DFO expenses from Access to Information Request

CONTENTS of this File:

1. Background and Rationale for this report .

2. Figure 1: Amounts of DFO Race Rocks MPA Budget, Amount Spent
and Amount Remaining for each year .. 1999-2010

3. Table 1: Yearly budgets, 1999-2010

4. Figure 2: Detailed overview of DFO expenditures on Race Rocks

5. Table 2: Detailed overview table, 1999-2010

6. Figure 3. Pie chart showing expenditures for five categories.

7. Table 3. List of Individual Expenses for the Race Rocks MPA 1999-2010

8. Example of Ecotourism report done for First Nations :2006
(668 KB.pdf file)

9. ATIP Report : A200900266_2010-02-09_09-00-22.pdf (6MB.pdf file)

10. Analysis and Discussion

10b. Followup April 20/2010

11. Condensed version with headers removed, showing graphs.

12. RRPAB Resource Documents

ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION:

Upon receiving this report, I was surprized to note several features:

1. The fact that there was a significant budget for the creation of the Race Rocks MPA almost every year from 1999 to 2010, when the RRAB (Race Rocks MPA Advisory Board ) had been effectively shut down in 2002.

2. The fact that in many years a significant portion of the budget remained unspent at the end of the DFO fiscal year when the process of management of this ecosystem and designate MPA was still being carried on by Lester Pearson College without any financial support from DFO.

3. The large portion of the cumulative budget over the 11 years that was designated for First Nations Liaison and continues to be designated, so far without any evidence of an outcome. ( process still ongoing as of Sept, 2011–)

4. The unavailability of written records showing the deliverables for most of the contracts.. hopefully in the interests of transparency and resource availability they are still to come from DFO.

5. When I made a request for the #8 report above: 2006 report on ecotourism, there was some concern about confidentiality expressed by DFO and then the pdf file referred to above in number 8 was released by DFO. This report, which it turns out after checking with the author of the document, was originally a generic power point presentation, which was never presented to the First Nations groups by the contractor. The simplicity and lack of quality directed a this specific case, represented by an expenditure of $19,000 is obvious. Furthermore, I consider the language and the content of the report to be patronizing to the First Nations who commissioned it and it only leaves me questioning the lack of oversight represented by this expenditure .

6. A request for further explanation of many of the contracts has been made to DFO and I will update this space if and when information is available.

7. The analysis for The Bowie Seamount MPA has so far not been done, but I plan on doing it as well as time allows in order to have comparative figures available.

8. One of the requests in my ATIP that they were not able to accommodate was for similar figures for the creation phase as well as the operation phase for the other MPAs in Canada, the majority of which are on the East Coast. I urge the DFO to make this available or if necessary other individuals to go through the ATIP process in order to retrieve this information and make it public.

9. I was struck by the fact that during the course of 11 years, not one cent was devoted by DFO to doing on the ground scientific research that could meet the GAPS in scientific knowledge that I identified early in the Pilot MPA process in April 1999 at the Race Rocks Ecological Overview Workshop . Furthermore, no funds were ever forthcoming for the ongoing operation of the designate MPA. ( Refer to year 2001 proposal )

10. As per a comment recently of one member of the current Advisory Board, If DFO really is serious about public advice from an MPA Advisory Boards, It should make all information like this freely and easily available to the Board members.”

11. I would like to thank the individuals in the DFO Access to Information and Privacy office for their advice and cooperation during the process involved in this ATIP request.

FOLLOWUP:

On March 17, 2010, I sent an e-mail to our RRPAB representative from of the Oceans Habitat and Enhancement Division of Fisheries and Oceans Canada in Nanaimo. He had agreed by phone to help clarify some of the specific questions I had about some of the items in the list of expenditures. Below are the results of that query, with his responses in green.

Response April1, 2110

Based on discussion with my manager and our ATIP staff, I suggest that you submit your request for records outlined below through ATIP. In reviewing the records you’re requesting, I note that many of them are not in my own files. Further, going through ATIP provides greater certainty that the records you receive have taken into consideration confidentiality concerns.

I did quickly go through your list below with some responses that you may find useful in posing specific questions to ATIP. To the extent you can keep your questions specific, it would certainly help reduce the search time estimates. Also keep in mind though, that I have files from past staff in boxes. Though they’re labelled to some extent, if I receive an ATIP for files and I know those past staff have had some involvement in the programs relevant to the records, I’m obliged to include in my search estimates the time to go through the boxes that could potentially have relevant records. As mentioned below in a number of spots, I’m not familiar with some. By that, I largely mean that your description didn’t ‘ring a bell’ with me which would suggest that I won’t have the financial records associated in my own files.

1. I mentioned I am missing the March 31 2008  end of year report of expenditures which may have been lumped in with the Endeavour project number.
As mentioned in my email, fiscal year 2008/09 activities included only First Nations liaison work through Aaron Reith and the Socio-economic overview and analysis report (contract carried out by Sunderman). As I understand, those records were provided to you, but may have had a date of 2009.

2. Also although Lisa sent me the Endeavour /Race Rocks end of year summary  for March 2009, It is difficult to separate RR from Endeavour in that one.. Is there any further clarification such as Total Line Object figures  which may help me to pick out the  Race Rocks specific expenditures.
As mentioned above, March 2009 relates to fiscal year 2008/09 and I’ve listed the items related to that year.

3. I have come across another report that  I am unsure about:
Feb 20/01 M.Pakenham Conference Fees? $340.16
I believe he delivered a presentation to this conference as  at least I have seen reference to it in a googled file , however it may be useful to have the whole presentation ( presumably a power point in pdf ) if it is still available.
I do not have this presentation. I would not be confident that it could be readily located. A conference presentation may also have limited utility. That is, I don’t know whether Marc would have written and followed speakers notes written in the presentation. It sounds like you’ve googled the conference, I would suggest the proceedings of the conference would potentially be at least as useful to you.

4. Mar30/00 CRD VEHEAP contribution $6000.00. What is VEHEAP ..of the CRD  was anything produced as a result of  this.
VEHEAP stands for Victoria and Esquimalt Harbours Environmental Action Plan. I don’t have records of this. Further, I would suggest that this was an activity more related to our Integrated Management Programs rather than Race Rocks.

5. Was a report made available from this: Jan29/02 Env.consult , Environment/Environnment 0500 726000008186 $10,000.00
I’m  not familiar with this.

6. Is there documentation or report  on this one? Apr9 Apr/02 sci/env consult Luanne Chew Consulting Services for Completion of MPA Design Reports.
$5000.00
I’m not familiar with this.

