Race Rocks Permit Application

For research, collection activities or commercial use of the ecological reserve.


Introduction:

The ecological reserve of Race Rocks is a transition zone between the inner coastal waters of Pedder Bay and the open Pacific Ocean. Due to this unique geographical location, it is home to an exceptional variety of marine life. This provides many unique opportunities for research or filming to be carried out on the reserve. However, it also means that the environmental impact of such activities on the ecosystem of Race Rocks must be carefully considered to ensure the sustainability of the biodiversity that is present here.

Therefore, the questions in this application form have been designed to find out the precise objectives and procedures of the proposed project and the anticipated environmental impact on Race Rocks. In addition to this, the opportunity to live on Race Rocks whilst carrying out research means that details are required by Lester B. Pearson College in order to arrange this for you.

Preservation of ecological values is the ultimate management priority and in the event of conflict, these values take precedence over the provision of research facilities. This permit must be returned to the Race Rocks Operating Committee for preliminary approval. A copy will forwarded to the Ecological Reserve Branch for final approval. 

See the Regulations for Using the Race Rocks Marine Research Centre

and the Operational Guidelines

If you require the use of the Light Tower, arrangements must be made directly with the Canadian Coast Guard Office in Victoria.


BASIC INFORMATION: (Type directly in the spaces provided)

(1) Individual(s) surname(s) First names

(2) Company/Society name

(3) Major shareholders or principals. Attach names and addresses.

(4) Company inc.no/Society no.

(5) Company/Society mailing address

(6) Business phone 

Home phone 

Fax 

E-mail

URL of your Web Site if available

(7) BC parks requires minimum public liability insurance coverage of $ 1,000,000. Will you be able to obtain this?

Yes No

(8) If paid employees are employed on site as part of your project please
provide proof of BC Worker’s Compensation coverage or suitable
substitute insurance.
Worker’s Comp # 


DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY

(9) Area of research

Please fax a map detailing the area(s) where you will be carrying out the research.

(10) Detailed plan of research:

A) Study Overview and Rationale. ( briefly describe the project and what you are trying to achieve).

B) Objectives ( briefly state the objectives of the project)

C) Methodology:

D) End Products: What are the end products of the research? Please be aware that final copies of reports must be made available in electronic form to the Race Rocks Operating Committee. Copies of slides, pictures, raw footage, videos produced etc.. must be made available to the Race Rocks Archive in the Lester Pearson College Library.

(11) Please detail your experience and involvement in the Race Rocks area.

(12) Please indicate the dates that you wish to carry out the research.

(13) Do you plan to stay at Race Rocks for this time? (See description of accommodation, and book the facility with the operating committee well in advance of the intended visit.)

(14) We require a component of Lester Pearson College student involvement for projects done on the reserve. Please indicate below how you aim to do this?
Will staff or students require specialized training or certification for this research? If so, describe.

(15) Will the proposed project require construction of any temporary or permanent structures on Race Rocks? Describe including proposed location.

(16) Do you propose to use any existing facilities at Race Rocks?
(e.g. docks, tanks etc..)

(17) What assistance for transportation ( include times and dates) will be needed.

(18) Will the proposed research project affect or restrict other visitors coming to Race Rocks? Describe.


ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

(19) What do you anticipate to be the environmental impact of the research under the following categories? Indicate how you intend to mitigate this impact.

A. Physical/Chemical

land, water, noise,

B. Ecological

habitat, species and populations

(20) Additional Comments


PLEASE SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR COMPUTER

YOU MAY IT FAX TO : 250-391-2412

or e-mail as an attachment to: The Race Rocks Operating Committee

A copy will be forwarded by us to the Ecological Reserves Office. Receipt of the application will be acknowledged by e-mail.

The Original version of this permit was created by members of the Pearson College Environmental Systems class, March, 1997 Leah Gray, Kata Meszaros, Iro Tikkanen

History of the War Signal Station at Race Rocks

This letter and pictures were received from Francis Clements of Calgary, Alberta. Francis tells of his posting to Race Rocks in 1939 when he was stationed with five other sailors at the “War Signal Station”. Our sincere thanks to Francis for this wonderful piece of history! Click on his pictures below.

fclementsletter

Race Rocks goes Live on at the Quick-Time Live Conference in California

On October 11 2000, a special live webcast from Race Rocks was arranged for a presentation at the Distance Education session by faculty member Garry Fletcher at the QuickTme Live Conference in Beverly Hills. The Apple Learning Interchange, an educational arm of Apple at the time had helped with the funding to register and stay at the conference.

Photos by Jaffar. Our thanks to Tiyona and Michael, also in the racerocks.com activity, who helped behind the scenes to make this webcast a success in California! ‘

NOTE: Followup on Damien Guihen doing research in Antarctica

“From my perspective, standing on a stage in front of more than 150 people in the conference centre in California, this was a big risk .. We had already done it to an Apple Conference in New York, but this was the first time the students were managing it completely on their own from the RaceRocks end. Although this was a QuickTime Live conference, several members of the audience remarked later after that this was the first real  “Live”and remote presentation they had seen at the Conference. Connections were made at that time with several companies interested in us using their webcasting software. ” Garry Fletcher 

CANADA GAZETTE.. Xwayen ( Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area

Copy of Gazetting

Vol. 134, No. 44
Canada Gazette
Part I
OTTAWA, SATURDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2000
Vol. 134, n o 44
Gazette du Canada
Partie I
OTTAWA, LE SAMEDI 28 OCTOBRE 2000
page 3364
3364
XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area
Regulations
Statutory Authority
Oceans Act
Sponsoring Department
Department of Fisheries and Oceans
REGULATORY IMPACT
ANALYSIS STATEMENT
DescriptionThe Oceans Act (the Act) came into force on January 31, 1997. Part II of the Act authorizes the establishment of an Oceans Man-agement Strategy (OMS) based on the principles of sustainable development, integrated management and the precautionary ap-proach. This part of the Act also provides authority for the devel-opment of tools necessary to carry out the OMS, tools such as the establishment of Marine Protected Areas. Section 35 of the Act authorizes the Governor in Council to designate, by regulation, Marine Protected Areas for any of
the following reasons: (a) the conservation and protection of commercial and non-commercial fishery resources, including marine mammals and their habitats;
(b) the conservation and protection of endangered or threatened species and their habitats;
(c) the conservation and protection of unique habitats;
(d) the conservation and protection of marine areas of high biodiversity or biological productivity; and
(e) the conservation and protection of any other marine re-source or habitat as is necessary to fulfill the mandate of the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans.

In 1998, the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans announced four pilot Marine Protected Area initiatives on Canada’s Pacific Coast. One of these, Race Rocks in British Columbia, meets the criteria set out in paragraphs 35(1)(b), (d)and(e) above. This regulatory initiative proposes to formally designate, under the Oceans Act, the waters surrounding Race Rocks as XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area (MPA). In addition, the harvesting of liv-ing marine resources within the MPA will be prohibited subject to existing aboriginal or treaty rights. XwaYeN (pronounced shwai’yen) is located in the Juan de Fuca Strait, 17 kilometres off the coast of Vancouver Island,southwest of Victoria. The islets of XwaYeN (Race Rocks) form the most southerly part of Canada’s Pacific Coast. Named for its strong tidal currents and rocky reefs, the waters surrounding XwaYeN (Race Rocks) are a showcase for Pacific marine life, featuring whales, sea lions, seals, birds and a wide variety of underwater plants and animals. These waters are home to a thriving community of sub-tidal invertebrates, includ-ing sponges, anemones, hydroids and soft corals. Crowds of barnacles, tunicates, urchins and sea stars adorn the underwater cliffs. Fish such as sculpin, rockfish and lingcod seek refuge in the rocky crevices and undulating kelp forests.
The area’s high velocity tidal currents — up to seven knots — in combination with the climate and the temperature and salinity of the water in the area supplies a generous stream of nutrients and promotes high levels of dissolved oxygen. These factors con-tribute to the creation of an ecosystem of high biodiversity and biological productivity.
The waters surrounding XwaYeN (Race Rocks) are an impor-tant nursery and recruitment area for Northern abalone. In 1999, Northern abalone (Halliotis kamischatkana)wasdesignated as a threatened marine species by the Committee on the Status of En-dangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). Protecting this nursery and recruitment area will aid the nurturing of this species. Fur-thermore, efforts to conserve and protect the biodiversity and biological productivity of the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) marine ecosystem will also enhance the protection of this threatened species.
To provide long-term and comprehensive protection of the di-verse
species and to maintain the biological productivity of the
ecosystem, a prohibition of the harvesting of all living marine
resources in the waters surrounding XwaYeN (Race Rocks) is
being proposed. Although seasonal fisheries closures under the Fisheries Act have restricted all commercial fishing of finfish and shellfish in the area since 1990, recreational harvesting of salmon and halibut and harvesting of non-commercial species continues.
The prohibition of living marine resource harvesting under the Oceans Act will provide a longer-term commitment to the conser-vation and protection of the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) ecosystem. In 1980, the province of British Columbia, under the authority of the provincial Ecological Reserves Act, established the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve, which provides for the protection of the terrestrial natural and cultural heritage values (nine islets) and of the ocean seabed (to the 20 fathoms contour line). Ocean dumping, dredging and the extraction of non-renewable resources are not permitted within the boundaries of the Ecological Reserve.
However, the Ecological Reserve cannot provide for the con servation and protection of the water column or for the living resources inhabiting the coastal waters surrounding XwaYeN (Race Rocks). The federal government is using its authority to complement the protection afforded by the Ecological Reserve by prohibiting the harvesting of living marine resources. Adopting an integrated management approach within the Race Rocks area will provide for a more comprehensive level of con-servation and protection for the ecosystem than can be achieved by either an MPA or an Ecological Reserve on its own. Desig-nating a Marine Protected Area within the area corresponding to the Ecological Reserve will facilitate the integration and increase the synergy of conservation, protection and management initia-tives under the respective authorities of the two governments.
The Oceans Act mandates the Minister to lead and facilitate the
development and implementation of plans for the integrated man-agement of all activities with other ministers and agencies of the Government of Canada, with provincial governments and with affected Aboriginal organizations and coastal communities for the purposes of conservation and protection of Canada’s oceans.

This proposal to designate the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) area as a Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act provides the neces-sary foundation for the Minister to lead and facilitate the devel-opmentof an integrated, cooperative ecosystem-based manage-ment regime utilizing:
(a)acooperative, integrated management approach involving several federal and provincial government agencies using their
respective authorities to conserve and protect the area;
(b) compliance based on best practices, stewardship and vol-untary guidelines; and
(c) assessment of effectiveness of the voluntary initiatives and further restriction as warranted. Integrating the management of the terrestrial and marine com-ponents of the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) ecosystem will facilitate coordinated, effective and efficient management of the area. This cooperative management regime is the preferred approach to the conservation and protection of XwaYeN (Race Rocks) as deter mined through the consultation process. Candidate activities for cooperative management include marine mammal watching, guided diving, research and education, ballast water management, National Defence and Transport Canada programs in the area.
The designation of the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) as an MPA and the prohibition of harvesting of living marine resources are an important and necessary element in the overall conservation and protection of an ecosystem which is biologically diverse and highly productive.
Alternatives The status quo was considered unacceptable because even though the area is currently afforded some protection under the Fisheries Act, an MPA designated by regulation under the Oceans Act provides an opportunity to use integrated management tools for conserving and protecting the biodiversity and biological pro-ductivity of the area and the threatened Northern abalone.
The proposed option is the designation of the XwaYeN (Race
Rocks) MPA by regulation with a prohibition on the harvesting of all living marine resources. This option will provide the primary element required to manage the MPA while allowing the Minister to lead and facilitate the development of an integrated manage-ment approach to comprehensive ecosystem management of the area.
This alternative to comprehensive regulation conforms to Regulatory Policy by limiting regulatory burden on Canadians. However, should it become necessary, control of activities in the area by regulation would be considered.

