AGENDA and Minutes for Meeting #4 of Race Rocks MPA Advisory Board

Race Rocks Advisory Board Meeting
BC Parks Office, 800 Johnson St. Victoria
12h00-16h00 February 23, 2000


Purpose:

Meeting #4 of the Race Rocks Advisory Board.

Participants:

 

Cheryl Borris – Friends of Ecological ReservesErin Bradley – Dive Community

Howard Breen – Georgia Strait Alliance

Garry Fletcher – Lester B. Pearson College

Kelly Francis – Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Gordon Hanson – Coast Salish Sea Council

Dan Kukat – Sport Fish Advisory Board

Lieutenant Commander Bill Laing – Department of National Defence (DND)

Angus Matthews -Lester B. Pearson College

Sean Moore – Local Marina Operators

Jim Morris – BC Parks

Marc Pakenham – Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Tom Sampson – Coast Salish Sea Council

Brian Smiley – Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Keith Symington – Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS)

Dr. Anita Voss – Science

Kevin Walker?- Whale Watch Operators Association – North West

Scott Wallace – Science

Observers

Rupert Gale – Georgia Strait Alliance Sean MacConnachie – Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Roy Neighbour – Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Jennie Sparkes – Parks Canada

*************************************************************


Agenda

    1. Purpose of meeting – Kelly Francis
    2. Agenda and minutes — All
    3. Update on public consultation (February 12 & 16) – Marc Pakenham / Jim Morris
    4. Roundtable updates — All
    5. Draft Management Recommendations — All
    6. Permit process for research and education — Garry Fletcher
    7. Next steps
    8. Other business
       
    9. RACE ROCKS ADVISORY BOARD MEETING # 4
      DRAFT MINUTES

      12h00 — 16h00, FEBRUARY 23, 2000 —BC PARKS, 800 JOHNSON ST, VICTORIA


      Participants: Doug Biffard — BC Park

      Regrets: Cheryl Borris — Friends of Ecological Reserves

      Observers:Sean MacConnachie – Fisheries and Oceans Canada

      INTRODUCTION

      • Revision and acceptance of agenda and previous minutes.

      FIRST NATIONS UPDATE

      • Tom Sampson gave an update on his work with First Nations’ participation in the process. He indicated that there would be a traditional burning ceremony on March 9, 2000 by the Beecher Bay First Nation. The intent of the ceremony is to bring parties together to work on this project and provide an opportunity for non- natives to gain an idea of respect that First Nations have for the land, resources and their ancestors. The invitation is open to all members of the RRAB. The intent is to have all First Nations’ chiefs present from Sooke, Esquimalt, Songhees, and Beecher Bay. The ceremony will be held on Indian Reserve #2 at Rocky point. Please let Marc Pakenham know about attendance and he will distribute a map to site.
      • Angus Matthews felt that this was a very generous offer by First Nations, it provides an opportunity for all of us to work together and it is not an offer that is given frequently.
      • Gord Hanson indicated that the MPA initiative goes beyond Race Rocks and suggests that First Nations people are looking at Race Rocks at what role they will play in the future processes and their interaction with senior levels of government.

      UPDATE ON PUBLIC CONSULTATION

      • Kelly Francis gave an overview of the public meetings held on February13 and 16.
      • Jim Morris introduced Doug Biffard and Marty Roberts. Jim Morris suggested that there was 95% support for the proposal, with 5% wanting more information.
      • Marc Pakenham felt that session went well. Over 100 participants spread over two meetings including the Mayor of Colwood and Mayor of Metchosin. The forums gave an opportunity for the public to see how the two levels of government are working together.
      • Kelly Francis indicated that the proceedings should be available next week from the consultant for RRAB members.

      ROUNDTABLE UPDATE

      • Erin Bradley indicated that the dive community and operators are currently developing site-specific guidelines and possible stewardship roles. Strong positive support from dive community on process and project. He is working to get a meeting together to finalize guidelines and hopes to have a draft document by the end of the week.
      • Garry Fletcher expressed his concern that the maximum sustainable use of the reserve has not been defined, not only for diving but research and all other activities. Marc Pakenham suggested that the management plan and framework once in place will allow us to deal with these sorts of things as they arise.
      • Dr. Anita Voss suggested that the problem with eco-tourism is that although it impacts less than traditional forms of industry it still impacts and she sited the example of the impact on amphibians with increased tourism. Angus Matthews felt that identifying the incremental increases of impact is what is important.
      • Angus Matthews informed the RRAB of a recent incident where people were camping on West Race and were asked to leave by not only the current keepers but also a whale watching organization.
      • Doug Biffard suggested that at some point triggers should be identified to discuss limits of access and use.
      • Erin Bradley stressed the importance of educating the people who will be using the area. By eliminating commercial operators and guides, public users will collectively impact the are more than commercial operators would.
      • Doug Biffard suggested that a dive speciality ticket could be established for Race Rocks. Erin Bradley indicated that there a peak performance buoyancy ticket exists that instructs divers how to minimize their impact by altering their diving behaviour.
      • Marc Pakenham suggested that Garry Fletcher’s experience in site specific diving practices could be beneficial to the diving community’s guideline development.
      • Duane Freeman reported that he has been focusing on internal communications with Ottawa and the Maritimes, as they are interested in this precedent setting exercise. He suggests that there is overall strong support for pilot in DND.
      • Jim Morris indicated that he is working on including activity specific management plans in the final overall management plan.
      • Marty Roberts indicated that he sits on the joint federal and provincial MPA working group and he appreciates the opportunity to get a feel for how this and that group relate.
      • Jennie Sparkes suggested that as an observer she continues to report back to Parks Canada on this group’s process.
      • Doug Biffard suggested that after the February 12 session the public at large supports this and these types of projects.
      • Angus Matthews firmly believes that the model we are pursuing may further facilitate the development of a positive relationship with First Nations. He believes that industries (diving and eco-tourism) can best develop their own guidelines that can be incorporated in Race Rocks management plan. The Race Rocks.Com project is going well and on-track.
      • Dr. Anita Voss suggested that she would like to see specific permits for some activities.
      • Alan McGillivray indicated that he was here in place of Kevin Walker. He distributed the whale watching community’s draft site specific guidelines. The hope is that these guidelines will help develop a common attitude toward best management practices. The guidelines have been based on the keep it simple model and include the use of radar to delineate a 1/8 of a mile (~200 m) exclusion zone from shore. He suggested that they are highly motivated to work on a conservative pro-active approach. He felt that implementing many regulations would create an atmosphere of trying to find loopholes as opposed to an atmosphere of compliance.
      • Garry Fletcher indicated that he doesn’t see how operators would deal with serendipitous events such as birds feeding on a herring ball and that these events may need to be included in the Whale Watch Operators Northwest association guidelines.
      • Keith Symington asked to have minutes from last the meeting revised about his comment on boundaries. He distributed a copy of the WildWaters document for the RRAB members.

      DRAFT MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

      • Marc Pakenham gave a slide presentation on recommendations:
        • Including model of governance with roles and responsibilities post designation;
        • Recommendations:
        • Missing: Vision, aviation, recommendation for designation, governance.
        • Garry Fletcher suggested that the Vision recommendation should include:
        • Vessel management regime
        • Recommendations should include something about safety needs superseding conservation needs.
        • Fishing Activities
        • Management of educational activity
          • Alan McGillivray suggested that whale watch community be co-managers of warden-operators. Therefore those that being permitted are part of the management team.
          • Jennie Sparkes inquired as to how does whale watch operators that educated public fit into permitting process. Marc Pakenham indicated that we need to define levels of education and research.
          • Alan McGillivray indicated that whale watch operators do not want to see a permitting system but want to work towards self-regulation and a change of attitudes.
        • Minimum standards — no dumping, dredging and extraction of non-renewable resources.
        • Migratory birds —change to just birds as many species at Race Rocks are non-migratory.
        • Diving activity
        • Commercial shipping
          • Duane Freeman suggested that changes to ballast water management guidelines have safety implications. Marc Pakenham indicated that the Port of Vancouver is aware of the Race Rocks project and concerns of existing regulations.

