Ryan Murphy’s Photos of Race Rocks

The most impressive pictures taken at Race Rocks are surely those done by Ryan Murphy, a graduate of Lester Pearson College who served as Ecoguardian in 2008-2011.

Ryan’s Flickr site is certainly worth browsing as almost every facet of life at Race Rocks has been covered in very artistic photographic excellence.  Check out the several albums on Race Rocks .

Screen Shot 2016-07-25 at 9.11.58 PM

Photo taken by Ryan in January, 2011

Lighthouse team disputes right to sell Race Rocks

Lighthouse team disputes right to sell Race Rocks operators say beacons not owned by federal government


BY AMY MINSKY, POSTMEDIA NEWS DECEMBER 24, 2010 

The 150-year-old tower at Race Rocks is among nearly 1,000 lighthouses and light stations under threat.
Photograph by: BRUCE STOTESBURY, Timescolonist.com

OTTAWA — With the federal government preparing to sell almost 1,000 lighthouses across the country, the group overseeing operations at the beacon on Race Rocks, off Vancouver Island, says many are not the government’s to sell.
At issue is who holds the rights to the land — the respective provinces or the federal government.
The lighthouse at Race Rocks, one nautical mile below the southernmost tip of the Island, was built by the Royal Navy in 1860.
It has been listed as “for sale” since June, when the government designated it and the others as surplus property. The tower stands on a rock within an island that is part of a provincial ecological reserve.
While the tower is owned and operated by the Canadian Coast Guard, the land on which it sits is not federal property, a spokesman for the province said Thursday. “The land occupied by the lighthouse on Race Rocks is provincial land, which is under a transfer, or lease, to the federal government for lighthouse purposes,” said Dan Gilmour, a spokesman for B.C.’s environment ministry.
In a letter to the Race Rocks team after the lighthouse was designated surplus property, Gilmour’s colleague, Doug Biffard, said he had received notice from the federal government indicating it was aware of the quandary.
“The Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the coast guard know that they cannot enter into any arrangement to sell, lease or otherwise tenure out, most of the lighthouses in B.C. because the land is under provincial ownership,” the letter said.
Last summer, the federal DFO published a catalogue of 975 surplus properties following the coast guard’s assessment of all the lighthouses it operates.
The list contains at least one from every province except Saskatchewan. To save the lighthouses listed as surplus, a community or group must agree to take on the maintenance of the site, but the federal government would continue to operate and maintain the lighthouse.
The government was criticised when the listing became public in June. Many groups said it undermined the Heritage Lighthouse Protection Act, which had come into force days earlier. The act was designed to ensure the federal government preserved historically significant lighthouses, rather than leave them abandoned.
Those feelings were echoed by the chairman of the Senate committee on fisheries and oceans, Liberal Sen. Bill Rompkey.
This week, the committee released the first of two reports on lighthouses.
When the committee toured the country and hosted discussions on the future of lighthouses, it heard from some of the stakeholders at Race Rocks, including Garry Fletcher, B.C. Parks Ecological reserve warden.
“It would defy logic to see how the federal government could sell a property owned by the province,” Fletcher said.
© Copyright (c) The Victoria Times Colonist

Lighthouse Team Disputes Right to Sell–(Times Colonist)

Race Rocks operators say beacons not owned by federal government
Dec 24, 2010

By Amy Minsky, Postmedia News December 24, 2010

tclighthouseThe 150-year-old tower at Race Rocks is among nearly 1,000 lighthouses and light stations under threat.
Photograph by: Bruce Stotesbury, Timescolonist.com
Ottawa— With the federal government preparing to sell almost 1,000 lighthouses across the country, the group overseeing operations at the beacon on Race Rocks, off Vancouver Island, says many are not the government’s to sell.
At issue is who holds the rights to the land — the respective provinces or the federal government. Continue reading

Boats in the Ecological Reserve Data for 2010

These notes below are taken from the old log of marine vessel occurrence and behaviours while in the reserve in 2010. Only those occurrences observed by the Ecoguardian and recorded at the time are represented here. This does not preclude other boats being in the reserve at other times.