Benefits and Costs The primary benefit of the proposed Regulations establishing the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area is that the foundation will be set for ensuring the conservation and protec-tion of a highly diverse and productive ecosystem of Canada’s oceans. It will aid in the prevention of potential ecological dete-rioration and protect the Northern abalone in that area. A subsidiary benefit of designating the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) MPA is the opportunity to initiate an integrated management regime based on a cooperative, integrated, ecosystem-based management approach to conserve and protect the area involving several federal and provincial government agencies using their respective authorities; and voluntary compliance through stewardship and cooperation with an alliance of stakeholder groups. The establishment of this MPA will also demonstrate Canada’s resolve to fulfill its commitments under the United NationsConference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (UNEP 1994), as well as Canada’s commit-ment to the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Program.
The costs related to the administration and management of he MPA will be managed within existing budgetary allotments. Consultation Since its announcement in 1998, the pilot Marine Protected Area process has identified and galvanized strong local support for designation of XwaYeN (Race Rocks) as an MPA. The con-sultative process has developed new trust-based relationships and the regulatory designation of the MPA will maintain the level of momentum and stakeholder confidence that have now beenestablished. To facilitate the consultative process, the Race Rocks Advisory
Board was established with representation from:
— the Department of National Defence
— Parks Canada
— Fisheries and Oceans Canada
— the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks of British
Columbia
— the Lester B. Pearson College of the Pacific
— Aboriginal groups through the Coast Salish Sea Council
— the Scientific community
— the Friends of Ecological Reserves
— the Dive community
— the Georgia Strait Alliance
— the Sport Fish Advisory Board — Victoria, representing the
recreational fishing community
— local marina operators
— the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society
— The Northwest Whale Watchers Association
The role of the Race Rocks Advisory Board role was to:
— represent key constituent groups or stakeholders;
— provide advice to Fisheries and Oceans Canada and British
Columbia Parks on the consultation process;
— collate and analyze feedback from consultations;
— make consensus-based, recommendations to Fisheries and
Oceans Canada and British Columbia Parks for the establish-ment
of a Marine Protected Area in the waters surrounding XwaYen (Race Rocks); and
— ensure community involvement in the establishment and on-going management of XwaYen (Race Rocks) MPA.

Four Coast Salish First Nations, Beecher Bay, T’souke, Song-hees
and Esquimalt Nations, claim the eastern end of the Strait of Juan de Fuca as part of their traditional territory. Although the creation of the MPA does not restrict harvesting by First Nations for food, social or ceremonial purposes, they volunteered to forego this activity in support of the designation of the MPA.

The Race Rocks Advisory Board provided an excellentforum for issue identification, discussion and resolution. It has func-tioned well and guided the development of the proposed coopera-tive management regime. The resulting commitment to steward-ship and cooperation in the protection of this area as an MPA has laid the groundwork for a management regime through voluntary compliance that is unprecedented. In discussing and developing recommendations for designation and management of the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area, all members of the Race Rocks Advisory Board and their constitu-ents clearly understood that, upon designation, the area would be closed to harvesting (commercial and recreational) of all living marine resources. It was also accepted that this would not prevent the removal of marine organisms for scientific or educational purposes as part of an ongoing research program to assess and monitor the long-term health of the XwaYen (Race Rocks) ma-rine ecosystem.
The most direct impact of this prohibition is on the recreational fishing community who have endorsed the implementation of a “no-take” zone within the boundaries of the proposed Marine Protected Area. There will be no impact on the commercial fish-ing sector as the area has been closed to commercial fishing since 1990 and there is no expectation on the part of the commercial sector that the area will be re-opened in the future. Aboriginal groups have indicated their support to the Race Rocks Advisory Board for the creation of the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area by voluntarily choosing not to fish in the area.

The recommendations reflect the outcome of a consensus-based process by the Race Rocks Advisory Board and directions expressed by the public, stakeholders and other partners through consultations conducted over a two-year period. In addition to sectoral consultations with stakeholders, two public sessions were conducted in February 2000. The public consultations were held to provide opportunities for information and discussion with those persons not represented by particular
interest groups. With an attendance of 101 persons, the consulta-tions provided useful fora for the discussion of both the MPA and Ecological Reserve aspects of the initiative. Results of these dis-cussions indicated a high level of support for establishment of a Marine Protected Area at Race Rocks to complement the area’s Ecological Reserve status. Media coverage since the initial announcement of the pilot ini-tiative XwaYeN (Race Rocks) has been regular, positive and resulted in continued public discussion and interest. Ranging from local newspapers to the Knowledge Network and the Discovery Channel, the coverage has highlighted the ecological values of the proposed MPA and public support for it. Compliance and Enforcement Principal stakeholder groups haveexpressed a keen interest in not only developing “best practices” but also working towards ensuring a high degree of compliance. The development of stew-ardship initiatives and “best practices” guidelines has already commenced.
The unanimous support for the creation of a Marine Protected Area in the waters surrounding XwaYeN (Race Rocks) suggests that enforcement interventions will rarely be required. XwaYeN (Race Rocks) has resident guardians and an Internet-based series of live video cameras strategically placed in the area. These provide the foundation for a strong community-based compliance environment. Therefore, management will be achieved through voluntary compliance/best practices guidelines for a number of activities, such as recreational boating, eco-tourism activities, including marine mammal viewing, and diving activity. Monitoring and assessment of the effectiveness of these guidelines will take place over a two-year period. Depending on the results, activity regula-tions can then be considered if necessary,

Contacts: Camille Mageau, Director, Marine Ecosystem Conservation, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, 200 Kent Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E6,

(613) 991-1285 (Telephone), (613) 998-3329
(Facsimile), mageauc@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (Electronic mail), or Mary

Ann Green, Director, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs, De-partment of Fisheries and Oceans, 200 Kent Street, Ottawa, On-tario K1A 0E6, (613) 990-0162 (Telephone), (613) 990-0120
(Facsimile), greenma@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (Electronic mail).

PROPOSED REGULATORY TEXT

Notice is hereby given that the Governor in Council, pursuant to subsection 35(3) of the Oceans Act a ,proposes to make the annexed XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area Regulations. Interested persons may make representations with respect to the proposed Regulations within 30 days after the date of publi-cation of this notice. All such representations must cite the Canada Gazette,Part I,andthedate ofpublication of this notice, and be addressed to

Camille Mageau, Director, Marine Ecosystem
Conservation, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 200 Kent Street,
Ottawa, ON, K1A 0E6. Telephone: (613) 991-1285; FAX: (613)
998-3329, E-mail: mageauc@dfo-mpo.gc.ca.
Ottawa, October 19, 2000

MARC O’SULLIVAN
Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council

XwaYeN (RACE ROCKS) MARINE PROTECTED
AREA REGULATIONS


DESIGNATION

1. The area within the 20-fathom (36.58 metre) contour line as shown on the chart set out in the schedule is hereby designated as the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area.

PROHIBITION

2. (1) The definitions in this subsection apply in this section. “fish” has the same meaning as in section 2 of the Fisheries Act.(poisson) “fish habitat” has the same meaning as in subsection 34(1) of the Fisheries Act.(habitat du poisson)
— a S.C. 1996, c. 31—

(2) No person shall remove from XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Ma-rine
Protected Area any
(a)fish;
(b) part of the fish habitat; or
(c) living marine organism that forms part of the ecosystem of
fish.
(3) Subsection (2) does not apply to removal for scientific re-search for the protection and understanding of the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area.
COMING INTO FORCE 3.

These Regulations come into force on the day on which they
are registered.

Règlement sur la zone de protection marine XwaYeN
(Race Rocks)
Fondement législatif
Loi sur les océans
Ministère responsable
Ministère des Pêches et des Océans
RÉSUMÉ DE L’ÉTUDE D’IMPACT
DE LA RÉGLEMENTATION
DescriptionLa Loi sur les océans (la Loi) est entrée en vigueur le 31 jan-vier 1997. La partie II de la Loi permetl’établissement d’unestratégie de gestion des océans (SGO) basée sur les principes dudéveloppement durable, de la gestion intégrée et de la prévention.Cette partie de la Loi prévoit aussi l’élaboration d’outils nécessai-resà la SGO, notamment l’établissement de zones de protection marine.
L’article 35 de la Loi autorise le gouverneur en conseil à dé-signer,en vertu de la réglementation, des zones de protection marines pour l’une ou plusieurs des raisons suivantes :

a) la conservation et la protection des ressources halieutique commerciales ou autres, y compris les mammifères marins, et de leur habitat;
(b) la conservation et la protection des espèces en voie de dis-paritionet des espèces menacées et de leur habitat;
c) la conservation et la protection d’habitats uniques;
d) la conservation et la protection des espaces marins riches en biodiversité ou en productivité biologique;
e) la conservation et la protection d’autres ressources ou habitats marins, au besoin, pour la réalisation du mandat du ministre des Pêches et des Océans.
En 1998, le ministre des Pêches et des Océans a annoncé la création de quatre projets pilotes concernant des zones de protec-tion marine sur la Côte du Pacifique canadienne. L’une d’elles était la zone pilote de protection marine Race Rocks, qui satisfait aux exigences établies aux alinéas 35(1)b), d)ete) décrits ci-dessus.
Par le biais de cette initiative réglementaire, on propose de désigner formellement, en vertu de la Loi sur les océans, les eaux avoisinant le secteur de Race Rocks comme zone de protec-tion marine (ZPM) de XwaYeN. De plus, le prélèvement de res-sources
marines vivantes à l’intérieur de la zone sera défendu,
sauf si ce dernier est relatif à des traités ou droits autochtones.
XwaYeN (dont la prononciation est shwai’yen) est situé dans le détroit de Juan de Fuca, à 17 kilomètres de la côte de l’île de Vancouver, au sud-ouest de Victoria. Les îlots de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) forment la partie la plus méridionale de la Côte du Pacifi-que
canadienne.
XwaYeN (Race Rocks) doit son nom à ses courants de marée puissants et à ses récifs rocheux, et ses eaux avoisinantes abritent une riche vie marine : baleines, otaries, phoques, oiseaux et une grande diversité de plantes et d’animaux sous-marins. Les eau de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) accueillent une communauté foison-nante infralittorale d’invertébrés, notamment des éponges, des anémones de mer, des hydraires et des coraux mous. Des colonies
de cirripèdes, de tuniciers, d’oursins et d’étoiles de mer ornent les falaises sous-marines. Des poissons comme des chabots, des sé-bastes et des morues-lingues cherchent refuge dans les crevasses
rocheuses et les peuplements d’algues brunes ondulantes.
Les courants de marée à haute vitesse de la zone —jusqu’à sept noeuds — combinés au climat, à la température et à la salinité
de l’eau de la zone fournissent un apport généreux de nutriments et favorisent des niveaux d’oxygène dissous élevés. Ces facteurs contribuent à créer un écosystème dont la biodiversité et la pro-ductivité
sont importantes. Les eaux avoisinant XwaYeN (Race Rocks) constituent un secteur important pour la reproduction et le recrutement de l’or-meau
nordique. En 1999, l’ormeau nordique (Halliotis kamis-chatkana)
a été désigné espèce marine menacée par le Comité
sur le statut des espèces menacées de disparition au Canada
(CSEMDC). La protection de cette zone de reproduction et de
recrutement favorisera la conservation de l’espèce. De plus, les
efforts déployés pour conserver et protéger la biodiversité et la
productivité biologique des écosystèmes marins de XwaYeN
(Race Rocks) contribueront également à la protection de cette es-pèce
menacée.
Afin de fournir une protection complète et à long terme de ces
diverses espèces, et de maintenir la productivité biologique de
l’écosystème, on doit mettre un terme au prélèvement de toutes
les ressources marines vivantes dans les eaux avoisinant XwaYeN
(Race Rocks). Bien que les fermetures des pêches saisonnières en
vertu de la Loi sur les pêches aient restreint la pêche commerciale
des poissons et des mollusques et crustacés dans la zone depuis
1990, la pêche du saumon et du flétan à des fins récréatives et la
récolte d’espèces non commerciales se poursuit. L’interdiction de
prélever les ressources marines vivantes en vertu de la Loi sur les
océans correspondra à un engagement à long terme envers la con-servation
et la protection de l’écosystème de XwaYeN (Race
Rocks).
En 1980, la province de la Colombie-Britannique, en vertu de
l’Ecological Reserve Act, une loi provinciale, a institué la réserve
écologique de Race Rocks, qui assure la protection du patrimoine
naturel et culturel des neuf îlots terrestres et du fond océanique
(20 lignes de profondeur). Les rejets en mer, le dragage et l’ex-traction
des ressources non renouvelables sont interdits dans les
limites de la réserve écologique.
Toutefois, la réserve écologique actuelle n’assure pas la con-servation
et la protection de la colonne d’eau ou des ressources
vivantes des eaux côtières avoisinant XwaYeN (Race Rocks). Le
gouvernement fédéral exerce donc son autorité afin d’ajouter une
protection complémentaire à ce qu’offre déjà la réserve écologi-que
en interdisant le prélèvement des ressources marines vivantes.
L’adoption d’une approche de gestion intégréeau sein de la
zone de Race Rocks permettra de mieux conserver et protéger
l’écosystème qu’une seule zone de protection marine ou réserve
écologique. La désignation d’une zone de protection marine à
l’intérieur de la zone correspondant à la réserve écologique favo-risera
l’intégration et la synergie des initiatives de conservation,
de protection et de gestion en vertu des pouvoirs respectifs des
deux gouvernements.
La Loi sur les océans permet au ministre de guider et de facili-ter
l’élaboration et la mise en oeuvre de plans de gestion intégrée
de toutes les activités entreprises de concert avec les autres mi-nistères
et organismes fédéraux, les gouvernements provinciaux,
ainsi que les organisations autochtones et les collectivités côtières
concernées, en vue de la conservation et de la protection des
océans au Canada.

