| Race Rocks Report:The following is a report on the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area prepared by Lester B. Pearson College, 9 August, 2002. It contains a summary of special events, user counts, natural occurrences of note, and a list of infractions that have been observed and recorded for the period of 1 January to 9 August, 2002. The raw information for this report was obtained from the Log Archives of Mike and Carol Slater, the Guardians of the MPA.
Race Rocks receives many visitors each month. All guests that land on Great Race are asked to sign our guest book, while the majority of visitors to the Ecological Reserve/MPA do not land, and their vessels are dutifully recorded by the Guardians. The number of whales through or past the Ecological Reserve/MPA is also noted by Mike or Carol, as well as infractions incurred in the Ecological Reserve/MPA. Table 1: Approximate User Counts with Whale sightings and infractions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Category Archives: MPA
Sean Leroy doing Masters Thesis on MPA Advisory Process
Thursday, June 13, 2002
TEMPERATURE Max 20.8C Min 11.1C Reset 19.2C
MARINE LIFE: The harbour seals are becoming very nervous of human presence, several times today they swept into the water at the sight of people on the pathways. The 4 pairs of Oystercatchers all have chicks now, a good sign that perhaps the river Otter has left the island. Two octopus were sighted in the low intertidal over near the surge channel this morning.
TEMPERATURE Max 20.8C Min 11.1C Reset 19.2C
MARINE LIFE: The harbour seals are becoming very nervous of human presence, several times today they swept into the water at the sight of people on the pathways. The 4 pairs of Oystercatchers all have chicks now, a good sign that perhaps the river Otter has left the island. Two octopus were sighted in the low intertidal over near the surge channel this morning.
Sean Leroy at Race Rocks
HUMAN IMPACT: Five eco-tourism vessels through the reserve and five fishing vessels on the reserve’s perimeter.
Garry and Hyaku docked with two visitors this morning, Sean LeRoy, Graduate Researcher, Georgia Basin Futures Project
Sustainable Development Research Institute, University of British Columbia and Dr.James Tansey also of UBC. They came to participate in the webcast with Garry and Ryan on Marine Protected Areas this morning with Tim Langois, Leigh Marine Laboratory University of Auckland, and Anne Saloman, University of Washington, Zoology Department .
After a tour of the Island and a great discussion about MPA’s in Canada and New Zealand they all left in the afternoon.
posted by at 10:49 PM
A Biography of Tom Sampson
We were fortunate to have Tom Sampson on the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area Advisory Board in 2000-2002. Tom brought to the board a welcome First Nations perspective . His concept of the three-legged milk-stool model of governance for the MPA was whole-heartedly accepted by the advisory group and formed our basis for recommedation to DFO for MPA status.
Tom Sampson on the left conversing with Federal Fisheries Minister, Herb Dahliwal and Provincial Environment Minister Joan Sawiki at Lester Pearson College on the occasion of the formal announcement of the creation of the Race Rocks MPA .
In his model, where the Provincial,Federal and First Nations governments formed the legs of the stool which supported the seat which was composed of the stake-holders and the marine ecosystems of the area . Unfortunately when the proposal went to Ottawa this model was not accepted, leading to a breakdown of the MPA process.
The article below appeared in a Georgia Strait Alliance newsletter:
Outgoing GSA (Georgia Strait Alliance) director Tom Sampson has lived all his life on the shores of Saanich Inlet. His family’s tradition is that the first born always goes to the grandparents—a way of ensuring that the new generation gets a solid grounding in traditional knowledge. As the eldest of 12 children, Tom was raised by his great grandmother, a remarkable Halalt woman who had raised his father before him.
He describes her as “the lady who taught me everything”. In her 80’s when two-year-old Tom came to live with her, she taught him history, his place in the world, spiritual beliefs and all about the natural world, in both languages of the Coast Salish, her own Halkomelem (Cowichan) and her husband’s Sencoten (Saanich). No one knew her exact age, but baptismal records showed she was over 120 when she died about 30 years ago.
Tom became immersed in the English language when he started school. Fortunately his great grandmother refused to let the church take him away to residential school, though five of his siblings weren’t so lucky. Tom did well at Indian Day School, and qualified for an academic program at St. Louis College in Victoria, where he attended grades 10 and 11. He enjoyed school and excelled in math and languages, learning to speak French and Latin on top of his other three languages. But it was a hard time for his family economically, so he quit and went to work in the woods as a whistle-punk.
It was a time of rapid change and development of resource industries. Yet already the problems were starting to show, if one paid attention: the trees being cut were significantly smaller than those Tom’s father had cut during his time as a logger.
Tom describes the devastation of resources that he has seen over his 64 years and how this has led to “a crisis all across North America”. He remembers, as a young man, regularly building fires on the beach to steam clams and mussels. Today, he says, that’s not possible, “because our beaches have been destroyed”.
“We seem to have the attitude,” he says, “that we need to destroy what doesn’t pay off monetary value of some kind—that it has no value and should be terminated. Scientists, managers and technicians seem to believe they know more about the environment than our people.”
He describes predictions that his people have made for decades about salmon, herring and other resources —that unless these were managed in a different way they would disappear. He quotes Chief Seattle and other tribal leaders over the past 50 years, but says they were always ignored by government officials. “We don’t have the degrees and diplomas, so our information isn’t considered important,” he says. “Yet our total survival has been based on understanding nature.”
“Our concept of harvesting of the land and ocean are based on the 13 moons of the year—the absolute time clock of nature, ” he explains. “We managed our resources by understanding this clock, which meant there was a right time for everything, and a time we weren’t allowed to harvest.” Tom has organized sessions on the 13-moon concept as part of his work on the Race Rocks marine protected area, where he has worked to improve cross-cultural understanding and appreciation for the traditional knowledge his people bring to the table. “It’s important that people understand that when we talk about the land we’re talking about a relationship that goes back thousands of years,” he says. “We know this land better than anybody else.”
This focus on cross-cultural awareness has been evident in other environmental work that Tom has tackled. A few years ago he played a key role in getting the BC Environmental Assessment Office to undertake a ground-breaking Aboriginal Land Uses Study within the Bamberton Environmental Assessment, which documented traditional knowledge from elders and others from the Saanich tribes; it was done in the traditional language and then translated into English.
Tom believes that listening is the key to understanding the environment. He remembers his great grandmother telling him to go down to the beach and listen to the ocean, because “if you don’t listen to it and hear the stories, you won’t learn”. Listening to each other is just as important to Tom, and he believes this skill is not being taught to most young people today.
Tom has taken a leadership role for most of his adult life. He’s been involved in tribal politics right to the national level, serving as Chief of Tsartlip for 24 years, chairman of the South Island Tribal Council for 22 years, vice-chief of the BC Assembly of First Nations, chairman of the Assembly’s Constitutional Working Group for Status Indians and chair of the Douglas Treaty Council.
