Find this article at: http://www.bclocalnews.com/vancouver_island_south/victorianews/community/107075928.html |
Category Archives: ER Warden Report
Nicholas Bertucci , Assistant lighthouse keeper
Nicholas Bertucci came to Victoria from Italy in 1862. He was assistant at Race Rocks for 5 years: from either 1863-1867 or 1863-1968. He later owned and operated the Ferry Boathouse until selling it in 1889. He died in 1917
( information provided from an e-mail from Annamaria Bamji, February 2008)
Annamaria was doing research on the life of Mr. Bertucci and sent us this obituary from the Victoria Daily Colonist of 1917.
“Nicholas Bertucci , res/here for 55 years. aged 79. N/o Lavagna Ita. he left there in early 1860’s and came here by way of Cape Horn. Prior to coming to Victoria, he worked on an American Survey ship, and after arriving here worked for 5 years as asst. lighthousekeeper at Race Rocks. Later he owned amd operated the Ferry Boat house, situated at that time where the E&N RR bridge now stand, selling it in 1889.
He leaves a widow, 7 sons: BG; D and J, now on active service:
N;A,Al,and F all of VIctoria.
Also 5 daughters: Mrs J. Sauit, Mrs. H Gallinger; Miss J, all of Victoria,
and MrsF Arnott, Los Angeles; Mrs. H.F.Silk, now in Eng.
VX/NewsPh/Jun23,5-A/Cpl Joseph Francis Bertucci, Victoria, WIA 2nd time. Left Victoria w/2 bros. Louis and Jack, both at front. Was employed in Times Business Office. U 073 B53 (location of burial in Ross Bay Cemetery in Victoria,BC.)”.
Recent information indicates that after his death, of the three sons who went to war, two died in active service in World War 1.
Another more thorough entry can be found on the Markes Family History page: http://marko.dgmm.net/bertucci.html
Friends of Ecological Reserves
For several years now, THE FRIENDS OF ECOLOGICAL RESERVES has helped with the funding of special projects at Race Rocks. In the Spring, of 2003 they provided further funding for our ongoing Stewardshhip in the Area. The Friends provide valuable assistance for research and upkeep of many ecological Reserves throughout British Columbia. We are grateful for their recognition and assistance in the operation of Race Rocks
Visit their website at : http://www.ecoreserves.bc.ca/
The publication of the Friends of Ecological reserves
The Friends of Ecological reserves Field trip, on October 3, 2004,
Race Rocks Mean Monthly Sea Temperature 1921-present,
Seawater Temperature: Race Rocks
Decade Comparisons:Sea Surface Temperature at Race Rocks-
Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
1921 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 7.7 | 8.5 | 9.5 | 10.3 | 10.5 | 10.3 | 9.8 | 9.1 | 8.2 | ||
1922 | 6.4 | 6.1 | 6.6 | 7.5 | 8.3 | 9.5 | 10.5 | 10.3 | 10.2 | 9.3 | 8.4 | 7.1 | |
1923 | 7.1 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 7.6 | 8.6 | 9.3 | 10.3 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 9.6 | 8.7 | 7.9 | |
1924 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 9 | 9.8 | 10.5 | 10.3 | 10.2 | 9.2 | 8.8 | 7.3 | |
1925 | 6.6 | 6.9 | 7.3 | 8 | 9.2 | 10.1 | 11.1 | 10.8 | 10.2 | 9.2 | 8.3 | 8.2 | |
1926 | 7.8 | 8 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 10.1 | 10.7 | 11.1 | 10.9 | 10.5 | 9.8 | 9.1 | 8.5 | |