La proposition pour la désignation de XwaYeN (Race Rocks)
en tant que zone de protection marine en vertu de la Loi sur les
océans fournira le fondement nécessaire au ministre pour diriger
et favoriser la mise en oeuvre d’un régime de gestion intégrée et
coopératif fondé sur l’écosystème, et basé sur les éléments
suivants :
a) une approche de gestion intégrée et coopérative impliquant
plusieurs organismes fédéraux et provinciaux qui exercent leur
autorité respective pour conserver et protéger la zone;
b)le respect volontaire fondé sur les pratiques exemplaires,
l’intendance et les lignes directrices volontaires;
c) l’évaluation de l’efficacité des initiatives volontaires et
d’autres restrictions au besoin.
L’intégration de la gestion des composantes terrestres et mari-nes
de l’écosystème de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) contribuera à une
gestion coordonnée, efficiente et efficace de la zone. Ce régime
de gestion coopératif est l’approche privilégiée pour la conserva-tion
et la protection de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) tel qu’il a été éta-bli
par le processus de consultation. Les activités proposées pour
une gestion coopérative comprennent l’observation de mammi-fères
marins, la plongée guidée, la recherche et l’éducation, la
gestion des eaux de ballast et les programmes des ministères de
la Défense nationale et des Transports (niveau fédéral) dans le
secteur.
La désignation de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) comme ZPM et
l’interdiction de prélever les ressources marines vivantes repré-sentent
des éléments importants et nécessaires pour la conserva-tion
et la protection d’un écosystème très productif et riche en
biodiversité.
Solutions envisagées
Le statu quo était considéré inacceptable. En effet, même si la
zone est actuellement protégée d’une certaine façon en vertu de la
Loi sur les pêches,uneZPMdésignée par règlement en vertu de
la Loi sur les océans fournira l’occasion d’utiliser des outils de
gestion intégrée pour conserver et protéger la biodiversité et la
productivité biologique de la zone ainsi que l’ormeau nordique,
une espèce menacée.
La solution envisagée est la désignation de la ZPMde
XwaYeN (Race Rocks) par règlement, avec l’interdiction de pré-lever
toute ressource marine vivante. Cette solution apportera
l’élément clé requis pour gérer la ZPM tout en permettant au mi-nistre
de guider et de faciliter la création d’une approche de ges-tion
intégrée de l’écosystème dans son ensemble.
Cette solution proposée pour la réglementation est conforme à
la Politique de réglementation car elle réduit le fardeau régle-mentaire
des Canadiens. Cependant, si la situation l’exige, la so-lution
qui consiste à contrôler les activités par la réglementation
demeure possible.
Avantages et coûts
L’avantage principal du règlement proposé pour désigner
XwaYeN (Race Rocks) zone de protection marine est l’établis-sement
des fondements nécessaires pour veiller à la conservation
et à la protection d’un écosystème marin canadien fort productif
et riche en diversité. Ceci contribuera à prévenir la détérioration
écologique de la zone et à protéger l’ormeau nordique dans cette
zone.
Un avantage secondaire à la désignation de la ZPM de
XwaYeN (Race Rocks) est l’occasion d’instaurer un régime de
gestion intégrée qui sera fondé sur une approche de gestion éco-systémique,
coopérative et intégrée pour conserver et protéger
la zone, et qui impliquera plusieurs organismes fédéraux et

provinciaux aux pouvoirs distincts; de plus, la désignation favo-rise
la conformité volontaire au moyen d’activités d’intendance et
de coopération avec des groupes d’intervenants.
La création de cette ZPM démontrera aussi la volonté du Cana-da
à s’acquitter de ses engagements en vertu de la Conférence des
Nations Unies sur le droit de la mer (UNCLOS) et de la Conven-tion
sur la biodiversité (PNUE 1994), ainsi que ses responsabilités
dans le cadre du programme des aires protégées de l’Union mon-diale
pour la nature (IUCN).
Les sommes nécessaires à la gestionde la ZPMproviendront
des affectations budgétaires existantes.
Consultations
Depuis son annonce en 1998, le processusde la ZPMpilote a
recueilli et stimulé un appui local considérable pour la désigna-tion
de la ZPM de XwaYeN (Race Rocks). Le processus de con-sultation
a contribué à tisser des liens basés sur la confiance, et la
désignation réglementaire de la ZPM aidera à préserver l’élan et
la confiance des intervenants.
Le Conseil consultatif de Race Rocks a été créé afin de faciliter
le processus de consultation. Les représentants sont les suivants :
— le ministère de la Défense nationale
— Parcs Canada
— Pêches et Océans Canada
— le Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks de la
Colombie-Britannique
— le Collège du Pacifique Lester B. Pearson
— les groupes autochtones, par l’intermédiaire du Coast Salish
Sea Council
— la communauté scientifique
— les Friends of Ecological Reserves
— la communauté des plongeurs
— la Georgia Strait Alliance
— le Conseil consultatif de la pêche récréative — Victoria
(représentant la collectivité de la pêche récréative)
— les exploitants de marinas locales
— la Société pour la protection des parcs et des sites naturels
du Canada
— The Northwest Whale Watchers Association
Le Conseil consultatif de Race Rocks remplissait les fonctions
suivantes :
— représenter les groupes ou les intervenants clés;
— donner des avis à Pêches et Océans Canada et au ministère
des Parcs de la Colombie-Britannique sur le processus
consultatif;
— assembler et analyser les résultats du processus de
consultation;
— faire des recommandations consensuelles à Pêches et Océans
Canada et au ministère des Parcs de la Colombie-Britannique
sur l’établissement d’une zone de protection marine dans les
eaux avoisinant XwaYen (Race Rocks);
— veiller à la participation de la collectivité à l’établissement et à
la gestion continue de la ZPM de XwaYen (Race Rocks).
Quatre Premières nations Salish du littoral soit Beecher Bay,
T’souke, Songhees et Esquimalt revendiquent la partie est du
détroit de Juan de Fuca comme leur territoire traditionnel. Bien
qu’on ne prévoie pas limiter les activités des Premières nations en créant la ZPM, ces dernières ont offert, durant les consultations, de renoncer à leurs activités de pêche à des fins alimentaires et rituelles pour manifester leur appui à la désignation de la ZPM.

Le Conseil consultatif de Race Rocks représentait un excellent
forum pour la définition, la discussion et la résolution des pro-blèmes. Il a bien fonctionné et a guidé la mise sur pied du régime
de gestion coopératif proposé. L’engagement résultant en matière d’intendance et de coopération pour la protection de cette zone en tant que ZPM, a jeté les bases d’un régime de gestion par confor-mité volontaire sans précédent.
Au cours des discussions et de l’élaboration des recommanda-tions pour la désignation et la gestion de la Zone de protection
marine de Race Rocks, tous les membres du conseil consultatif et leurs commettants ont bien compris qu’avec la désignation, le
prélèvement de toute espèce marine vivante (commerciale et ré-créative) serait interdit. Ils ont aussi accepté que cette restriction
n’empêche pas le prélèvement d’organismes marins à des fins
scientifiques ou académiques dans le cadre d’un programme de
recherche continu pour évaluer et effectuer le suivi de la santé à
long terme de l’écosystème marin de XwaYen (Race Rocks).
L’impact le plus direct de cette interdiction porte sur la collec-tivité de pêche récréative, qui a accepté l’établissement de la zone sans prélèvement à l’intérieur des limites de la zone de protection marine proposée. Le secteur de pêche commerciale ne sera pas touché, car la zone est fermée à la pêche commerciale depuis 1990, et le secteur commercial ne s’attend pas à la réouverture de cette zone dans un avenir prochain. Les groupes autochtones ont manifesté au Conseil consultatif de Race Rocks leur appui envers lacréationde la zone deprotection marine de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) en optant volontairement pour ne pas exercer la pêche dans ce secteur.
Les recommandations traduisent le résultat du processus de
concertation mené par le Conseil consultatif de Race Rocks et les opinions exprimées par le public, les intervenants et les autres partenaires au moyen de consultations qui ont duré deux ans.
En plus des consultations sectorielles avec les intervenants,
deux séances publiques ont eu lieu en février 2000. Les consulta-tions
publiques ont été tenues afin de permettre aux personnes
non représentées par des groupes d’intérêt d’obtenir de l’in-formation
et de discuter sur ces questions. Les consultations, aux-quelles
ont participé 101 personnes, ont représenté un forum utile
pour la discussion sur divers aspects de la ZPM et de la réserve
écologique. Les résultats de ces discussions témoignent d’un ap-pui
considérable à la création d’une zone de protection marine à
Race Rocks comme complément au statut de réserve écologique.
Depuis l’annonce première de l’initiative pilote de XwaYeN
(Race Rocks), la couverture médiatique a été positive, continue et
a stimulé la discussion et l’intérêt de la part du public. Parmi les
médias qui ont traité du dossier, on comptait des journaux locaux
et des émissions de télévision éducatives (Knowledge Network et
Discovery Channel) qui ont souligné les avantages écologiques de
la ZPM proposée et l’appui du public.
Respect et exécution
Les principaux groupes d’intervenants ont manifesté un vif in-térêt,
non seulement envers l’élaboration de pratiques exemplai-res,
mais aussi envers l’atteinte d’un niveau élevé de conformité
aux exigences réglementaires. La mise sur pied d’initiatives
d’intendance et de lignes directrices visant des pratiques exem-plaires
a déjà commencé.
L’appui unanime à la création d’une zone de protection marine
dans les eaux avoisinant le secteur XwaYeN (Race Rocks) sug-gère
que des interventions coercitives seront rarement requises.
Le secteur de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) compte des gardiens ré-sidants
et abrite une série de caméras vidéo en ligne (liées à

Internet) disposées stratégiquement. Ces mesures contribuent à un
environnement local propice à la conformité.
Par conséquent, la gestion sera assurée au moyen de lignes di-rectrices
sur la conformité volontaire relative à un certain nombre
d’activités telles les bateaux plaisanciers, les activités liées à
l’écotourisme y compris l’observation de mammifères et la plon-gée.Le suivi et l’évaluation de l’efficacité de ces lignes directri-cesse feront sur une période de deux ans. Selon les résultats, des règlements relatifs aux activités seront alors considérés au besoin.
Personnes-ressources
Camille Mageau, Directrice, Conservation des écosystèmes
marins, Ministère des Pêches et des Océans, 200, rue Kent, Otta-wa
(Ontario) K1A 0E6, (613) 991-1285 (téléphone), (613) 998-
3329 (télécopieur), mageauc@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (courriel), ou Mary
Ann Green, Directrice, Affaires législatives et réglementaires,
Ministère des Pêches et des Océans, 200, rue Kent, Ottawa (Onta-rio)
K1A 0E6, (613) 990-0162 (téléphone), (613) 990-0120 (télé-copieur), greenma@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (courriel).