      Action Item: Marc Pakenham will revise slides for a recommendations package for March meeting.

      • Marty Roberts explained that different levels of government have different levels of responsibilities as set out by the Constitution, which has made it traditionally difficult for us to work together, but protection and conservation of the environment can not be reached unless there is goodwill and cooperation between governments.
      • Angus Matthews suggests taking sometime to sign-off on those recommendations that can be reached today. RRAB members agreed.
        • Governance structure: Model does not hierarcherize. Advisory board would be comprised of users. Operations-warden would be the servant of the two groups. Jennie Sparkes suggested that to fully respect First Nations involvement in the process, First Nations have to be included in the management plan for both the ER and MPA.
        • Boundaries– Alan McGillivray suggested that the whale watchers are indifferent to the size or shape of the boundaries but agree to the ER model. Greatest concern is the vessel management regime in the area.
      • Rupert Gale suggested that an evaluation and monitoring recommendation be included. Marc Pakenham indicated that it would be included in the list but it is also one of the roles of the Steering Committee as described in the governance model.

      PERMITTING PROCESS–Garry Fletcher

      • Garry Fletcher distributed a document detailing the evolution and history of the current permitting process. He gave an overview of the permitting process that is required to go forward with RaceRocks.com work of installing sensors in the marine environment. He recommended using a form created by Pearson.
      • Jennie Sparkes inquired if the permitting process in the ER is legislated. Doug Biffard indicated that it was.
      • Duane Freeman indicated that existing processes exist for different types of activities. He gave an example of the permitting process required for introducing an actual object into the environment as opposed to just observing the environment.
      • Garry Fletcher felt that the MPA process should be able to overcome the existing requirements to streamline the process and that the Oceans Act gives the authority to overcome this issues. Jennie Sparkes indicated that the Canadian Impact Assessment Act (CIAA) supersedes the Oceans Act on this regard.
      • Rupert Gale suggested that what people are looking for is one point of access and that could be the Steering Committee.
      • Doug Biffard indicated that the purpose of permitting is not to control research but to form a contract with the researcher so that the information that is generated is open to the public domain. Further it can be used as a mechanism to maintain the ecological integrity of the area.
      • Angus Matthews suggested an important role that the Steering Committee could have is to screen and channel permits so that external authorities that are not familiar with local issues do not supersede the authority of the advisory board and eco-wardens.

      NEXT STEPS.

      • Kelly Francis indicated that there would be one more meeting where the vision will be vetted and recommendations are accepted. She suggested that if there was interests in particular areas, groups could get together to discuss recommendations.

      Next proposed meeting date March 22, 2000 from 09h30 to 15h30 at the BC Parks office on 800 Johnson St..
      Meeting adjourned 16h00.

      Return to RRAB Index
      Racerocks.com Pearson College website Sitemap Contact
      webmaster:
      Garry Fletcher
      Copyright

Telus Crew Installs Microwave tower- Feb.22, 2000

The TELUS Crew Installs the Antenna on Observatory Hill behind Pearson College.


Not only has the antenna been donated, but the costs of crew and equipment for several days of installation, and the routers for operation have been provided. Telus has also agreed to assist the college in its bandwidth requirements necessary to run the streaming video from Race Rocks . We greatly appreciate their commitment as a collaborating partner in this unique venture.
Garry Fletcher on behalf of the students and faculty of Lester B. Pearson College

CONTINUE TO DISH AND RADIO INSTALLATION AT RACE ROCKS

LGS Group goes to Race Rocks

Scott Nichol, Western Coordinator, Creative Group of LGS Group Inc Business Unit and other members of the LGS team accompanied Garry Fletcher and Angus Matthews to Race Rocks to see the dsite they are working with for the new racerocks.com internet.

LGS Group Inc. – is one of Canada’s largest full service IT consulting firm with 2100 employees in 20 offices in Canada, Europe and the US. LGS is donating the time and resources to provide project management and web design services in the creation of racerocks.com. Along with their ability to capitalize on emerging Internet technologies to promote the project, LGS brings essential knowledge, skills, and expertise.

 

racerocks.com Project Update Feb 13, 2000

The week of February 6 through 13, 2000 has plotted more progress for the racerocks.com project.

With only 27 days remaining until the system is scheduled to go on line, daily progress is required so we will meet the project deadlines.

On Monday, Coast Guard officials granted permission for us to temporarily install a 24 inch radio antenna atop the historic Race Rocks lighthouse tower. Required for the transmission of our Race Rocks video
and data signal, the antenna will be fastened by Coast Guard technicians to the ladder structure above the main light room on the tower. We are very grateful to Coast Guard officials Fred Stepchuck and Noelani Taylor for reviewing our request so efficiently.

Wednesday morning Lyle Kosola, the radio engineer from Comlink caught the 7:00 am BC Ferry from the mainland to Vancouver Island along with Telus antenna and microwave specialists Al Mireau, Dave Farley and Rob Robinson. These top Telus staff members pulled together to make the radio link happen. While Chris Blondeau took Lyle and Dave to Race Rocks Al and Rob drove to the top of the hill near Pearson College’s observatory. As the island crew laboured up the spiral staircase in the 140 year old light tower Dave set about the tough task of hand climbing a 200 plus year old Douglas Fir tree. At the 60 foot mark Dave thankfully and somewhat breathlessly reported seeing the top two stripes of the black and white lighthouse. With a strobe light held just in front of a mirror Dave was finally seen in his tree by Chris Blondeau from atop the lighthouse. With two towering trees framing the radio path like goal posts on a ridge Lyle collected the information he would need to determine the tower height required to make all this work. The swell from Tuesday’s storm was still throwing waves at the Race Rocks jetty despite the pleasant day causing the Pearson College workboat Second Nature to plunge on her spring lines so it was decided to evacuate the island crew as quickly as possible. At the antenna location Al determined the best lay out for the tower and Lyle scouted locations for the radio equipment and wiring. A very good day filled with promise.

On Thursday Lyle completed his calculations and determined that the tower height could be reduced to 60′ provided we shot the radio right through the middle of the Douglas Fir “goalposts” on the Rocky Point ridge. Its worth a try. The shorter tower (as opposed to the 100′ considered) will have much less aesthetic impact at the college site, protect a clear sky view for the College’s telescope and, we hope, save Telus a bit of money. The antenna tower was a late addition to the Telus contribution.

Friday was a very positive day for the development of the project. Work on wiring Great Race Island for the network that system designer Ken Dunham has prescribed is 75% installed. Al Mireau from Telus reports that antenna installation will begin on Tuesday February 15. Our ever watchful professional worry specialist Aengus MacIntosh will review the critical time paths at this stage. Unlike the picture 10 days ago this looks like it can actually happen! We have a few wrinkles in our server delivery plans. We meet with Ian Scott our guardian angel at Telus to devise final plans for delivery of the signal to the internet. Ian as always has some creative solutions. We also have a good conversation with Richard Catinus our contact at Apple. We are very keen on using Apple’s remarkable QuickTime software to stream our video on the net. This will of course also commit us to Apple’s computer equipment. Garry Fletcher has lusted for Apple’s new G4 computer. We are very close to a decision. Mid afternoon we meet with John Nightingale, Director of the Vancouver Aquarium Marine Science Centre and his senior science and external relations staff. Their enthusiastic support backed by a significant financial contribution is greatly appreciated. At the end of a network planning discussion with Ken Dunham it suddenly dawns on me that we have spoken with every one of our sponsors and suppliers today and they are all doing their very best for us.