Although “retired” from tribal politics, Tom has certainly not slowed down. The schedule of long days that he keeps as a volunteer would exhaust most people half his age. He works tirelessly, helping people that the system has failed.
One of his key concerns is how the justice system has been unfair to aboriginal people and ignored their beliefs about individual and community healing. “The system works if you can afford it,” he says, pointing out that from 60 to 90% of his people live in poverty. It is this poverty that has motivated Tom to work for his people.
Another area of his volunteer work is community health. He’s working more with older people these days, since the average age of his people has risen (though it’s still only 55). But he says his tribe has to struggle against the legacy of the 40-year-long residential school experience, which destroyed the social fabric of many families, removing positive family models and leading to many of the social problems experienced by native communities today.
But there’s been no shortage of strong models in Tom’s family. He remembers his mother, a Nez Perce from Idaho, serving on the Tsartlip council at “a strange time” when the band elected an all-woman council (one of the first in his territory) with a man as chief.
Tom’s wife of 43 years, Audrey—as active as Tom in community work and a vocal advocate of aboriginal rights—also comes from a family of strong models. Her father was a Cowichan chief and tribal spokesman for many years, and like Tom, her mother served on the band council. Audrey has served on the Tsartlip council, and now works as coordinator for adult health care for all the Saanich First Nations. Tom is visibly proud of Audrey and impressed with her ability to juggle her roles as mother, grandmother, great grandmother, housewife and full-time health administrator.
But he’s no slacker himself! On top of his community-based work, these days he’s very busy building the new Coast Salish Sea Council, an initiative he launched to bring together the close to 90 Coast Salish tribes on both sides of the Canada-US border, to develop agreements and move forward on social and environmental issues. Later this month the Lummi tribe will host the first major meeting of the Council, and Tom is busy organizing this.
He’s also doing a lot of traveling—recently to Seattle, Ottawa, and Texas, speaking out on environmental issues and urging that action accompany agreements.
When he gets time at home he loves to garden, a skill he learned from his father who taught him that, “when you run out of money at least you’ll have food”. This year he has planted a full acre with flowers and vegetables. He also spends as much time as possible with his five children, 10 grandchildren and one great grandchild, who all live close by. He thanks his great grandmother for teaching him the importance of “never losing” his family.
Tom says he has learned a lot from his first year with GSA and he plans to stay involved even though he will no longer be on the Board. One thing that’s made a big difference is learning to use a computer (something he had to do over the past year as a Director). Being “wired” has provided him with daily information from all over the world, which Tom says has “helped me understand issues, linkages and the reasons behind things.” He sees modern communication skills as vital for young people.
But spiritual beliefs form the heart of his environmental philosophy. “Conservation and management of resources are inseparable from these,” he says. “If you don’t see the spiritual need for the land and water, then people will continue to dump raw sewage, log mountains, and devastate the streams beyond repair. We have to look at ourselves. We can’t be holistic without a spiritual connection to the land.”
SOURCE: Georgia Strait Alliance Newsletter
RRAB meeting December 6, 2001
Participants:
Kelly Francis – Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Keith Symington – Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society
Observers: Sean Leroy – UBC Graduate Student
Louise Murgatroyd – Minutes
Introductions
Update on First Nations Activities
- Kelly Francis discussed two meetings held with First Nations which were productive and demonstrated an appetite on part of chiefs to support and participate in MPA. Kelly updated the RRAB on developments occurring subsequent to publication of the designation regulation in Part I of the Canada Gazette – the Chiefs of T’souke, Songhees and Beecher Bay wrote to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans in November, 2000 expressing opposition to the proposed MPA at Race Rocks citing Delgamuk, infringement of rights and lack of consultation. At that point the regulatory process was put on hold pending resolution of these concerns. Kelly and Dick Carson met with each individual Chief in December – while there was general support for the MPA, the Chiefs expressed concern over inadequate consultation; DFO has acknowledged that it has not engaged in this effectively; Chiefs have since written letter of support on the condition that there i true co-operation and acknowledgement of Douglas treaty rights. The most ect meeting with FN’s in June, 2001 was very positive with agreement to share info on RR, including all documentation, recommendations, copies of all info for their review and a desire to meet again to review all of this: this meeting has not occurred yet.
- Angus Matthews pointed out that the intervention was triggered by not dealing with wider scope of First Nation interests appropriately; he inicated that there were very serious flaws in wording of gazette piece, not reflecting recommendations of RRAB, serious disconnect between Ottawa and RRAB; understood need for wider consultations and wording needs to be much more sensitive.
- Kelly Francis discussed the need for another version of the regulation that better captures First Nations rights to access resources for Food, Social and Ceremonial purposes and indicates that that these rights are not being infringed upon
- Angus Matthews expressed his hope that that the new wording would be reviewed by the Board so that it can go through second time without difficulties and that failure at this juncture would be disastrous.
- Marc Pakenham pointed out that Ottawa’s unfamiliarity with MPA regulation is a factor and it that it is necessary to keep them in tune with wording and regulation and that problems had been experienced with this previously.
- Garry Fletcher stressed the importance of dealing with and documenting the mechanisms of what has gone wrong with the process, given that this committee was set up as unique experience and it is a first-time scenario and will be held up as a model for future processes of consultation; he expressed concern over the legacy of the process and strongly expressed the need for governmental transparency with respect to this and future advisory board processes; he elaborated by stating that the establishment of the RRAB was mandated under the Oceans Act, that the Board was under the impression that Tom Sampson had been present as overall representative of First Nations, but that a mistake had been made in that not all tribes were represented; he further expressed discomfort that there are parallel meetings between government and First Nations, rather these should involve the RRAB, and not be held separately.
- Kelly Francis responded that the vision was that First Nations would come to the RRAB table as equals but that at the moment they are not comfortable with working with third parties
- Garry Fletcher stated that this must be addressed in the future.
- Marty Roberts indicated that First Nations want government to government meetings first; and that they have added conditions, for example, as in the initiative with CW a similar process to Race Rocks; he pointed out that the process was challenging and frustrating for those who wish to see it happen but that First Nations have a protocol which they expect to be adhered to.
- Garry Fletcher questioned whether future boards will have representatives from the Coast Salish Council pointing out that a great deal has been learned from Tom Sampson and his input.
- Kelly Francis stated that First Nations must be allowed to decide how they wish to be represented, i.e. individual chiefs or one person to represent all.
- Keith Symington pointed out that a lesson to learned from this is to talk of co-operative management and steering committee participation; that First Nations must be invited as co-chairs for meetings, rather than participants.
- Angus Matthews suggested a further lesson is tripartite arrangements are necessary and that much has been learned of this model after the fact.