PROJET DE RÉGLEMENTATION
Avis est donné que la gouverneure en conseil, en vertu du pa-ragraphe
35(3) de la Loi sur les océans a ,sepropose de prendre
le Règlement sur la zone de protection marine XwaYeN (Race
Rocks),ci-après. Les intéressés peuvent présenter leurs observations au sujet du projet de règlement dans les 30 jours suivant la date de publica-tion
du présent avis. Ils sont priés d’y citer la Gazette du Canada
Partie I ainsi que la date de publication, et d’envoyer le tout à

Camille Mageau, Directrice, Conservation des écosystèmes ma-rins,
Ministère des Pêches et Océans, 200, rue Kent, Ottawa (On-tario)
K1A 0E6. Téléphone : (613) 991-1285, Télécopieur : (613)
998-3329, Courriel : mageauc@dfo-mpo.gc.ca
Ottawa, le 19 octobre 2000

Le greffier adjoint du Conseil privé,
MARC O’SULLIVAN

RÈGLEMENT SUR LA ZONE DE PROTECTION
MARINE XwaYeN (RACE ROCKS)

DÉSIGNATION
1. L’espace situé à l’intérieur de la ligne de contour de 20 bras-
ses (36,58 m) dont le tracé figure sur la carte hydrographique en
annexe est désigné comme la zone de protection marine XwaYeN (Race Rocks).
INTERDICTION
2. (1) Les définitions qui suivent s’appliquent au présent
article.
« habitat du poisson » S’entend au sens du paragraphe 34(1) de
la Loi sur les pêches.(fish habitat)
« poisson » S’entend au sens de l’article 2 de la Loi sur les pê-
ches.(fish)
———
a L.C. 1996, ch. 31

(2) Il est interdit d’enlever de la zone de protection marine
XwaYeN (Race Rocks) :
a) tout poisson;
b) tout élément de l’habitat du poisson;
c) tout organisme marin vivant faisant partie de l’écosystème
du poisson.
(3) Le paragraphe (2) ne s’applique pas à l’enlèvement aux fins
de recherche scientifique visant la protection et la compréhension
de la zone de protection marine XwaYeN (Race Rocks).

ENTRÉE EN VIGUEUR
3. Le présent règlement entre en vigueurà la date de son
enregistrement.

The complete text of the CANADA GAZETTE from which this has been copied may be found in PDF form at : http://canada.gc.ca/gazette/part1/pdf/g1-13444.pdf pages 112-120.
INCLUDED on page 119 and 120 are the charts of the proposed MPA area with coordinates defined also a copy of the English version facsimile is attached below
Return to the
Index of RRAB
racerocks.com home page
Sitemap Contact
webmaster:
Garry Fletcher
Copyright

Ryan Murphy films underwater at West Race Rocks


This video was shot by the team of Pearson College divers while practicing for the live webcast for the QuickTime Live Conference in California- Oct 2000 .

On the 4th of October, a 5 member diving team brought the camera to West Race Rock to film the marine life there. Along with Red Sea Urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus), Plumose Anemones (Metridium farcimen), and a Tiger Rockfish (Sebastes nigrocinctus) was a large school of Black Rockfish (Sebastes melanops). The camera crew for the dive was J.O. Dalphond, Hana Boye, and myself. Organism identification responsibility falls on me. Hinted streaming video time is 3 minutes 22 secs
My name is Ryan Murphy and I am a Year 26 Pearson Student from Newfoundland. I am doing the editing on this movie. I’m the diver with the blue snorkel signalling “OK” at the beginning. Garry, our Guru, is showing me how to do this in iMovie as this is my first movie, I hope you enjoy it.

RRAB meeting Sept 25 2000

Date:                  September 25th, 2009
Time:                  10:00am to 2:00pm
Location:           Canadian Coast Guard Station, 25 Huron Street, Victoria
Meeting Room:  Administration Building, J. Wedge Board Room

Draft Agenda

  1. Welcome and Introductions
  2. Presentations about the project and the Race Rocks area
  3. The MPA process and the role of the Public Advisory Board
  4. Important features and uses of the Race Rocks area.
  5. Next steps.

Ethology laboratory- Sample write-up

Sunny Ashcroft
September 22, 2000
Laboratory: A Sealion Ethology
Aim:
To become familiar with the process of preparing an ethology, including observation over a period of time, proper techniques of observation, and analysis of data collected. Natural animal behavior of sealions will be studied using field observations, and patterns of behavior will try to be identified and quantified using an ethogram and time budget. An ethogram lists behaviors observed by the subject, while the time budget gives the percentage of time that the subject engaged in the behavior.1

Introduction

Data for this ethology was collected on Race Rocks, a rocky outcrop housing a lighthouse and several buildings, and now an ecological reserve, located in the Juan de Fuca Strait. Figure 1 shows the location at which the subjects were observed, with field binoculars, and the site of observation.

Figure 1: Photo of Race Rocks showing observation location and site of observation

wholerockob

The group of sea lions observed consisted of both species of sealion found at Race Rocks, California and Steller’s. The observations were taken over the period of one hour, with 6 minutes being allotted to each of the 10 sealions observed, 5 of the subjects being the darker and smaller Steller’s sealions, Eumetopias jubatus, and 5 of the subjects being the pale and larger California sealions, Zalophus californianus. Due to the distance that the observations were taking place, I was unable to identify the morphology of the sealions observed. This particular group of sealions was observed from 12:00pm to 1:00pm on September 15, 2000. The weather was fair, with sun and only sparse cloud cover, and a breeze.

Data Analysis

Part A: Sealion Ethogram

Grooming behavior
– scratching
intermediately looking around, observing
grooming (i.e. licking, smoothing self with tongue)
stretching
Observation
sitting up on fins
looking up at sky
looking around
Making noises
Sitting up and random noise making (i.e. non aggressive barking)
Socially aggressive
no extensive movement of body (excluding sitting up or posturing)
opened mouth aggression, may or not be making noise
aggressive posturing
Movement:aggressive, or because of antagonism
involves making noise (i.e. barking)
aggressive charging or chasing
movement away or towards an aggressor
being aggressive towards others
Movement:not aggressive
moving for better position on rock, or sleeping position
Resting
laying down with intermediate head raising or barking
yawning

Part B: Sealion Time Budget

Number of 6 min. observation periods
10 %E. Movement:aggressive 8%
Number of individuals observed 10 % F. Movement:non aggressive 24%
Total minutes of observation
60 % G. Resting 13%
% A. Grooming behavior
29
% B. Observation 16
% C. Making noises 8%
% D. Socially aggressive
2%

Evaluation

piechartAccording to Figure 2 it appears that most of a sealion’s time, in comparison with other behavioral categories identified, is spent grooming (29%). This is followed by non-aggressive movement (24%), and then by observation (16%) and resting (13%). Both at 8% of the observed hour are aggressive movement and making noises. The least part of the sealion’s hour, 2%, was spent in socially aggressive behavior. This data would suggest that at this particular hour of observation, from 12:00pm to 1:00pm, sealions perched on rocks can be said to spend their time at various activities, but that the majority of time is spent grooming, moving non-aggressively (for better resting position), and resting. This behavior can be attributed to the fair weather and amount of sunlight available at this time of the day.This data does not really relate to the energy requirements of the species as the sealions were not observed to be feeding or hunting on or for their food.2 In fact from the data gathered, it might be possible to postulate that the sealions, during that one hour period, did not require much energy at all since they were mostly at rest, and at activities related to their own well being that were not related to hunting or eating. Similarily the data collected also does not shed that much light on the adaptive strategy of the sealion.3 The data collected can be interpreted to say that sealions are adapted to lying and resting on the land, with such motor capabilities and lung capabilities as needed, away from possible predatory sources in the sea.

Several sources of error can be identified in this particular experiment. The first and perhaps most important is the failure of the group to return to Race Rocks at a similar time of day, during the same part of the year, to do another hour of observation of the sealions. This data would have been very beneficial in the compilation of both the time budget and the ethogram and would have made our observations more accurate. The observations, had they been taken during two different intervals, should be made at relatively the same time of day and year to keep the results as accurate as possible, as to relate what that species is doing at that particular point in time, during that time of day.

The sealions observed by the group were of different species. This fact is very interesting. Our observations can then be said to represent the behavior of “sealions” in general, but is not very species specific. To be entirely accurate and precise only one of the species should have been observed for the hour. In that manner our observations could be said to accurately depict the behavior of such and such species at such and such time in the day.

The groups method of recording data is judged to have been fairly good. In a group of two, the 6 min periods of time were alternated between us, and the one partner who was not looking through the field glasses at the subject was recording and timing the observations of the other. This proved to be a fairly efficient and effective manner of recording data. A source of error could be attributed to the amount of time taken for the next observer to pick up the field glasses and locate the new subject of observation. To improve upon this it is suggested that only one person take the observations the entire hour, and the other partner record everything observed. This would eliminate the time gap, but it wouldn’t be very much fun .

The distance at which our observations were taken did not allow the group to identify between the males and females of both species. This is unfortunate and would have added to our data. If we were able to the group should have pre-determined that half of the hour would be given to females of the species, and half of the hour to males. This would have allowed for more accurate and impartial data. The fact that the group was unable to determine the sex of the sealions also gives rise to the question, what other details did we miss out on because of the distance of our observations? If possible, the observations should have been made at a distance where important details could be observed, but the observers would have to keep in mind that they should disturb the natural environment as little as possible. As it was, our distance did not allow for disturbance of the sealions or their environment.

The temperature, wind direction, water temperature, and other related physical statistics about the area of observation were not noted down at the time of observation. The absence of this data is of particular importance when analyzing the reason for the behavior of the sealions being what it is, and why so much time was spent on a particular activity. For instance, I have postulated above that the sealions spent so much time grooming, resting, and moving to get into a better resting position, because the weather was so fair and sunlight in abundance. More accurate observations of temperature and the weather would have assisted in this analysis.

Our group’s method of observing a group of sealions at a particular physical location, with 6 min on each individual, is judged to have been a fairly good one. Our group moved from the individuals in the left of the group to the individuals to the right of the group, one sealion after another, spending 6 min of observation time on each individual. This resulted in impartiality and our data being a representation of the entire group of sealions at that particular hour. The data collected can only be said to represent the behavior at that particular location though:what about those sealions in the water, what are they doing? As this data was not gathered, our observations cannot be said to truly depict an hour in the life of a sealion, only an hour in the life of those sealions that were resting on that rock at that time.