1927 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.8 | 8 | 8.8 | 9.8 | 10.5 | 10.9 | 10.3 | 9.7 | 8.6 | 7.6 | |
1928 | 6.9 | 7.3 | 7.8 | 8.6 | 9.7 | 10.2 | 10.8 | 10.9 | 10.3 | 9.2 | 8.6 | 7.9 | |
1929 | 7.1 | 6.3 | 7.1 | 7.8 | 9 | 9.8 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 10.7 | 9.8 | 8.8 | 7.8 | |
1930 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 7.1 | 8.2 | 9.3 | 10 | 10.6 | 10.8 | 10.6 | 9.4 | 8.6 | 8 | |
1931 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 9.9 | 10.6 | 11.5 | 11.1 | 10.7 | 9.6 | 8.6 | 7.7 | |
1932 | 7.1 | 6.8 | 7.3 | 8.2 | 9.3 | 10.4 | 10.8 | 10.9 | 10.7 | 9.6 | 8.9 | 7.7 | |
1933 | 7.1 | 6.7 | 7.1 | 8 | 9.1 | 10.2 | 10.5 | 11.5 | 10.1 | 9.6 | 8.6 | 7.7 | |
1934 | 7.8 | 7.9 | 8.3 | 9.2 | 10 | 10.8 | 10.9 | 11.6 | 10.7 | 9.7 | 9.2 | 8.4 | |
1935 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 9.2 | 10.1 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 10.7 | 9.7 | 8.2 | 8.1 | |
1936 | 7.9 | 6.7 | 7 | 7.8 | 9.3 | 10.4 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10.5 | 10.1 | 8.6 | 7.9 | |
1937 | 6.6 | 6.4 | 7.7 | 8.7 | 9.9 | 10.9 | 11.7 | 11.5 | 10.9 | 9.9 | 8.5 | 8.1 | |
1938 | 7.4 | 7.2 | 8.1 | 9.4 | 10.6 | 12.3 | 12.7 | 11.9 | 11 | 9.9 | 8.6 | 7.5 | |
1939 | 7.4 | 6.6 | 7.1 | 8.6 | 10.3 | 11.4 | 12.2 | 11.1 | 11.4 | 9.7 | 8.5 | ||
1940 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 9 | 10 | 11.4 | 11.6 | |||||||
1941 | 10 | 10.5 | 11.2 | 11 | 10.6 | 9.9 | 9 | 8.5 | |||||
1942 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 7.8 | 8.5 | 9.6 | 9.8 | 10.5 | 11 | 10.3 | 9.5 | 8.4 | 7.9 | |
1943 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 7.1 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 10 | 10.3 | 10.6 | 10.3 | 9.6 | 9 | 8.1 | |
1944 | 7.7 | 7.5 | 7.3 | 8 | 9.2 | 10.5 | 11 | 10.9 | 10.5 | 9.6 | 9.2 | 8.1 | |
1945 | 7.8 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 8 | 8.8 | 9.8 | 10.1 | 10.5 | 10 | 9.5 | 8.1 | 8.1 | |
1946 | 7.7 | 7.3 | 7.7 | 8.1 | 9.4 | 10.2 | 10.7 | 10.8 | 10.3 | 9.4 | 8.1 | 7.7 | |
1947 | 7.1 | 7 | 7.7 | 8.4 | 9.5 | 10.4 | 10.6 | 10.9 | 10.5 | 9.9 | 9.1 | 7.9 | |
1948 | 7.5 | 6.9 | 7.2 | 7.9 | 9 | 10.2 | 10.8 | 10.7 | 10.4 | 9.5 | 8.2 | 7 | |
1949 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.9 | 8.3 | 9.4 | 10.1 | 10.3 | 10.2 | 10.5 | 9.5 | 8.7 | 7.8 | |
1950 | 6.2 | 5.8 | 6.6 | 7.7 | 8.7 | 9.4 | 10.1 | 10.4 | 10.3 | 9.3 | 8.5 | 8 | |
1951 | 7.5 | 6.9 | 6.7 | 8.1 | 9.2 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 11.1 | 10.9 | 9.5 | 8.5 | 7.7 | |
1952 | 6.9 | 7.1 | 7.6 | 8.2 | 9 | 9.6 | 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.2 | 9.8 | 8.6 | 7.9 | |
1953 | 7.8 | 7.9 | 7.6 | 8.1 | 9.3 | 9.8 | 10.6 | 11 | 10.6 | 9.9 | 9.3 | 8.5 | |
1954 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 7.5 | 7.9 | 8.7 | 9.3 | 9.9 | 10 | 10 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 8.4 | |
1955 | 7.5 | 7.1 | 6.7 | 7.5 | 8.4 | 9.3 | 9.8 | 10.2 | 10 | 8.9 | 7.5 | 6.6 | |
1956 | 6.7 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 7.6 | 8.7 | 9.6 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 10.1 | 9.2 | 8.1 | 7.1 | |