- Marc Pakenham pointed out that thoughout the process efforts to establish communications with chiefs were unsuccessful, many lessons have been learned and he felt that the Board is now on the right course.
- Kelly Francis emphasized that Tom Sampson’s role has been critical to the process and that in retrospect, there should have been more active communication with chiefs who had a specific interest in the area.
- Keith Symington pointed out the difficulties inherent with territorial overlap between tribes and that First Nations must determine representation.
- General discussion over Tom Sampson’s status on the RRAB; invitation to this meeting was sent.
Status of other Pilot MPAs
- Angus Matthews inquired into the status of other pilot MPAs
- Kelly Francis provided the following update: Endeavour has been gazetted and undergone (Regulatory Impact Assessment Statement) RIAS; there is a hold-up due to DND concerns of access for reasons of national security and has therefore gone back to the deputy minister level for consideration; Bowie is further behind, still in the midst of consultations and the draft management plan; there has been one meeting of the advisory board; should be tied up by the end of the fiscal year; Gabriola – there has been no progress but meetings are planned during the next few months; no RIAS?s have yet been submitted for East Coast MPAs.
Race Rocks Management Plan
- Kelly Francis discussed the notion of an overarching strategic vision for RR in which the ER and MPA management plans are nested; this recognizes differing mandates of provincial and federal governments and allows for overlap between them.
- Garry Fletcher asked how two plans would be dealt with, when originally there was to be only one plan.
- Kelly Francis explained that the two management plans will be linked and will appear as one management plan for RR; logistics will be understood as single entity.
- Chris Kissinger pointed out that whether there are one or two plans, there are areas where the provincial and federal governments cannot speak for one another; relevant chapters in parallel documents beneath umbrella document would work well for evryone with the potential for First Nations elements to fit in as well.
- Garry Fletcher felt there should be a single management plan and expressed disappointment that his advice on this matter has not been taken.
- Angus Matthews suggested that cross-referencing would become confusing and that the ecosystem dictates a need for a single, unified document with parts that detail the responsibility of each agency; this would address the legal authorities of each; he pointed out that it was a recommendation of the Board and part of the pilot to determine how effectively the provincial and federal governments can manage RR.
- Chris Kissinger passed out latest draft of provincial ER management plan which was pulled together by Marty Roberts who is a new face but familiar with the background and the process; he opened the floor to comments on the document.
- Marty Roberts explained that the planis essentially the same one that was prepared of the period of time when the pilot was announced but was put on hold to allow the MPA process to unfold; he has taken the existing plan and updated it with recommendations and key issues that were unresolved but incorporated direction from the RRAB which makes it a far more substantial document; he further stated that a document like this is difficult to review because of its size and encouraged written comments based on the discussion during the meeting.
- Angus Matthews expressed his satisfaction at seeing that all recommendations made by RRAB were in the document; he complimented the work and the updates; he still holds major reservations about First Nations and fears that the upcoming provincial treaty referendum will sour relations with First Nations because of the larger referendum issue; he asked what latitude the province had in dealing with fiduciary responsibility towards First Nations; he drew attention to p.12, which deas with First Nations relations and suggested that there needs to be stronger emphasis on First Nations’ management role, not simply discussion and relationship building; that the identification of First Nations’ management role is absent, the word “management” might be added to “objectives” here; felt the document must be more proactive in this area; also pointed a large gap in p. 26 that deals with roles, responsibilities and relationships; he suggested that First Nations secton should be inserted heretonsure issue is addressed fully.
- Marty Roberts asked Angus for a sense of wording with respect to this; he suggested a continuum from consulting to shared decision-making.
- Angus Matthews agreed that wording should indicate direction towards shared decision-making and the establishment of a management committee; he brought up the example of Cape Scott as a model.
- Marty Roberts felt that the province was unclear in providing direction and mandate and asked when First Nations’ right to hunt can be infringed upon for the purposes of conservation; he cited the example of the protection of nesting seabirds at RR, indicating that the province’s position would be that this should be restricted because of conservation needs; he indicated further that the province will be reluctant to enter into shared decision-making and will remain true to the ER act; evolution is important along with the notion of shared responsibility for a mandate of shared protection however he is not optimistic; he pointed out that the First Nations network is very good and in some cases the province will utilise this, for example, the central coast where there is more willingness to enter into shared management of interim protected areas; First Nations want to re-visit land use decisions with shared decision-making.
- Angus Matthews pointed out that this approach does not corresponding to the recommendations of RRAB and that the province could derail federal plans because of this discrepancy; there could be some flexibility on the conservation issue with respect to the harvesting of Sea Gull Eggs from Great Race Rocks, however he felt there could be a high level of co-operation from First Nations; he felt the province should do whatever it can to facilitate this and that if the federal government can pull together the larger picture with First Nations it would be a huge success.
- Keith Symington suggested that shared decision-making or co-management arrangements could be fleshed out but that the this is not reflected in the current ER plan and will be picked upon by First Nations; the Board must look very carefully at the language of the plan and specify First Nations rights to harvest.
- Chris Kissinger pointed out that the document does reference Douglas Treaty and fishing rights, among others.
- eith Symington felt that there should also be included an element of no-take recommendations, reflecting rights to harvest still exist and that the plan is to work with First Nations to respect conservation goals; he felt First Nations would win in any battle that might ensue over this issue.
- Marty Roberts expressed hope not to see this a battle and offered the notion of asking permission for harvesting and that First Nations are aware of the law, and the risk of being charged; he noted the need for further dialogue before this activity is engaged in and that an agreement could be drawn up to accommodate these activities as long as a sense of commitment and honouring of protocols vis a vis government to government relations.
- Angus Matthews mentioned that Tom Sampson had suggested that First Nations would agree to a five-year period of total protection to monitor the effects of the MPA and evaluate its effectiveness; the big challenge lies in the profile and the fact that regulations exist is an invitation to test those regulations rather than promoting discussion; he has a great deal of faith in the potential to forge relationships over conservation objectives.
- Keith Symington discussed the need to link conservation objectives to the steering committee in order to ease misgivings and participate in conservation objectives; he noted the lack of content with respect to the application of traditional knowledge and thatCPAWS supports this and is looking forward to cohesion between the provincial and federal agencies.
- Marty Roberts state that not much has changed in terms of First Nations’ use of the area and that it is still subject to same laws including the fishing closure that has been in place since 1991.
- Angus Matthews felt that there have been some changes, e.g. Great Race Rock is now included in the ER, and pointed out that the fishery closure only applies to groundfish.
- Keith Symington felt that if no-take were gazetted alarm would be raised.
- Jennie Sparkes noted that elements of the document are streamlined to specific needs but that it also contains an umbrella component; she referred to the final on page 5 referring to the management plan and agreement pointing out that this was fine for the umbrella level however at the provincial level it may not be appropriate. She suggested tat this might be identified as a component of the plan and not the basis for it.