As for the compilation of the data collected, the most objective descriptions can be said to be the sub-points in the categories A through G. The categories themselves, the category titles, and the grouping of the sub-points into their respective categories, can be said to be more subjective. My ability to judge what behavior belongs in which category, for example in the grooming category, which includes both elements of observation and the subject licking itself, I established that grooming behavior appeared to include periods of looking up from one’s grooming and observing one’s surroundings. This is my own personal interpretation, and while it may not be correct, is what I correlate with what I have observed. This makes such categories subjective in manner. Others may not necessarily categorize what I may categorize as a certain behavior the same way. As well my personal method of making an ethogram is quite interesting. I have clearly identified seven behavioral categories that include specific behavioral actions. These are my interpretations of what my group observed. In this way the ethogram itself can be said to be subjective.

Overall the laboratory, and results obtained, are judged to have been adequate for the aim proposed.

Resources“Race Rocks Website https://www.racerocks.ca accessed September 21, 2000

Appendix A,

Ethology Laboratory“, prepared by Matt Rise

“Sealion Field guide”, http://www.lifestories.com/Spring99/field-guide/seal-field-guide.htm, accessed September 21, 2000

1. sentence adapted from Introduction in “Ethology Laboratory” handout

2. referring to question 7 in “Ethology Laboratory” handout

3. referring to question 8 in “Ethology Laboratory” handout

 

Interview by CBC reporter Loreen Pindera (PC year3)

In this interview for the CBC program “The World This Weekend” by CBC reporter Loreen Pindera (Pearson College student, year 3) with Garry Fletcher, faculty member at Lester Pearson College. they discuss how a fragile ecosystem can be loved to death by too many people wanting to visit it, The solution for the Race Rocks Ecological reserve was to use the technology of the internet to bring this island ecosystem in the Strait of Juan de Fuca to the world while conserving this fragile ecosystem -Sept 16/2000.

Race Rocks Officially Designated as an MPA Sept 14, 2000

RACE ROCKS OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS AN MPA SEPT. 14, 2000

 

Table of Contents:PREAMBLE

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. BACKGROUND
    1. National, International and Provincial Context
    2. Legislative Authority for the Stewardship/Conservation of (Race Rocks)
    3. Marine Protected Area Strategy
  3. – A Place of Many Values
    1. Conservation Interests
    2. Historic Interests
    3. Socio-economic Interests
  4. PROPOSAL FOR (RACE ROCKS) MARINE PROTECTED AREA
    1. Process
    2. Issues Raised During Consultation
    3. A Vision for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area
    4. Objectives for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area
    5. Proposal to Designate
    6. Name
    7. Area Boundaries
    8. Designation
    9. Management Intentions
    10. Post Designation

LIST OF APPENDICES

I–Canada/BC Marine Protected Area Strategy MPA CriteriaII–IUCN Management Categories for Marine Protected Areas

III–Assessment of known conservation (Table 1) and socio-economic (Table 2) values in (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area according to IUCN criteria for the identification and selection of marine protected areas

IV–Consultative Process

V–Guiding Principles for Designation of Race Rocks Ecological Reserve as a Marine Protected Area

VI–Maps

VII–Bibliography

PREAMBLE

The purpose of this proposal is to demonstrate that the criteria outlined in the draft Canada/British Columbia Marine Protected Area Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast (Appendix I) for establishing marine protected areas have been met, thereby providing the rationale for proceeding with formal designation of Race Rocks Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act. Such designation will compliment the protected status of the existing provincial Ecological Reserve. In addition, designation of Race Rocks Marine Protected Area will also contribute to the World Conservation Union (IUCN) World Commission on Protected Areas initiative to create and manage a network of marine protected areas.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

In 1998, the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans announced four pilot Marine Protected Area initiatives on Canada’s Pacific coast. One of these areas was (pronounced “shwai’yen” (Race Rocks) (Appendix VI). Since then, a wide range of further studies and consultations has been undertaken to determine the feasibility of proceeding to final designation of this unique area under the Oceans Act.

Located at the eastern entrance of Juan de Fuca Strait, (Race Rocks) with its small rocky island system and high-current subtidal and intertidal areas is ecologically unique. The area contains ecologically significant and unique assemblages of benthic and pelagic invertebrates and provides haulout and feeding areas for California and Stellar sea lions during the winter. It is also the largest haulout and breeding areas for harbour seals in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and provides nesting habitat and resting areas for migratory seabirds.

Race Rocks has been managed as a provincial marine protected area for the past 20 years. The natural values of the (Race Rocks) area were recognized formally by the Province of British Columbia in 1980 in its designation of the area as an Ecological Reserve under the provincial Ecological Reserves Act. This designation provides for protection of the natural and cultural heritage values of the terrestrial (nine islets) and the ocean bottom (to a depth of 20 fathoms) lands.

(Race Rocks) is located 17 kilometres southwest of Victoria, and is the most southerly part of Canada’s Pacific Coast. One of its nine islets is the site of Race Rocks lightstation, the second oldest lighthouse in Western Canada.

The area’s remarkable tidal flow – up to seven knots – supplies a generous stream of nutrients to a thriving community of subtidal invertebrates, including sponges, anenomes, hydroids and soft corals. Crowds of barnacles, tunicates, urchins and sea stars adorn the underwater cliffs. Fish such as sculpin, rockfish and lingcod seek refuge in the rocky crevices and undulating kelp forests. Above water, the islets serve as nesting colonies for many seabirds, such as gulls, cormorants, pigeon guillemots and oystercatchers, and as a

stopover for migratory birds. They share the rocks with resting harbour seals, Stellar and California sea lions, and a few Northern Elephant seals. River otters patrol the shoreline and killer whales are frequent visitors. Gray whales, Dall’s and harbour porpoises occasionally pass by.

The (Race Rocks) area is traditional territory for at least four Coast Salish First Nations people; Beecher Bay, T’souke, Songhees and Esquimalt. The nutrient rich waters provided a wide diversity of food fishing opportunities year round. The Coast Salish people’s interaction with the area has been based on the First Nations “Thirteen Moons” calendar; a spiritual and temporal-based approach to sustainably harvesting and respecting the resources.

The exceptional diversity of marine life at (Race Rocks) – long recognized by First Nations in the area – makes it an ideal place for scientific and educational observation. It serves as a model for the transition zone between inner coastal waters and the open ocean, which is why nearby Lester B. Pearson College has supported the stewardship and protection of the area. In accordance with the management objectives for the Ecological Reserve, BC Parks is proposing to operate the lightstation facility as a research/education/guardian centre. It is proposed that Lester B. Pearson College will provide this service, under permit to BC Parks.

Designation as a Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act will be followed by a further consultation process leading to the preparation of a long-term integrated management plan for the joint federal/provincial marine protected area under the direction of Fisheries and Oceans Canada and BC Parks.

 

2.0 BACKGROUND:

 

2.1-International, National and Provincial Context

Canada and British Columbia are committed to the protection of marine biodiversity and ecological processes, and the sustainable use of marine resources. The commitment to establish Marine Protected Areas fulfils Canada’s international responsibilities and obligations to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and as a signatory to the Convention on Biological Diversity (UNEP 1994) and the major components of the Jakarta Mandate developed under that Convention. This commitment also provides a means of meeting obligations under the Convention on Migratory Species (Bonn Convention).

This commitment is reinforced by a national Fisheries and Oceans Canada policy for establishing Marine Protected Areas. This policy aims to establish a system of Marine Protected Areas under the Oceans Act throughout Canada’s oceans to protect areas that are examples of the major ecological regions and the communities of plants and animals they contain. Supported by a range of provincial and federal marine-related legislation and policy responsibilities, the Federal Committee on Oceans (Pacific Region and National) provides advice and input to assist in the co-ordination and integration of Marine Protected Area proposals at the broader regional and national level.

Section 35 of the Oceans Act specifically provides for the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans to establish Marine Protected Areas. The commitment of this Act and associated policy supports the above international responsibilities and obligations in addition to the World Conservation Union (IUCN) World Commission on Protected Areas program of promoting the establishment and management of a global representative system of Marine Protected Areas (Kelleher et al 1995). Appendix II lists the internationally accepted IUCN management categories for protected areas. These management categories were developed by the IUCN with input from agencies with protected area responsibilities from around the world to promote a consistent approach to protected area management. It is proposed that this MPA will have an appropriate management category assigned to it as part of the preparation, with stakeholders, of the management plan.

(Race Rocks) has been assessed against the IUCN’s and World Commission of Protected Areas (WCPA) criteria for selection and identification of Marine Protected Areas (see Appendix III for summaries of these assessments).

 

2.2 -Legislative Authority for designation and management of (Race Rocks)Stewardship of the (Race Rocks) area is entrusted to all Canadians. To ensure that the interests of all Canadians are fairly represented in management processes for the area, three lead steward groups will oversee the management of the (Race Rocks) area. The tri-partied management of will be comprised of the Coast Salish First Nations people; the provincial government through the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks; and the federal government through Fisheries and Oceans Canada. The legislative authorities under which these stewards are mandated (acknowledged) are as follows:

First Nations:

Aboriginal title to traditionally used territories is recognized and affirmed as an ‘existing Aboriginal right’ in Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. Aboriginal title is one manifestation of a broader-based conception of Aboriginal rights. Aboriginal title is based on occupation of traditional territory prior to the assertion of European sovereignty and takes into account the following aspects: right of exclusive use and occupation of the land; right to choose to what purposes the land can be put; and the economic aspect of the land. (Delgamuukw vs. British Columbia).

The Crown is required to give appropriate priority to Aboriginal interests in Aboriginal title lands, reflecting the exclusive nature of Aboriginal title. The Supreme Court has also affirmed the Crown’s obligation to accommodate participation by First Nations in decision-making with regard to development of lands subject to Aboriginal title.

The legal authority to establish a protected marine area flows from one or more provincial and federal statutes including: British Columbia’s Ecological Reserve Act, Park Act, Wildlife Act or Environment and Land Use Act, as well as the Fisheries Act of Canada, National Parks Act, Canada Wildlife Act, Migratory Birds Convention Act, Canada’s Oceans Act or the proposed new Marine Conservation Areas Act.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada has the mandate to manage specified marine resources under the Fisheries Act and the Oceans Act. Section 35 (2) of the Oceans Act states that the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada has a responsibility “to lead and co-ordinate the development and implementation of a national system of Marine Protected Areas on behalf of the Government of Canada”.

Section 35 (1) of the Oceans Act authorizes the Government of Canada to establish Marine Protected Areas for a number of reasons, including the conservation and protection of:

  1. commercial and non-commercial fisheries, including marine mammals and their habitats;
  2. endangered or threatened species and their habitats;
  3. unique habitats;
  4. marine areas of high biodiversity or biological productivity; or
  5. any other marine resource or habitat as is necessary to fulfil the mandate of the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans.

British Columbia ecological reserves are established by provincial order-in-council under the Ecological Reserves Act for the:

  1. preservation of representative samples of British Columbia’s ecosystems;
  2. protection of rare and endangered plants and animals in their natural habitat;
  3. preservation of unique, rare or outstanding botanical, zoological or geological phenomena;
  4. perpetuation of important genetic resources; and
  5. scientific research and educational uses associated with the natural environment.

 

2.3-Marine Protected Area Strategy

The governments of Canada and British Columbia are working together to implement a Marine Protected Areas strategy that will achieve co-ordinated marine protection and

conservation goals for the Pacific coast. As mentioned earlier, one of these areas is (Race Rocks).