1957 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 7.2 | 8.1 | 9.3 | 10 | 10.3 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 9.8 | 8.8 | 8.3 | |
1958 | 8 | 8.3 | 8.6 | 9.3 | 10.3 | 10.7 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 11 | 9.9 | 8.7 | 8.1 | |
1959 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.9 | 9.1 | 9.7 | 10.4 | 11.3 | 11 | 10.4 | 9.7 | 8.3 | 7.8 | |
1960 | 7.1 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 8.6 | 9.6 | 10.3 | 11.4 | 10.8 | 10.1 | 9.5 | 8.6 | 7.9 | |
1961 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 8.4 | 8.8 | 9.4 | 10.3 | 10.9 | 11.3 | 10.6 | 9.4 | 8.2 | 7.5 | |
1962 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 8.4 | 9.3 | 10 | 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 10 | 9.3 | 8.7 | |
1963 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 8.5 | 9.6 | 10.2 | 10.5 | 10.8 | 10.6 | 10.3 | 9.9 | 8.7 | |
1964 | 8.2 | 7.9 | 7.7 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 9.6 | 10.3 | 10.5 | 10 | 9.4 | 8.3 | 7.4 | |
1965 | 6.9 | 7.1 | 7.2 | 8 | 8.8 | 9.8 | 10 | 10.2 | 10.3 | 9.7 | 9.2 | 8.5 | |
1966 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 7.7 | 8.5 | 9 | 9.1 | 99.9 | 10.7 | 10.1 | 9.5 | 8.7 | 8.6 | |
1967 | 7.9 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 9.6 | 10.3 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 9.7 | 9.1 | 8 | |
1968 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 8 | 8.3 | 8.7 | 9.5 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 9.3 | 8.8 | 7.8 | |
1969 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 7.2 | 8.1 | 9.1 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 10.5 | 9.8 | 9.2 | 8.7 | 8.1 | |
1970 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 8 | 8.7 | 9.6 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 10 | 9 | 8.3 | 7.5 | |
1971 | 7 | 6.9 | 6.7 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 9.1 | 10 | 10.6 | 10.4 | 9.3 | 8.3 | 7.3 | |
1972 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.9 | 7.6 | 8.8 | 9.5 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.2 | 9.1 | 8.4 | 7.3 | |
1973 | 7 | 7.2 | 7.9 | 8.4 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 10.1 | 10.3 | 10 | 9.2 | 8.2 | 8 | |
1974 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 8.1 | 8.5 | 9.7 | 10 | 10.9 | 10.6 | 9.7 | 8.6 | 8.2 | |
1975 | 7.3 | 6.8 | 7.2 | 7.7 | 8.7 | 9.4 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 10.4 | 9.6 | 9.2 | 7.8 | |
1976 | 7.2 | 7 | 7 | 7.8 | 8.7 | 9.3 | 10.1 | 10.1 | 10 | 9.4 | 8.6 | 8.1 | |
1977 | 7.6 | 7.9 | 8 | 8.3 | 8.8 | 9.7 | 9.9 | 10.8 | 10.3 | 9.2 | 8.6 | 7.9 | |
1978 | 7.6 | 7.9 | 8.3 | 8.9 | 9.4 | 10.3 | 10.4 | 10.9 | 10.5 | 9.8 | 8.2 | 7.3 | |
1979 | 6.5 | 6.9 | 7.5 | 8.3 | 9.5 | 10 | 10.8 | 10.7 | 10.5 | 9.8 | 9 | 8.6 | |
1980 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 7.9 | 8.6 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 10.6 | 10.9 | 10.5 | 9.9 | 9.2 | 8.6 | |
1981 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.8 | 9.2 | 9.4 | 9.9 | 10.3 | 10.5 | 10.2 | 9.7 | 9.3 | 8.5 | |
1982 | 7.2 | 7.5 | 8 | 8.8 | 9.9 | 10.7 | 11.4 | 11.8 | 11.4 | 10.3 | 8.8 | 8.3 | |
1983 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 9.3 | 10 | 10.6 | 11.3 | 11.7 | 12.4 | 11.4 | 10.3 | 9.5 | 7.7 | |