Saturday, members of the public and various interested groups joined DFO and BC Parks staff to review the status of the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area plans. Marc Pakenham the DFO coordinator has lead an exhaustive series of community consultations on the plan along with Jim Morris from BC Parks. Brian Smiley, a DFO scientist gave a compelling presentation about the ecological values of Race Rocks. There appears to be real enthusiasm for the protection of the Race Rocks area and many creative ideas of how the opportunities for public access and educational uses could be accommodated were suggested. The last public presentation on the MPA plan will be at the Olympic View Golf Club on Wednesday February 16, 2000 at 19:00 hrs.

PROCEED TO NEXT UPDATE- FEB 22/2000
Thank you for your interest.
Angus Matthews

racerocks.com Project Update, Feb 6 2000

We have made very significant advances towards our goal of initiating Phase 1 on March 11, 2000. This is especially true in the week of January 31, 2000 thanks to an extraordinary effort from our lead partners at Telus and LGS.

NEWS FROM LGS
LGS Project Manager Aengus McIntosh has proven himself to be a stern task master and gifted conductor as he coordinates the various aspects of the project. We have ordered the radio equipment needed to beam the heavy bandwidth of streaming video from Race Rocks to Pearson College and our entry point into “mainland” fiber and the internet. With advice from the specialists at Telus we have selected Tsunami Radio, 5.8 GHz spread spectrum 4Mb equipment to deliver the signal from Race Rocks. This equipment has been ordered from Glentel in Edmonton. Web specialist Scott Nicholl at LGS is working with Garry Fletcher and his students from Pearson College to develop the new racerocks.com web page for the March 11 launch. Scott has sourced our first camera, a SiteZap from Reardon Technology which is on the way to us from California. Aengus McIntosh continues to track our activities to make sure we apply foresight in our design, maximize the value of our purchases and work together to meet the complex and interconnected deadlines.

TELUS TO THE RESCUE
At Telus, effective support from Ian Scott, has mobilized a dedicated group of specialists in various Telus departments. Telus provided the solution to our biggest challenge when they agreed to provide the tower required to mount the radio antenna at the Pearson College end of our radio link. This was a turning point for the whole project and we are all very grateful to Telus. Staff in their Advanced Communication division are working on the issues around delivering the streaming video out of Pearson College and onto the Internet through the Telus server farm. Tim will have more details on this in the near future.

AT PEARSON COLLEGE
With a red balloon tethered high above the College’s observatory it is obvious something is happening. Garry Fletcher and a group of students in the know are aware of the work being done by Tom Bates of Telus to find the site for a radio link to the Pearson College campus. Less obvious are the preliminary web activities and documenting of the project that Garry’s students are working on. As the educational leader | and Director of the project, Garry is researching the various needs and options of the project design. We are very grateful to Tom Sampson for his advice on First Nation’s aspects of the educational program. Throughout this time the public consultations onthe establishment of the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area are also proceeding. Garry and several students are very much involved in this process as well. Garry also finds time to teach as well!

MORE RESOURCES
We welcome more supporters to the project. Ken Dunham, a Pearson College graduate and the principal of Symmetrical Systems Consulting is a born again partner in the project. It was Ken Dunham and Garry Fletcher that first developed the idea of a virtual Race Rocks web site in 1996 (when the costs were prohibitive). Ken is donating his network design expertise to design and build the local area network on Great Race Island and across the campus of Pearson College to Telus fiber. It is amazing how much today’s design looks like Ken’s 1996 radical version! Vancouver Aquarium and Marine Science Centre have confirmed significant financial support for the project and we look forward to the benefits of the Centre’s extensive experience in delivering marine education programs as we move into subsequent phases of the project.

MILLENNIUM BUREAU
The Federal Millennium Partnership Bureau has made this project possible. We have been in extensive communication with Bureau staff in recent weeks and they have been of great assistance in developing our contract and accounting systems. Though detailed and precise the systems are efficiently expedited. The good news is that at this point we are exactly on budget.

On a personal note… it is a great experience to work on this project. I have never worked with a group of such eager problem solvers. Thank you to all those mentioned here and to the many others working on specific elements of racerocks.com who will I am sure be recognised as their particular component comes on line.

UPCOMING EVENTS
If you are interested in the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area plan you are welcome to attend a Department of Fisheries and Oceans and BC Parks open house on the plan at Royal Roads on Saturday February 12, 2000 from 9:00 to 15:00hrs or at the Olympic View Golf Club on Wednesday February 16, 2000 from 19:00 to 21:30hrs. Garry and some of our students will be there to discuss the issues and present information about Race Rocks from our existing web site at http://www.racerocks.com

please e-mail Marc Pakenham at DFO if you plan to attend.

Angus Matthews

PROCEED TO NEXT UPDATE- FEB 13/2000

RRAB Meeting # 3 January, 2000

RACE ROCKS ADVISORY BOARD MEETING # 3
DRAFT MINUTES
12h00 — 16h00, JANUARY 26, 2000
LESTER B. PEARSON COLLEGE, VICTORIA
 


Regrets: Duane Freeman — Department of National Defence

Observers: Judith Burke — South Islands Aquatic Stewardship Society

***************************************
INTRODUCTION

  • Nancy Holman DFO Communications and Judith Burke from South Islands Aquatic Society were introduced. Judith will be assisting 2WE Associates with the public meetings.

TERMS OF REFERENCE REVIEW

  • Roundtable discussion and revision of Terms of Reference.

ACTION ITEM: Marc Pakenham to circulate revised Terms of Reference.

BOUNDARIES

  • Marc Pakenham described the results of various information sessions and outcomes to date including: Sports Fishing Advisory Board’s endorsement of the bathymetric model; the diving community’s support of the bathymetric model with an extension to the 50 metre depth contour. The greatest amount of support was for the angularized version (Option 2.)
  • Keith Symington inquired where would 50 metre contour be on the map. Marc Pakenham indicated that he would produce another map showing the 50-metre contour line.
  • Marc Pakenham discussed the option of cutting off the western fingers and extending northern boundaries of the ER.
  • Keith Symington suggested that we need to discuss what is important at the end of the day (e.g. the establishment of the first MPA in Canada).
  • Garry Fletcher suggested that northern point of Option 2 does not need to go further than northern boundary of the ER. Race Passage falls well below the “protection unit” and protection of that area would not provide any added value to the core area.
  • Angus Matthews indicated that the major users of Race Rocks from an operational perspective are one — the sports fishing community, two — the eco-tourism community and three – the dive community. We need to focus on those that are going to be using the area. The existing problems with Option 2 are: 1) the northern point in Race Passage, and 2) western fingers are prime halibut areas.
  • Sean Moore indicated that he needs to have information to hand out regarding boundaries. His experience indicates that the numbers of people that fish in area has been dropping since the inception of the ER and that many people know and recognize the existing footprint.
  • Sean Moore indicated that SFAB totally supports no-take of resident species but is still looking for fishing opportunities for transient species.
  • Howard Breen agreed with Angus Matthews’ remark that boundaries are a “maker or breaker” issue. What is important is getting task completed. He suggested that existing boundaries won’t reach conservation goal, but future network of MPAs will add to biomass for all users.
  • Kelly Francis re-iterated that during consultation or information sessions we are referring to Race Rocks and not all future MPAs. This process may be used as a template but the outcomes may not necessarily be the same.
  • Cheryl Borris felt that the College is the primary constituent at Race Rocks and not fish harvesters. The ER is the land and the seabed and the MPA is water column. There are separate goals for each, but we need to keep them joined. The issue of the MPA is whether it is going to be a no-take or not. First Nations have suggested that they would suspend harvesting for 5 years. Is SFAB willing to do that?
  • Tom Sampson expressed his concern that if this process was to establish a protected area than it should be protected in its entirety. He felt that a larger area would be better because there are other areas for all fishermen to go to. He suggested that First Nations would be looking to look at this project for 4 to 5 years to see if MPAs work. He indicated that the RRAB is too concerned with excluding people out of the area and out of the process, and the focus should be on the fact that we are already out of and not recognizing the natural process.
  • Keith Symington indicated that to facilitate completion of the process he would rather support going back to Option 1 with a no-take provision and that changing the ER boundaries would be viewed negatively by the conservation community.
  • Garry Fletcher indicated that the 20-fathom line boundary of the ER was not based on science but on limit of scuba diving. In 1990, fisheries regulations were put in place to address impact on the ecosystem from harvesting. The RRAB has to come to terms with the fact that this area is not a scientifically defensible in terms of conservation and protection but that there is an urgency to move forward. Future MPAs may need a 20-year study to determine where to put boundaries, but until that time use existing boundaries i.e.. the Ecological Reserve.
  • Jim Morris indicated that the problems lie with compliance, enforcement and education. He suggested a 5-year study plan to examine options of a larger area.
  • Howard Breen suggested that we need a mechanism to ensure that users know when they are in or out of the ER/MPA. The RRAB should not be hung up on boundaries – education /enforcement is the greater issue.
  • Angus Matthews suggested that the essence of problem is compliance and education and that it is very hard to inform people of fishing rules when the rules are not straightforward. He felt that it was critical to collect data as to why people are at Race Rocks and what they are doing.
  • Angus Matthews suggested that with the addition of a radar system they would be able to overlay boundaries on radar screen. He also indicated that they may be able to use strobe lights to signal people when they are in or out of the boundaries
  • Jenny Sparkes suggested that until the objectives of the MPA are defined it is not possible to make a decision on boundaries.
  • Anita Voss inquired when would the boundary questions be decided. Kelly Francis indicated that we have to finish public consultations before boundary decision can be made.
  • Cheryl Borris suggested that maybe step one is to accept the existing ER boundaries as the MPA for now and plan for an incremental approach to addressing changes.

DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN

  • Marc Pakenham distributed a copy of an example of a provincial management plan and asked for the RRAB to review it.
  • Marc Pakenham indicated that the current draft management plan does not discuss governance or fiscal/financial implications and discussed ideas of an annual report as a reporting tool.
  • Jim Morris described the province’s requirement for a certain format and management plan specifically for the ER.
  • Angus Matthews indicated that the governments have to work together in the development of a unified management plan. Keith Symington and Tom Sampson both agreed to this point.
  • Cheryl Borris inquired if the Province had a problem going forward with a joint plan.
  • Jim Morris indicated that the only problem is question of format. He indicated that he would go back to his managers to let them to know that the RRAB wants a joint plan.
  • Howard Breen indicated that the one of the reason he was here is to ensure that the governments work together on this pilot.

SCIENCE MEMBERSHIP

  • Marc Pakenham thanked Dr. Voss for her attendance and participation. He informed the board that Scott Wallace has been unable to participate to-date because of workload and remote location. Marc asked for suggestions for another Science representative.
  • Keith Symington suggested Bill Austin from the Cowichan Marine Centre.
  • Gary Fletcher suggested someone from the University of Victoria would be preferable, as they would be able to generate future interest for graduate students.
  • Anita Voss suggested that Bill Cosgrove or Phil Lambert from the Royal BC Museum might be good candidate.
  • Gary Fletcher suggested that Norm Healy from Royal Roads may be interested.

PRESENTATION

  • Gary Fletcher gave a progress report on the www.racerocks.com project.

PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS

  • Marc Pakenham discussed the DND site tour and thanked Bill Laing for hosting the event.
  • Marc Pakenham informed the board of the latest information sessions including the session with dive community who expressed interested in a volunteer warden program. The dive community may develop a code of conduct for divers in the ER/MPA as well as regulations regarding speed limits. Erin Bradley suggested that it was a very useful discussion about compliance and volunteer policing of the area by the people who are using the area.
  • Howard Breen inquired if there was any expression of interest from the divers about sinking a wreck in the MPA. Marc Pakenham indicated there was not.
  • Angus Matthews indicated that there were opportunities for local divers to participate in research at Race Rocks that require a relatively low science background (e.g. through Reefkeepers).
  • Jim Morris indicated he was enthusiastic with the meeting with local divers. He felt that divers do not want anchorage in MPA and may want to include an environmental component in their training.
  • Marc Pakenham discussed the presentation to the Metchosin Regional District and indicated that they will be sending a motion of support for the project.
  • Marc Pakenham discussed the upcoming public consultation sessions and the possible contracting of 2WE Consultants. The target date for these sessions is the second to third week of February.
  • Angus Matthews inquired as to what sort of forum would be used to inform the public of the sessions. Marc Pakenham and Nancy Holman suggested that it would be a combination of radio, and daily and weekly newspapers. Angus Matthews suggested using a Western Community site as well as in Victoria.
  • Angus Matthews suggested also advertising the information on the Internet and that the presentation could use an open house type format.
  • Howard Breen inquired what would be the end date for information sessions. Angus Matthews suggested that it should coincide with last public presentation.
  • After a roundtable discussion around time and location Marc Pakenham indicated that February the 12th from 0930-1530 in Victoria and the 16th in Metchosin from 1930-2130 would be planned for.

OTHER BUSINESS

  • Marc Pakenham discussed the opportunity to use a video teleconference facility to communicate with New Zealand sports fishers and their experience with the establishment of MPAs. Rupert Gale suggested although that was an interesting idea he cautioned that the issues are different in New Zealand than here in terms of target species and the establishment of MPAs.

Next meeting date: Feb 23 2000 1200-1600

Location: 1st Floor Parks Board Room, 800 Johnson St. Victoria

Return to RRAB Index

Millenium Partners, LGS and Telus visit Race Rocks with Pearson College

Photos by Victor Rakou, PC student (Russia) —–Text by Peter Seem, PC student ( US)

On January 14th, 2000, Tom Bates, Paul Longley, and a Telus representative, along with Angus Macintosh and Scott Nichol, from LGS, came out to Pearson College. After a whirlwind tour of campus from Garry Fletcher, Biology and Marine Science teacher, and Angus Matthews, administration and finance director,  the group headed out to Race Rocks along with several Pearson Students.The group’s main goal for the day was to find sites for the radio or microwave transceivers that would transmit data between the college and Race Rocks.

The transmission of data will be Telus’ contribution to the project. Paul Longley, from pre-sales technical support, and Tom Bates, with microwave engineering, were there to lend their expertise.   LGS’ Aengus Macintosh was acting as project manager, and Scott Nichol was recording the work for the web page the IT firm would be helping to create.

Other options, the tops of local mountains, would require running a ground cable from the site to the college, which would be both time consuming and costly. Clearly, the best option present was to aim for a site just behind Pearson College’s observatory, which was relatively clear of trees and already connected to the internet by a high speed line.

While the group also needed to deal with finding sites and running power to all of the equipment on Race Rocks, their primary concern was the data transmission. In order to get undisturbed transmission they needed a clear line of sight between two stable sites. Any trees, foliage, or other obstructions, or small movements at either end, would break up the transmission. Indeed, even being too close to the water would generate refraction that could disturb data flow.The best solution found was to start from the highest point on Race Rocks, and aim up. From the top of the lighthouse, with the aid of a sighting scope, they took stock of the options: William Head, the closest point to the island, was deemed too low to the water to allow for a clean shot.

 

examining the tide pool on the west side

Garry took the group over to the tidepool that has been constructed on the West side of the island.
Plans were to install one small camera underwater in this pool to provide a window to view the emerging life and the frequent surge action .