7. When it says ” as per attached statement of work”  are those statements available and can they be made public.
as in
——–June 30/09-July13/09-Aaron Reith&Co     Community Liaison for First Nations with Respect to the designation process for the Race Rocks Marine Protected area. See the attached statement of work
——Feb 05/04 –To suport the engagement of Select Douglas Treaty First Nations as per attached statement of work. $15,000.00
——and 17 Aug,18 July 2004 –Songhees First Nation Support the ongoing negotiations of select Douglas Treaty First Nations in SVI in Broad Discussions related to Marine Aquatic Resources /To support neg. with Fed and Prov. Gov’ts of a framework for the cooperative mgt. as per statement of work $25,000.00
That would be a question best dealt with through filing an ATIP

8. What is meant by protection services in this one? and to whom did it get paid?
Feb08, Jan 09/2005 Security Additional Meeting, Protection Services ( Guardians, Commissionaires, security Guards etc.) $5,000.00
I ‘m not familiar with this. 

9. October 99 to December 2000 Axys Environmental Consulting.. Socio-Economic Overview of RR  — Is this the same one we have been looking at recently? if not could we get a copy for our resource files.
This is the  same as the Sunderman report provided to the RRPAB and referenced below.

10. It also is apparent that the socio-economic study update , I believe done in 2009 Prepared by:Randy Sunderman Peak Solutions Consulting Inc. Kamloops, BC  does not seem to be included anywhere in the expenditures up to January 2010, so could you check on that.
 I had understood that was provided in the ATIP. Again, you may wish to check the records provided for fiscal year 2008/09.

11. Dec 99-Feb 2000 Gordon Hanson & Associates Consulting…. was there a report produced for this, and if not what was the nature of the contract?
I’m not familiar with this.

12. The Canadian Hydrographic survey  (done back in 1999, that used the multi-beam SONAR ) does not seem to be represented as far as I can determine. This is probably because it was done by another part of the department, could you check into whether that cost is available as it would be a relevant science portion.
You are correct, it would have been financially coded in Canadian Hydrographic Services (CHS) coding. It may have been Oceans funded, but there could have been a budget transfer to Science Branch for the CHS expenditure.

Thanks for your attention to this. I hope this is not too many questions to pursue. If you can’t resolve all of them we will have to live with that. 

The above comments in the Analysis and Discussion represent the opinion of Garry Fletcher and are not to be interpreted as being the opinions of any other organization or individuals unless indicated otherwise. It is my hope that it can lead to a level of accountability in expenditure by DFO, and transparency to the public about this process.

Garry Fletcher
Victoria, BC
March 25, 2010

(updated April 20, 2010–GF.)

 

 

Access to Information Request on DFO expenses 1999-2010

CONTENTS of this File:1. Background and Rationale for this report .

2. Figure 1: Amounts of DFO Race Rocks MPA Budget, Amount Spent
and Amount Remaining for each year .. 1999-2010

3. Table 1: Yearly budgets, 1999-2010

4. Figure 2: Detailed overview of DFO expenditures on Race Rocks

5. Table 2: Detailed overview table, 1999-2010

6. Figure 3. Pie chart showing expenditures for five categories.

7. Table 3. List of Individual Expenses for the Race Rocks MPA 1999-2010

8. Example of Ecotourism report done for First Nations :2006
(668 kb.pdf file)

9. ATIP Report : A200900266_2010-02-09_09-00-22.pdf (6MB .pdf file)

10. Analysis and Discussion

10b. Followup April 20/2010

11. Condensed version with headers removed, showing graphs.

12. RRPAB Resource Documents

Background and Rationale for this report:
When we started the MPA designation Process for Race Rocks in 1999, I believe we all went into it assuming that the process of community involvement and stewardship would be one that could be a model of how ordinary people could help to achieve ecological conservation. Further to this, they could play a valuable role in assisting governments in creating one regime, devoid of jurisdictional barriers for the management of humans to ensure ecological sustainability of this unique resource. It was also hoped, that there would be unprecedented transparency in the process. At the time there was no reason that it could not become a template for the establishment of a network of Marine Protected Areas.

The Initial MPA Advisory Process involving the Race Rocks Advisory Board ended in 2002 when the consensus of the Board was not accepted by DFO office in Ottawa, and the resulting modified document gazetted was repugnant to RRAB members as well as First Nations. The Master’s Thesis of Sean Leroy provides a good overview of why this process had failed.

Since that time Lester B. Pearson College has continued with the support of the Ecological Reserve at Race Rocks. They had assumed this responsibility in Stewardship of facilities and the Ecological Reserve since the de-staffing of the light station by the Coastguard in 1997. Since that time the College has provided an on site guardian and generated the funds to cover all expenses, striving for energy self sufficiency and a sharing of the resource with creative use of technology on the internet in keeping with the mandate set out in the management plan for the Ecological Reserve. During that time, BC Parks has also cooperated by providing some funding for on-sight infrastructure repair and maintenance.

“If we are to learn from past mistakes in the Process of Creating Marine Protected Areas, then it must be documented transparently so that stakeholders might have
an opportunity to inform themselves.”

In the fall of 2009, DFO reconvened the Race Rocks (Public) Advisory Board. It became clear to many in the first meeting that the community memory was absent, leading to a projected process highly reminiscent of the re-invention of the wheel, aimed to push through the process and seek completion of the MPA by the end of March, 2010. It was to me as if the last 11 years had not existed.

Prior to the November meeting of the Race Rocks Advisory Board (RRAB), I initiated an Access to Information and Privacy request ( ATIP) to DFO which was originally intended to quantify the costs involved in the creation and the follow up costs of administration and operation of the existing Marine Protected areas on all coasts of Canada. One of many points of that ATIP request included the costs of the MPA Creation Process since 1999 for Race Rocks. After many email and telephone communications back and forth with the ATIP office in Ottawa, I agreed to reduce the extent of the request due to costs they were projecting for my complete list: ( 52 hours at $10.00 per hour which was beyond my budget!) Since I was still primarily concerned with being able to compare costs to see whether there was a common approach to MPA designation and operations after designation, I agreed to accept the records for Bowie and Race Rocks. It was made clear to me at the time that I would only get the figures from invoices for expenses which had been tagged with a code designating the project of that reserve.

This means that staff time and DFO internal resource costs were not available. In addition there is no accounting of the costs incurred by Lester Pearson College, outside researchers and volunteers with no support from DFO for research and the protection of the reserve during the interim while apparently ongoing negotiations by DFO had continued.

Knowing that ATIP requests usually take a long time, I assumed we would be having another meeting before I received the ATIP file. In the November RRAB meeting, I asked to include in the agenda of the next meeting a discussion of the costs of the MPA Process for Race Rocks . I was not given assurance at that time that it would be discussed and a further attempt by telephone to get it on the agenda also failed with an indication that it was not in the interests of the Advisory Board. By the time of the March meeting I had had time to do an analysis of the data and asked if I could present this report to the Board. Time was not made available to do that in the meeting so a group of a dozen Board members were able to stay after the meeting for the presentation and follow-up discussion.