- Marc Pakenham suggested that one area in which progress was needed was to determine a hierarchy in the “sea” of recommendations, first and second priorities; there are many recommendations from RRAB, priorities from the management plan all with implications for resources; he felt that the RRAB must determine direction and priorities since there can only be so many first priorities, i.e where to start?
- Garry Fletcher felt that the map of the ER is inadequate and that a CHS chart should be used onto which the ER boundary is superimposed.
- Chris Kissinger responded that the province was limited to the TRIM database and inquired whether access to CHS charts was possible.
- Garry Fletcher also noted the importance of presenting areas outside the ER.
- Keith Symington added some points about formatting and clarification of reasons for establishment of the ER on p.11, i.e. education and research vs. high volume intertidal research.
- Cheryl Borris responded that there are several reasons for establishing an ER but that the primary ones are research and education, therefore this section could be reorganized with different subheadings.
- Chris Kissinger pointed out that each purpose appropriate to the ER has been highlighted in the document.
- Garry Fletcher wished to add “marine biology” to p. 33 and felt that aquaculture should be added as a consumptive use; he also inquired into how dynamic/adaptive, i.e. can it be changed or added to?
- Jennie Sparkes asked whether consultation would be required for this?
- Chris Kissinger responded that the document is part of the consultations; that it was constructed with the knowledge that consultations are required; that the strategy for consultation on the document has not been formalized and that there is no legal requirement for this.
- Jennie Sparkes suggested it might be worthwhile to put this draft out for consultation along with DFO’s plan to avoid public confusion.
- Chris Kissinger responded that it was still necessary to get Pearson College signed off with permits.
- Angus Matthews suggested posting the plan on the website and noted that Ecological Reserves links have gone missing from the BC Parks website.
- Marty Roberts responded that they fall under protected areas and that there is on going debate over separate legislation (between ERs and parks).
- Keith Symington, referring to p.17, brought up the need to flesh out the issue of ocean dumping adjacent to the ER.
- Marty Roberts commented that marine areas are very susceptible to adjacency issues and that it’s important to include the statement.
- Angus Matthews commented that the RRAB has asked the province to consider adjacency.
- Kelly Francis stated that a memo had been sent with respect to this but that she was unsure of the response.
- Marc Pakenham pointed out that nautical charts indicate that RR is within the blast zone of Benthic Island and also within the safety perimeter of Benthic Island and that this incongruity needs to be addressed.
- Chris Kissinger commented that the province is participating in a process to ensure the prohibition of dumping.
- Garry Fletcher noted an edict from the Port of Vancouver stipulating no dumping unless west of RR.
- Kelly Francis mentioned that there should be discussions with a habitat biologist on this issue, but statistics show that there has been no dumping here.
- Jennie Sparkes commented that the key management issues and opportunities on p.8 have negative connotations; she pointed out differing management perceptions of First Nation actions within the MPA and ER; she felt it would be prudent for the province to attend First Nations meeting with federal government.
- Kelly Francis agreed, proposed meeting in January.
Whale Watching Incident at RR
- Garry Fletcher presented video on Harlequin Ducks that over-winter in RR; the birds are on the rocks because a sea lion has just passed; he presented video of a whale watching incident which he took from the tower; Discovery Launch and the Prince of Whales were on scene along with several hundred seals and sea lions that are normally okay with the boats; POW came around north end and caused stampede on north section of the rock; it was an accident but they do happen due to narrow gap in passage between kelp and island; he felt that passengers standing on the top deck made the profile of the vessel look larger, inciting a flight response; this behaviour can be expected in the public boat commercial operator should know better; he suggested that if this is how guidelines are interpreted then there is something wrong and the behaviour is not acceptable.
Marine Mammal Monitoring Project
- Marc Pakenham tied the above incident into the M3 project and discussion with industry about its guidelines; RR has not been discussed recently but more observational data required to evaluate the validity of the guidelines; works into M3 project and discussion with industry about their guidelines; Marc described the M3 program which began in June to monitor eco-tourism in the trans-boundary area inorder to characterize viewing and vessel/human interactions; second function is outreach to educate and promote stewardship; two staff members worked throughout the summer monitoring activities from the vessel; the program was funded through DFO and HSP, VOLWS, Pearson College, Vancouver Aquarium and Soundwatch; the industry is monitored according to their own guidelines and guidelines approved by the US and Canada; guidelines developed by M3 and others are distinguished from WWOANW in that they are simple nd easy to understand; future activities will be monitored according to these guidelines that depart from inusy on two points: parking in the path of whales and engaging in dolphin bow-riding (both activities allowed for in WWOANW); larger number of boats leading to worse behaviour such as crowding, getting in path; will work with industry on consolidation of guidelines; many issues with commercial vessels, aviation, ferries (e.g. Seattle which engages in opportunistic viewing activities; monitoring at RR art of M3 activities, volunteers; need to work to align RR monitoring with M3; departure between M3 guidelies and vessels operating at RR; updated version of brochure will be printed; precautionary approach being taken and onus is on industry to prove no harm; notion that no disturbance is acceptable – once disturbance occurs behaviour has gone too far; Marc has abstracts from papers on effects of repeated disturbances on haul-outs that can lead to long-term evacuation; M3 looking at both short and long-ter impacts; southern residents have been assigned endangered status (COSEWIC); transients are threatened as re northen resident population; work supports recovery plans to be developed by DFO; heighten intensity of monitoring activities and resources devoted to these creatures; also working on development of marine mammal regulations including federal regulations on marine mammal viewing; DFO consultations will take place in the New Year; licensing is being discussed and there is some interest on the east cost, this issue needs more thorough examination on west coast; 30 000 brochures have been printed up and distributed broadly in Puget Sound; US Fish and Wildlife Service has indicated it will support further printing for distribution in Puget Sound; M3 examining use of different platforms for observing behaviour such as aerial observation, digital video analysis.
- Cheryl Borris asked whether DFO can regulate/stop whale watching in the same way that it does fishing.Marc Pakenham responded that there was considerable interest in this; he went on to discuss the presentation of papers and the Marine Mammal Biology Conference in Vancouver on the impacts of noise on cetaceans and mammals; M3 plans to work with Dr. David Bain to look at acoustic impacts; indicated there may be a move towards temporal respite for orcas; the US may also move orcas to their endangered species list which will create a major shift in the management regime; he brought up the impending changes to the vessel management scheme which will place it in closer proximity to San Juan island and the _ mile exclusion zone for whale watching.
- Angus Matthews stated that commercial whale watchers have indicated they will not enter RR when whales are present; he indicated that whale watcher compliance at Race Rocks has been very good and that the no-go zone has been respected.