‘2010-01-03’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 1, ‘Company was called as the driver did not observe the Pacific Whale Watch Association guidelines of the go-slow zone that surrounds the rocks and islands of the reserve (i.e. the operator powered up to leave the reserve going East before passing the North-South meridian between North Race and Great Race Island).’, ‘Ryan’, ’14:16:55′),
‘2010-01-17’, ‘Pleasure’, 1, ‘Large black zodiac came from Victoria, reduced speed and kept distance from all rocks.  Went through the main channel E->W as far as the sea lions, turned around and left bound for Victoria.’, ‘Ryan’, ’12:35:43′),
‘2010-01-31’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 1, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’16:31:59′),
‘2010-02-15’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 3, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’14:55:48′),
‘2010-03-07’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 4, ‘POW, \\”BC Lung\\”, Eagle Wing, and 1 other’, ‘Ryan’, ’15:51:39′),
‘2010-03-28’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 12, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’16:02:27′),
‘2010-03-31’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 9, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’16:04:22′),
‘2010-03-31’, ‘Other’, 2, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’16:02:53′),
‘2010-04-07’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 5, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’16:15:08′),
, ‘2010-04-11’, ‘Pleasure’, 4, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’15:00:42′),
‘2010-04-11’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 10, ‘A lot of west-bound traffic in the afternoon, I’m guessing    there are some whales out past Sooke.’, ‘Ryan’, ’16:09:22′),
‘2010-04-17’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 12, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’22:06:29′),
‘2010-04-23’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 12, ‘a wet old day, but lots of traffic.’, ‘Ryan’, ’18:30:23′),
‘2010-04-24’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 7, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’18:32:55′),
‘2010-04-25’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 10, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’20:08:53′),
‘2010-04-25’, ‘Fishing’, 3, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’20:09:03′),
‘2010-05-02’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 8, ‘Traffic is really beginning to pick up.  3 eco tour zodiacs paraded past the jetty today in under 60 seconds.’, ‘Ryan’, ’15:55:24′),
‘2010-05-13’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 25, ‘A busy day in the reserve today, however the tours have been regularly spaced so that the traffic congestion seen here in the fall has not materialized.’, ‘Ryan’, ’16:26:02′),
‘2010-05-21’, ‘Pleasure’, 4, ‘safe/slow tours of the reserve conducted by all, with illegal fishing thrown in.’, ‘Ryan’, ’15:52:31′),
‘2010-05-21’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 17, ‘traffic is definitely picking up.’, ‘Ryan’, ’15:52:46′),
‘2010-05-22’, ‘Pleasure’, 5, ‘Had to call 2 boats who were speeding through the turbine area, but luckily they listen to their radios.’, ‘Ryan’, ’15:53:18′),
‘2010-05-22’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 31, ‘A lot of traffic today, including a troubling increase in the < 50m viewing distance of marine mammals and increased maneuvering of boats to do so on the N side of Great Race.’, ‘Ryan’, ’15:54:34′),
‘2010-05-29’, ‘Other’, 1, ‘First Swiftsure boat made it to Race Passage at 11:15’, ‘Ryan’, ’11:07:04′),
‘2010-06-11’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 5, ”, ‘adam’, ’21:07:37′),
‘2010-06-12’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 20, ”, ‘adam’, ’20:28:03′),
‘2010-06-12’, ‘Pleasure’, 5, ”, ‘adam’, ’20:28:17′),
‘2010-06-21’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 3, ”, ‘adam’, ’18:17:34′),
‘2010-06-21’, ‘Pleasure’, 1, ”, ‘adam’, ’18:17:41′),
‘2010-06-27’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 1, ”, ‘adam’, ’18:18:09′),
‘2010-06-27’, ‘Pleasure’, 2, ‘One pleasure vessel this afternoon approached far too close to Middle Rock and scared all the seals away. I tried to hail them on the radio but only had silence.’, ‘adam’, ’18:18:59′),
‘2010-07-02’, ‘Pleasure’, 12, ”, ‘adam’, ’19:14:31′),
‘2010-07-03’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 25, ”, ‘adam’, ’14:54:02′),
‘2010-07-03’, ‘Fishing’, 1, ”, ‘adam’, ’14:54:08′),
‘2010-07-04’, ‘Fishing’, 1, ”, ‘adam’, ’21:37:15′),
‘2010-07-06’, ‘Pleasure’, 15, ”, ‘adam’, ’20:08:09′),
‘2010-07-06’, ‘Fishing’, 3, ”, ‘adam’, ’20:08:15′),
‘2010-07-06’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 20, ”, ‘adam’, ’20:08:23′),
‘2010-07-16’, ‘Pleasure’, 1, ”, ‘adam’, ’09:17:17′),
‘2010-07-16’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 15, ”, ‘adam’, ’09:17:23′),
‘2010-07-17’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 35, ”, ‘adam’, ’22:03:19′),
‘2010-07-17’, ‘Pleasure’, 2, ”, ‘adam’, ’22:03:29′),
‘2010-07-17’, ‘Diving’, 1, ”, ‘adam’, ’22:03:35′),
‘2010-08-08’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 40, ”, ‘adam’, ’09:41:23′),
‘2010-08-13’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 40, ”, ‘adam’, ’07:09:11′),
‘2010-08-24’, ‘Pleasure’, 2, ”, ‘adam’, ’10:21:27′),
‘2010-08-24’, ‘Fishing’, 3, ”, ‘adam’, ’10:21:34′),
‘2010-08-24’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 25, ”, ‘adam’, ’10:21:47′),
‘2010-09-04’, ‘Kayak’, 7, ‘See disturbance report’, ‘Ryan’, ’16:32:23′),
‘2010-09-04’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 5, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’16:32:33′),
, ‘2010-09-15’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 2, ‘I share here a typical example of the interaction of Eco Tour vessels and the wildlife at Race Rocks.  This occurred from 10:50 to 11:05 this morning:   A Seafun Safaris boat entered the reserve first and maintained a respectable distance from marine mammals while making a passive drift tour of the sea lions hauled out on Great Race Island.  The driver obviously is aware of and believes in the importance of the PWWA’s stewardship protocols for viewing wildlife at Race Rocks.\r\nThe Eagle Wing Tours vessel Gold Wing  entered the reserve and approached the Seafun Safaris vessel motoring against the current.  Its noisy, active approach alerted the Steller sea lions on the NE corner of Great Race Island causing some individuals to take to the water. The Seafun Safaris vessel finished its drift tour and left the reserve after a respectful and sustainable tour.  The Eagle Wing Tours vessel drifted and motored against the current several more times while viewing the sea lions on Great Race Island before motoring further against the current to view the sea lions on Middle Rocks. Sound and traffic congestion in the narrow channels are concerns for both Ecological Reserve management and community stakeholders.  All vessels are reminded that passive drift tours are encouraged  “whenever possible “, particularly in conditions of rippled seas as we are enjoying today.’, ‘Ryan’, ’11:08:22′),
‘2010-09-21’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 26, ”, ‘Ryan’, ’19:02:12′),
‘2010-11-05’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 1, ”, ‘VirginieLP’, ’09:09:41′),
‘2010-11-06’, ‘Diving’, 2, ‘Divers in two locations, arrived around 11:00 and departed around 14:00.’, ‘VirginieLP’, ’09:07:39′),
‘2010-11-06’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 1, ‘Eagle wing whale watching tour stopped by at 16:30.’, ‘VirginieLP’, ’09:08:33′),
‘2010-11-07’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 2, ‘Prince of Whales at 2:50\r\nSprint tide at 11:30’, ‘VirginieLP’, ’08:14:53′),
‘2010-11-07’, ‘Other’, 0, ‘3 private vessels came through the reserve’, ‘VirginieLP’, ’08:16:35′),
‘2010-11-08’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 2, ‘whale watching tours-orange boats (missed the name of company)’, ‘VirginieLP’, ’23:02:22′),
‘2010-11-11’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 2, ‘Prince of Whales at 13:50\r\nUnidentified tour boat at 16:30’, ‘VirginieLP’, ’22:57:21′),
‘2010-11-12’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 3, ‘Eagle Wing tours at 14:30, Prince of Whales at 15:30, Seaking Adventures at 16:00.’, ‘VirginieLP’, ’15:57:12′),
‘2010-11-16’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 1, ‘Eagle wing around 15:00’, ‘VirginieLP’, ’11:50:50′),
‘2010-11-18’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 1, ‘prince of whales @ 16:00’, ‘VirginieLP’, ’18:54:35′),
‘2010-11-21’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 1, ‘whale watching boat’, ‘VirginieLP’, ’20:26:19′),
‘2010-11-27’, ‘Diving’, 2, ‘in the morning, Ogden point diving boats’, ‘AlexF’, ’18:54:05′),
‘2010-11-27’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 1, ‘around 15:00, orange zodiac.’, ‘AlexF’, ’19:02:15′),
‘2010-11-28’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 1, ‘Eagle Wing, caused some upset to the sea lions on west rock’, ‘AlexF’, ’09:18:11′),
‘2010-11-28’, ‘Fishing’, 1, ”, ‘AlexF’, ’09:18:49′),
‘2010-12-06’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 1, ‘Zodia with a cabin, \\”BC Luna\\”, passed through reserve.’, ‘AlexF’, ’09:17:10′),
‘2010-12-19’, ‘Eco-Tour’, 1, ‘princess of whales 14:30’, ‘AlexF’, ’19:59:44′),