This tidepool was rearranged and no longer functioning after the hurricane of 2006. Fortunately the underwater camera had not been installed!

=============================================

The observatory could be seen from the top of the lighthouse through a gap in the trees. The next question that had to be dealt with was whether any of the taller trees in between would provide an obstruction, and need to be topped. The prospect of gaining permission from the DND to take the tops off of one or two old growth trees on their property was frowned on because of the delays that would undoubtedly ensue. To get an answer, the team decided to take a look at the situation from the other end. A boat ride later, things weren’t much clearer. From within the dome of the observatory, it was very difficult to catch site of Race Rocks, or more importantly, the lighthouse. Despite Garry’s excited, “I see red! ” the mood was skeptical. Stripped black and white, with a red cap, the lighthouse should have stood out, if it was visible. The difficulty catching sight of it suggested that they would either need to be higher up or that a clean shot wasn’t going to be possible.

No one was willing to go ahead with any other part of the project, trying to secure donors and expensive equipment, without being sure that this most fundamental requirement could be met. It was resolved that they would try a test the next day to find out just how high an observatory side tower would need to be, if indeed it was possible at all.

On January 15th, at noon at Pearson College there happened a strange sight. A giant red helium balloon flew high over the college, dancing in the breeze on a long tether tied to a banister at the observatory. While one part of the group headed out to Race Rocks, the other sent up the helium filled balloon.The helium filled balloon. Over radio from the lighthouse, they directed the balloon to be raised higher until they could see it, unmistakably and comfortably above any surrounding trees. The length of the tether, still well within the achievable height for a tower, was proof that a clear line for transmission had been found.

The project is ready to move into actually constructing the tower, setting up the transmission equipment, and obtaining the cameras and sensors. They hope to have transmission established and two cameras up and running by March 11, 2000.

PROCEED TO NEXT UPDATE- FEB 6/2000

LGS Project Management of the Millennium Project

This Project Management was a donation of the LGS group the following .PDF files represent the valuable contribution that this group contributed to ensuring the successful completion of the Project.

 

 

1. Project Definition Statement
ganttreportfeb112000

2. January 6, 2000 Gantt Report
PDS01

3. LGS Project Management Methodology
PDS02

4.January 11 Gantt Report
PDS03

The Ecological Niche of Anthopleura elegantissima at Race Rocks”

“The Ecological Niche of
Anthopleura elegantissima at Race Rocks”
by: Santiago Salinas
Candidate number:
0034 – 119
Subject:
Biology   Best Language Spanish

Student , Lester B. Pearson College of the Pacific
Submitted as partial fulfillment for the International Baccalaureate diploma program, January 2000

 

Abstract
 

As with any other species at Race Rocks, Anthopleura elegantissima is an important member of the ecosystem to which it belongs. By knowing its ecological niche, trends can be analyzed, niche overlapping or other predictions may be made, particularly, for example, if new species are introduced.

The field work consisted of taking three variables (elevation, rock temperature and time underwater) and testing them against number of organisms. Three different populations were selected and a transect containing subsequent quadrats for each was used (a Mann-Whitney test was performed to determine whether or not there is a general trend between the three populations). The variables were selected because they are known to be influential in the determination of the distribution of species. Since the field work took place during only one day due to the limiting factor of low tide level, a good and thorough design was created. The priorities were the elevation of the terrain and the number of organisms per quadrat in view of the fact that the tidal level was constantly altering, making the measurements inaccurate otherwise. The rock temperature was taken once these two sets of values had been gathered from the three locations.

?Since the statistical device suggested that the three populations are organized in the same way, a general description of the ecological niche was given. The species prefer a temperature range of 11-13ƒ C, the ideal elevation span goes from 1.5 to 2.8 meters, thus, it is an inter tidal species, and finally, the preferable time underwater was found to be 5 to 15 hours.

____________________________________________________________

Table of Contents
Introduction

?The Problem ………..?………….9 ?

?Purpose and Background of the Study………9

?Hypothesis …………………………….…..9

?Assumptions …………………………..…..1

?Limitations …………………………….….10

?Definition of Terms ………………………11

Review of Literature and Related Research

?Introduction, Information about the Organism …..13

?The Theory ………………………………….15

?Research Results in Related Areas ……16

Research Design and Procedures

?The Setting and Population of the Stud…18

?Field Work …………………19?

Instruments…………………………21

?Statistical Techniques Used ………22

Analysis of Data

?

Introduction …………………………………….23

?Findings ………………………………………23

Conclusions and Recommendations for Further Study

?

Interpretation and Implications of the Findings……………40

?Recommendations …………………………….42

Appendix

Bibliography

Table of Figures and Tables
Figures

Figure 1. Topographic representation of Race Rocks…….12

Figure 2. Representation of Anthopleura elegantissima and Anthopleura xanthogrammica …………………..14

Figure 3. Location of Populations at Race Rocks…18

Figure 4. Tidal Height graph ………………………. …23

Figure 5. Terrain Gradient graph (Population 1) ……25

Figure 6. Abundance graph (Population 1) …………..26

Figure 7. Elevation against # of Organisms graph (Population 1.27

Figure 8. % of Organisms at different Temperatures graph (Population 1) ……..28

Figure 9. Terrain Gradient graph (Population 2) …30

Figure 10. Abundance graph (Population 2)………31

Figure 11. Elevation against # of Organisms graph (Population 2) 32

Figure 12. % of Organisms at different Temperatures graph (Population 2) ……33

Figure 13. Terrain Gradient graph (Population 3) …….35

Figure 14. Abundance graph (Population 3) ……………36

Figure 15. Elevation against # of Organisms graph (Population 3)…37

Figure 16. % of Organisms at different Temperatures graph (Population 3) ……………………38

Figure 17. Elevation, Temperature and # of Organisms graph (Population 1) …………………40

?Figure 18. Elevation, Temperature and # of Organisms graph (Population 2) …………………41

Figure 19. Elevation, Temperature and # of Organisms graph (Population 3) ………………….42

Tables

Table 1. Data Collection for Population 1 ………24

Table 2. Data Collection for Population 2 ………29

Table 3. Data Collection for Population 3…………34

Acknowledgments
?I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Guillermo Montero and Garry Fletcher for immersing me in the fascinating world of ecology, and also for the support and direction that they provided me. I am also grateful to Sylvia Roach for her invaluable contribution not only to this work but for her constant encouragement.

?Finally, I would like to thank all the organisms at Race Rocks, especially Anthopleura elegantissima, for their patience and understanding of my investigations and for not complaining from my sometimes careless techniques.

Introduction

The Problem: Anthopleura elegantissima (common name: aggregating anemone) plays, along with all other biotic and abiotic components, an important role in the ecosystem to which it belongs. It is a highly valuable member of many food webs and participates in symbiotic relationships with other species. Taking this information into account, it would be useful to know facts about A. elegantissima in order to be able to predict and analyze trends in the ecosystem so as to gain an insightful knowledge about the species and its relation to the ecosystem found at Race Rocks.

Purpose and Background of the Study: To achieve the goals presented, a wide range of proposals were identified, leading to the decision to investigate the ecological niche as a focused and clear plan. The final design involved testing three populations at different locations of the island with the purpose of determining the preferred range of abiotic conditions for A. elegantissima. Four very significant variables were examined, all of them intimately related with intertidal zonation. These four variables were: the slope of the gradient, the tidal height, the time covered by sea water and the rock temperature. Carrying out the field work in three different sites allowed room for generalized conclusions about the species to be made.

Hypothesis: A null hypothesis for the Mann-Whitney test was formulated: “the three different locations are not inter-related and the similarities that may occur are merely coincidental.” If rejected, some conjectures about the species had to be formed. Given that Anthopleura elegantissima is a low inter tidal species, its range of positioning would not be between 1 to 3 meters. A hypothesis was made based on the fact that sea water is generally at about 10ƒ C, thus the rock temperature was not expected to be similar to this.