- Marc Pakenham pointed out that boats continue to move very close to shore, not necessarily in Race passage, but elsewhere.
- Angus Matthews responded that there is a separate set of standards for operation at Race Rocks that do no correspond with M3 guidelines and that the RR guidelines are lax compared to these.
- Marc Pakenham indicated that the gap between these guidelines is closing, and that there have been discussions with Dan Kukat and the Association; M3 guidelines are starting to get buy-in from industry.
- Garry Fletcher asked whether RRAB could recommend setting up a registry for whale watching boats in the area.
- Marc Pakenham mentioned the potential for an observer program, modeled on fishery observer programs.
- Kelly Francis commented that the guidelines will form the basis of regulations.
- Marc Pakenham commented that CPAWS has some funding for harmonization of nternational guidelines; Marc has had some discussions with colleagues in Mexico, to incorporate guidelines into Baja to Bearing initiative.
- Angus Matthews brought up two further issues that are on-going: Department of National Defence disruptions and the unexpected blasting on September 14 for which there was no notification given at Rare Rocks; and kayak “disturbance by stealth”.
- Marc Pakenham responded that M3 has had meetings with kayak guides alliance to discuss guidelines; industry representatives have recognized problems associated with kayaks at Race Rocks and have indicated a willingness to explore voluntary provision to stay out of RR.
- Chris Kissinger asked how whale watching guidelines might be reflected in the management plan.
- Marc Pakenham commented that this should be a priority item for the RRAB and the importance of keeping the process alive; there is a ned to clarify RR guidelines by the whale watching industry.
- Angus Matthews felt that the M3 guidelines wouldn’t work at RR and must be tailored to the area; he suggested that voluntary guidelines need to be developed and then turned into regulations.
- Chris Kissinger again asked where these might fit into the management plan.
- Marc Pakenham commented that all recommendations are subject to monitoring therefore further evaluation of M3 guidelines will indicate how effective they are.
- Chris Kissinger suggested that if we know that regulations are on their way then should RRAB be proactive i.e. management plan to reflect this?
- Jennie Sparkes responded that measures currently in place are those that have been recommended by RRAB; any new findings must be presented to the Board and then reviewed accordingly.
- Marty Robrts felt that the plan could be more explicit; where monitoring reveals that these guidelines are not adequate they must be revisited.
- Marc Pakenham indicated that a definition of disturbance might be agreed upon in addition to adopting a principle of “no disturbance”.
- Garry Fletcher brought up the weekly presence of a UVic Research vessel that has not notified Pearson College of BC Parks of its activities and that there seems to beno accountability in this case; he has observed some form of testing going.
- Marty Roberts responded that the UVic class for which the boat is operated are advocates of marine mammal protection however jurisdictions must still be respected – little awareness of what activities are being undertaken.
- Marc Pakenham pointed out that research permits are a function of DFO; if research is being conducted then it must be subject to DFO permit; h suggested that communication within DFO may be lacking in this case; M3 is dealing with large number of researchers, photographers, that have permits; this behaviour needs to be monitored also and there is a case to be made for the identification of research vessels on the water.
- Marty Roberts pointed out that the Ecological Reserve Act is clear on permitting; need to look at a more seamless response between DFO and the province.
- Cheryl inqured into the adaptability of the management plan and whether it can provide for the review of whale watching guidelines and adapt accordingly.
- Chris Kissinger indicated that changes could be made when there were enough smaller issues or pressing larger ones to warrant revision.
- Marty Roberts added that the role of RRAB is to bring up issues that need to be addressed, including when to revisit the management plan.
Concluding discussion
- Marc Pakenham commented that racerocks.com is a wonderful website, its webcasting is considered groundbreaking technology and is every effective.
- Angus Matthews pointed out the daily log feature on the website and drew attention to Carol Slater’s excellent entry from the previous evening.
- There was general discussion of CBC Radio Ideas programs for 8-art Ocean series
- Angus Matthews brought up the need for feedback; stated that RR’s money situation is grim – BC Parks has little money other than for maintenance and some money has come from DFO for monitoring work; daily costs to run RR are $410/day or $150,000/year. Some money has just been donated by the Richard Ivey Foundation in addition to Dr. Anita Voss and the Friends of Ecological Reserves; he mentioned the recommendation for a traditional use study, indicating it s a priority action and offered Pearson College’s facilities to facilitate any initiatives in this area.
- There was further general discussion of the management plan including the possibility of providing a link for Board members to access the document on line.
- Angus Matthews brought up concerns about attendance at the meeting.
- Marc Pakenham responded that all members had been contacted.
DFO Pamphlet on Race Rocks MPA ( 2001)
Race Rocks Ecological Overview: Wright and Pringle 2001
This overview is linked here in PDF form: https://racerocks.ca/wp-content/uploads/2001/06/257000.pdf
Race Rocks Marine Protected Area Update May 6 2001
Racerocks.com continues to reach to the far corners of the world as more and more people become aware of this extraordinary ecosystem and the opportunity to discover it electronically.(over 100,000 visitors in the past year) Garry Fletcher, our Educational Director, has attended conferences in New York, California (twice) and in the near future plans to go to Halifax. In each case we have featured live webcasts from Race Rocks with video from both above and below the surface to the conference site. On March 17, 2001 we completed the first underwater webcast in which in addition to video one of our student divers spoke directly to the conference participants from underwater at Race Rocks. This was possible thanks to a fabulous, locally developed, wireless underwater communications system created by Divelink.
A wireless internet feed from Race Rocks is now possible for eco-tourism vessels in the MPA. Visitors to the MPA can now establish wireless internet access aboard their vessel from most locations within the MPA. This allows guides to download real time video streams showing activity in the MPA including underwater video from the display tanks on the island. In addition, visitors can have access to archived video of marine life, First Nation’s activities and more recent history stored on the Race Rocks server. If you are interested in more information about the equipment required and how you could subscribe to this service please contact Angus Matthews.
Eco-guardians Mike and Carol Slater continue to do an outstanding job for us all as our resident caretakers of the island and equipment. We are grateful to Mike and Carol for their dedication and commitment to Race Rocks and it’s many residents. It is also reassuring to know that their watchful eyes are always looking out for us.
Should you need to contact them they are usually monitoring VHF 16 or 68.
Site restoration has continued on the island over the winter. In late April the Coast Guard finished flying out the last of the concrete from the dykes that surrounded the old tank farm. This has returned another large portion of the island to a natural state. We are working with BC Parks to establish a plant life inventory of Great Race Island. We have modified the Coast Guard’s old lawn mowing compulsion to allow more of the natural grasses and vegetation to take over the island. A small perimeter is maintained around the buildings for fire safety and Mike and Carol of course maintain their traditional kitchen garden.