The ATIP file of data had been sent to me on February 10, 2010. That document included all financial reports contained in DFO Pacific’s electronic financial reporting system (MRS) under the project code numbers for the Race Rocks MPA designation process (54257 and 93818) and the Bowie Seamount designation process (54262 and 93826), from 1998 to the present (January 15, 2010).  Total 6mb with 142 pages in a pdf file.) The following are summary graphs generated by extracting information from the ATIP file.

No information is available so far for the year Mar.2007-Mar.2008 ( GF)

NEXT:2. Figure 1: Amounts of DFO Race Rocks MPA Budget, Amount Spent
and Amount Remaining for each year .. 1999-2010

Garry Fletcher
Victoria, BC
March 25, 2010

Clean Current Presentation on Race Rocks as Possible Demonstration site

This PDF is of a presentation by the staff of Clean Current Power Systems Incorporated that was given to the BC Ministry of Land water and Air Protection and Fisheries and Oceans Canada in May of 2004  to give a background to the Tidal Current Energy proposal and to answer the question ” Does Tidal Turbine Technology fit the Management Plans for Race Rocks Ecological reserve? ”

See the PDFcleancurrentpreso:Race Rocks Tidal Generator

 

Race Rocks MPA Feasibility Report and Recommendations

DRAFTRace Rocks Marine Protected Area
Feasibility Report and Recommendations

Table of Contents:

Acknowledgements

1.0 Background

1.1 Legislative Authority for Marine Protected Areas

1.2 MPA Strategy

1.3 Map

2.0 An Introduction to Race Rocks

2.1 Rationale for Selection
2.2 Purpose of Feasibility Report
2.3 A Vision for Race Rocks Marine Protected Area
2.4 Goal
2.5 Principles For Management of Race Rocks Ecological Reserve / Marine Protected Area
2.6 Objectives for Race Rocks as an MPA

3.0 Creating a Marine Protected Area at Race Rocks
3.1 Process
3.2 Consultative Framework

3.2(a) First Nations3.2(b) Race Rocks Advisory Board

3.2(c) Stakeholder consultations

3.2(d) Public consultations

3.3 Recommendations for Race Rocks Marine Protected Area

3.3(a) Designation3.3(b) Area Boundaries

3.3(c) Human Use

(c) 1. vessel and boating management(c) 2. aviation

(c) 3. management of fishing

(c) 4. diving management

(c) 5. educational activities and research

(c) 6. traditional use study

3.3(d) Environmental Protection

(d) 1. dredging and dumping(d) 2. management of exploration for, and development for non-

renewable resources

(d) 3. birds and habitat

(d) 4. marine mammals and habitat

3.3(e) Management/Governance Framework

(e) 1. Pacific Steering Committee
(e) 2. Race Rocks Management/Implementation Committee
(e) 3. Race Rocks Advisory Board
(e) 4. Eco-warden operator(e)
(e) 5. Compliance

3.3(f) Stewardship

3.4 Resource Requirements F/Y 2000/2001

4.0 Conclusion

4.1 Opportunities for Race Rocks as an MPA
4.2 Challenges for Race Rocks as an MPA
Appendix I

 

Acknowledgements

The Report was produced by Marc Pakenham, Community Advisor and Integrated Coastal Zone Coordinator, Kelly Francis – Oceans Directorate, Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Assistance was provided by Jennie Sparkes – Parks Canada, BC Parks staff including: Jim Morris, District Planner; David Chater, District Manager; and Marty Roberts and Garry Fletcher of Lester B. Pearson College.

1.0 Background

1.1 Legislative Authority for Marine Protected Areas

Currently jurisdictional responsibilities for the management of the marine environment and marine resources are shared between the federal and provincial governments, as described by the Constitution. For example, DFO is responsible for organisms in the water column, marine mammals, migratory birds and navigation. The Coast Guard maintains a heritage lighthouse tower at Great Race Rock. The province has jurisdiction over the terrestrial areas and the land under the water column. The provincial government is working with federal government agencies of DFO, Parks Canada and Environment Canada to develop and implement a marine protected areas strategy, and with Parks Canada to implement the Pacific Marine Heritage Legacy program. The Canadian Forces Base (CFB) in Esquimalt holds and uses the land at Rocky Point which may impact the ecological reserve – marine protected area’s values.

1.2 Marine Protected Area Strategy

The Marine Protected Area Strategy consists of three elements:

  1. A joint federal-provincial approach: All relevant federal and provincial agencies will work collaboratively to exercise their authorities to protect marine areas.

 

  • Shared decision-making with the public: Commits government agencies to employ an inclusive, shared decision-making process with First Nations, marine stakeholders, coastal communities and the public.
  • Building a comprehensive system: Seeks to build an extensive system of protected areas by the year 2010 through a series of coastal planning processes.
     1.3 Map

    2.0 An Introduction to Race Rocks

    Named for its strong tidal currents and rocky reefs, Race Rocks is a showcase for Pacific marine life, featuring whales, sea lions, seals, birds and a dazzling array of underwater plants and animals.

    Race Rocks is located 17 kilometres southwest of Victoria, and is the most southerly part of Canada’s Pacific Coast. One of its nine islets is the site of Race Rocks lightstation, the second oldest lighthouse in Western Canada.

    In 1980, Race Rocks was designated as an ecological reserve by the province of British Columbia. The area’s remarkable tidal flow – up to seven knots – supplies a generous stream of nutrients to a thriving community of subtidal invertebrates, including sponges, anenomes, hydroids and soft corals. Crowds of barnacles, tunicates, urchins and sea stars adorn the underwater cliffs. Fish such as sculpin, rockfish and lingcod seek refuge in the rocky crevices and undulating kelp forests.

    Above water, the islets serve as nesting colonies for many seabirds, such as gulls, cormorants, pigeon guillemots and oystercatchers, and as a stopover for migratory birds. They share the rocks with resting harbour seals, Stellar and California sea lions, and a few northern elephant seals. River otters patrol the shoreline and killer whales are frequent visitors. Gray whales, Dall’s and harbour porpoises occasionally pass by.

    The exceptional diversity of marine life at Race Rocks – long recognized by First nations in the area – makes it an ideal place for scientific and educational observation. It serves as a model for the transition zone between inner coastal waters and the open ocean, which is why nearby Lester B. Pearson College was instrumental in having Race Rocks designated as an ecological reserve. In cooperation with B.C. Parks and the Canaian Coast Guard, the college now operates the lightstation facility as an education/guardian centre.

     

    2.1 Rationale for Selection:

    The Race Rocks area was selected as an MPA pilot under the federal-provincial MPA Strategy initiative based on its status as a richly diverse and representative marine ecosystem due in part to the past twenty years of protection as an ecological reserve.

    While provincial designation affords a strong measure of protection it does not have authority over the water column. Past collaboration with Fisheries and Oceans Canada has yielded Fisheries Act closures within the reserve for most species (1990). New opportunities under the Federal Oceans Act now exist for more complete and integrated measures to achieve the ecological reserve and marine protected area vision for protection and conservation.