Assumptions: One of the major assumptions made was that the tide tables for Victoria, British Columbia, Canada are the same as these for Race Rocks. In theory this may not be true since Race Rocks is located approximately 10 km. away from Victoria. Therefore, there might exist a slight difference in tidal heights between the two zones.

Limitations: The entire experiment and data collection was done on the 27th of October, 1999, due to the limiting factor of relative low tides occurring in day-light hours. Hence the experiment could not be repeated on another day. Therefore, the research reveals the ecological niche of Anthopleura elegantissima at a fixed point in time and not the variations or changes in its distribution over a period of time. Furthermore, based on these results, the general ecological niche of the species cannot be concluded since all the data was gathered in a specific place, Race Rocks, which is a distinct site due to its location.

Another major limitation is that the “ecological niche” is an abstract term and therefore, the ecological niche of a species can never be fully represented. What was done in this case was to narrow the aspects to be considered and try to work with them by relating each factor to the others to acquire an approximation of the ecological niche. In this essay, four abiotic components were measured in order to obtain an insight to the ecological niche of Anthopleura elegantissima.

Definition of Terms: A number of terms should be defined at this point in order to ensure a clear understanding of this essay. One of these terms is population, which is defined as: all members of a species living in a particular area and making up one breeding group (Kucera, 1978). This is of particular importance since a similar species, Anthopleura xanthogrammica, may be found on the island, a phenomenon which would cause some distortions in the results if they are counted as Anthopleura elegantissima. Tides – the gravitational effects of the sun and moon on the oceans of the earth – are also a fundamental pivot in intertidal life. Tides along the Pacific coast of North America are of the mixed semidiurnal type; that is, there is a pronounced difference between the levels to which two successive low tides fall, and a lesser, but still apparent, difference between the levels reached by two successive high tides (Carefoot, 1977). Lastly, the most important term to be defined is ecological niche. The niche of a population or species is its functional role in an ecosystem. Using a human analogy, the niche is the species’ profession or way of life whereas the habitat is where this way of life is carried on — its address. The way a population responds to the various characteristics of its habitat is part of this population’s way of life and, therefore, of its niche. Hutchinson was the first to formally quantify the niche concept in terms of geometric space. The level of activity describes the ability of the individual to exploit the resources in a given level of each environmental factor (Odum, 1963). Then the niche space occupied by the species is the 3-dimensional space actually occupied by all individuals (Rickleffs, 1996). An empirical model (Box and Draper, 1989) can be obtained by the empirical determination of niche occupancy (number of individuals, in this case) in terms of n environmental variables (slope, tidal height, time covered and rock temperature).

Review of Literature and Related Research

Introduction, Information about the Organism: The field work was conducted at Race Rocks, Southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. This area was chosen for ecological reserve status because of its unique richness and diversity of marine life. Race Rocks is ideally located to receive a constant supply of plankton swept past by almost continuous strong currents (up to 7 knots) . This provides nourishment for a complex group of underwater organisms.

Figure 1. This image is a view from the South of Race Rocks looking Northward. Colors toward the blue scale are representing depths of almost 100 meters. (3d capture of entire area from south – 1x magnification – 3 x vertical exaggeration).

One of the many organisms found at Race Rocks are sea anemones. Sea anemones belong to the phylum known as the Cnidaria, from the cnida or stinging cells that are present in this major group of animals that also include corals, jellyfish, hydroids, medusae, and sea fans. Sea anemones, corals and their allies form the class know as the Anthozoa. Anthopleura elegantissima (Phylum Cnidaria, Class Anthozoa, Subclass Zoantharia, Order Actiniatia, Family Actiniidae) is abundant on rock faces or boulders, in tide pools or crevices, on wharf pilings, singly or in dense aggregations (Smith and Carlton, 1975). It is a species characteristic of middle intertidal zone of semi protected rocky shores of both bays and outer coast from Alaska to Baja California. Aggregating individuals do not exceed 6 centimeters in column diameter and 8 centimeters across the tentacular crown. The column is light green to white, and twice as long as wide when extended, with longitudinal rows of adhesive tubercles (verrucae) often bearing attached debris (Carefoot, 1977). The species presents numerous short tentacles, in five or more cycles, which are variously colored. Anthopleura elegantissima reproduces both sexually and asexually. In sexual reproduction, ova are present as early as February and grow steadily until their release in July; the ovarian is then resorbed and new eggs do not appear until the following February. Sperm are released through the summer. The asexual reproduction occurs by longitudinal fission. This process results in aggregations or clones of anemones pressed together in concentrations of several hundred per square meter. Anthopleura elegantissima feeds on copepods, isopods, amphipods, and other small animals that contact the tentacles. On the other hand, it is preyed upon by the nudibranch Aeolidia papillosa, which usually attacks the column, by the snail Epitonium tinctum, which attacks the tips of the tentacles, and by sea stars such as Dermasterias imbricata that can engulf an entire small anemone. Moreover, in some anemones, small pink amphipods, Allogaussia recondita, make a home in the gastro vascular cavity (Carefoot, 1977).

Figure 2. Schematic representation of Anthopleura elegantissima and Anthopleura xanthogrammica, the two major sea anemones found at Race Rocks.

The theory: In 1957, G. E. Hutchinson defined the niche concept formally. One could describe the activity range along every dimension of the environment. Physical and chemical factors such as temperature, humidity, salinity, and oxygen concentration, as well as biological factors such as prey species and resting background against which an individual may escape of predators, could be determined. Each of these dimensions could be thought of as one of the n-dimensions in space. Visualizing a space with more than three dimensions is difficult, thus the concept of the n-dimensional niche is an abstraction. We may, however, deal with multi-dimensional concepts mathematically and statistically, depicting their essence by physical or graphical representations in three or fewer dimensions. Moreover, Ricklefs notes that “… for example, a graph relating biological activity to a single environmental gradient represents the distribution of a species’ activity along one niche dimension. The level of activity, whether oxygen metabolism as a function of temperature or consumption rate as function of prey size, conveys the ability of an individual to exploit resources in a particular part of the niche space and, conversely, the degree to which the environment can support the population of that species. In two dimensions the individuals niche may be depicted as a hill with contours representing the various levels of biological activity. In three dimensions, we must think of a cloud in space whose density conveys niche utilization. Beyond three the mind boggles.”

(Ed note: See exercise on Ecological niche)

To be more precise, it should be recognized that there are three different definitions for the term niche. The first one (also known as “niche as community function”) comes from Elton (1927) defining it as the animal’s place in the biotic environment, its relation to food and enemies. The second definition is called “niche in the species” and reveals that a specific set of capabilities for extracting resources, for surviving hazard, and for competing, coupled with a corresponding set of needs (Colinvaux, 1982). The most used and known is the one defined by Hutchinson, which was explained previously. 

Research Results in Related Areas: Even though only one research paper was found containing information about Anthopleura elegantissima at Race Rocks, many investigations have been carried out with Anthopleura elegantissima and its physiology. The paper obtained on Anthopleura elegantissima at Race Rocks (Zahid, 1987) tries to detail the distribution of the species in one crack by two statistical methods (Plotless and Poisson techniques). It is concluded that A. elegantissima is an intertidal organism showing a clumped distribution. The clonal form, being lower mid-intertidal is exposed to sunlight and air much more than the solitary form in the sub-tidal zone. Hence, the clumped distribution is very useful and is also an important factor in reducing desiccation and water loss, as clumping reduces the surface area exposed to light.