BC Parks has assumed ownership of the area of Great Race Island that was previously leased to the Coast Guard. A small area around the light tower and solar panels has been retained by the Coast Guard as they are still responsible for the automated navigational aids. All the remaining infrastructure on the island has been given over to BC Parks. Pearson College has entered into a 30 year park use permit agreement with BC Parks to continue to operate the facility as we have for the past four years.
Serious financial challenges lie ahead. Now that the federal Millennium Partnership funding that established racerocks.com has been exhausted we are receiving no financial support for the operation of the Race Rocks MPA from any government. We are hopeful that BC Parks and DFO which established the MPA will respond positively to our application for them to provide a contribution of $50,000 each towards operating costs. Pearson College has undertaken to raise the balance required to cover the $150,000 annual budget. We hope that the eco-tourism industry will consider assisting us in the future as a demonstration of the commitment you have to environmental protection and Canada’s first Marine Protected Area. See $ave Race Rock$
Please excuse our questionable flag etiquette! One of the pitfalls of joint federal/provincial jurisdiction is they both want their label on the product. At the request of our current MLA we are now flying both the BC and Canadian flag on the same mast on the island. Until the funding arrangements are worked out it is simply prudent to do so!
The special operational guidelines for Race Rocks established by the eco-tourism operators have been largely respected and we greatly appreciate the individual commitment vessel operators have made to following them. We are now working on better cooperation from other organisations such as the Navy and education of the general public. Our proceedure is to log all infractions and contact the operator or their owner directly to advise them of a difficulty. The level of cooperation and voluntary compliance from the eco-tourim sector has been outstanding and we appreciate it a great deal.
Operator training for the 2001 season is now occurring in many eco-tourism organisations. Many of your operators have received special training about the MPA in the past. If the number of new operators warrants it, we have offered to host a training session ashore at Race Rocks in the near future. Please contact Dan Kukat if you think this is necessary.
Marine life at the Race features several elephant seals again this year and the sea lion/ harbour seal population looks fairly strong for the time of year. Already a number of harbour seal pups have been born, and this emphasizes the need for cautious navigation through the area as they are very vulnerable. Serious bird nesting activity is starting so our activity on the island and access is now being limited. Chick survival on the island was very poor last year largely due to what appeared to be starvation. Hopefully more of the usual food sources will return this year.
We look forward to another successful season of protection and education at the Race. Thank you for all you do to share this experience with an appreciative public.
Angus Matthews
Director of Administration and Special Projects, Lester Pearson College
First Nations Cooperative Management of Protected Areas in British Columbia, Tools and Foundation
The following excerpt presents the Te’Mexw Treaty Association assertion in response to the proposal for the Race Rocks MPA in 1998. See bolding below:
First Nations Cooperative Management of Protected Areas in British Columbia:
Tools and Foundation
by Julia Gardner Dovetail Consulting April 2001
From page 9:
An ecosystem approach
The designation of special management zones in LRMPs recognizes that protected areas
cannot be managed as islands: buffers and connecting corridors beyond their boundaries
are needed to ensure that ecological integrity is protected. Similarly, marine protected
areas cannot protect marine biodiversity on their own – they should be implemented as a
part of integrated coastal zone management.
The management of protected areas on an ecosystem level is a priority that has been
brought into the public eye recently through the report of the Panel on the Ecological
Integrity of Canada’s National Parks (Parks Canada Agency, 2000) and the report of
B.C.’s Park Legacy Panel (MELP, 1999). There is growing recognition that the
ecosystems of protected areas cannot be protected without attention to the portions of
their ecosystems falling outside their boundaries, as opposed to being “islands in a sea of
development.”
In the marine setting, there is a parallel rationale for an ecosystem approach, often under
the label, “integrated coastal zone management.” But in this “sea of development” where
fluid ecosystems even more thoroughly defy protection via boundaries, some argue that
protected areas are contrary to the priority of protecting the whole environment. For
example, “The Nuu-chah-nulth believe that all marine areas should be treated respectfully
for the gifts that nature provides. The concept of establishing certain areas for favourable protection while mismanagement occurs in areas outside of protected zones is foreign to
Nuu-chah-nulth principles” (Nuu-chah-nulth Tribal Council, November 13, 1998) Similarly, the Te’Mexw Treaty Association asserted in response to the proposal for the
Race Rocks MPA in 1998 that “It is the position of the Nations that a coordinated co-management program for the coast from Jordan River to Ten Mile Point would be the appropriate method by which conservation, harvest and priority for First Nations users can be integrated” (Moahan, 1998,p7). at the very least, MPAs need to be considered in their broader setting, including the watershed and the surrounding sea.
A sixth key assumption is that land and sea are an integrated whole, so MPAs
alone cannot protect the marine environment. Nevertheless, we can usefully
consider the particular circumstances of protected areas in the water, so as to
increase their extent and effectiveness through cooperative management.
Financial Proposal For Race Rocks Operation
The following operational budget provided details of projected minimum operational expenses at Race Rocks for the period April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002. The budget is based on our four years of experience in funding the Race Rocks project and the highly efficient operational format we have established. Pearson College guarantees to cover any cost over runs if they should occur.
It is proposed that the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, BC Parks, and Pearson College each contribute $50,000 to cover the 2001-2002 operating budget.
(Ed Note: As of 2012 Neither Provincial or Federal governments have responded to this request with any financial support. During that time Pearson College has raised funding separate from the college funding to maintain operations at Race Rock.)
|
Race Rocks MPA/ER
|
|
|
Operating Budget April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002
|
|
|
Salaries
|
|
|
Eco-guardian(s)
|
42,000
|
|
Educator (1/2 time)
|
30,000
|
|
Shore-side support (1/3 time)
|
14,000
|
|
Benefits
|
9,460
|
|
95,460
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
Generator
|
11,000
|
|
Heating
|
1,400
|
|
Boat
|
1,750
|
|
Lube/oils
|
2,000
|
|
16,150
|
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
Buildings
|
6,000
|
|
Generators
|
4,300
|
|
Water pumps
|
2,100
|
|
Desalinator
|
2,200
|
|
Winches
|
800
|
|
Boat and motor
|
4,700
|
|
Jetty
|
400
|
|
Fuel system
|
450
|
|
Radios
|
200
|
|
Diving equipment
|
2,500
|
|
23,650
|
|
|
Administration Costs
|
|
|
Phone
|
600
|
|
Insurance
|
1,800
|
|
Stationery/printing
|
1,150
|
|
3,550
|
|
|
Education Program
|
|
|
Classroom materials
|
4,500
|
|
Communication/outreach programs
|
2,500
|
|
First Nations’ program
|
5,000
|
|
Internet access
|
2,000
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditures
|
$152,810
|
Provincial Proposal for Race Rocks MPA Funding
Ecological Reserve and Marine Protected Area
OPERATIONAL PROPOSAL 2001/2002
Presented to: Province of British Columbia
BC Parks
Attention:Denis O’Gorman
Assistant Deputy Minister
January 31, 2001
Background
BC Parks was among the first to recognize the extraordinary value of this treasured eco-system. In 1980 the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve was established to protect marine life on the rocky outcrops and the ocean floor extending to a depth of 20 fathoms. Great Race Island, home to the Race Rocks light station was leased to the Federal Government since BC joined confederation. As a result the Island was excluded from the Ecological Reserve.