Military Activities Near Race Rocks

DND BLASTING ACTIVITIES AT ROCKY POINT:

  • blast-18Bentinck island is used by the Department of National Defense as both a demolition range and a testing range for explosives. On the South end of Rocky Point there is a disposal pit where other demolition occurs, and in Whirl Bay, behind Christopher Point, there is an underwater test site. The size of the explosions is supposed to be monitored and controlled , however, we invariable get widely varying impacts. Our ecoguardians have made observations of the impact on sea
    agornge-1

    From the “burn pit” on Rocky Point

    lions, seals and seabirds over the last few years. Invariably the blasting results in the sea lions being scared from the islands . Sometimes they do come back to haul out on the rocks but they often move on to another location. Unfortunately the location of Race Rocks next to these areas makes it very difficult to mitigate the impact of these explosions.

  • See the “Before and After” from the sitezap camera 1- Nov 7,2002
  • Link to Fisheries and Oceans Canada file on Guidelines for the Use of Explosives In or Near Canadian Fisheries Waters
  • The Race Rocks logs have documented the activities of the military and the effects observed on the animals of Race Rocks
  • Summary report: Responses of Steller Sea Lions (Eumetopias jubatus) to In-Air Blast Noise from Military Explosions DEMARCHI, MW AND MD BENTLEY. 2004.
  • Effects of natural and human-caused disturbances on marine birds and pinnipeds at Race Rocks, British Columbia. LGL Report EA1569. Prepared for Department of National Defence, Canadian Forces Base Esquimalt and Public Works and Government Services Canada. 103 p.
  • This video was made on October 7, 2002 in order to document the effect of the dndblasts-1Department of National Defence demolition exercises on Bentinck Island on the behaviour of birds and marine mammals at Race Rocks MPA. In previous years we have observed considerable disruption by military exercises involving blasting on nearby Bentinck Island in the fall just after the sea lions have returned to the island. We have requested that blasts be spread out over a longer period of time during an exercise. Traditionally blasts have come in a series of three. The first one would alert the sea lions, the second would send a few in the water and the third would clear the islands. This year on this one occasion, only two blasts were held at five minutes apart. The results are shown in the video.
  • On November 7, 2002, the DND were still doing their demolition blasting exercises at Bentinck Island. (not Oct 7 as stated in this draft version of the video) The students lionblasts-1from Lester Pearson College who were out for a project week were able to catch the images of the impact of these blasts on the first day from the science centre window and on the second day from the top of the light tower. In the tower, they interviewed Mike Demarchi of LGL who is currently doing a $50,000 contract for the Department of National Defence to monitor the impact of these blasts and to compare them with other disturbances at Race Rocks.

Update 2020: and its still going on —-https://www.racerocks.ca/tag/blasting/

and on January 27-2020: another set of blasts from Bentinck Island clears the docks of sealions:

https://www.racerocks.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Blasting.mp4“][/video]

Recommendations:

1. Explosions should only be conducted at times of the year when there are no nesting birds or harbour and elephant seals having young .
( this occurs May to mid-August for harbour seals and mid-january to February for elphant seals )

2. During the months of August, September and October when the sea lions are returning to the islands, they are particularly sensitive to disturbances.

3. December, March and April are probably the times of least impact but only if explosion size is carefully controlled.

4. The sizes of explosions should be carefully monitored so as to limit the impact of disturbance.

5. Blasts should be spaced out to at least 10 minutes between detonation, and especially never three blasts in succession. This lessens the impacts on the animals.

SAMPLE DAILY LOGS FROM RACE ROCKS WITH EFFECTS OF BLASTING ON ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR

Thursday, November 22, 2001–MARINE LIFE: A typical November day weather wise however the Military detonation exercises on Bentinck Island were particularly disturbing for the Harbour Seals and Sea Lions. Once the blasting was done for the day the animals were still quite nervous and in fact when a Cuda Marine Whale Watching boat went by one rock (15:15-15:30) with approximately 120 sea lions hauled out over half of them stampeded into the water!”

Thursday, January 17, 2002
MARINE LIFE:At 8:30 there were 150-170 Sealions, 2 large bull and 1 smaller Elephant Seals on Middle rock. With the first blast at 11:10 the gulls and cormorants took flight, most of the sealions were alerted and some went into the water. When the second blast went off 2 minutes after the first, the sealions scrambled over each other in a rush to get to the water. The elephant seals although alerted (raised their heads and looked around ) did not move off their spots. With each blast the eagles, gulls and cormorants all took flight but within 1 or 2 minutes settled back down. During the hour between blast series 10 to 15 sealions hauled out again but appeared to be somewhat ‘edgy’ and were much quicker to move into the water when the blasting occurred again. There were 14-7 mature Bald Eagles in the M.P.A. today.

Friday, January 18, 2002
MARINE LIFE: At 8:30 there were only 75-80 sealions hauled out on middle rock, not all the animals have returned since the blasting yesterday. The first blast at 9:58 alerted all the sealions and 20-25 went into the water, the second blast 2-3 minutes later sent all but 6 animals scrambling into the sea. The last blast at approx. 10:25 sent 12 of the 20 sealions that had hauled out after the 10:01 blast, back into the water. There will be blasting exercises again next week on the 24th and 25th. There were 11 (7 mature ) Bald Eagles today.
posted by Carol or Mike S at 6:03 PM

Thursday, January 24, 2002
MARINE LIFE: Today we monitored the scheduled detonations at the D.N.D. site on Bentinck Island. There were three sets of blasts, each consisting of two detonations separated by about 2 minutes. The first blast at 10:54 sent the gulls, cormorants into the air and alerted the sealions hauled out on the middle rock. About 20 animals moved towards the water then the second blast went off and caused a stampede of all the hauled out sealions. The birds as usual settled back down in a minute or two. Very gradually a few at a time, 10-15 sealions returned to the haul out areas. The Elephant Seals raised their heads and looked around but did not move away. The Second set of blasts at 11:53 and 11:55 cleared Middle Rock of sealions and also sent 40-45 Harbour Seals hauled out on the western slopes of the Southeast Rocks scrambling into the water. The Last 2 blasts( 12:48 and 12:50 ) sent the 5 sealions that hauled out again about 20 minutes after the 11:55, back into the water. Do not know the size of the detonations but they shook the cameras and most of the pictures on the walls. There are more blasts scheduled for tomorrow. There were 7 Bald Eagles – 4 mature.