The proposed designation of (Race Rocks) as a Marine Protected Area exemplifies the essential elements of a viable west coast Marine Protected Area draft strategy (Marine Protected Area Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast) in that:

  1. It uses a joint federal-provincial approach: all relevant federal and provincial agencies will work collaboratively to exercise their authorities to achieve the full level of protection expected by the public for the area.

2.-It provides for shared decision-making with the public: commits government agencies to employ an inclusive shared decision-making process with First Nations, stakeholders, coastal communities and the public.3.-It contributes to a comprehensive marine protected area system: seeks to build an extensive system of protected areas by the year 2010 through a series of coastal planning processes.

4. The (Race Rocks) area was selected as an MPA pilot under the federal provincial MPA Strategy initiative based on its status as a richly diverse and important ecosystem. Both levels of government recognized that the Oceans Act could provide new, complementary and longer-term opportunities for the protection of the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve.

Past collaboration between Fisheries and Oceans Canada and BC Parks has yielded Fisheries Act closures within the reserve for most species since 1990. The creation of an Oceans Act MPA within the water column above the provincial Ecological Reserve will facilitate the integrated management of the (Race Rocks) area under the respective authorities of the two levels of governments.

Management planning processes provide a mechanism for public review and support for management strategies. In this respect it will be important that the proposed management plan for the joint Ecological Reserve – Marine Protected Area make appropriate linkages with other land use planning strategies.

 

3.0- (Race Rocks) – a place of many values

(Race Rocks) is a place with many values. It is essential that these values be respected and managed holistically to enable optimum protection of (Race Rocks). It is because of the array of natural, cultural heritage, and recreation values that complementary federal and provincial designations and management activities are required to achieve the level of protection expected by the public.

These values have been categorized into three interest areas: Conservation, Cultural Heritage, and Socio-Economic.

While the Ecological Reserve and Marine Protected Area complement each other in contributing to the maintenance of biological diversity and the protection of genetic material, equally important is the historic significance of the area to First Nations people and mariners.

 

3.1-Conservation Values

The Ecosystem Overview of Race Rocks (Race Rocks Ecosystem Overview, G. Fletcher, 1999) and the Draft Management Plan for Race Rocks (BC Parks, 1998) identify a number of key conservation values for the (Race Rocks) area which are outlined below.

Geology:

The geological terrain that includes Race Rocks is known as the Crescent Terrain, with the most prominent feature being the Metchosin Igneous Complex. This package of rocks are fine grained basalts (extrusive ocean crust) and their coarse grained equivalent, gabbros (intrusive rocks). Still evident are the small erratics and scour marks from the last of three glaciations.

Climate:

Located in the rain shadow of the Olympic Mountains and influenced by a wind funnel effect over the Strait of Juan de Fuca, (Race Rocks) often experiences weather patterns quite different to southern Vancouver Island. It has an unusually high amount of sunshine in the winter months, very seldom recording freezing temperatures. In the summer, there is the occasional blanketing of fog. The winds in the Juan de Fuca Strait blow principally from the southeast and northwest. Outward blowing winds occur fifty percent of the time during the winter (October through to March) while the inward blowing winds predominate during the summer (April through to September).

Temperature and salinity:

Race Rocks lightstation staff have recorded salinity and temperature for the past sixty years, with some local records dating back to 1921. Salinity varies considerably and is seasonally affected by the large volumes of weakly stratified, freshwater from the Fraser River. Winter water temperatures average about 7.5° C. with summer peaks of about 11° C.

Physical oceanography:

The area features high velocity currents that can reach up to seven knots in some shallow rocky intertidal or subtidal locales. The currents create a turbulent regime that brings nutrients up from surrounding depths and thus support a highly localized and complex food web. The currents also mix the water column, inhibit stratification, and promote high dissolved oxygen and nutrient concentrations. Rocky intertidal and subtidal sites especially those with high current flow also attract many diverse species of fishes, marine mammals and seabirds and promote high levels of invertebrate larval recruitment.

Marine algae and vascular plants:

Forty-one taxa are found at Race Rocks. Approximately 50% of vegetation coverage consists of Brown Kelps in certain depths and months; 30-90% may be Coralline Algae in other locales. Their biomass may be significantly higher than in surrounding areas.

Phytoplankton and zooplankton:

Species information is available from collection stations in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, a highly dynamic but poorly studied area. About 130 known taxa of phytoplankton and 100 zooplankton occur. Diatoms are most abundant in spring and early summer; dinoflagellates high in later summer and early fall; microflagellates in winter. Chlorophyll ranges from 1 to 5 mg/m3, low in fall/winter, high in spring/summer. Calanoid copepods are a dominant group, up to 70 – 90% in spring and summer. Pseudocalanus are most common species in the Strait. Other important zooplankton include euphasids, arrow worms, and fish eggs and larvae. Zooplankton abundance reaches a high of about one million individuals per sq. metre in August.

Benthic Invertebrates:

Although the species list is incomplete, evidence indicates high abundance and species diversity with over 200 taxa listed. Germesia (soft-coral), Gorgonocephalus (brittle star), E. prolifera and M. senile (anemones) are extremely abundant. Pacific abalone is listed as threatened by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). Recent towed video surveys showed high occurrences of sea urchins and anemones.

Fishes:

Thirty-five species are found here. However, there are large knowledge gaps about the fish populations and their roles in this ecosystem. The area represents a critical habitat for many species of rockfish, lingcod, and kelp greenling. Some rockfish species are now considered a “Species of Concern” by Washington State (U.S.A.) and are of conservation concern in B.C.

Birds:

About 45 known species of marine associated birds use Race Rocks Area for feeding, roosting, and nesting. The area provides critical nesting habitat for Glaucous-winged Gulls, Pigeon Guillemots, Black Oystercatchers and possibly Brandt’s Cormorants. Twenty-three percent of the Pelagic Cormorant population in the eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca nests at Race Rocks.

Marine Mammals:

Species found at Race Rocks include five known species of pinnipeds and ten species of cetaceans, five of which are common. The area is primarily used as a stop-over and rafting site for California (>1,000) and Steller sea lions (>50) in the winter. Harbour seals are the primary year-round resident users for haulout, birthing, pupping, and weaning. Race Rocks is the largest haulout for harbour seals in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, the second largest in the Canadian waters of the Georgia Basin, and can represent up to 20% of the South Gulf Islands population.

3.2- Cultural Heritage Values

Traditional harvest:

Four Coast Salish First Nations, Beecher Bay, T’souke, Songees and Esquimalt Nations, claim the eastern end of the Strait of Juan de Fuca as part of their traditional territory. Other Coast Salish Nations may have used this area. Interviews with First Nations representatives indicate that a wide range of food was available from the coastal waters including gull’s eggs, sea cucumbers, sea urchins, chitons, snails, whelks, mussels, barnacles, seaweeds, crab and fish. Seafood was not only eaten but also traded with other First Nations including those from Washington State (U.S.A.).

Marine Navigation:

As part of the “Graveyard of the Pacific”, the area was named “Race Rocks” by officers of the Hudson’s Bay Company who noted the area as a severe hazard to navigation in the 19th century due to the dangers created by the rip tide. Numerous shipwrecks led to the establishment of a lighthouse station at Great Race Rock in 1860. This lighthouse is the second oldest on Canada’s West Coast and is protected with designation as a heritage structure. The Underwater Archaeological Society of British Columbia maintains an inventory of shipwreck sites within the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve.

 

3.3 -Socio-economic interests

The diversity and significance of natural, cultural heritage and recreational values of the Race Rocks area generates substantial and varied socio-economic interests. Under the provincial legislation however, there are significant limitations on the acceptable uses of the area. For instance, the primary purpose of the Ecological Reserve is the protection of the natural and cultural heritage values, and human use may only occur to the extent to which these values are not impaired. Ecological Reserves are not designated for recreational purposes. The socio-economic interests identified below should be considered in light of this restrictive legislation.

  1. Co-operation with First Nations:The (Race Rocks) pilot Marine Protected Area investigation and pre-designation process has provided a good opportunity to nurture significant relationships between all participants and improved understanding of First Nations’ interests (Appendix IV). The area has been a productive traditional use fishing area for First Nations.
  2. Education and research:The biodiversity of the (Race Rocks) area has strong value for the local naturalist and science communities. Lester B. Pearson College of the Pacific, as an international school of choice for many foreign students, has been engaged for more than twenty-five years with the “ living classroom”; providing benefits to thousands of people of all ages and from more than a hundred countries. Through its interactive internet site, www.racerocks.com, the college is promoting awareness of the marine environment to an international audience.The faculty and students of the Biology and Environmental Systems program at Pearson College are long-time volunteer ecological reserve wardens. They are actively involved in research and education activities and provide an important monitoring function. The College has been the principal research agency to date and has developed an excellent database for the ecological reserve and its values. Numerous opportunities exist to involve the education and research community in creative joint educational initiatives with First Nations, BC Parks and Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
  3. Eco-tourism:The following summarizes the forms of eco-tourism that currently occur in the Race Rocks area. It is recognized that these uses may be restricted as necessary to protect the natural and cultural heritage values of the area and ensure that these values are sustained.Marine wildlife viewing and diving are the predominant forms of eco-tourism in the Race Rocks area. As a result of a rapid and spontaneous growth of marine wildlife viewing in southern Vancouver Island, principally for orca whales, there has been increasing interest in Race Rocks for the diversity and availability of other marine mammals.British Columbia’s waters are renowned world-wide for their excellent diving value and Race Rocks exemplifies some of the world’s best diving opportunities. Strong currents, offer limited diving windows requiring experienced and “guided” diving. The dive industry is enjoying good growth and providing jobs and benefits to the tourism sector.
  4. Commercial Fishing:The area has been closed to commercial fishing for all species under the Fisheries Act since 1990.
  5. Recreational Fishing:Sport fishing for salmon and halibut is currently very popular in the area directly adjacent to the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve.
  6. Marine Navigation:Frequent heavy oil and crude tanker traffic (two supertankers per day on average) passes within two miles of the (Race Rocks) area. Recreational boating is somewhat limited because of tidal and current conditions.
  7. Mining and Petroleum:The authority for exploration for or extraction of any oil or gas reserves within the Georgia Region, including the (Race Rocks) area rests with the Province of British Columbia.Exploration and development of mineral and petroleum resources within the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve is prohibited under the British Columbia Ecological Reserve Act.
  8. Co-operation with non-government organizations:The process for consultations with stakeholders involved considerable and useful dialogue with non-government organizations. The volunteer Race Rocks Advisory Board (RRAB) included representation from the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Georgia Strait Alliance and Friends of Ecological Reserves. As a result, all participants developed better understanding of interests, values and common objectives with the establishment of a marine protected area.
  9. Co-operation Between Governments:

BC. Parks, Parks Canada, the Department of National Defence and Fisheries and Oceans Canada are committed to a coordinated and cooperative approach to the management of Race Rocks and providing the level of protection identified by the public and the RRAB. This pilot process has led to a greater understanding and improved collaboration between these agencies.

 

4.0 Proposal for (Race Rocks) Marine protected Area4.1-Process

To assist Canada and B.C. in working towards the formal designation of the (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act, a multi-stakeholder Race Rocks Advisory Board was established in 1999.

Membership on the Race Rocks Advisory Board was comprised of representatives from: Friends of Ecological Reserves, the local dive community, Georgia Strait Alliance, Pearson College, First Nations (Coast Salish Sea Council), Sport Fish Advisory Board – Victoria, Department of National Defence, Lester B. Pearson College of the Pacific, Parks Canada, the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, the local science community, Northwest Whale Watchers Association and Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

The function of the Advisory Board was to:

  • represent key stakeholders and partners who would provide advice to Fisheries and Oceans Canada and BC. Parks on the consultation process;
  • collate and analyze feedback from consultations;
  • provide consensus-based, recommendations to Fisheries and Oceans Canada and BC Parks for the establishment of a Marine Protected Area at

(Race Rocks) and recommendations for management of the MPA; and,

ensure community involvement in the establishment and on-going management of the (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area.