1984 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 8.4 | 9 | 9.7 | 10.3 | 11.4 | 11.6 | 10.6 | 9.7 | 8.5 | 6.9 | |
1985 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 7.2 | 8.2 | 9.6 | 10.6 | 11.5 | 11.6 | 10.8 | 9.6 | 6.8 | 6.4 | |
1986 | 7 | 6.6 | 8 | 8.4 | 9.4 | 11 | 10.9 | 11.8 | 10.8 | 9.8 | 8.4 | 7.8 | |
1987 | 7.6 | 7.9 | 8.3 | 8.9 | 9.8 | 10.6 | 11.1 | 11.5 | 11.1 | 10 | 9 | 8.2 | |
1988 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 8.6 | 9.6 | 10.4 | 11 | 11.4 | 10.6 | 9.6 | 8.7 | 7.9 | |
1989 | 7 | 5.8 | 6.8 | 8.2 | 9.5 | 10.7 | 11.3 | 11.2 | 11 | 9.9 | 8.9 | 8.2 | |
1990 | 8.1 | 7.7 | 8.2 | 9 | 9.9 | 10.8 | 11.8 | 12.1 | 12.1 | 10.7 | 9.9 | 8.2 | |
1991 | 7.1 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 8.4 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 10.8 | 11 | 11.2 | 10.1 | 8.9 | 8.3 | |
1992 | 7.9 | 8.1 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 10.2 | 10.7 | 11.1 | 11.4 | 11 | 10 | 9.1 | 7.8 | |
1993 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 7.6 | 8.6 | 9.7 | 10.8 | 11 | 11.2 | 11 | 10.1 | 8.5 | 7.9 | |
1994 | 8 | 7.4 | 8.6 | 9.3 | 10.1 | 10.6 | 11.6 | 11.5 | 11.3 | 10.7 | 9.3 | 8.4 | |
1995 | 8.2 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 9.2 | 10.2 | 11.2 | 11.8 | 11.5 | 11.3 | 10.2 | 9.4 | 8.9 | |
1996 | 8.2 | 7.8 | 8.4 | 9.2 | 10 | 10.4 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 10.5 | 9.9 | 8.7 | 7.6 | |
1997 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 8.1 | 9 | 10.3 | 10.9 | 11.7 | 12.2 | 11.6 | 11.3 | 9.9 | 9.3 | |
1998 | 8.7 | 9.2 | 9.7 | 9.9 | 10.4 | 11.4 | 11.7 | 12.3 | 12.1 | 10.7 | 9.8 | 9 | |
1999 | 8 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 9.5 | 10.4 | 11.1 | 11.5 | 11.9 | 10.1 | 9 | 8.5 | |
2000 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 8.1 | 9.1 | 10 | 11.1 | 11.3 | 11.7 | 11.4 | 10.3 | 9 | 8 | |
2001 | 7.9 | 7.7 | 8.1 | 8.7 | 9.7 | 10.6 | 11.3 | 11.4 | 11.4 | 10.2 | 9.2 | 8.3 | |
2002 | 8.1 | 7.9 | 7.7 | 8.7 | 9.4 | 10.5 | 11,2 | 11.7 | 11.3 | 10.0 | 9.0 | 8.8 | |
2003 | 8.8 | 8.5 | 8.7 | 9.2 | 9.9 | 10.9 | 11.3 | 11.4 | 11.4 | 10.9 | 9.0 | 8.5 | |
2004 | 7.8 | 7.9 | 8.3 | 9.1 | 10.4 | 11.0 | 11.8 | 11.9 | 11.2 | 10.6 | 9.4 | 8.6 | |
2005 | 7.7 | 8.0 | 8.8 | 9.4 | 10.7 | 11.2 | 11.6 | 12.1 | 11.5 | 10.4 | 9.5 | 8.3 | |
2006 | 8.61 | 8.49 | 8.41 | 8.75 | 10.08 | 10.86 | 11.66 | 12.09 | 11.49 | 10.55 | 9.29 | 8.5 | |
2007 | 7.8 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 10.2 | 11.2 | 11.6 | 11.0 | 10.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 | |
2008 | 7.46 | 7.33 | 7.68 | 8.06 | 9.36 | 9.77 | 10.84 | 11.30 | 11.16 | 10.14 | 9.39 | 7.87 | |
2009 | 7.29 | 7.20 | 7.5 | 8.4 | 9.54 | 10.4 | 11.4 | 11.74 | 11.8 | 10.5 | 9.0 | 7.0 | |
2010 | 8.11 | 8.68 | 9.12 | 8.96 | 9.54 | 10.36 | 11.16 | 11.93 | 11.08 | 10.37 | 8.98 | 8.5 | |
2011 | 7.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2013 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2014 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2016 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Note, The blanks for the years 1940-41 are due to the Second World War. Apparently during that time, data was not collected by a lightkeeper.