As a consequence of a Federal decision to de-staff the light station in 1997, the keepers were to be removed and they would no longer provide the essential supervision required for full protection of the Reserve. In excess of $25 million worth of commercially exploitable species are known to exist within the Reserve area. The presence of the keepers was determined to be essential for continued protection. Coast Guard agreed to a special short-term agreement whereby Pearson College would retain the former light keepers as eco-guardians and operate the surplus facilities as a new Marine Education Centre until such time as a permanent solution for the operation of Race Rocks could be found.
BC Parks and the Federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans began community consultations in 1998 to assess the possibility of Race Rocks being recognized as Canada’s first Marine Protected Area. For the first time, Race Rocks, with the cooperation of both levels of government would be truly protected with a management plan that included both the Provincially managed Ecological Reserve and the Federally controlled water column.
On January 24, 2001 Great Race Island (except for a small piece of land which accommodates the navigational aids) reverted back to the Province of British Columbia under the control of BC Parks.
A New Beginning
A long-term Parks permit is currently being prepared by BC Parks to allow Pearson College to operate the facilities at Race Rocks as a Marine Science and Education Centre in accordance with the new management plan and the original rationale from 1980 when the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve was established.
For the first time, the Race Rocks eco-system enjoys full protection under a unified management plan with the authority of both the Provincial and Federal governments. An important new provision has also been made for the full involvement of First Nations in on-going management of the Race Rocks area. The priorities of protecting ecological values, education and research are the primary focus of the recently developed management plan.
Scope of the Race Rocks Project
- The key activities that Pearson College will manage on behalf of BC Parks include:
- Protection
- Continuous supervision of the island and Reserve by resident eco-guardian.
- Security for buildings, equipment and infrastructure (24 hrs/day all year).
- Vigilant observation of activities within the Reserve and if needed, reporting of infractions to appropriate agencies.
- Electronic video monitoring of the Ecological Reserve by enforcement agencies.
- Restrict access to specific areas as necessary.
- Safety
- Observe and report any situations which may represent a safety hazard.
- Assist individuals in distress when required and liaise with rescue agencies.
- Assist in emergency communications.
- Be vigilant for fire hazards.
- Monitor for the occurrence of hazardous material spills.
Science
Continue monitoring program for weather conditions.
- Continue monitoring program for seawater temperature and salinity.
- Ongoing protection of unique Northern Abalone populations and monitoring of population and growth rates.
- Annual intertidal and subtidal transect site monitoring.
- Installation of environmental scan sensor arrays for air, soil and seawater with full accessibility on the Internet.
- Observation and recording of marine mammal and bird populations.
- Daily ecological events log.
- Support for visiting scientists.
- Development of alternative energy solutions.
The Federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans began community
Education
- Development of curriculum materials for K-12 use.
- Cooperative development of information about First Nations focusing on the history of traditional uses and creating a supporting curriculum.
- Operation and continuous upgrading of the racerocks.com education site with a major commitment for the production of online archived video for classroom and public use.
- Interactive web cast production and delivery for use by schools, science centres, museums and conferences.
- Public education programs for visitors to the Race Rocks area.
- Education programs in cooperation with eco-tourism industry and dive community.
Operations
-
- Supervision and monitoring of operating systems including generators, water systems, heating systems and data network.
- Routine preventative maintenance for all buildings, equipment and infrastructure.
- Maintenance of station vessel.
- Assistance to government agencies with equipment installed at Race Rocks.
Eco-guardian / Project Management
Pearson College is uniquely qualified and suited to operate and manage Race Rocks on behalf of BC Parks and the public.
Located 3.7 nautical miles from Pearson Collegeâs docks at Pedder Bay, Race Rocks is within easy reach in moderate weather conditions. In addition to the Race Rocks station boat, Pearson College operates two purpose built aluminum workboats suitable for transporting fuel, personnel, equipment and supplies to Race Rocks.Pearson College staff provides all logistical support required for the efficient operation of Race Rocks. Qualified staffing for maintenance, accounting, purchasing and deliveries are all coordinated by existing College systems. Mike and Carol Slater, the former light-house keepers, are now employed by Pearson College and they live at Race Rocks. They are particularly well qualified to supervise and operate the facility after 30 years of experience with the Coast Guard and extensive experience observing marine life. Over the past 14 years they have been responsible for dealing with the public in the Reserve area and, when necessary, reporting infractions to the appropriate agency. Many of the College’s suppliers such as Nixon Electrical Services, Day’s Welding, Aramark Services, Henning’s Plumbing and others offer their services to Race Rocks at reduced rates or by donation.
It is an extraordinary legacy of the Millennium Partnership Fund and our partners that Race Rocks is now the most technologically advanced Marine Protected Area in the world. The state of the art information technology system includes a full island network, wireless technology, remote controlled live video streams from above and below water and an environmental data array all streamed live on the Internet for public use. Major sponsorships from Apple, Apple Learning, LGS Group, Sorenson, Sony, Telus, Yamaha, Seapoint Sensors, the Vancouver Aquarium and others support the Race Rocks project.As an educational institution Pearson College applies significant educational resources to the Race Rocks project. Environmental Systems/Biology faculty member Garry Fletcher serves as Educational Director of the Race Rocks program. Supported by students involved in web design, scuba diving, vessel operation, photography, video production, research and school program delivery, Garry has established an award winning education program at Race Rocks. This program is widely used by provincial agencies such as the Open Learning Agency, Ministry of Education, University of Victoria and the Royal British Columbia Museum. In the past year alone there have been over 65,000 users of the racerocks.com site.- This project has proved conclusively that there can be mass electronic public access to a protected area without the negative impact of large numbers of visitors to the islands. Race Rocks provides a viable alternative to the potentially high impact personal site visit. Rather than a BC Parks Ecological Reserve being a secret resource this approach encourages public education and appreciation of the area while maintaining a high level of protection.Pearson College has a proven record of successful fundraising for the Race Rocks project. Since 1997 over $280,000 has been raised from private donors to operate Race Rocks. This was an emergency initiative to save the site from demolition while a long-term solution could be found. Pearson College will continue this commitment to fundraising for the project by raising one third of the annual operating costs for the ongoing operation of Race Rocks.