    2.2 Purpose of Feasibility Report and Recommendations

     

    The purpose of this report is to clearly demonstrate that all the identified criteria have been met to proceed with the formal designation of Race Rocks Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act.

    In broad terms the report outlines a conceptual management vision, goals and objectives which have been derived through consultations with local First Nations, public and multiple stakeholders. It provides conceptual strategies for the protection and management of natural values, recreation use, research and education uses for both the ecological reserve and marine protected area.

    Preparation of a management plan for Race Rocks will take place following designation.

     

    2.3 A Vision for Race Rocks as a Marine Protected Area

    “Based on a cooperative and integrated, multi-lateral relationship, Race Rocks Marine Protected Area – Ecological Reserve will conserve and protect a unique, high energy marine ecosystem for the benefit of future generations.”

    2.4 Goal :

    To evaluate Race Rocks Ecological Reserve as a pilot Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act by testing Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s national MPA program framework and the joint federal-provincial MPA Strategy for Canada’s Pacific coast.

    2.5 Principles For Management of Race Rocks Ecological Reserve / Marine Protected Area

    WORKING TOGETHER: The full realization of Race Rocks as both and ER and MPA is dependent on the combined authorities of Canada and British Columbia, as well as the ongoing coordination of management actions by a range of federal and provincial agencies, non-government organizations and volunteers. DFO and BC Parks will, together, provide the leadership that fosters this coordination, cooperation and partnership.

    RESPECT FIRST NATIONS AND THE TREATY PROCESS: Canada and British Columbia consider First Nations’ support and participation in the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve and Marine Protected Area planning and management processes as essential. First Nations will be actively involved in all planning and management processes. The establishment of any MPA will not preclude options for settlement of treaties.

    PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE: All management actions, including the regulation of appropriate uses, will be based on the precautionary principle. The precautionary principle means, “When in doubt, err on the side of caution.” This principle puts the burden of proof on any individual, organization or government agency conducting activities within Race Rocks MPA to demonstrate that there will be no damage to the marine ecosystem from proposed activity.

    2.6 Objectives for Race Rocks as a MPA

    As outlined in Marine Protected Areas – a Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast, the objectives for establishing Race Rocks as a marine Protected Area are:

    To contribute to, provide for and enhance:

    1. protection of marine biodiversity, representative ecosystems and special natural features.
    2. conservation and protection of fisheries resources and their habitats.
    3. protection of cultural heritage resources and encourage understanding and appreciation.
    4. opportunities for recreation and tourism.
    5. scientific research opportunities and support the sharing of traditional knowledge.
    6. increased education and awareness.

    3.0 Creating a Marine Protected Area at Race Rocks

    3.1 Process

    The following outlines the process followed in the development of this feasibility report and recommendations.

    After Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s Minister David Anderson’s announcement

    regarding the nomination of Race Rocks as a pilot Marine Protected Area in

    September, 1998, the Oceans Directorate – South Coast staff developed an action plan which outlined a process to determine the feasibility of designating Race Rocks. This action plan included the following steps:

    1. Establishment of a federal/provincial management planning team consisting of representatives of BC Parks and Fisheries and Oceans Canada and First Nations (Sept. 99).
  • Review of the draft management plan for Race Rocks as an ecological reserve (June ’98) by BC Parks and Fisheries and Oceans. A pamphlet was developed to provide the public and stakeholders with general information.
  • Completion of an ecosystem overview and the identification of additional information requirements.
  • Determined the scope of consultations with stakeholders to ensure that all interests affected by federal/provincial authorities were addressed (September 1999).
  • Initiation of an assessment of the feasibility and implications of using Federal (Oceans Act) and Provincial (Ecological Reserves Act, Park Act) legislation jointly (April/May 1999);
  • Development of a draft Socio-economic Overview of Race Rocks as a Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act (September 1999).
  • Consultations, open houses and meetings with affected stakeholders and public to discuss the creation of a Marine Protected Area and the development of a feasibility report and recommendations (September ‘99 – March ‘00).
  • Recommendations developed based on the feedback received for designation and management/governance of Race Rocks (March ‘00).

    9. Development of the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area Feasibility Report and

    Recommendations, in part, as a synthesis of the following

    documents:

    • Race Rocks Ecological Reserve Draft Management Plan (June 1998),
    • Marine Protected Areas- a Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast – discussion paper (Aug. 1998), and
    • Recommendations for Designation and Management of Race Rocks Marine Protected Area
  • Race Rocks Pilot MPA – a Science Review3.2 Consultative FrameworkThe pilot process for the establishment of a Marine Protected Area at Race Rocks recognized the importance of a comprehensive dialogue between those constituents whose interests might be affected. After identifying the key stakeholder groups or individuals, interests, issues and proposals for resolution were developed through facilitation and meetings. In some instances, this required a series of meetings to develop consensus. Overall, it is important to note that there was and continues to be a high level of support for the creation of marine protected areas. The Race Rocks Advisory Board provided an excellent forum for discussion and issue resolution. 3.2(a) First Nations:

    Engaging First Nations in the consideration of Race Rocks as a pilot MPA has been a priority. Initial discussions with T’souke and Beecher Bay First Nations revealed both common interests and issues requiring resolution.

    From a First Nation’s perspective, the Race Rocks area has cultural significance with respect to traditional use and management of the area’s resources. There is recognition that, should a Marine Protected Area be established, it will not infringe on First Nations’ existing Treaty rights, traditional, food, ceremonial interests or relationship with the area. Further, there developed a significant opportunity to develop cooperative management and First Nation’s educational opportunities.

    During the consultative process, a Race Rocks Advisory Board was developed which included representation from the Coast Salish Sea Council, through Tom Sampson. Active participation from First Nations ensured effective communications with local Bands and those in neighbouring Washington State. Several events highlighted the First Nations participation. A Thirteen Moon seminar was conducted in December “99 by Mr. John Elliott and Tom Sampson. This demonstrated the lunar cycle’s influence on traditional First Nation’s life and relationship to the ecosystem. On March 09, 2000 the members of the Race Rocks Advisory Board were honoured to be invited by the Beecher Bay Band to a “Burning Ceremony near Race Rocks. This event is highly spiritual and provides an offering to ancestors. It was a rare privilege to be invited to participate in such a ceremony and it provided a very meaningful opportunity to build relationships.

    More recently, First Nations elders and youth are visiting Race Rocks to learn about traditional uses and relationship to the marine environment. These visits are assisting in the development of both a traditional use study and First Nations curriculum for elementary and junior secondary students.

    The Race Rocks Advisory Board members expressed appreciation for the opportunity to develop a fuller understanding of First Nation’s relationship with marine ecosystems.

    It became apparent that there was First Nations’ support for the creation of Marine Protected Areas such as Race Rocks and a willingness to participate in the management of MPA’s.

    3.2(b) Race Rocks Advisory Board

    A Race Rocks Advisory Board was established to support the consultative process for Race Rocks pilot MPA. Terms of reference were developed to clarify the objectives, process, role and conduct of the Advisory Board.