Original data was sent by the Lightkeepers and now by the Marine Protected Area Guardian of Race Rocks to the Institute of Ocean Sciences where it is compiled and displayed at
http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/science/oceans/data-donnees/lighthouses-phares/index-eng.htm
Decade analysis by G. Fletcher.. NOTE probable evidence of climate change
Newspaper Archives 1859-1906
July 20 1859: House of Assembly Notice of Intention to select sites for the two lighthouses
Aug 12-1859: HMS Plumper with Capt. Richards left Esquimalt to select a site for the lighthouse on Race Rocks
Sept 19, 1859: Last evening three “square rigged ” vessels were inside Race Rocks heading towards Victoria.
Dec.25 1859: Wreck of the Idaho still afloat in Strait of Juan de Fuca
April 12 1860: HMS Topaze is stationed in Victoria.. See story on our history page of their crew providing labour on Race Rocks Tower Construction
April 14 1860 House of Assembly re appropriations for Race Rocks and FIsgard.
April 26, 1860: Estimates for erection of public works.. Race Rocks and Fisgard
May31860: Band from the H.M.S.Topaze leads the Mayday parade.: Further evidence of this ship being stationed in Victoria while its crew helped build the tower at Race Rocks. Plus two other articles.
June 09, 1860 Mr. Morris , Civil Engineer now erecting the lighthouse at Race Rocks—Home government appropriates 7000 pounds for the construction of the two lighthouses.— 3500 to be paid by the Imperial government, , the other half by this colony and British Columbia– “In that case we ought to have had the right to select the lightkeepers as there are many persons her just as well qualified as any that can be imported from England”
June 30, 1860 A discussion arose as to whether the Home Government, British Columbia or Vancouver Island had to pay for the lightkeepers.
and July 05, 1860 The Assembly discusses who should pay the wages for the lightkeepers.–
Mr. Franklin ” The Home government having built the lightouses and stocked them , it was natural to suppose that they should pay for their keeping”—
July 20 1859 House of Assembly dispatches have passed between the Governor
(Sir James Douglas) and Sir L.B. Lyton ( British parliament) regarding payment for the two lighthouses.
August 28 1860 Letter from “an old sailor” on payment for Pilotage. Vessels coming in from San Francisco would pick up a pilot off Race Rocks.
August 30,1860: The gun boat “Forward” receives the two lanterns for the l;ighthouses which have just arrived from England by the “Grecian”
December 25 1860 to Jan23, 1861. Several articles relating to the wreck of the Nanette off Race Rocks:
Dec. 25 1860 Total Loss of the British Barque Nanette, wrecked on Race Rocks
Dec 27, 1860 Pilotage bill not passed yet–two days ago the Nanette sank on Race Rocks.. On Nov 9 a pilot lost his life..—The pilots say they cannot maintain a boat outside because the remuneration they receive is insufficient to support them—
–Jan.15 1861: the schooner “Rebecca” was caught stealing from the wreck of the Nanette on Race Rocks
Jan 22, 1861 Reference to loss of the Nanette on Race Rocks.
Jan 23, 1861 Reference to Nanette as one of several shipwrecks.
Jan. 26, 1861 Two men arrested for stealing goods from the Nanette wrecked at Race Rocks
Feb.1 1861 Court of Naval Inquiry re theft from wreck of Nanette.