 

4.2 -A Vision for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area

“Based on a cooperative and integrated, multi-lateral relationship, Race Rocks Marine Protected Area – Ecological Reserve will conserve and protect a unique, high-energy marine ecosystem for the benefit of future generations.”

Source: Stakeholder Consultations 1999/2000
“Race Rocks Ecological Reserve will continue to protect the high energy marine system found in the eastern entrance of the Strait of Juan de Fuca.”

Source: Race Rocks Ecological Reserve, Draft Management Plan June 1998
4.3 Management Issues Raised During Consultation

Eco-tourism

As British Columbia’s eco-tourism and dive industries expand, it is anticipated that visits to (Race Rocks) will increase over the next few years. This will necessitate the development of “best practices” to ensure that the feeding, resident and breeding species in the area are not disturbed. To date, there has been excellent co-operation from the marine mammal viewing industry towards the development and maintenance of guidelines for operating in the (Race Rocks) area. Similarly, the dive industry has expressed strong interest in developing guidelines, training and stewardship models for managing activity within Marine Protected Areas.

Any restrictions to recreational use will be made in consultation with the Race Rocks Advisory Board and the affected interest groups and others. For example, through the public advisory group process, and with the support of the whale watching industry, voluntary guidelines for appropriate viewing procedures have been established. As the popularity of viewing activities increases, this use will be monitored and further restrictions may be applied if impacts on the resources exceed acceptable limits.

Recreational Fishing

There are conservation concerns related to bycatch of species of concern such as rockfish and lingcod in the recreational salmon and halibut fisheries directly adjacent to the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve. The Race Rocks Advisory Board recommended that the area be closed to all fishing activity. Although initially reluctant to consider a total recreational fishing closure within the boundary of the proposed (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area, the Sport Fish Advisory Board (SFAB) now supports this recommendation.

Recreational Boating

Proximity to a large population base and the geographic location of Race Rocks (transit between the “west coast” and Gulf Island communities) make the Marine Protected Area particularly vulnerable to boating use. The volume of traffic passing in close proximity to, or through the MPA, will likely continue to increase over time. This activity will need to be closely monitored and subject to marine safety considerations, further restrictions may be required if adverse impacts exceed acceptable limits.

Marine Navigation

Due to the isolated nature, and the small area encompassed by the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve and proposed Marine Protected Area, even a small oil spill could have a devastating impact on the Race Rocks area. Oil spill contingency resources are available in Victoria. There may be a requirement to consider special contingency arrangements during the development of the management plan for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area due to the area’s high-energy environment.

The Port of Vancouver’s draft Ballast Water Management Guidelines state that dumping of ballast water may take place west of the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve. The introduction of alien species and contamination could significantly impact the (Race Rocks) environment. A monitoring regime to address the potential introduction of alien species will need to be considered through the Federal Committee on Oceans — Pacific during the development of the management plan.

Federal Committee on Oceans (Pacific Region)

Members of the Federal Committee on Oceans (Pacific Region) were contacted by letter in mid-May to determine if there were any issues related to moving forward with designation of the Race Rocks MPA. No issues were raised.

4.4-Objectives for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area

The following objectives have been identified for the Oceans Act portion of the joint marine protected area. These objectives may be modified following an integrated management planning process for the joint Federal-Provincial Marine Protected Area.

The objectives for the (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area are as follows:

  1. To protect the conservation values associated with marine biological diversity, marine habitats and the marine ecosystem associated with the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve and surrounding waters (see Appendix III);
  2. To permit the awareness, appreciation, use and enjoyment of the Race Rocks area, its natural and cultural heritage values to the extent that these uses do not impact adversely on the values within the proposed Marine Protected Area;
  3. To support the sharing of traditional knowledge;
  4. To provide scientific research opportunities to further understanding of the area to the extent that the impact of these uses is within acceptable limits and do not impair the diversity, abundance and functioning of the marine ecosystem;
  5. To permit increased education and awareness of the marine environment to the extent that the impacts of these uses are within acceptable limits and do not impair the diversity, abundance and functioning of the marine ecosystem; and,
  6. To test Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s National Framework for Establishing and Managing Marine Protected Areas and the Canada/BC Marine Protected Areas Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast.

 

4.5-Proposal to designate

The recommendations, outlined below, reflect the outcome of a consensus-based process by the Race Rocks Advisory Board (RRAB) regarding the management of the (Race Rocks) area as an MPA. These recommendations also reflect the directions expressed by the public, stakeholders and other partners, through consultations over the past two years, in support of complementary management of the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve as a Marine Protected Area.

Over the past eighteen months, the pilot Marine Protected Area process has identified and galvanized strong support for the complementary designation of Race Rocks as a joint MPA under federal and provincial jurisdictions. The consultative process developed new, trust-based relationships between an array of stakeholders and user groups including First Nations, sports fishers, eco-tourism companies, dive charter operators, scientists, educators and environmental organizations. It also elevated expectations that federal follow-through will be expeditious. There is significant risk to these valuable relationships and stakeholders’ reputations should the designation be delayed.

The following recommendations for the area’s management are presented for consideration:

4.6 a-Designation

It is recommended that Race Rocks be a joint federal-provincial marine protected area, receiving a high level of protection through the complementary authorities of the Federal Oceans Act and the Provincial Ecological Reserve

Act.

4.6 b-Co-operative Management

It is recommended that a joint Management Committee consisting of First Nations, Fisheries and Oceans Canada and BC Parks be established to ensure that the planning and management of the area is co-ordinated, effective and efficient and that Fisheries and Oceans Canada and BC Parks, as the lead public agencies, are publicly accountable for achieving the area’s goals and objectives.

4.6 c-Name

It is recommended that the Marine Protected Area be named (Race Rocks) in respect for the Coast Salish Nations name in the Clallam language, which is translated as meaning “fast flowing waters”.

4.7-Area Boundaries

It is recommended that the boundary for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area coincide with the current Ecological Reserve boundary (1980); being all waters within the 36.5 metre (20 fathom) line as described on Canadian Hydrographic Chart 3641 [1980]. Total area 200 hectares. For maps, see Appendix VI.

 

4.8-Federal Oceans Act Designation

This proposal:

  • addresses the relevant objectives of Canada’s Oceans Act;
  • is consistent with the National Framework for Establishing and Managing Marine Protected Areas (March 1999);
  • addresses and is consistent with the “Marine Protected Areas: A Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast”, Guiding Principles for the Development of Marine Protected Areas (as outlined in Appendix V);
  • meets the “Marine Protected Areas: A Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast” suggested criteria for selection of Marine Protected Areas (Appendix I); and,
  • meets IUCN criteria for selection and identification of Marine Protected Areas (as outlined in Appendix III).

 

On this basis, it is recommended that (Race Rocks) be designated as a Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act Section 35.

An appropriate IUCN Management Category will be applied to the (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area as part of the establishment of a management plan. It will be recommended as part of this process that (Race Rocks) become an IUCN Category I Marine Protected Area.

 

4.8-Management Intentions

Managing human use and impacts are the principal issues for (Race Rocks) as a combined Oceans Act Marine Protected Area and Ecological Reserve. Human use including eco-tourism is compatible with the objectives of establishing and managing Marine Protected Areas, but is incompatible with the purpose and objectives of provincial ecological reserves.

In recognition of the historical significance of the area to First Nations, shared management of the (Race Rocks) will be addressed co-operatively by First Nations, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and BC Parks in consultation with the Race Rocks Advisory Board. The management plan to be developed by First Nations, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, BC Parks, in consultation with stakeholders, will address the issues of human use, environmental protection, governance and stewardship. The Race Rocks Advisory Board has developed a series of recommendations (Race Rocks Advisory Board Management Recommendations for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area, March 2000) that outline a vision for the management of the MPA. This will form the basis for discussions leading toward the development of a management plan for the area.

Rather than develop a new regulatory framework for protection and conservation, existing regulatory mechanisms will be applied where necessary to support management objectives. There are strong indications that a voluntary compliance and stewardship program will achieve many of the resource protection goals and objectives, it is recognized, however, that some management objectives will require regulatory authority in order to be achieved. Principal stakeholder groups have expressed a keen interest in not only developing “best practices” but also working towards ensuring a high degree of compliance.

 

The recommended milestones and timing for designation appear below:

MILESTONES TIMING
Preparation of the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area Proposal June 30 ‘00
Agreement/support from key stakeholders, relevant provincial and federal agencies and committeesMinister (agreement-in-principle) July 31 ‘00August ‘00
Federal/Provincial announcement (of designation or the timing of designation and implementation of interim management arrangements) September ‘00
Commence management planning processCanada — B.C. approval of management plan

Regulatory regime completed

September 30 ‘00June 8 ’01

Dec. 1 ‘01

 

4.9-Post Designation

Following the designation, the Federal-Provincial Management Committee referred to in Section 4.6 b will work with key stakeholders on the development and implementation of management policies and practices for (Race Rocks). These policies and practices will remain in place until such time that a formal integrated management plan is finalized and agreed to by relevant stakeholders and government agencies. The Management Committee will have ongoing responsibility for management of the joint MPA.

 

List of Appendices:

 Appendix I–Canada/BC Marine Protected Area Strategy MPA Criteria

Appendix II –IUCN Management Categories for Protected Areas

Appendix III –Assessment of known conservation (Table 1) and socio-economic values (Table 2) in Race Rocks Marine Protected Area according to the IUCN criteria for the identification and selection of marine protected areas.

Appendix IV–Consultative Process
Consultative framework
First Nations
Stakeholder consultations

Public consultations

Appendix V–Guiding Principles for Designation of Race Rocks Ecological Reserve as a Marine Protected Area

Appendix VI–Maps

Appendix VII–Bibliography

 

 

APPENDIX I

 

Canada/BC Marine Protected Area Strategy MPA Criteria

MPA Protection Objectives Determining Criteria
To contribute to the protection of marine biodiversity, representative ecosystems and special natural features.
  • representativeness
  • degree of naturalness
  • areas of high biodiversity or biological productivity
  • rare and endangered species
  • unique natural phenomena
  • vulnerability
  • unique habitat
To contribute to the protection and conservation of fishery resources and their habitats.
  • areas of high biodiversity or biological productivity
  • rare and endangered species
  • vulnerability
  • areas supporting unique or rare marine habitats
  • areas supporting significant spawning concentrations or densities
  • areas important for the viability of populations and genetic stocks
  • areas supporting critical species, life stages and environmental support systems
To provide opportunities for increased scientific research on marine ecosystems, organisms and special features, and sharing of traditional knowledge.
  • value as a natural benchmark
  • value for developing a better understanding of the function and interaction of species, communities and ecosystems
  • value for determining the impact and results of marine management activities

 

 

APPENDIX II

 

IUCN Management Categories for Protected Areas

Management Categories

The World Conservation Union (IUCN) has been actively involved in the process for the establishment of marine protected areas since first promulgating guidelines in 1991. Through the efforts of the IUCN, governments and communities around the world have been spurred to conservation and protection initiatives that have, in effect, been harmonised by the development of an international context within which to operate. Dependent upon their objectives, the IUCN (’94) has provided six categories for all protected areas including marine protected areas:

Category I-Protected area managed mainly for science or

wilderness protection (Strict Nature Reserve/Wilderness Area);Category II -Protected area managed mainly for ecosystem

protection and recreation ( National Park);Category III-Protected area managed mainly for conservation of

–specific natural features (Natural monument);

Category IV-Protected area managed mainly for conservation

through management intervention (Habitat/SpeciesManagement Area);

Category V-Protected area managed mainly for landscape/seascape

–conservation and recreation (Protected Landscape/Seascape); and

Category VI-Protected area managed mainly for sustainable use of

natural resources (Managed Resource Protected Area) 

Given the uniqueness, diversity and size of the proposed Race Rocks Marine Protected area, the highest level of protection will be required – IUCN Category I Protected Area. Based on the results of previous consultations, it is anticipated that relevant stakeholders and partners will support this approach.