    The Race Rocks Advisory Board role was to:

    • represent key constituent groups or stakeholders
    • provide advice to Fisheries and Oceans Canada and B.C. Parks on the consultation process
    • collate and analyze feedback from consultations
    • make consensus-based, recommendations to Fisheries and Oceans Canada and B.C. Parks for the establishment of a marine protected area at Race Rocks
    • ensure community involvement in the establishment and on-going management of Race Rocks MPA

    The Race Rocks Advisory Board met five times between December ’99 and March ’00. It is important to note that the recommendations developed through the consultations and work with the Race Rocks Advisory Board may not reflect the complete agreement of every person involved in the dialogue but it does represent complete unanimity from the Race Rocks Advisory Board and the groups they represent.

    MEMBERS OF RACE ROCKS ADVISORY BOARD

    Cheryl Borris -Friends of Ecological Reserves-

    Erin Bradley – -Dive community-

    Howard Breen -Georgia Strait Alliance –

    Garry Fletcher -Pearson College –

    Kelly Francis -Fisheries & Oceans-

    Gordon Hanson-First Nations projects

    Dan Kukat- -Sports Fish Advisory Board – Victoria-

    Lt. Cdr. Bill Laing-Department of National Defence-

    Angus Matthews -Pearson College of Pacific-

    Sean Moore-Pedder Bay Marina

    Jim Morris -B.C. Parks

    Marc Pakenham – Fisheries & Oceans

    Brian Smiley – -Fisheries & Oceans-

    Tom Sampson-Coast Salish Sea Council-

    Jennie Sparkes – Parks Canada-

    Dr. Anita Voss -Science community-

    Kevin Walker -Northwest Whale Watchers Association –

    3.2(c) Stakeholder Consultations

    Extensive consultations were conducted to determine interests, issues and support for the creation of a Marine Protected Area at Race Rocks. With most groups support was readily apparent and strong. A small minority of stakeholder groups expressed concerns and interests which initially seemed at odds with Marine Protected Areas’ goals and objectives. Some of the issues were the result of insufficient information and misapprehension. These were quickly resolved. Issues regarding sportsfishing and eco-tourism interests required more detailed and protracted discussion. For a list of stakeholder groups see Appendix I.

    3.2(d) Public Consultations:

    In addition to sectoral consultations with stakeholders, two public sessions were conducted in February 2000. The public consultations were held to ensure the widest range of information and discussion with those persons potentially not represented by particular interest groups. With an attendance of 101 persons, the consultations provided useful for a for the discussion of both MPA and Ecological Reserve aspects of the initiative.

    Media coverage, after the initial announcement of the pilot initiative at Race Rocks, has been regular, positive and resulted in continued public discussion and interest. Ranging from local newspapers to Knowledge Network and Discovery Channel, the coverage has highlighted the ecological values and public support.

     

    3.3 Recommendations for Designation and Management of Race Rocks Marine Protected Area

    Recommendations for the designation and management of the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area have been developed as a result of extensive consultations over the past eighteen months. The Race Rocks Advisory Board unanimously supports these recommendations. Key recommendations are categorized into the following six areas:

    (a) Designation

    (b) Area Boundaries

    (c) Human Use

    (d) Environmental Protection

    (e) Management/Governance Framework

    (f) Stewardship

    3.3(a) Designation:

    Recommend that Race Rocks be designated as a Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act Section 35.

     

    3.3(b) Area Boundaries:

    Recommend that the boundary for Race Rocks Marine Protected Area coincide with the Ecological Reserve boundary (1980); being all waters within the 36.5 metre(20 fathom) line as described on Canadian Hydrographic Chart 3641 [1980]. Total area 200 hectares.

     

    3.3(c) Human Use

    Managing human use and impacts are the principal issues for Race Rocks as a combined marine protected area and ecological reserve

    (c) 1. Recommendations for vessel and boating management guidelines addressing the following areas will be developed in consultation with user groups:

    • speed limits
    • anchoring restrictions
    • shoreline restriction
    • considerations when whales are within the MPA boundary
    • sensitive areas restrictions (i.e. kelp beds)
    • ballast water discharge and vessel traffic considerations
    • vessel and boating management guidelines will de developed in consultation with user groups
    • routine monitoring and reporting of vessel activity

    (c) 2. Recommendations for the management of aviation activities:

    • helicopter traffic by authorization
    • no over flights

    (c) 3. Recommendation for the management of fishing activities:

    • establish a “no-take” zone for all species within the 20 fathom contour line with other conservation and protection measures as recommended by the Steering Committee

    (c) 4. Recommendations for management of diving activities to be developed in consultation with user groups:

    • volunteer stewardship developed in cooperation with the dive community
    • educational and training programs for the dive community
    • adaptive development and application of Reefkeepers and other observation programs
    • routine monitoring and reporting of diving activity

    (c) 5. Recommendations for the management of educational activities and research:

    • adaptive and integrated permit process for education and research, as per Ecological Reserve Act example monitored by Eco-warden Operator
    • develop a spectrum of learning opportunities including internet-based learning opportunities about MPA’s
    • educational and research activity reported annually
    • develop learning and research opportunities which have minimal impact on ecosystem

    (c) 6. Recommendations for the development of a Traditional Use Study:

    • through consultation with First Nations, develop terms of reference and framework for a traditional use study, including translation
    • conduct traditional use study
    • working cooperatively, develop marine ecosystem-related curriculum for schools to further understanding of First Nations’ relationship with Race Rocks

    3.3(d) Environmental Protection

    (d) 1. Recommendations for the management of dredging and dumping:

    • dredging of any kind is prohibited in Race Rocks Marine Protected Area
    • disposal of any material, including overboard discharge of sewage, is prohibited in the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area

    (d) 2. Recommendations for the management of exploration for, and development of, non-renewable resources:

    • that the exploration for, or development of, non-renewable resources is prohibited in the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area
    • no pipelines or utility corridors

    (d) 3. Recommendations for the protection of birds and habitat:

    • develop a structured monitoring program and protocol for other activities
    • establish appropriate conservation measures and protection areas
    • develop partnerships with CWS, Rocky Point Bird Observatory Society. etc.
    • use internet capability for non-intrusive observation
    • routine monitoring and reporting

    (d) 4. Recommendations for the protection of marine mammals and habitat:

    • develop partnerships with all groups for monitoring and research within a structured program
    • establish protection measures where appropriate
    • partnerships with whale watching industry for public education
    • work with marine mammal viewing industry to develop best practices
    • use internet capability for non-intrusive observation
    • routine monitoring and reporting

    3.3(e) Management/Governance Framework

    Recommendations for management/governance:

