streams through culverts, and the backshore and intertidal placement of seawalls, outfall pipes and riprap armouring interrupt natural coastal processes (such as erosion) that supply terrestrially-borne gravel sediments to beaches crucial to spawning surf smelt and Pacific sand lance. Seawalls are physical barriers that block the seaward transport of eroding gravels from feeder bluffs. Impediment of the long-shore transport of sediments by groins, outflow pipes, piers, boat ramps and docks have all contributed to the sediment-starved state of some beach faces. In general, the placement of seawalls and riprap armouring in the backshore and in the intertidal continues the process of sediment deprivation due to the action of wave scouring. Wave scouring can result in the loss of fine sands and gravels (appropriate for spawning) and the dominance of coarser (larger) gravels and cobble beaches inappropriate for use as spawning gravels for both surf smelt and Pacific sand lance. Seawalls such as those on Albert Head and Tower Point are often placed in the backshore, supralittoral and high intertidal zones (the uppermost portion of the high tide range) which can result in the loss of spawning habitat area, a decrease in beach elevation, an increase in beach slope, interruption of the sediment-transport drift cell, and the loss of sediment retaining logs. Not only are these “hard” approaches to storm protection negatively impacting forage fish populations, but they can fail to deliver the protection intended. Around the world and locally, there are growing incidences of seawalls and other armouring failing to protect land owners. Modern engineering approaches, or “soft” approaches work with coastal processes to provide safety for human populations and industries as well as maintaining marine ecological functions. While this report will not address this topic in detail, several informative websites and consultants include http://www.greenshores.ca, http://www.coastalgeo.com, http://www.herrarainc.ca and http:// www.sanjuans.org.
The presence of overhanging vegetation in marine riparian zones is important for the ecological function of nearshore marine habitats (Levings and Jamieson 2001; Brennan and Culverwell 2004) including having a positive effect on surf smelt spawn survival (Penttila 2001). The loss of overhanging vegetation (due to shoreline hardening measures) in the marine riparian zone has several ecological implications not only for marine fish and invertebrates, but the loss of shade cover increases the mortality of incubating surf smelt eggs (Penttila 2001, Rice 2006). Summer beach sediment temperatures are moderated by overhanging vegetation. Surf smelt eggs are typically anchored to surface gravels but are also buried between interstitial spaces within sediments layers (Penttila 2001). Surf smelt eggs deposited in summer months likely encounter high mortalities on the surface but eggs buried deeper in spawning substrates can avoid extreme surface temperatures and drying resulting in an increased survival rate (Penttila 2001). The loss of shading, however, increases thermal stress and desiccation to incubating eggs as temperatures within the sediments rise resulting in increased mortality of even buried eggs (Penttila 2001, Rice 2006). Vegetation buffers the drying effect of winds, and where beaches have lost riparian zones, eggs can also suffer a higher mortality than “natural” due to wind-induced desiccation effects.

In Washington State, sand lance, surf smelt and other forage fish species such as anchovy are protected due to their importance to upper trophic levels of the food chain to support commercial fisheries (such as salmon, rockfish, ling god) and for ecosystem function (as advocated in WDFW principles of ecosystem management).
In general, surf smelt and Pacific sand lance depend on healthy nearshore and beach habitat, and they are vulnerable to impacts from shoreline development. Beaches with natural erosion processes supplying appropriate sized gravels and extant riparian zones are an optimal state for spawning surf smelt and sand lance. Winter spawning stocks of surf smelt may avoid desiccation stress and may have evolved to exploit beaches lacking overhanging vegetation (D. Penttila, pers. comm. 2007). Of primary importance for spawning is the mixture of gravels with a sand base. Cobbling beaches for heavy equipment operation, bulkheads, seawalls, outflow pipes and structures impeding sediment-transport drift cells are threats to maintaining these crucial spawning beaches.
The content of this report summarizes the data acquired from July 2006 to June 2007 (with mention of spawning results to September 07).

The above was ADAPTED FROM RAMONA de GRAAF'S reference materials and the Forage Fish Report The photos above come from the Power Point presentation of Emerald Sea Research and Consulting.

FORAGE FISH REPORT see www.birdsonthebay.ca The Boundary Bay intertidal forage fish spawning habitat report. Please contact Ramona and Wen-Ling of Forage Fish Matter! at emeraldsearesearch(use the at sign)hotmail.com or rdegraaf(use the at sign)bms.bc.ca for more information, talks or training!

Ramona has also supplied the following manual available here as a .pdf file:

SURF SMELT AND PACIFIC SAND LANCE INTERTIDAL SPAWNING HABITAT ASSESSMENT
This manual is to guide surveys after training is provided by a biologist experienced in
monitoring for beach spawning forage fish (see page 6 for contact information). Sampling for
surf smelt and Pacific sand lance eggs consists of: Site selection (Section 1); obtaining a bulk
sample of mixed sand and gravel from the upper intertidal region of an appropriate beach
(Section 2); condensing the bulk sample to a manageable volume (Section 3); and examining
the condensed sample under a dissecting microscope to determine the presence or absence
of eggs (Section 4). Sections 1 – 3 are supplied in this field guide as are field data codes and
data sheet. Pages 2 – 6 of this document can be laminated for use in the field.

Technical Report 2006-05
Nearshore Birds in Puget Sound Joseph B. Buchanan
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Protecting Nearshore Habitat and Functions in Puget Sound
Technical Report 2006-06 Kurtl. Fresh, Noaa
Juvenile Pacific Salmon and the Nearshore Ecosystem in Puget Sound
Hungry Oceans-- Oceana


From Oceana, an informative file called Hungry Oceans, What happens when the prey is gone?.
Green Shores Sample Policy & Bylaw Language
anthropogenic This file with a map of Metchosin's Shoreline shows the major areas where humans have modified the habitat, often resulting in ecosystem modification and loss of habitat for local species of fish, invertebrates and marine mammals. The term Anthropogenic refers to human modification.
Ecologically Sensitive This file contains a map with the ecologically sensitive areas of Metchosin's Coastal Ecosystems.
Invasive Coastal Plants Reference Link
Coastal Jurisdiction:
Who owns what ?.. a reference on the various government jurisdictions for coastal Metchosin

This site has been created to represent the contiguous ecosystems of the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve/Marine Protected Area and for the use of the Green Blue Spaces sub committee of the Metchosin Environmental Advisory Select Committee ( MEASC).

The website is hosted courtesy of Lester B. Pearson College. Copyright: G.Fletcher Marine Education Consulting, 2008
webmaster:
Garry Fletcher, educational director of racerocks.com