Research Design and Procedures

The Setting and Population of the Study: The field work was designed to take place in three different locations of Race Rocks (see Figure 4), in order to gain a more detailed examination of the ecological niche of Anthopleura elegantissima in this island. Another reason for doing so was well explained by Odum: “It is also true that the same species may function differently —that is, occupy different niches- in different habitats or geographical regions.” The three places exhibit different environmental conditions and, therefore, the species may experience changes in its distribution. These changes could be current flow (which is in and of itself a major contributor to tidal life), light exposure, and even different rock composition.

A hazardous inconvenience that had to be overcome before doing the field work was to be able to distinguish among the two major types of sea anemones at Race Rocks, Anthopleura elegantissima and Anthopleura xanthogrammica. In order to achieve this, a key book was consulted. In the book, the distinctive characteristics between the two are described (see Appendix.)

 
Figure 3. Hand-made representation of Race Rocks showing the location of the three populations, the lighthouse and the docks.

Field Work: The complete field work took place on the 27th of October, 1999 due to the limiting factor of low tide level. The priorities were the elevation of the terrain and the number of organisms per quadrat in view of the fact that the tidal level was constantly altering, making the measurements inaccurate otherwise. The rock temperature was taken once these two sets of values had been gathered from the three locations. For the sake of help, a line transect was set in each crack to make the data collection uncomplicated and feasible.

Elevation: With the aim of measuring the elevation of the terrain for each population, a rudimentary, home-made apparatus was created. Due to the fact that the topography of the shore is extremely irregular at Race Rocks, it is not possible to assume that the elevation is a straight line. Thus, to have a detailed insight of Anthopleura elegantissima —or any other intertidal organism- at Race Rocks, an imperative factor to be considered is elevation. To approach this, the first action taken was to delimit the transect (generally a straight line along which observations are made in a systematic fashion) and the quadrats (starting from where the tidal level equals 0 meter). Since there was not a zero meter tide predicted, it was decided to start at 0945 approximately —tidal height equal to 2- and calculate the zero tide level. To accomplish the task, a two meter stick was used perpendicular to the sea water since tidal height is a vertical measure of water. Following this, a 4 meter stick was put where the tidal level equals 0 meter -quadrat number 15- (perpendicular to the sea water) and, with the help of a rope, a triangle was formed between the stick, the rope and the last quadrat —number 1. Once the triangle was finished, the elevation existing between quadrat number 1 and number 15 is known by the distance in the stick from the land to the conjuncture of it and the rope (for example, 3.9 in the first population). The subsequent measurements were much easier to carry since only a meter stick and a measuring tape were needed. Starting from quadrat number 1, a meter was measured with the measuring tape along the land. Then, the meter stick was put in such a manner that it formed a 90ƒ angle with the top of the quadrat, giving a number (0.3 in the first population). Therefore, 3.1 minus 0.3 equals 2.6, the elevation for quadrat number 2). So on and so forth the procedure was repeated until quadrat number 15 was reached.

Number of organisms: A very important feature involving the number of organisms per quadrat is the quadrat’s size. It was proven by Grey-Smith (1952) that the size of a quadrat could actually determine some erroneous conclusions in a population by using a series of progressively larger quadrats to measure the distribution in an artificial situation in which individuals were represented by colored disks. A reasonably good size for the quadrats was estimated to be 0.5 by 0.5 meters, given personal observation. Once the quadrats were sorted out, the counting took place. Only if more than 75 % of the organism was inside the quadrat was it counted. A difficult aspect of the counting was to differentiate individuals from the same group clone or aggregation. This difficulty was expected since the clones are held together very tightly and because at this time of the year young anemones are developing their bodies (as fertilization occurs during summer).

Rock temperature: This process was relatively simple compared to the previous two. It consisted of using the thermometer in small crevices in rocks —for each quadrat- in order to get the rock temperature.

?Time underwater: Aided by the tide table for the day (starting at 0500 and finishing at 2300), it is possible to calculate how much time a certain elevation is exposed to sea water. Assume that it is desirable to know the underwater time of a quadrat at 2.5. Then, we trace a line at 2.5 and the area under the curve will indicate the time that quadrat was covered by water.

Instruments Used: A simple technological apparatus was used for the field work. A measuring tape, a meter stick, a four meter stick, the tide tables for Victoria, BC, a thermometer, and a rope were all the required instruments.

Statistical Techniques Used: The technique used to verify that the distribution of the species was not random or by chance was the Mann-Whitney test. This non-parametric tool (meaning there are no specific distributional assumptions required) is sometimes called Wilcoxon test or rank sum test. This test relies on a special kind of transformation that replaces each observation by its rank in the combined sample. The purpose of this is to transform the data to a scale that eliminates the importance of the population distribution altogether (Ramsey and Schafer, 1997). In order to make it easier and more accurate, a web-page (VassarStats) was utilized to perform the calculations and the statistics values.

 

Analysis of Data

Introduction: The data will be presented by population and not by factor. This is aimed to help the understanding of the ecological niche of Anthopleura elegantissima at Race Rocks in a detailed and comprehensible fashion. Three separate populations were examined on different parts of the island The populations are numbered (1, 2 and 3) referring to a certain strip (see Figure 4.)

Findings: The Mann-Whitney test was used to determine whether or not there is a general trend between the three populations. Two populations were tested at a time, therefore, three runs of the test were conducted using the number of organisms as the variable to be ranked. Using VassarStats, an U value was calculated: 140.5 for populations 1 and 2, 96.5 for populations 1 and 3, and 44 for populations 2 and 3. These U values were then checked in the significance levels table:

n
5 per cent
1 per cent
15
185
170

 

By this, it is possible to conclude that, although it is impossible to be absolutely certain that the different is not due to chance, the probability is sufficiently small for it to be considered negligible. Thus, the null hypothesis can be rejected and assume that there are similarities among the three populations. Bearing that in mind, the variables should now be tested to determine the ecological niche of Anthopleura elegantissima at Race Rocks.

?Tidal Height:

Figure 4.

The variations of the tidal height of the day are normal and reflect the constant water movement that take place in the ocean affecting inter tidal life. Based on this chart, the underwater time will be calculated. Note that the chart begins at 0500 and ends at 2300 (therefore, total time underwater = 18:00).

Population # 1:

Quadrat #
Elevation (m.)
Rock Temperature (ƒ C)
# of Organisms
Time Underwater
1
3.9
12
0
00:00
2
3.6
12
0
00:00
3
3.7
12
0
00:00
4
3.4
13
5
00:00
5
3.2
12
10
00:00
6
3.0
12
21
00:00
7
2.9
11
32
00:00
8
2.5
12
56
04:30
9
2.4
12
68
05:15
10
2.1
13
55
07:55
11
1.7
13
76
14:10
12
1.2
12
45
15:30
13
0.9
12
25
16:15
14
0.6
12
18
17:05
15
0.0
12
21
18:00
Mean Temp. 12.133

Table 1.
 
Figure 5.

The terrain gradient for population number 1 is the typical slope and is also the most regular among the three. It has a steep drop at the end (quadrat # 15) where it meets the sea water at 0 m. (tidal level). This gradient features some small tide pools and is sometimes covered by kelp beds. By personal observations, I could say that it is the strip with the highest level of species diversity on it.

Figure 6.

Even though this is not the most abundant population (432 individuals), it features the largest number of individuals per quadrat (76) and has an extremely large number of Anthopleura elegantissima at a certain level of the gradient. It should also be noted that no individuals were found in the first three quadrats and there were not many before quadrat 6. The number of organisms was measured in quadrats of 0.25 square meters.

Figure 7.
 

This graph clearly shows the relationship between elevation and number of organisms. It is easy to recognize that the preferred place for Anthopleura elegantissima is around 1.2 to 2.5 meters, a fact that will be very useful when making conjectures about its niche. The drop of abundance at 2.1 is only a local anomaly. At high heights (3.9, 3.6, etc.) there were no organisms present while at low heights there were some (however not very many).