Feb. 9 1861 Captain of Schooner Rebecca accused of stealing from wreck of Nanette
Feb.11 1861 Court of Naval Inquiry re : Wreck of Nanette
Feb.13 1861 he Nanette is sold at auction for $650.00
Dec.27, 1860—the beacon on Race Rocks was lighted last evening for the first time—
Jan. 26, 1861 False Alarm–Two heavy guns heard in the direction of Race Rocks
Feb.1 1861 Notice to Mariners about the new light being exhibited in the Light House recently erected on Great Race Rock and cautioning about the strong tides at Race Rocks No ti ice to Mariners of Lighthouse on Race Island , Strait of Juan de Fuca
Directions for Fisgard and Race Rocks — Notice to Mariners;
Feb. 4, 1861 Tax assessment for John Morris at Race Rocks of 2500 pounds.
Sept.21 1861 Topaze arrives from Chile , she left here last April (1861) En route took in tow a sloop from the Fannings Islands with starving occupants on board who had resorted to cannibalism in order to survive.
Jan. 08, 1862 Discussion on the Pilot Bill .. Government had killed the passage of an excellent Pilot law in 1860
Dec 10 1862 House of Assembly recognizes the work of Capt. Richards who surveyed and chose the site for Race Rocks.
March 22, 1864 Use of semaphore signal at Race Rocks
Dec. 17, 1866 Death at the Lighthouse Geo. N. Davies first lightkeeper died on Friday night last-
–Feb.5,1867 Disaster to the Ship Nicholas Biddel
Mar.4, 1873 Lightkeeper reports ship aground on Rosedale Reef
May 11, 1873 Dominion Estimates.. gives lightkeepers salaries,
May 29 1873 Lightkeepers spend time blasting and removing large rocks making a landing at Race Rocks1874Sessional Papers- Dominion of Canada-lighthouse repair
1874–Sessional papers on repairs to lighthouse,
Feb2, 1877: “Murder”—– “Mr.T. Argyle arrived in town yesterday bringing with him in a canoe the body of an Indian woman, which , from the marks upon it, leaves but little doubt that the woman was foully murdered.”
Nov. 7, 1877 Wreck of the HMS Swordfish off Beecher bay
Nov. 7, 1877 H.M.S.Opal rescues crew of the Swordfish
Nov. 7 1877Trial of James Argyle for rescuing deserters from a naval ship (Full newspaper page!)
Nov.11,1877 Sale of the Swordfish ( wreckage)
March 22 1881 Report on lack of a granite quarry on Vancouver Island.. This may be evidence that the grey granite of Race Rocks was probably not quarried locally 21 years previous to this date.
March 31, 1881 The tug Etta White rescues American barque Antioch. note reference to the Idaho which later comes aground at RR.
July 31 1888 A watery grave: Thomas Argyle Jr., at 25 years of age the eldest son of lighthouse keeper Thomas Argyle, along with three other friends who were on their way out to Race Rocks to stay overnight with his parents, all drowned in a gale.
Aug 2 1888 Lightkeeper Argyle searches and is unable to find his son and other drowning victims.
Dec 25, 1889 Wreck of the Idaho still afloat after slipping off Race Rocks
Aug 11 1895 A Fortunate Escape: (by the New Zealand Vessel Warrimoo.)
Sept 19 1900 Lightkeeper Eastwood charged with leaving the station and employing Japanese(!!)
June 10 1909 The tug Sea Lion Sunk in Collision--run down by Oceania Vance during thick fog near Race Rocks
Sept 51909 Proposal to build a Fort (Fort Rod Hill) at the entrance to Esquimalt Harbour :
“The width of the Strait East of the Race Rocks is such that a ship of war, keeping well out to sea would be out of range of the guns at Esquimalt or at Fort Macaulay, and would be free to proceed on its way to Vancouver without interuption unless a fort were erected at some point commanding the passage.”
Sept 18 1909 Lightkeeper F.Eastwood saw drowning by the overturning of a Columbia River boat loaded — Hesquiot Indian tells another story—-No one drowned!-
1889-1906 Reference page for entries from the Daily Colonist for Lightkeeper W.P. Phil Daykin
File on Shipwrecks at Race Rocks |
See also Digitized records of newspapers by University of Victoria , |
For photographs of the Light station in the early years go to |
Waves as an Abiotic Factor at Race Rocks
This file is extracted from a report of the analysis of the data by Rick Birch of ASL from the ADCP deployment at Site 2.