Addendum:
In the fall of 2002 the blasting activities took place again at Bentinck Island. This year we have had a large population of the endangered Northern Sea Lions, and are again at risk of having them move out due to the effects of the blasting. The DND has let a contract for an environmental study to LGL, an environmental consulting firm ( See link below). Unfortunately the results of that study will not affect the pattern of blasting scheduled for the fall term. We have been recording the effects with several videos and images below.

UPDATE: January, 2007: Recent blasting activities at Bentinck Island have flushed some of the birds and have scared some of the northern sea lions into the water. In general however we have observed that when they only do two blasts at more than a 1 minute interval, there is much less disturbance than three successive blasts.
EffectsDEMARCHI, MW AND MD BENTLEY. 2004. Effects of natural and human-caused disturbances on marine birds and pinnipeds at Race Rocks, British Columbia. LGL Report EA1569. Prepared for Department of National Defence, Canadian Forces Base Esquimalt and Public Works and Government Services Canada. 103 p.

Note in particular, the discussion of the results concerning the effects of blasting on the behaviour of sea lions.

lgl2010progreport

 

Return to the Environmental Impact and Disturbances Index.

Values Input table from Lester Pearson College UWC 2010

VALUES INPUT TABLE: for DFO Race Rocks MPA Advisory Board Process.

Past, Present, Future Use

Lester B.Pearson College’s first significant interaction with the area was in 1977 as a location for marine biology field trips and diving. Faculty and students initiated the process of getting it preserved as an ecological reserve in 1979:
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/history/rrerhist.htm

and assisted BC Parks in the preparation of the Management plan.
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/bcparks/planning/mgmtplns/race_rocks/racerock.html

Since that time there has been a continuous record of student, faculty and staff involvement in doing ecological monitoring in the reserve and in student and visitor field trips,
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/education/education.htm

From the 2005 report on State of Ecological Reserves in BC, ” For the past several years the Ministry has regularly stated that it is committed to shared stewardship and partnerships. Such a commitment by the Ministry requires innovative approaches and resources. The Race Rocks Ecological Reserve is clearly exemplary from a shared stewardship, ecological protection, public education and applied research perspective.”
http://www.ecoreserves.bc.ca/newsissues_files/State%20of%20Ecological%20Reserves%202005%20final.pdf

Pearson College has supported student research at Rocks ,
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/research/research.htm

and the faculty and students have assisted outside scientists in research projects there.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/research/researchexternal.htm

Each year it provides boat cover for the Christmas Bird Count by the Victoria Natural History Society.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/seabirds/xmascount/birdcount.htm

A college faculty member, now retired has continued to serve as Ecological Reserve warden for BC Parks since 1980. and in 1997, the college took over full time management of the Ecological Reserve and the island facilities on a long term lease from BC Parks.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/admin/admin.htm

Lester Pearson College has a high level of participation in R&D and energy projects such as the AXYS wind resource assessment buoy testing
https://racerocks.ca/racerock/data/axystest/jdfwindwave.htm
and the Integrated Energy Project involving solar and tidal energy for the Island. http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/energy/tidalenergy/tidalenergy.htm
There is an ongoing program of retrofitting and enhancement of efficiency to the infrastructure through additional solar panel installations; LED and CFL lighting and battery energy storage has resulted in close to 60 % reduction in fuel consumption and resulting emissions.

It has also implemented more efficient water systems and is currently upgrading the composting toilets…

The college has also had an ongoing ecological restoration program for the island in an attempt to mitigate ecological footprint of former operations on the island.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/eco/ecorestore.htm
It has installed and continues to run a weather station:
https://racerocks.ca/racerock/data/weatherlink/Current_Vantage_Pro.htm
and continues the long term daily water temperature and salinity records for monthly submission to IOS.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/abiotic/temperature/seatemperature.htm
A database is maintained with observations from the ecoguardian and volunteers using remote cameras on tagged and branded marine mammals;
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/marmam/sealion/tracking/tracking.htm

In 2000, Pearson College secured a grant from the Millennium foundation for the installation of a LAN on the island and internet connection passing live remote controlled video and audio to the outside world by microwave.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/video5.htm
The college supports the website racerocks.com which is a non-commercial educational site continually being updated by a volunteer with contributions from staff, students, faculty and outside researchers. This website is used worldwide as a distance education tool, with several specific curriculum programs using the resources contained on the website.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/eco/ecoeducation.htm

Ecological features of importance:
The high currents in the area with nutrient laden water lead to a highly productive ecosystem with high biodiversity of Invertebrates, fish and marine algae.
It is a seabird nesting colony for four species, a migratory stopover for countless migrants and overwintering residence for several thousand gulls of several species. It also provides habitat for several species of endangered and listed plants and animals.

It is the largest marine mammal haulout and birthing colony on southern Vancouver Island and a Northern Elephant seal birthing colony,
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/eco/taxalab/nufar.htm

a harbour seal birthing colony,
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/eco/taxalab/damionw.htm

a haulout for a large colony of Northern ( Steller’s) sea lion from August to April,
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/eco/taxalab/nufar.htm

and a haulout for a large colony of California sea lions especially Sept. to December each year.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/eco/taxalab/carolinem.htm

The college has supported research on hydroids by Dr. Anita Brinckmann-Voss leading to the identification of over 65 species of that group of cnidarians, several which are new species records.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/hydroid/anitabv.htm

In the racerocks.com taxonomy files, an inventory featuring all individual species from the island is continually being updated as new photographs, videos and observations are available.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/eco/taxalab/taxonomy.htm

A large bank of video archives also forms a core of the documentation of animals and events on the island,
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/archives.htm

and the Daily Log section provides a record of daily happenings on the island from the viewpoint of the resident ecoguardian, a monthly photo gallery provided by a viewer using the remote camera, and a log of updates to the website of resources for Race Rocks.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/diary/


Geographic features of importance
The archipelago of islands is a unique geographic feature providing optimal exposure in the Strait of Juan de Fuca to diverse elements of wind and currents which lead to a highly biodiverse ecosystem. Its location provides the highest measured upwelling area of the west coast which results in deep water species occurring at a shallow depth and a large biomass of contributed larvae and planktonic species.