Appendix III

Table 1

Assessment of known conservation values in (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area according to the IUCN criteria for the identification and selection of marine protected areas.

CRITERIA FOR THE DENTIFICATION AND SELECTION OF AN MPA CONSERVATION VALUES
ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCEContains genetic diversity

Contains habitat (or refugia) for rare or endangered species; and

Contains one or more areas which is a biologically functional, self sustaining ecological unit

For a small area (less than 220 hectares), the area has one of the highest levels of biodiversity in Canada’s pacific waters. Contains diverse species assemblages in the terrestrial, intertidal and subtidal zones and habitat (or refugia) for two “threatened” marine species — Northern abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana) and killer whales (Orcinus orca).
UNIQUENESSContains unique geographic features, species, communities and ecosystems The area contains a geographic/physical oceanographic feature (a combination of shallow sills and island archipelago off a prominent headland with strong currents that is unique to the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The strength and speed of tidal currents at Race Rocks make it a unique feature in the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The area is characterized by turbulent and nutrient-rich waters, resulting in species assemblages both unique and ecologically significant to the Strait.
BIOGEOGRAPHICAL IMPORTANCEPresence of rare biogeographical qualities The combination of geographic/physical oceanographic features unique to the Strait of Juan de Fuca creates ecological conditions that yield important species assemblages.
INTERNATIONAL OR NATIONAL IMPORTANCEPotential to be or is listed on the World Heritage list (Race Rocks) has potential for consideration by the UNESCO World Heritage List as a site of international significance based on its natural heritage values.
VULNERABILITYDegree to which species or ecosystems are susceptible to natural processes Relative to more inland coastal waters (Strait of Georgia), water quality is high despite being located in waters contiguous to Victoria’s Inner Harbour and its sewage outfall. Oceanographic mixing, high flushing rates and proximity to the open Pacific, maintain good water quality. The marine system is vulnerable to oil spills (heavy tanker traffic in the Strait), commercial and recreational fishing and eco-tourism. Both terrestrial and marine systems are vulnerable to the introduction of non-indigenous species.
PRODUCTIVITYContains species, populations, or natural communities that have a high natural biological productivity Contains populations and species that flourish in high-energy, productive marine environments. The combination of rocky reefs and high-velocity currents create high levels of biological productivity and biodiversity
NATURALNESSDegree to which the area has been protected from, or not been subject to, human induced change The terrestrial environment has been heavily impacted through the construction and manning of a lightstation over many years. The marine environment likely has a high degree of naturalness, although there has been heavy fishing pressure on pelagics and groundfish over the years. Designation as an ecological reserve for more than twenty years, has provided a some protection, along with the stewardship of Pearson College.
REPRESENTATIVENESSDegree to which the area adds to the representativeness of a national MPA network Representative of the transitional zone between the open Pacific Ocean and coastal inshore waters
COMPREHENSIVENESSDegree to which the area covers the full range of ecosystems within the region The proposed area ranges from the terrestrial environment through an extensive sub-tidal zone to depths in excess of forty metres. Low energy, sand-dominated and freshwater habitats are not included.

 

 

TABLE 2

Assessment of socio-economic values in the (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area according to the IUCN criteria for the identification and selection of Marine Protected Areas.

 

Criteria for the identification and selection of an MPA Degree to which the proposed MPA satisfies each criterion
ECONOMIC INTERESTSDoes this site:

make an existing or potential contribution to economic value by virtue of its protection, e.g. for recreation or tourism, or as refuge or nursery area, or source of supply for economically valuable species-

have current or potential use for the extraction of, or exploration for resources-

have importance for shipping and/or trade-

have usage by traditional users including commercial fishers-

have value due to its contribution to local or regional employment and economic development-

Recreation — restricted under provincial legislationTourism — restricted under provincial legislation

Refugia — likely

Nursery areas — likely

Supply of key species — yes

Non-renewable resources — no

Proximity to busy shipping lanes — yes

Commercial fishing — no

Sports fishing — limited

Restrictions may be applied to tourism, recreation, education and research tht limit their contributions to employment and development of local community

FIRST NATIONS INTERESTShave traditional First Nation use and/or current economic value-

contain First Nation’s cultural values-

subject to Treaty and/or title considerations-

Traditional use — yesCultural values — yes

Treaty — yes

SOCIAL INTERESTSdoes the site have existing or potential value to the local, national or international communities because of its heritage, cultural, traditional, aesthetic, educational recreational or economic values- National and international communities have strong interests in the area’s educational, research, eco-tourism, cultural and traditional use values.

Appendix IV

Consultative Process

Consultative Framework

The pilot process for the establishment of a Marine Protected Area at (Race Rocks) recognized the importance of a comprehensive dialogue between those constituents whose interests might be affected. After identifying the key stakeholder groups or individuals, interests, issues and proposals for resolution were developed through facilitation and meetings. In some instances, this required a series of meetings to develop consensus. Overall, it is important to note that there was and continues to be a high level of support for the creation of Marine Protected Areas. The Race Rocks Advisory Board provided an excellent forum for discussion and issue resolution.

First Nations:

Engaging First Nations in the consideration of Race Rocks as a pilot MPA has been a priority. Initial discussions with T’souke and Beecher Bay First Nations revealed both common interests and issues requiring resolution.

From a First Nation’s perspective, the Race Rocks area has cultural significance with respect to traditional use and management of the area’s resources. There is recognition that, should a Marine Protected Area be established, it will not infringe on First Nations’ existing Treaty rights, traditional, food, ceremonial interests or relationship with the area. Further, a significant opportunity has developed for cooperative management and First Nation’s educational opportunities.

The Race Rocks Advisory Board included representation from the Coast Salish Sea Council. Active participation from First Nations ensured effective communications with local Bands and those in neighbouring Washington State U.S.A. Several events highlighted the First Nations’ participation. A “Thirteen Moon” seminar was conducted in December “which demonstrated the lunar cycle’s influence on traditional First Nations’ life and relationship to the ecosystem”. On March 9, 2000 the members of the Race Rocks Advisory Board were honoured to be invited by the Beecher Bay Band to a “Burning Ceremony” near Race Rocks. This event is highly spiritual and provides an offering to ancestors. It was a rare privilege to be invited to participate in such a ceremony and it provided a very meaningful opportunity to build relationships.

More recently, First Nations’ elders and youth are visiting (Race Rocks) to learn about traditional uses and relationship to the marine environment. These visits are assisting in the development of both a traditional use study and First Nations’ curriculum for elementary and junior secondary students.

 

The Race Rocks Advisory Board members expressed appreciation for the opportunity to develop a fuller understanding of First Nations’ relationship with marine ecosystems.

Through this process it became apparent that there was First Nations’ support for the creation of Marine Protected Areas such as (Race Rocks) and a willingness to participate in the management of MPA’s.

 

Stakeholder Consultations

Extensive consultations were conducted to determine interests, issues and support for the creation of a Marine Protected Area at Race Rocks. With most groups support was readily apparent and strong. A small minority of stakeholder groups expressed concerns and interests that were resolved. Issues regarding recreational fishing and eco-tourism interests required more detailed and protracted discussion.

Public Consultations

In addition to sector consultations with stakeholders, two public sessions were conducted in February 2000. The public consultations were held to ensure the widest range of information and discussion with those persons potentially not represented by particular interest groups.

 

 APPENDIX V

The following Guiding Principles for Marine Protected Area development have been adapted, in co-operation with BC Parks, from the draft Marine Protected Areas – A Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast 1998 – Guiding Principles for MPA Development.

 

 

Guiding Principles for the Designation of Race Rocks Ecological Reserve as a Marine Protected Area

Working Together: The full realization of Race Rocks as both and ER and MPA is dependent on the combined authorities of Canada and British Columbia, as well as the ongoing coordination of management actions by a range of federal and provincial agencies, non-government organizations and volunteers. DFO and BC Parks, representing Canada and British Columbia, will together provide the leadership that fosters this coordination, cooperation and partnership.

Learning by Doing: The outcomes and recommendations for management were based on stakeholders working together to develop the best solutions for a new initiative. Flexibility and adaptability will be required to meet the needs of all interests.

Respect First Nations and the Treaty Process: Canada and British Columbia consider First Nations’ support and participation in the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve and Marine Protected Area planning and management processes as essential. First Nations will be actively involved in all planning and management processes. The establishment of this MPA will not preclude options for settlement of treaties.

Managing for Sustainability: All resources within the Marine Protected Area require protection and conservation and must be managed for the benefit of future generations, with the emphasis on maintaining viable populations of all species and conserving a functioning ecosystem.

Precautionary approach: All management actions, including the regulation of appropriate uses, will be based on the precautionary approach. The precautionary approach means, “erring on the side of caution.” This principle puts the burden of proof on anyone conducting activities within Race Rocks MPA to demonstrate that there will be no damage to the marine ecosystem from the proposed activity.

Adaptive Planning and Management: The values protected within Race Rocks MPA will be subject to external influences and change over time. As such, the management direction and actions for the MPA component of the Race Rocks area will be adaptive and responsive to the changing environmental, social and economic conditions.

 

 

Fostering Ecosystem-Based Management: An ecosystem-based approach will be used to manage Race Rocks MPA. This means that management respects the integrity of the natural ecosystem and its key components structure and functions. This approach means that certain human activities will be managed in order to protect the natural environment.

Fostering Stewardship: Governments, stakeholders and local communities all play an equally important role in sustaining the activities, lifestyles, economics and health of the Race Rocks marine environment. Opportunities to actively involve others outside of Government in the stewarding of the Race Rocks area will be a foundation for the successful protection of the Race Rocks environment.

Open, Informed and Inclusive Decision-Making: Effective protection of Race Rocks’ values, as well as trust-based stewardship depends on open, transparent and informed decision-making. The management direction will be both inclusive of all interests and supported, to the greatest extent possible, by all affected organizations and individuals.

Appendix V1 MAPS

 

 

 

 

 Appendix VII

Bibliography

 

BC Parks (1999). The Management Plan for the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve –Draft. Unpublished. 26pp.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada (1999). National Framework for Establishing and Managing Marine Protected Areas. 25pp

Fletcher, G. (1999). The Race Rocks Ecological Overview

Governments of Canada and British Columbia (1998). Marine Protected Areas – A Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast. 28pp.

Kelleher, G. & A. Phillips (eds.) (1999). Guidelines for Marine Protected Areas. World Commission on Protected Areas of IUCN – The World Conservation Union. 28 pp.

Murgatroyd, L. (1999). Managing Tourism and Recreational Activities in Canada’s Marine Protected Areas: the Pilot Project at Race Rocks British Columbia. Dalhousie University graduate thesis.

Pakenham, M. (ed.) (2000). Race Rocks Advisory Board Management Recommendations for ( Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area. Unpublished. 20pp.

Pakenham, M. & K. Francis. (eds.) (2000). Regulatory Impact Assessment Statement – regulations to Designate (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area. Unpublished. 17 pp.

Pakenham, M. & K. Francis. (eds.) (2000). Proposal to Designate (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area. Unpublished. 25pp.