Figure 8. (Note that 1 symbolizes 11ƒ C, 2 symbolizes 12ƒ C, and 3, 13ƒ C)
 

Despite the fact that a correlation could not be found between rock temperature and elevation or tidal height, an important feature was discovered, this being the relationship involving surface rock temperature and abundance. It was discovered that Anthopleura elegantissima prefers a rock temperature of 11, 12 or 13 because of the fact that these were the only temperatures found on the rocks (higher elevations were found to be warmer and A. elegantissima apparently does not favor such conditions).

Population # 2:

Quadrat #
Elevation (m.)
Rock Temperature
(ƒ C)
# of Organisms
Time Underwater
1
3.8
12
0
00:00
2
3.7
13
2
00:00
3
3.4
12
24
00:00
4
3.3
12
33
00:00
5
3.1
12
50
00:00
6
2.8
11
47
00:00
7
2.5
11
58
04:30
8
2.4
11
61
05:15
9
2.1
12
62
07:55
10
1.6
12
46
14:20
11
1.2
12
40
15:30
12
1.3
13
34
15:15
13
0.8
11
26
16:30
14
0.3
12
29
18:00
15
0.0
12
23
18:00
Mean Temp. 11.866

Table 2.
Figure 9.

This gradient features a large tide pool at 1.25 meters level. In it, a whole new ecosystem is found due to different climatic conditions, therefore, it may create some distortions with the number of Anthopleura elegantissima expected. A steep fall at the end should also be noted as a probable cause for the distribution of the species.

Figure 10.

In this population some irregularities are shown. Quadrats 6 and 13, for example, are not quite as expected. The virtual absence of organisms in quadrat 1 and 2 has to be considered as well. Overall, an inverted u-shaped curve could be distinguished.

Figure 11.

Again, the same trend as in population 1 is presented. A major distribution is seen at 2.1 to 2.8 meters and none or very few organisms were found at high elevations. On the other hand, a large number of the species was encountered at very low elevations

 

Figure 12.

These results reinforce the idea that Anthopleura elegantissima prefer a range of temperatures of 11-13ƒ C. No further analysis could be made since it is unlikely that a distinction could be drawn using greater detail such as degree by degree. On the other hand, at temperatures significantly different from the range above, the species will not be found.

?

Population # 3:

Quadrat #
Elevation (m.)
Rock Temperature (ƒ C)
# of Organisms
Time Underwater
1
3.6
13
4
00:00
2
3.3
13
11
00:00
3
3.2
13
20
00:00
4
2.9
12
31
00:00
5
2.7
12
33
00:00
6
2.2
12
25
09:45
7
2.2
11
28
09:45
8
1.9
12
22
13:30
9
1.8
12
16
13:50
10
1.4
11
19
15:00
11
1.0
12
23
16:00
12
0.9
12
15
16:15
13
0.6
12
12
17:05
14
0.4
12
10
17:30
15
0.0
12
10
18:00
Mean Temp. 12.066

Table 3.
Figure 13.
 

This gradient was the most irregular of the three, featuring ups and downs from the first to the last quadrat. A fact that seems rather curious is that on top of this strip sea lions lie down to rest quite frequently whereas this does not happen in the other two strips, probably because this gradient starts from a very plain, big rock. Kelp beds are observed floating on water and algae is seen at higher elevations.

Figure 14.

Although this graph does not show a perfect inverted u form, a general trend is seen. This population is the less abundant of the three and shows some irregularities in the middle quadrats.

Figure 15.

Apparently, more organisms prefer a range of 2.9 to 2.2 meters in this gradient. Some animals were found at 0.0 meters but not many were seen at higher heights. Two major drops, at 2.2 and 1.8 meters, can be explained due to overpopulation of other species in those two tide pools.

Figure 16.

Once again, no other temperature ranges were found, leading to the conclusion that Anthopleura elegantissima does prefer temperatures of 11deg C to 13deg  C.

Conclusions and Recommendations for Further Study

Interpretation and Implications of the Findings: After looking at the graphs, general descriptions of the ecological niche of A. elegantissima could be made:

ideal temperature for the species is a range of 11-13ƒ C because at higher or lower temperatures, the number of organisms decrease significantly. The null hypothesis is then rejected.

 Idyllic elevation goes from 1.5 to 2.8 meters. Once again, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Since time underwater is a function of elevation, it was not considered on graphs. However, the preferable time underwater for Anthopleura elegantissima was found to be 5 to 15 hours approximately (out of 18 hs.)

A clear description of the ecological niche dimensions is observed in the graphs below. The larger bubbles represent the portion of the space that the species prefers:

 

Figure 17

Figure 18
Figure 19.
 

Recommendations: If a thorough understanding of the ecological niche of Anthopleura elegantissima is desired, these and more variables should be tested to obtain a more profound and detailed approximation. Also, by determining ecological niches of other species such as Anthopleura xanthogrammica and comparing them, it is possible to predict niche overlapping, which is very likely to lead to a constant competition and aggressive behavior of the species. Moreover, it could be used to predict changes in the ecosystem if introduced species are brought. The documentation of data like this provides an invaluable record for establishing baseline distributions of organisms. Scientists are often required to monitor anthropogenic changes in sensitive marine environments. Similar niche patterns could be done on the other key invertebrates of the inter tidal and sub-tidal zone at Race Rocks, for example black leather chitons, limpets, abalone and various species of algae.

Appendix
This appendix presents the dichotomous key for Anthopleura elegantissima and Anthopleura xanthogrammica.

“Column green to white; tubercles usually in distinct longitudinal rows; tentacles with pink tips; height up to about 5 cm; often in aggregating masses, and frequently buried by sand covering rocks to which they are attached Anthopleura elegantissima. ~~ Column green or olive green; tubercles usually not in distinct longitudinal rows; tentacles uniform in color and not pink-tipped; height regularly exceeding 5 cm; solitary and not often buried in sand Anthopleura xanthogrammica.”

Boughey, A.S. 1968. “Ecology of populations.” The Macmillan Company, New York.
Buschsbaum, R., Buschsbaum, M., Pearse, J, and Pearse, V. 1987. “Animals without backbones.” University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

Carefoot, T. 1977. “Pacific seashores.” J.J. Douglas, Vancouver, BC, Canada.?

Colinvaux, P. 1986. “Ecology.” John Wiley & Sons, United States of America.

Francis, L. 1973. “Clone specific segregation in the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima.” Biological bulletin. 144, 64-72.

Francis, L. 1973. “Intraspecific and its effects on the distribution of Anthopleura elegantissima and some related sea anemones.” Biological bulletin. 144, 73-92.

Kozloff, E.N. 1974. “Keys to marine invertebrates of Puget Sound, the San Juan Archipelago, and adjacent regions.” University of Washington Press, Washington State.

Kozloff, E.N. 1993. “Seashore life of the Northern Pacific Coast.” University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington State.

?Kucera, C. L. 1978. “The challenge of ecology.” The C. V. Mosby Company, Saint Louis.

Lewis, J.P. 1995. “La biosfera y sus ecosistemas: una introducción a la ecología.” Ecosur, Rosario, Argentina.

Odum, E. P. 1963. “Ecology.” Holt, Rinehart and Winston, United State of America.

Odum, E.P. 1989. “Ecology and our endangered life-support systems.” Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

Pianka, E. R. 1986. “Ecology and natural history of desert lizards.” Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Smith, R.I., and Carlton, J.T. 1975. “Intertidal invertebrates of the Central California Coast.” University of California Press, Los Angeles, California.

Zahid, M. 1987. “Distribution of Anthopleura elegantissima.” Extended Essay for the International Baccalaureate.

GO to the Ecological Monitoring Site