Below is the wave height spectra for site 2. During the time of deployment, two significant storm events occured. The results show up very well in the graphs
This provides a sample of the type of data we logged when we used an ADCP deployed in the spring of 2006:Wave Data from ADCP Deployment at Site 2.
Below is an interesting set of data that documents the behaviour of waves arriving from two directions at the same time. 
Wave Energy as an Abiotic Factor Determining the Distribution of Organisms at Race Rocks
When one is on the island during a storm, the impact of wave energy is certainly obvious. The docks are awash making it impossible to launch a boat and further providing a great deal of force on the organisms living in the upper intertidal zone.<bulletlist>
- Waves bring debris that can impact directly on mussels and goose-neck barnacles, however the adaptations of those animals as well as the intertidal algae have ensured that they remain clinging (for the most part) to the rocky substrate.
- The energy flow of many species of marine algae involves wave energy depositing them on shore.
- Wave energy also brings rocks and other aggregates onto the shore.
- The evolution of shorelines and shoreline ecosystems is also the result of wave energy.
- Waves carry salt water sea spray far inland as well. This restricts the kind of plants which can survive near shorelines. Certain plants survive only with the benefit of salt spray however, such as the Romanzoffia tracyi.
- One of our concerns with all Ecological reserves with shoreline borders is that any spill at sea of oil or chemicals which can wash up on shorelines could have consequences for the ecosystems of ecological reserves far inland.
- Rarely do abiotic factors act alone. A good example at Race Rocks is that they cause “surge or swell” which causes water to reach higher levels on the shore.
- Another good example is wind energy and currents combine to form standing waves in current channels at Race Rocks.
See the other posts on this website about waves:
![]() |
Ocean Wave Model ForecastsWaveModel |
The 150-year-old tower at Race Rocks under threat
Senators examining the proposed destaffing of lighthouses insist they want to hear from all sides when they visit Vancouver Island next week.
The members of the Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans aim to hand its report and accompanying recommendations to federal Fisheries Minister Gail Shea by the end of the year.
In 2009, Shea announced lightkeepers would be eliminated. But a public outcry prompted her to ask the senate committee to investigate and make recommendations.
The senators will visit the west coast Nov. 16-20. But its appointment-only format has left some people concerned that only select parties are being heard.
“The senate committee’s schedule does not include any public meetings where B.C. residents can tell the senators what they think about eliminating lightkeepers from B.C.’s 27 remaining staff lightstations,” the Canadian Lightkeepers Association. Its comments came in a press release titled “B.C. public shut out of lighthouse hearings.”
Senator Dennis Patterson, deputy chairman of the committee, said the press release is an example of the misunderstandings over the visit and added that the senators wanted to meet as many people as possible.
“I know there has been some concern about this format, that we’re cherry-picking witnesses, and I want to assure you this is not the case,” Patterson said.
“We’re very open to hearing all points of view. We just want to get the facts.”
Financial constraints prohibit the senate from holding full-blown public hearings here, Patterson said. Instead, the committee will hold “fact-finding” sessions around kitchen tables, at lighthouses and in places like council chambers, said Patterson.
The format can be less intimidating than formal hearings, he said.
“In my opinion [it] can work very effectively,” he said. “You can sit around a table and have an informal exchange of views. We want to hear from the maximum number of people in an informal way.”
With a deadline of Dec. 31, there is a sense of urgency, Patterson said. Last week, he canvassed public opinion in Newfoundland and Labrador.
“The destaffing question we feel is most urgent — it has evoked a lot of concern on both coasts,” said Patterson.
The committee has already heard from representatives of the Coast Guard, the Canadian Lightkeepers Association and others who have testified in Ottawa.
Former senator Pat Carney, who opposes destaffing lighthouses, is scheduled to testify in Ottawa on Nov. 23.
The public hearings have a place in the system, said Patterson, “it’s just that we’re not able to take the show on the road for financial reasons.”
The committee expects to visit 10 to 12 lighthouses on the west coast and meet people in Victoria, Nanaimo, Campbell River, Prince Rupert and Vancouver.
The senators represent both sides of the house and there is no hidden agenda, Patterson said.
“Senate committees, I believe, have a reputation for doing good work and being independent,” he said.