    (e) 1. create a Pacific Steering Committee, with representation from First

    Nations, BC Parks, Fisheries and Oceans Canada

    (e) 2. create a Race Rocks Management/ Implementation Committee with

    representation from First Nations, BC Parks, Fisheries and Oceans

    Canada

    (e) 3. create a Race Rocks Advisory Board

    (e) 4. create a Eco-warden Operator

    (e) 5. develop a compliance program

    (e) 1. Pacific Steering Committee

    • consists of a representative from First Nations, B.C. Parks and Fisheries & Oceans Canada
    • develops policy and management recommendations for ER/MPA’s
    • identifies areas of interest and process for designation
    • provides general direction for Race Management/ Implementation Committee

    (e) 2. Race Rocks Management/Implementation Committee

    • consists of a representative from First Nations, B.C. Parks and Fisheries & Oceans
    • implements and coordinates the management of Race Rocks ER/MPA
    • provides policy and management recommendations to government departments regarding ER/MPA’s
    • provides direction for the Race Rocks ER/MPA Eco-warden Operator
    • works with the Race Rocks Advisory Board
    • provides direction for ER/MPA evaluation

    (e) 3. Race Rocks Advisory Board (post designation)

    • cross-sector representation
    • provides advice to Pacific Steering Committee and Race Rocks Management/Implementation Committee on management issues
    • facilitates communications with constituents
    • makes recommendations for the operations of Race Rocks Marine Protected Area
    • provides advice and participates in ER/MPA evaluation

    (e) 4. Eco-warden operator

    • direction provided by Race Rocks Management/Implementation Committee
    • manages day to day operations in Race Rocks ER/MPA
    • facilitates permit system for research and education
    • facilitates compliance program
    • develops information and education programs
    • assists with ongoing evaluation and monitoring

    (e) 5. Recommendations for compliance:

    • emphasize partnerships and voluntary compliance through education
    • support stewardship initiatives
    • develop enforcement response by appropriate government agencies, as required
    • develop a protocol for reporting to the Steering Committee and Management/Implementation Committee

     

     

    3.3(f) Stewardship

    As the consultative process unfolded, it soon became apparent that there was significant support for the creation of a Marine Protected Area at Race Rocks. Rather than develop a complex regulatory framework for protection and conservation, there are strong indications that a voluntary compliance and stewardship program will achieve the goals and objectives as described herein. Principal stakeholder groups have expressed a keen interest in not only developing “best practices” but also working towards ensuring a high degree of compliance. The development of stewardship initiatives and “best practices” guidelines has already commenced; the results will be reflected in the development of a management plan.

    3.4 Resource Requirements F/Y 2000/2001

    4.0 Conclusion:

    4.1 Opportunities for Race Rocks as an MPA

    Cooperation Between Government: Good working relations exist between B.C. Parks, Coast Guard, DFO, Parks Canada and Department of National Defense which will contribute to the best protection for the ecological reserve – marine protected area. The pilot process has led to a greater understanding and improved collaboration between these agencies.

    Cooperation with First Nations:

    The Race Rocks pilot Marine Protected Area process has developed significant relationships with participants and improved understanding of interests. Further opportunities have been outlined in the recommendations.

    Cooperation with Lester B. Pearson College: Lester B. Pearson College was instrumental in the establishment of the ecological reserve – marine protected area. The faculty and students of the Biology and Environmental Systems program at Pearson College are long-time volunteer ecological reserve – marine protected area wardens. They are actively involved in research and education activities and provide an important monitoring function. The College uses the decommissioned lighthouse buildings at Great Race Rock as a research and education facility and guardian base through a temporary agreement with the Coast Guard. The Coast Guard lease of Great Race Rock is reverting to the province of B.C., at which time, Pearson College’s tenure will be confirmed. Race Rocks Ecological Reserve – Marine Protected Area provides outstanding marine research opportunities. Lester B. Pearson College has been the principal research agency and has developed a good database for the ecological reserve – marine protected area and its values.

    Management of Education and Research Activities:

    The Race Rocks ecological reserve – marine protected area will enhance the protection and conservation of the high-energy marine ecosystem found in the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Research will assist in focusing the management and monitoring of the ecological reserve – marine protected area, as well as contribute to the knowledge base of coastal marine systems on a broader scale. The ecological reserve – marine protected area will be a prime educational source for increasing awareness of marine systems for students, visitors and the general public. It will also be a key educational and awareness tool for the DFO MPA program. Recent Millennium 2000 funding has supported the development of www.racerocks.com , an internet, interactive series of video cameras which provide world-wide educational opportunities. Opportunities exist to involve First Nations with BC Parks and Fisheries and Oceans Canada in management, stewardship and creative joint educational initiatives.

    With the proximity to Victoria, Race Rocks Ecological Reserve – Marine Protected Area provides excellent educational opportunities. Lester B. Pearson College uses Race Rocks for their marine ecology program for college and local school students and naturalists. Tourism operators from Victoria also offer educational nature tours.

     4.2 Challenges

     

    Boundaries: The irregular shape of the proposed Marine Protected Area boundary is challenging for compliance and enforcement of regulations. Recent improvements in navigation technology, such as more accurate global positioning satellite (GPS) units, electronic charts and depth sounders are readily and inexpensively available. As the vessel operators equipment improves, so does the accuracy for determination of boundaries.

    Management of Human Use: Commercial and non-commercial recreation activities such as wild life viewing, diving, boating and nature appreciation occur in the ecological reserve – marine protected area, both in the water and on land. These activities will require strong cooperative management and stewardship initiatives with the federal government, tour operators and recreational users to ensure that the values of the ecological reserve – marine protected area are maintained.

     

    Sport Fishing: Sport fishing for halibut and salmon is currently very popular in the area directly adjacent to the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve. The large sport fisher community does not wish to see the boundaries for Race Rocks Marine Protected Area any larger than the current ecological reserve boundaries.

    Ballast Water Dumping: Currently under the draft Ballast Water Management Guidelines, the Port of Vancouver stipulates that dumping of ballast water may take place west of the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve – marine protected area. The introduction of alien species and contamination could significantly impact the Race Rocks environment.

    Oil Spills: Frequent heavy oil and crude tanker traffic (two supertankers per day on average) passes near the Race Rocks area. Due to the isolated nature, and the small area encompassed by the Race Rocks ecological reserve – marine protected area, even a small spill could have a devastating impact on the Race Rocks area.

     

    Relationship with Other Land Use Planning: Management planning processes provide a mechanism for public review and support for management strategies. In this respect, an ecological reserve – marine protected area management plan must be considered in terms of its relationship with other land use strategies.

    In June 1994, the provincial government announced the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan. This plan recommended that strategic planning occur for marine areas. Marine planning units have now been identified and planning framework statements summarizing values and capabilities have been prepared for the next level of planning. Race Rocks and surrounding areas are included in this process.