The geology:
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/abiotic/geology/geology.htm

and other physical factors of the area are unique as well and provide a special set of habitats to a large number of species.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/eco/ecodata.htm
It is also the most southerly point of Canada on the Pacific Coast.

Cultural features of importance

The island has a historic light station and has hosted generations of pioneering light keeper families who survived under difficult conditions. A year from now, in December 2010, the light tower marks its 150th year as a guiding beacon for those plying the waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/history/histam.htm

In recent years, our investigations on the rock mounds on the island have led them to be identified as pre-contact First Nations burial mounds from a culture that thrived in the area from 1000 to 1500 years ago, and then disappeared . In the year 2000 with the assistance of a First Nations elder, we sought the place name for Race Rocks from a another elder, the late Tom Charles , and were granted permission then to use the Klallum name Xwayen, the area of swift flowing water. Race Rocks is essentially in the geographic centre of the Salish Sea. The first peoples of that sea recognized the close relationship between the land and the sea and we have always dedicated on the home page of racerocks.com, an icon which changes with the 13 stages of he moon as recognized by that culture.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/firstnations/first.htm

Human Threats to any of the important features.
The human presence at Race Rocks is a critical component to making this endeavour a success on many levels whether it be safety ; ecological stewardship and restoration; science,  education and research; human activities monitoring. As such, adequate funding levels must be maintained to  a level that will enable these essential activities to continue. To date, Pearson College has been solely responsible for finding the necessary funds to continue operations. It is important that appropriate funding be secured to enable long term sustainability.
There has been a continuation of problematic recreational boaters who view and disturb animals and birds from too close a distance and increase the chance of boat strikes on marine mammals and diving birds. There continues to be on an intermittent basis recreational fishing in the reserve.

There is ongoing concern for boat traffic, noise and effluent that goes with it, speed reduction and viewing distance. Airline overflights continue to cause occasional disruption to the mammal and bird colonies. The implementation of the DFO regulations on Marine wildlife viewing are long overdue. http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/admin/disturbances.htm

The threat of an oil or chemical spill is always possible in the Strait of Juan de Fuca. This would be heightened if there is an increase in Juan de Fuca Tanker Traffic and removal of the moratorium on offshore drilling. The disposal of wastes and bilge water from all ships and the increasing onset of Cruise lines operating in the area is a real concern.
http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/admin/ships.htm

The rockfish protection area should be maintained and strengthened so that threats to marine mammals are reduced and stock recovery in the area is enhanced.

Other threats to the area
The human presence at Race Rocks is a critical component to making this endeavour a success on many levels whether it be safety, security, ecological stewardship and restoration, education and scientific research, or monitoring of human activities. As such, funding levels must be maintained to a level that will enable these essential activities to be sustainable. To date, Lester Pearson College has been almost solely responsible for finding the necessary funds to continue operations. It is important that appropriate funding be secured to enable long term sustainability.

A general statement of your vision for the area
Pearson College has provided internet linkage to the resources of the island since 2000. Since it is a small area with a complex set of ecosystems, it is our hope that direct human contact remains minimal, while global access to the resources through the internet remains high.

The commitment of volunteers, faculty, staff and students of Pearson College over the last 30 years in assembling the resources of Race Rocks and then making them available on racerocks.com and racerocks.ca is evidence of how we value maintaining the ecological integrity of the reserve, and wish to continue sharing it with the world. We plan to continue to support the activities and programs currently underway; improve on them and support new activities and endeavours that will add to our understanding and continued protection of the ecosystem.

The College is committed to explore and expand its research and education opportunities available at RR and maintain a long term presence as the custodian of the Ecological Reserve. It will continue to demonstrate the use and integration of sustainable resources and renewable energy with the goal to reduce the emissions from our operations to an absolute minimum.

Since de-staffing of the station by the Coast Guard in 1997, Lester B. Pearson College has hired Ecoguardian staff to be resident on Race Rocks and has raised over $1 million for operating costs at Race Rocks in the past 12 years of operation. Pearson College will continue to employ staff as Ecoguardians and station operators year round. Currently a full time resident marine scientist holds this position.

Why is the Area important to you?

It is important because ultimately it must be possible for all who pass through this part of the Salish Sea must be informed of its unique values and must be committed to allow it to remain a relatively pristine and undisturbed ecosystem. The significant education and research value can endure if Race Rocks Marine Protected area is well supported and locally managed.

Monitoring Demolition Training Impacts in Military Training area WQ on Sea lions

MONITORING DEMOLITION TRAINING IMPACTS IN
MILITARY TRAINING AREA WQ ON SEA LIONS IN THE
RACE ROCKS ECOLOGICAL RESERVE, BRITISH COLUMBIA
PROGRESS REPORT #1 REVISEDOVERVIEW1

LGL Limited successfully completed 5 days of monitoring (28P30 lgl-reportNovember and 1P2 December 2010) of demolition training (OfficerTs Course) in Exercise and Training area WQ. Monitoring comprised a day of pre-blasting, 3 days with blasting, and a day of post-blasting. We have not yet reviewed information on the sizes of the projects that were detonated, but expect that all were  4 slabs of C4 as per past courses. Projects within a run were spaced at a minimum interval of 5 min. Time between runs varied considerably (~0.4P3.2 hrs). All other ranges in WQ were inactive during monitoring. Weather was modestly overcast and unsettled. Although a gale warning was in effect for local waters during the first few days of the session, winds only reached 20 knots on one day (30 November); they were mostly below 10 knots for the session. Light rain fell at times, and swell height was moderate and high for most of the session. Seas were Beaufort 1P3. Air temperature ranged from 5P8 °C. As per the table below, numbers of sea lions fluctuated considerably within and between days in response to natural and human-caused disturbances. There were no California sea lions in the Reserve and only 1 northern elephant seal. Significant displacement of sea lions from a haulout was observed in response to a single ecotour boat on the pre-blasting day and in response to blasting on days when the range was active. Only one ecotour boat was observed during the 5-day session, but that boat caused a disturbance that saw all sea lions become active (heads up) and most (~100) animals scramble off the haulout. Steller sea lion response to blasting ranged
from modest increases in activity to complete haulout abandonment. The number of sea lions hauled out in the Reserve at the end of the session (i.e., at the end of the post-blast monitoring day) was practically identical to the number at the beginning of the session (i.e., 130 cf. 131).
The total at the end of the session was off by a modest 20 animals from the peak count during activity samples (i.e., 150) P a difference that could be accounted for by animals not in view from the tower at their new location atop Area 2P5 at the end of the session and animals
swimming near the haulouts. Although nearly all animals were on haulout Area 2P5 at the beginning and end of the session, they had shifted their position to the highest part of the haulout in response to large swells that inundated the lower reaches of the haulout. As of 7 December,
the upper reaches of Area 2P5 continued to be used by most of the sea lions in the Reserve (as evident from the LBPC web cam).
No further monitoring is anticipated until summer/fall 2011.