Anyone wishing to address the committee should contact its clerk, Danielle Labonte, at 613-949-4379. The committee’s email is fish-pech@sen.parl.gc.ca.
smcculloch@timescolonist.com
Lighthouses Part of Canada’s Culture :
Opinion Column : Goldstream Gazette: Lighthouses Part of
Canada’s Culture : November 11, 2010
Lighthouses part of Canada’s culture
Published: November 11, 2010 1:00 PM
Updated: November 11, 2010 1:41 PM
Its easy on southern Vancouver Island to allow lighthouses to become part of the scenery. Unless one is a boater, a person may simply take the presence of these light stations for granted.
But there is a certain romance with lighthouses. They are a part of our history, a slice of coastal living that we envision as part and parcel of experiencing the rugged life of a maritime resident.
A Senate committee is further looking into whether Canada’s 51 remaining stations with lighthouse keepers need to be staffed.
No one would argue that having a live set of eyes available with the ability to take action in the event of a crisis isn’t critical at times.
On the other hand, technology has improved since the first lighthouses were installed along our coastlines. The notion of setting up a series of cameras, perhaps linked to satellites, to monitor the waters off Vancouver Island, for example, doesn’t seem like such an out-of-this-world solution.
But what of the actual light stations?
The revelation that the federal government has listed the majority of Canada’s lighthouses as surplus had many Canadians collectively raising their eyebrows.
It’s easy to envision high rollers buying the land cheap and erecting pricey spa-lodges on prominent waterfront properties currently anchored by lighthouses.
But is that what we want to see?
Other coastal communities and jurisdictions, the state of Oregon for example, have created successful models for saving these picturesque and culturally significant icons and utilizing them in a different way. Cultural tourism, facilitated by community groups and other agencies, could be the answer for saving the lighthouses of Canada’s Pacific Coast.
The federal government, if it chooses to divest itself of these assets, must commit to work with interested groups to enhance the viability of lighthouses, either as working navigational aids, tourist attractions or both.
Once they’re gone, they’re gone forever.
This article was originallyfound at:
http://www.bclocalnews.com/vancouver_island_south/goldstreamgazette/opinion/107312893.html
now discontinued.
Lighthouses Part of Canada’s culture
Its easy on southern Vancouver Island to allow lighthouses to become part of the scenery. Unless one is a boater, a person may simply take the presence of these light stations for granted.
But there is a certain romance with lighthouses. They are a part of our history, a slice of coastal living that we envision as part and parcel of experiencing the rugged life of a maritime resident.
A Senate committee is further looking into whether Canada’s 51 remaining stations with lighthouse keepers need to be staffed.
No one would argue that having a live set of eyes available with the ability to take action in the event of a crisis isn’t critical at times.
On the other hand, technology has improved since the first lighthouses were installed along our coastlines. The notion of setting up a series of cameras, perhaps linked to satellites, to monitor the waters off Vancouver Island, for example, doesn’t seem like such an out-of-this-world solution.
But what of the actual light stations?
The revelation that the federal government has listed the majority of Canada’s lighthouses as surplus had many Canadians collectively raising their eyebrows.
It’s easy to envision high rollers buying the land cheap and erecting pricey spa-lodges on prominent waterfront properties currently anchored by lighthouses.
But is that what we want to see?
Other coastal communities and jurisdictions, the state of Oregon for example, have created successful models for saving these picturesque and culturally significant icons and utilizing them in a different way. Cultural tourism, facilitated by community groups and other agencies, could be the answer for saving the lighthouses of Canada’s Pacific Coast.
The federal government, if it chooses to divest itself of these assets, must commit to work with interested groups to enhance the viability of lighthouses, either as working navigational aids, tourist attractions or both.
Once they’re gone, they’re gone forever
.This article was originally found at:
http://www.bclocalnews.com/vancouver_island_south/goldstreamgazette/opinion/107312893.html–now discontinued.
Pugettia gracilis: Graceful kelp crab–The Race Rocks Taxonomy
We see this small crab occasionally at Race Rocks. Ryan caught this one as it nestled in between white anemone.
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Crustacea
Class: Malacostraca
Order: Decapoda
Infraorder: Brachyura
Family: Epialtidae
Genus: Pugettia
Species: P. gracilis
Other Members of the Phylum Arthropoda at Race Rocks.
![]() and Image File |
![]() |