    The marine environment of the Pacific coast is not well represented in either federal or provincial protected areas systems. The federal and provincial governments are committed to establishing a system of marine protected areas and are developing a strategy to this end. A separate but related initiative is the Pacific Marine Heritage Legacy (PMHL), where the federal and provincial governments are working to form a network of coastal and marine protected areas along the southern Pacific coast. Race Rocks Ecological Reserve – Marine Protected Area is situated adjacent to a study area for a national marine conservation feasibility study which was initiated in 1998-99 as part of the PMHL Program.

     

     

    APPENDIX I

    The following groups were represented or directly participated in the information/consultations:

    Amalgamated Conservation Society

    Aquarius Dive Club – DND

    Association for the Protection of Rural Metchosin

    BC Shorekeepers/Reefkeepers Assoc.

    BC MELP – Parks

    BC Ministry of Fisheries

    Canadian Coast Guard – DFO

    Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society

    Canadian Wildlife Service

    Capital Regional District — Roundtable on the Environment & Environment Committee

    Department of National Defence – CFB Esquimalt

    District of Metchosin

    Environmental Risk Management – CFB Esquimalt

    Environmental Youth Alliance

    First Nations – Beecher Bay, Esquimalt, Songhees, T’sartlip, T’souke

    Frank White’s Scuba Shop

    Friends of Ecological Reserves

    Georgia Strait Alliance

    Golden Rods and Reels Victoria

    Greater Victoria Natural History Society

    Habitat Acquisition Trust

    Lester B. Pearson College

    Local marinas

    Ogden Point Dive Centre

    Ocean Centre

    Parks Canada PMHL

    Pedder Bay Marina

    Regional Recreational Boating Advisory Council

    Royal BC Museum

    Rotary Club – Victoria

    Rural East Sooke Association

    Saanich Inlet Protection Committee

    Sea to Sea Greenbelt Society

    Sierra Club of British Columbia

    Society for the Protection of Ayum Creek

    South Island Aquatic Stewardship Society

    Sports Fish Advisory Board – Race Rocks Sub-Committee

    The Land Conservancy

    Tourism Victoria – Environment Committee

    University of Victoria

    Veins of Life Watershed Society

    Victoria Golden Rods and Reels

    Victoria Natural History Society

    Victoria Marine Adventure Centre

    Victoria Marine Advisory Council

    Western Canada Wilderness Committee

    Whale Watch Operators Association NW.

     RETURN TO TOP

     

    Return to RRAB Index

 

Recreational lingcod fishing prohibited in Strait of Juan de Fuca

Saturday, June 01, 2002
Good Morning WEATHER: Sky Cloudy  Vis. 12 Miles  Wind West 11 Knots Rippled
Good Evening
TEMPERATURE: Max. 13.0 C  Min. 8.1 C Reset 10.0
MARINE LIFE: Another beautiful day here, with quite a lot of marine activity. The Glaucous Winged Gulls are actively mating and nesting, being very defensive of their nests. Crows are harassing the Gulls, Oystercatchers and and Pigeon Guillemots, in search of an unattended nest and egg. One of the pairs of Canadian Geese on the Island are nursing their five young Goslings, despite the Goslings rapidly increasing size the Geese continue to be very protective of their youngsters. Divers spotted some large Ling Cod** around the docks, along with a healthy stock of smaller fish.
HUMAN INTERACTION: A lot of fishing activity around the reserve today, around 10 to 12 vesels on the reserve boarder actively fishing. Problems with both vessels motoring too quickly through the reserve and fishermen disregarding the reserve limitations and fishing around West Race rocks. Four eco-tourism vessels moved through the park today.
**Good news for the Ling Cod!! This note was just received from the Sierra Club:
June 1, 2002 Victoria, BC: Despite intense pressure from sports-fishery lobbyists, local Fisheries and Oceans managers have decided that this year’s recreational fishery for lingcod in the Strait of Georgia will not go ahead today as scheduled. In an unprecedented, last-minute move, regional Fisheries and Oceans officials decided late Friday to issue a variation order to the B.C. tidal waters recreational fishery regulations, to prevent the recreational fishery for lingcod from proceeding. In an unprecedented, last-minute move, regional Fisheries and Oceans officials decided late Friday to issue a variation order to the B.C. tidal waters recreational fishery regulations, to prevent the recreational fishery for lingcod from proceeding. The lingcod season, which would have run from today to September 30, would have allowed anglers a daily bag limit of one lingcod, a possession limit of two, and an annual limit of 10.
The commercial harvest of Strait of Georgia lingcod was banned in 1990, after commercial landings had steadily declined to 44 tonnes after a peak catch of 3,300 tonnes in the 1930s. Fisheries and Oceans scientists estimate that only five per cent of the 1950s-era lingcod biomass is left in the Strait of Georgia. Against the advice of federal fisheries scientists, the recreational lingcod fishery was allowed to continue, however, and by 2001 the sports catch was believed to result in an annual harvest of at least 30 tonnes. Friday’s decision to suspend the fishery will prohibit recreational lingcod fishing throughout Johnstone Strait, the entire Strait of Georgia area, and most of Juan de Fuca Strait.
“We believe that the vast majority of anglers will support this decision,” said Terry Glavin, fisheries adviser to the Sierra Club. “While we are encouraged by reports that there may be localized revivals in lingcod stocks, a full closure is the only hope that these precious fish will gain the time they need to recover to their former abundance.”posted by at 5:49 AM

Operational Proposal for Race Rocks Ecological reserve and MPA

Ecological Reserve and Marine Protected Area
OPERATIONAL PROPOSAL 2001/2002

Presented to:
Department of Fisheries and Oceans
Attention: Dick Carson,
Director, Pacific Region
February 15, 2001


The Department of Fisheries and Oceans has recently recognized the ecological value of this treasured eco-system by selecting Race Rocks as one of the first Pilot Marine Protected Areas under the Oceans Act. Since 1980 when the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve was established, marine life on the rocky outcrops and the ocean floor extending to a depth of 20 fathoms has been protected by the Province of British Columbia. Great Race Island is home to the Race Rocks light station. Since 1980 the light- keepers have been of great assistance in protecting the Ecological Reserve by keeping a watchful eye.

As a consequence of a Federal decision to de-staff the light station in 1997, the keepers were to be removed and they would no longer provide the essential supervision required for full protection of the Reserve. In excess of $25 million worth of commercially exploitable species are known to exist within the Reserve area. The presence of the keepers was determined to be essential for continued protection. Coast Guard agreed to a special short-term agreement whereby Pearson College would retain the former light keepers as eco-guardians and operate the surplus facilities as a new Marine Education Centre until such time as a permanent solution for the operation of Race Rocks could be found.

A New Beginning
The Federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans began community consultations in 1998 to assess the possibility of Race Rocks being recognized as Canada’s first Marine Protected Area. For the first time, Race Rocks, with the cooperation of both levels of government would be truly protected with a management plan that included both the Provincially managed Ecological Reserve and the Federally controlled water column.

On September 14, 2000 the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, the Hon. Herb Dhaliwal, announced he had accepted the recommendations of the Race Rocks Advisory Board and DFO staff and Race Rocks would become Canada’s first Marine Protected Area.