See the of the full report at lgl2010progreport.

See other LGL reports at:

http://www.racerocks.com/racerock/research/LGL_report/DNDreportbyLGL.htm

RRPAB Meeting #5 November 23, 2010

These are draft minutes..

MEETING NOTES

Race Rocks Public Advisory Board Meeting #5

10:00 – 15:00, 23 November 2010

Pearson College, Victoria, British Columbia

Meeting Goal:

To receive feedback and input for the Race Rocks Public Advisory Board (the Board) in order to move the designation process forward.

 

Objectives:

  1. To update the Board on progress to date
  2. To continue to develop the Conservation Objectives
  3. To receive feedback on the Ecosystem Overview and Assessment Report
  4. To receive feedback on the Socio-Economic Report
  5. To discuss the draft Management Plan / Recommendations Document

.

Attendees:   


Chris Blondeau, Pearson College

Stefan Beckmann, Fisheries & Oceans Canada

Rosaline Canessa, University of Victoria

Chantelle Coulson, Fisheries & Oceans Canada

Garry Fletcher, Race Rocks Ecological Warden

Hilary Ibey, Fisheries & Oceans Canada

Sabine Jessen, Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, BC

Gabrielle Kosmider, Fisheries & Oceans Canada

Angus Matthews, Shaw Ocean Discovery Centre

Glen Rasmussen, Fisheries & Oceans Canada

Aaron Reith, First Nations Liaison

Tomas Tomascik, Parks Canada Agency


Facilitator: Jessica Delaney – Delaney and Associates Inc.

 

Items for Discussion           

ITEM

1. Welcome – Glen Rasmussen on behalf of Fisheries & Oceans Canada

 

It is recognized that many people may be missing due to the inclement weather and that some key stakeholders may not be present.

Thanks for the use of the traditional First Nations territories.

General Notices

       Board changes: Glen Rasmussen has returned as the Integrated Coastal Zone Management Coordinator, after an 8 month assignment in Enhancement, Hilary Ibey is here as the Marine Planning and Protected Areas Specialist, Stefan Beckmann is here as the DFO Conservation and Protection representative.

       DFO will be sending out a letter to representatives of the commercial fishery

o   how this will impact their fishery

o   the letter will be sent out with a deadline for comments of January 15

o   the letter will also be sent to First Nations Commercial Communal licence holders

§  T’Sou-ke is the only licence holder in the area

       This is the 5th meeting of the RRPAB.

o   There is one more meeting planned before submission of the regulatory package.

o   The 6th meeting will be the last meeting before the regulations go out.

o   Any missing stakeholders will be pursued through bilateral meetings.

o   The RRPAB will have a clear understanding of what the Regulatory Intent will look like.

o   Hopefully, Christie Chute, DFO National Headquarters will be able to attend the final meeting to answer any questions about the regulatory process

§  The regulations themselves are secret – while they are being worked on.

        • DFO is planning to have a meeting once the regulations are Gazetted to make sure that all are “on board”
    • Concern was expressed by a member regarding the past designation process; the regulations that were Gazetted were different than those presented to the RRAB.
    • The focus of this meeting will be Conservation Objectives and Management Plan/ Recommendations document

2. Introductions

            Round table – refer to list of attendees

3. Meeting #4 Agenda

  a. Review

  b. Discuss / amend / approve

       Approved

       A Board Member expressed concern with representation of Board at meeting

o   Absence of Marine Wildlife Viewing, Fishing, and Diving communities.

o   DFO will be pursuing bilateral meetings with those constituencies not represented here today.

4. Meeting #4 Minutes – discuss comments / amend / approve

Review of Action Items:

 

Log Number

Responsible

Action

Status

09-11-01

DFO

Investigate lower than 300m flights over Race Rocks as part of the DFO creel survey. (carried over)

Paul

Cottrell

Email

Read –

done

10-03-04

DFO

DFO is to provide updates the Board on a timely basis, so that they can report to constituents.

done

10-03-07

RRPAB

Board members to prepare a recommendation to state this (w.r.t to Socio-Economic Report)

strike

 

10-03-08

RRPAB

Board members to prepare a recommendation that gaps be identified and prioritized and a commitment be made to research

strike

10-05-01

RRPAB

Board members to review recommendations from Richard Delaney’s summary report and provide feedback – he will then provide all this feedback to DFO.

done

10-05-02

DFO

DFO to request MPAIT provide the RRPAB with a briefing on the updated Marine Protected Areas Strategy

Hilary

update

10-05-03

DFO

DFO to revise draft Vision to reflect Board input.

done

10-05-04

RRPAB

Board to review Incompatible/Compatible Activities document over the next two weeks and provide input to DFO.

done

10-05-05

DFO

DFO to include “What an MPA Regulation looks like” as an agenda item for the next meeting.

done

Minutes from Meeting #4 adopted.

5. First Nations Update

First Nations update

       DFO has met with Chief Andy Thomas of the Esquimalt First Nation.

       Chief Andy Thomas of Esquimalt First Nation has been dealing with environmental contamination of  traditional lands

o   affecting ability to harvest food

o   this is a serious issue

       DFO must be aware and address Douglas Treaty rights in working with local First Nations communities.

       DFO is going to share the MOU (Beecher Bay First Nation, Songhees Nation, T’Sou-ke Nation and DFO) with Esquimalt First Nation, as well as the Terms of Reference for the Government-First Nations Management Board to see whether they would like to be involved in this manner.

       DFO is planning community meetings in the other three Communities

o    Looking for feedback on any concerns, how they use the area, how they want to be involved in the MPA.