Community Commitment
BC Environment Minister The Hon. Joan Sawicki and Federal Fisheries Minister The Hon. Herb Dhaliwal committed their respective governments to the establishment of a Marine Protected Area at Race Rocks on September 14, 2000. Their action was based on the unanimous recommendations of the Race Rocks Advisory Board. The Advisory Board includes senior staff from BC Parks, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and south island First Nations leadership. In addition there is broad public representation from groups such as sports fishers, the dive community, ecotourism companies, marina operators, scientists, Friends of Ecological Reserves, Georgia Strait Alliance, and the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society. A key feature of the Race Rocks Advisory Board conclusions is a recommendation that both the Federal and Provincial governments provide financial support for the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area.
So many Parks so little money
British Columbia leads Canada in the establishment of parks and protected areas. The fact BC is the first jurisdiction in Canada to attain the 12% of total landmass under protection goal is an extraordinary accomplishment that places British Columbia as a world leader. In only the past nine years the NDP government has doubled total park space to 11.7 million hectares to meet itâs declared objective. One might think the Ministry budget would also have been increased to provide financial support for this initiative. The Ministry budget has in fact decreased.
The financial reality of the Ministry of the Environment, Lands and Parks budget situation makes it extremely difficult for BC Parks managers to fulfill the operational challenges of administering this burgeoning parks system. One solution to the budget crisis as identified by the BC Parks Legacy Panel in their 2000 report is partnership funding arrangements with the private charitable giving sector. This is exactly what we propose for Race Rocks. Under the formula presented here BC Parks will contribute only one third of the annual operating cost of Race Rocks. For every dollar expended by BC Parks two additional dollars will be contributed to operate this BC Parks facility.
Why is Race Rocks funding special?
Race Rocks is a unique Provincial asset with specific circumstances that qualify it to be deserving of a special funding allocation designated at the Ministerial level.
So many Parks so little money
British Columbia leads Canada in the establishment of parks and protected areas. The fact BC is the first jurisdiction in Canada to attain the 12% of total landmass under protection goal is an extraordinary accomplishment that places British Columbia as a world leader. In only the past nine years the NDP government has doubled total park space to 11.7 million hectares to meet itâs declared objective. One might think the Ministry budget would also have been increased to provide financial support for this initiative. The Ministry budget has in fact decreased.
The financial reality of the Ministry of the Environment, Lands and Parks budget situation makes it extremely difficult for BC Parks managers to fulfill the operational challenges of administering this burgeoning parks system. One solution to the budget crisis as identified by the BC Parks Legacy Panel in their 2000 report is partnership funding arrangements with the private charitable giving sector. This is exactly what we propose for Race Rocks. Under the formula presented here BC Parks will contribute only one third of the annual operating cost of Race Rocks. For every dollar expended by BC Parks two additional dollars will be contributed to operate this BC Parks facility.
Why is Race Rocks funding special?
Race Rocks is a unique Provincial asset with specific circumstances that qualify it to be deserving of a special funding allocation designated at the Ministerial level.
Race Rocks is:
- an internationally recognized Marine Protected Area established jointly by the Province and the Federal government.
- Canadaâs first and only Marine Protected Area and therefore success is essential if others are to follow.
- the only Ecological Reserve in BC with over $650,000 in physical building and equipment assets owned by the Province which clearly require security and routine maintenance.
- over $25 million worth of extremely marketable sea-life that has prospered under 20 years of protection would be subject to immediate poaching without the presence of the resident eco-guardians.
- Race Rocks has the most comprehensive accumulation of scientific data of any marine Ecological Reserve. The continuous data chain some of which dates back to 1926 must be sustained.
- Race Rocks, through award winning web based education programming, is recognized as a word leader in environmental monitoring and education delivery.
- partnerships with Provincial agencies such as the Open Learning Agency, Royal BC Museum, and Ministry of Education provide direct benefit to the BC Government and British Columbians.
- the funding formula proposed is in accordance with recommendations of both the Race Rocks Advisory Board and the BC Parks Legacy Panel.
- BC Parks investment in Race Rocks will be directly matched at a two to one ratio by other independent funding sources.
- when gift in kind contributions from our other sponsors are considered the ratio of private contribution is over ten times the BC Parks contribution level.
- the involvement of BC Parks assures the project of stable funding. The lack of involvement by BC Parks will lead to immediate financial collapse.
Financial Proposal
The following operational budget provides details of projected minimum operational expenses at Race Rocks for the period April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002. The budget is based on our four years of experience in funding the Race Rocks project and the highly efficient operational format we have established. Pearson College guarantees to cover any cost over runs if they should occur.
It is proposed that the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, BC Parks, and Pearson College each contribute $50,000 to cover the 2001-2002 operating budget.
|
Race Rocks MPA/ER
|
|
|
Operating Budget April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002
|
|
|
Salaries
|
|
|
Eco-guardian(s)
|
42,000
|
|
Educator (1/2 time)
|
30,000
|
|
Shoreside support (1/3 time)
|
14,000
|
|
Benefits
|
9,460
|
|
95,460
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
Generator
|
11,000
|
|
Heating
|
1,400
|
|
Boat
|
1,750
|
|
Lube/oils
|
2,000
|
|
16,150
|
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
Buildings
|
6,000
|
|
Generators
|
4,300
|
|
Water pumps
|
2,100
|
|
Desalinator
|
2,200
|
|
Winches
|
800
|
|
Boat and motor
|
4,700
|
|
Jetty
|
400
|
|
Fuel system
|
450
|
|
Radios
|
200
|
|
Diving equipment
|
2,500
|
|
23,650
|
|
|
Administration Costs
|
|
|
Phone
|
600
|
|
Insurance
|
1,800
|
|
Stationery/printing
|
1,150
|
|
3,550
|
|
|
Education Program
|
|
|
Classroom materials
|
4,500
|
|
Communication/outreach programs
|
2,500
|
|
First Nations’ program
|
5,000
|
|
Internet access
|
2,000
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditures
|
$152,810
|
Pearson College is a registered charity and as such is subject to an annual audit. Our auditors KPMG will provide fully audited accounting details of all Race Rocks expenditures to the partner agencies. In addition the College will file an annual operating report with BC Parks.
Conclusion
We had not expected to operate the facility on an interim basis without any financial support from any government for the past four years. Our donors are experiencing fatigue and our largest private financial supporter has indicated their continued support is conditional upon governments entering into this cost sharing formula. A similar proposal has been well received by the Federal Government. Race Rocks is an essential investment by BC Parks, a cost effective arrangement, a unique innovation in the field of environmental protection and education and a proud accomplishment for all British Columbians. We ask that you agree to support Race Rocks Ecological Reserve as it begins a new life.
Respectfully submitted,
Angus Matthews
Director of Special Projects
Lester B. Pearson College of the Pacific
650 Pearson College Drive
Victoria, BC