       Aaron Reith is back on contract and will continue to act as liaison to with Beecher Bay First Nation, Songhees Nation, and T’Sou-ke Nation; working on the  Terms of Reference and community meetings.

       In response to questions regarding commercial fisheries from RRPAB members, clarification was provided that all fishing is “closed unless open” and Communal Commercial fishing licences are subject to the same rules as any other commercial fishing.

6. Conservation Objectives Discussion – Glen Rasmussen – DFO

  • Please see presentation under separate cover.
  • MPA only covers what is in the water
    • Internal boundary excludes the land.
    • Anything brought in for protection must consider that things could be occurring in the intertidal
    • Protection must be coordinated closely with the provincial Ecological
  • In response to a question of if the Province manages the seabed, how are the organisms on the seabed managed?  Clarification was provided by DFO that all fish are protected under the Fisheries Act.
  •  A Board member expressed concern that there might be gaps in jurisdiction or conflicts over “who controls what”.
  • Clarificationwas provided in response to Board member questions regarding Aboriginal fishing for Food, Social and Ceremonial purposes in a MPA
    • To do this DFO issues an Aboriginal communal fishing licence to the First Nations group
    • Some communities feel they do not need a licence, as they have a treaty (Douglas Treaty)
    • In order to put this into a regulation, DFO must issue a licence
    • DFO is working with legal services on language surrounding this
  • A Board Member expressed that Douglas Treaty rights should be respected and as a Board Member would like to be on record as not supporting this.
  • A Board Member expressed concern with Coast Guard maintenance, DND activities and DFO Creel surveys in MPA
  • Concernwas raised by Board members regarding 60 day advance notice for Activity Plan submissions and need for flexibility.
    • DFO responded by outlining the need for having some way to approve, and record activities that are happening in this area, to be used as a management measure; will increase knowledge of area.
    • Could look at annual submissions by dive community, marine wildlife viewing and educational institutions.
    • There is no cost for applying.
  • A Board Member suggested having this discussion at the next meeting, when Marine Wildlife Viewing might be present
  • A Board member suggested looking at what is being used in other protected areas, in terms of approvals.
  • DFO (Stefan Beckmann) will look at other models (for example Parks Canada) where approvals are issued for protected areas.
  • DFO responded that a process needs to be developed that works for the needs of the Race Rocks MPA, but allows the Conservation Objectives to be met.
  • There must be a way to address cumulative effects.
  • A Board member expressed concern with Reporting of Accidents
    • Feels that 2 hours for reporting is too long
    • DFO can bring this forward to Coast Guard
  • Board Members expressed concern withfollow up reporting for accidents
    • Where are they found?
    • This could be a role for theEcoguardian
      • To liaise and inform what is happening in the MPA.
  • There is an overarching vision for the MPA – especially since Race Rocks is coordinated with the Ecological Reserve
  • The focus, however, because of the structure of the MPA, is on achieving scientifically based Conservation Objectives.
  • It is difficult to to list things, unless they directly impact the Conservation Objectives
  • DFO Science is will be working with the Conservation Objectives to develop Monitoring Objectives.
  • Concern was raised by a Board Member over how bathymetrically unique the area is.
  • A Board Member expressed that the First Order Conservation Objective might be too general
    • Did not express long term goal.
  • A Board Member expressed thatDNDshould be added as an activity to the Incompatible/Compatible activities table
    • DFO responded that DND is not an activity, but a stressor
  • In response to a request byDFO for any other stressors missing from the table, Board members offered.
    • Coast Guard activities
    • College activities
      • Could be positive or negative
    • Vessel traffic from ecotourism needsto be broken down
      • For example – kayakers vs. vessels
    • In response to a Board member’s concern over DND activities, DFO clarified that this could not be managed through regulations, as DND activities will have an exemption, but a cooperative relationship will be continued.
  • Board Members recommended that Renewable Energy be re-termed as Tidal, Wave and Wind Energy.
  • A recommendation was made by a Board Member for DFO to contract the Ecoguardian at Race Rocks to complete the table. 
    • The Values Document should provide some of the information.
  • DFO questioned the Board whether an exemption would be required for the tidal generator
    • If any replacements or removal is anticipated, the activity might not be permitted without an exemption.
  • A Board member brought up underwater camera installations and the Tribal Journeys program as potential considerations.

 

Action Item – 10-11-01 DFO to refer to values input document and synthesize into the compatible/incompatible activities table.

7. Socio-Economic Report – Gabrielle Kosmider – DFO

·       Ryan Murphy and Raisa Mirza have provided a draft Socio-economic Report.

·       Some minor edits are still required, but overall a very good piece of work.

·       In response to a Board Members concern that the Socio-economic Report did not have enough numbers, in terms of economics, growth, etc., DFO clarified that for this MPA, there is not a lot of risk associated with it i.e. there is not a significant cost associated with the regulation.  As a result of this low risk, an extensive Cost-Benefit analysis is not required; instead a more qualitative analysis can be done.

·       In response to a Board Member’s suggestion that this Report be adopted and the Sunderman 2009 Report be discarded, DFO explained that all three Socioeconomic

·       Please submit any comments on the Socio-Economic Report to DFO by January 5, 2011.

8. Ecosystem Overview and Assessment Report – Glen Rasmussen – DFO

       Please refer to presentation under separate cover.

       A Board member expressed concern about the Ecosystem Overview and Assessment report.

o   No plankton studies

o   No mention of work done by Archipelago Marine.

o   No mention of Scott Wallace Abalone work.

o   No mention of River Otters

o   Four elephant seals pups in Spring 2010

o   Concern with Juan de Fuca Strait being used to describe Race Rocks

o   Feels that report needs more development.

9. Management Plan – Recommendations Document – Glen Rasmussen – DFO

  • Please refer to presentation under separate cover.
  • A Board Member stated that the Recommendations do represent consensus of theRRPAB.
    • Feels that the answers provided to the recommendations are not satisfactory
    • Feels that people are looking for guarantees of what the MPA will look like after designation.
    • DFO responded by explaining they have a draft Management Plan; normally this would not be as well developed prior to designation, but it was advanced in order to illustrate where Board recommendations would appear in the Management Plan sections.
  • In response to a Board Member’s questions, DFO explained that the draft Management Plan will evolve as it developed and will involve participaton of the GFNMB, the Province of British Columbia and the public advisory Board.  The Province of British Columbia and First Nations are intended to be on the management Board.  National guidance is to have a stakeholder advisory Board and a management Board.
  • In response to a Board Member’s concern that the Province was/would not be involved in the MPA process, DFO explained that the province leads MPAIT and their involvement is very important, although they might be getting involved at a different level in the process than is apparent to the Board.
  • In response toa question of whyDND fell under the Governance section of the draft Management Plan,DFO explained that the proposed MPA is in the buffer zone of Whiskey Quebec.
    • Board member does not believe that DND has governance over the buffer zone.
  • In response to a Board member’s concern about birds being ignored in the MPA and the absence of Environment Canada, DFO explained that the Conservation Objectives cannot include birds, as they do not fall under the mandate of an Oceans Act MPA, but this does not mean that these objectives cannot be included in how the MPA is intended to be Managed.
  • Some Board Member feedback
    • Education and Outreach needs to be developed
    • The draft Management Plan should include goals for the next 5 years for each section.
      • With a timeframe of some of the activities and measurable for the next 5 years to provide a picture of what is going to be achieved in
    • In realityDFO is seriously underresourced for Surveillance and Enforcement
      • There is a case for 24 hour surveillance in the MPA
      • DFO should make financial commitments to the Ecoguardian; human presence is of great value.

Action Item – 10-11-02 DFO to confirm DND’s governance role in the buffer zone of Whiskey Quebec.

10. Next Meeting / Adjournment

·       The Regulatory Intent package will be the focus of next meeting.

·       DFO is planning on having Christie Chute from DFO National Headquarters attend the next meeting to answer any questions about the regulatory and legislative process. 

·       Next meeting will be held in the early spring.

·       It will be the final meeting before the regulatory intent is finalized

·       Please submit any comments on the draft documents provided to DFO by January 5, 2011.

·       DFO Closing: Thanks.  Board participation is important to the Department.  Thanks to Pearson College for lunch and hosting.

·       Meeting adjourned.

Log Number

Responsible

Action

Status

10-11-01

DFO

DFO to refer to values input document and synthesize into the compatible/incompatible activities table.

 

10-11-02

DFO

DFO to confirm DND’s governance role in the buffer zone of Whiskey Quebec.

 

Groups Struggle to Save Lighthouses

Growing up in B.C. lighthouses, Alanny Brutton learned to help her mom and dad with their lightkeeper duties.

In 1970, two years after the family moved to Sheringham Point lighthouse, west of Sooke, a call came in from Victoria Air Marine Radio (a weather watch run by the Coast Guard at the time) while Brutton’s parents were visiting neighbours. There was a report of a boat fire on the water and the operator asked the 14-year-old girl to take a look. She picked up binoculars.

“I couldn’t see a boat, but could see a fire on land,”she recalled this week, pointing across the Strait of Juan de Fuca to the Olympic Peninsula as she stood uphill from the lighthouse. “I gave him the best co-ordinates I could.”

It was a house fire, she learned the next day when the dispatch centre called back.

“They told my dad ” Wow, she pinned that almost to the foot.'”Her directions helped firefighters locate the burning house.

Today Brutton is part of a volunteer group working to preserve the light tower as a heritage site, through a federal Heritage Light Preservation Act passed in May. They’ve collected $250,000 so far to purchase the land, if necessary, and are in discussions with the Capital Regional District and T-Souke First Nation on a potential three-way partnership to protect Sheringham Point lighthouse and operate it as an education centre.

“We want to preserve and protect this, to make it accessible to people who want to come and use it, to not have it fenced in.”

But because of confusion around the Act it could be many more years before the Sheringham Point Lighthouse Preservation Society can put its plans into action.

Introduced by retired senator Pat Carney, the HLP Act has a mandate to identify and designate federally owned lighthouses that qualify for heritage status and to ensure they be maintained, preferably by community groups.

Carney is livid, however, that the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada issued a list earlier this year of lighthouses it says are surplus. The department’s website states the stations “could be replaced with simpler structures whose operation and maintenance would be more cost-effective.”

In order to be considered for heritage status, Carney points out, a lighthouse must belong to the feds at the time of application.

“Once a surplus light has been divested, it'[s no longer a federal light and doesn’t qualify for a heritage protection,”she said, speaking from her home on Saturna Island. “DFO has torpedoed the Act by putting (lighthouses) on a real estate list.”

The federal agency says it is only doing what the Act requires of it.

“DFO is complying fully with its responsibilties under the legislation,”spokesperson Nathalie Trepanier said in an e-mail. “This included the requirement to publish a list of all lighthouse properties deemed surplus to operational requirements, which was required under Section 8(1) of the Act.”

There is a process for community groups like the Sheringham society and individuals to petition Parks Canada – the federal body looks after heritage lighthouses, such as Fisgard – to have lighthouses considered for heritage designation through the Act.

Carney fears people will be frightened off by the complicated process. That’s what happened to Victoria resident Jeff McKay. A month ago McKay, who works in the marine industry, called up Fisheries and Oceans Canada about three properties on its lighthouse surplus list: Discovery Island off Oak Bay, the Ogden Point Breakwater and Race Rocks.

He found out that the breakwater shouldn’t have been on the list “ it’s actually owned by the Greater Victoria Harbour Authority. And although the other two properties are available, McKay was warned it could take years to acquire them because any sale must be vetted by local First Nations.

“Basically, it was so complicated I just walked away from pursuing it,”he said.

Brutton says community groups should step forward to pursue heritage designation for significant lighthouses.

“They should sit down as soon as possible with government and make their intent known. Don’t just go to the regional district. Go to your MP, your mayor, to all levels at the same time and get them on board with you.”

From a road above it, she looks toward Sheringham Point lighthouse surrounded by chain link fence.

“It depends on the government now, when it (the lighthouse) will be released and to who and how.”

vmoreau@oakbaynews.com

Find this article at:
http://www.bclocalnews.com/vancouver_island_south/victorianews/community/107075928.html
© Copyright Black Press. All rights reserved.

Friends of Ecological Reserves

For several years now, THE FRIENDS OF ECOLOGICAL RESERVES has helped with the funding of special projects at Race Rocks. In the Spring, of 2003 they provided further funding for our ongoing Stewardshhip in the Area. The Friends provide valuable assistance for research and upkeep of many ecological Reserves throughout British Columbia. We are grateful for their recognition and assistance in the operation of Race Rocks

Visit their website at : http://www.ecoreserves.bc.ca/

The publication of the Friends of Ecological reserves

 

 

The Friends of Ecological reserves Field trip, on October 3, 2004,