 

Background

An extensive management plan for the Race Rocks area is now being developed by DFO staff working in close consultation with BC Parks and representatives of the South Island First Nations. At the invitation of the MPA strategy, extensive community involvement has led to broad consultation and local support for the MPA initiative.

For the first time, the Race Rocks eco-system will enjoy full protection under a unified management plan with the authority of both the Federal and Provincial governments. An important new provision has also been made for the full involvement of First Nations in on-going management of the area. The vital priorities of protecting ecological values, education and research are the primary focus of the new plan now being developed.

Scope of the Race Rocks Project

 For the past four years, on a temporary basis to assure interim protection at Race Rocks, Pearson College staff and students have undertaken the following responsibilities: 

Protection

  • Continuous supervision of the island and Reserve by resident eco-guardian.
  • Security for buildings, equipment and infrastructure (24 hrs/day all year).
  • Vigilant observation of activities within the Reserve and if needed, reporting of infractions to appropriate agencies.
  • Electronic video monitoring of the Reserve area by enforcement agencies.
  • Restrict access to specific areas as necessary.

Safety

  • Observe and report any situations which may represent a safety hazard.
  • Assist individuals in distress when required and liaise with rescue agencies.
  • Assist in emergency communications.
  • Be vigilant for fire hazards.
  • Monitor for the occurrence of hazardous material spills.

Science

  • Continue monitoring program for weather conditions.
  • Continue monitoring program for seawater temperature and salinity.
  • Ongoing protection of unique Northern Abalone populations and monitoring of population and growth rates.
  • Annual intertidal and subtidal transect site monitoring.
  • Installation of environmental scan sensor arrays for air, soil and seawater with full accessibility on the Internet.
  • Observation and recording of marine mammal and bird populations.
  • Daily ecological events log.
  • Support for visiting scientists.
  • Development of alternative energy solutions.

Education

  • Development of curriculum materials for K-12 use.
  • Cooperative development of information about First Nations focusing on the history of traditional uses and creating a supporting curriculum.
  • Operation and continuous upgrading of the racerocks.com education site with a major commitment for the production of online archived video for classroom and public use.
  • Interactive web cast production and delivery for use by schools, science centres, museums and conferences.
  • Public education programs for visitors to the Race Rocks area.
  • Education programs in cooperation with eco-tourism industry and dive community.

Eco-guardian / Project Management BC Parks, which now owns Great Race Island is issuing a long term Parks Permit to Pearson College staff to operate the site and serve as eco-guardians.

Located 3.7 nautical miles from Pearson College’s docks at Pedder Bay, Race Rocks is within easy reach in moderate weather conditions. In addition to the Race Rocks station boat, Pearson College operates two purpose built aluminum workboats suitable for transporting fuel, personnel, equipment and supplies to Race Rocks.

 

Pearson College staff provides all logistical support required for the efficient operation of Race Rocks. Qualified staffing for maintenance, accounting, purchasing and deliveries are all coordinated by existing College systems. Mike and Carol Slater, the former light-house keepers, are now employed by Pearson College and they live at Race Rocks. They are particularly well qualified to supervise and operate the facility after 30 years of experience with the Coast Guard and extensive experience observing marine life. Over the past 14 years they have been responsible for dealing with the public in the Reserve area and, when necessary, reporting infractions to the appropriate agency. Many of the College’s suppliers such as Nixon Electrical Services, Day’s Welding, Aramark Services, Henning’s Plumbing and others offer their services to Race Rocks at reduced rates or by donation.
It is an extraordinary legacy of the Millennium Partnership Fund and our partners that Race Rocks is the most technologically advanced Marine Protected Area in the world. The state of the art information technology system includes a full island network, wireless technology, remote controlled live video streams from above and below water and an environmental data array all streamed live on the Internet for public use. Major sponsorships from Apple, Apple Learning, LGS Group, Sorenson, Sony, Telus, Yamaha, Seapoint Sensors, the Vancouver Aquarium and others support the Race Rocks project.

 

As an educational institution Pearson College applies significant educational resources to the Race Rocks project. Environmental Systems/Biology faculty member Garry Fletcher serves as Educational Director of the Race Rocks program. Supported by students involved in web design, scuba diving, vessel operation, photography, video production, research and school program delivery, Garry has established an award winning education program at Race Rocks. This program is widely used by educational institutions such as the Open Learning Agency, primary and secondary schools, universities, museums and science centres throughout Canada. In the past year alone there have been over 65,000 visitors directly to the racerocks.com site and thousands more through links to the Apple Learning Exchange site.

This project has proved conclusively that there can be mass electronic public access to a protected area without the negative impact of large numbers of visitors to the islands. Race Rocks provides a viable alternative to the potentially high impact personal site visit. Rather than a Marine Protected Area being a secret resource this approach encourages public education and appreciation of the area while maintaining a high level of protection.

Pearson College has a proven record of successful fundraising for the Race Rocks project. Since 1997 over $280,000 has been raised from private donors to operate Race Rocks. This was an emergency initiative to save the site from demolition while a long-term solution could be found. Pearson College will continue this commitment to fundraising for the project by raising one third of the annual operating costs for the ongoing operation of Race Rocks.

Community Commitment

Federal Fisheries Minister The Hon. Herb Dhaliwal and BC Environment, Lands and Parks Minister The Hon. Joan Sawicki committed their respective governments to the establishment of a Marine Protected Area at Race Rocks on September 14, 2000. Their action was based on the unanimous recommendations of the Race Rocks Advisory Board. The Advisory Board includes senior staff from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, BC Parks and South Island First Nations leadership. In addition there is broad public representation from groups such as sports fishers, the dive community, ecotourism companies, marina operators, scientists, Friends of Ecological Reserves, Georgia Strait Alliance, and the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society. A key feature of the Race Rocks Advisory Board conclusions is a recommendation that both the Federal and Provincial governments provide financial support for the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area.

 

 

Meeting DFO Needs at Race Rocks

Race Rocks represents a unique challenge for DFO if it is to meet the declared objectives of protection, sustainability, education, research and broad community collaboration as defined in the MPA strategy. As the lead agency in the establishment of Canada’s first MPA, the Department must meet these objectives in a coordinated, cost effective manner. Pearson College, through a contract with DFO, can deliver programs under the direction of DFO that meet the defined objectives and fulfill specific DFO areas of responsibility.

The following key DFO objectives would be fulfilled under this contract:

    • 24 hour on site staffing throughout the year
    • monitoring of visitors to the MPA to ensure use guidelines are respected
    • data collection on the daily number of vessels and visitors within the MPA
    • reporting and recording of any infractions that may occur
    • vigilant reporting of any evidence of toxic contaminants
    • periodic marine mammal and sea bird population counts
    • ongoing intertidal and subtidal marine life inventories
    • underwater data collection through environmental scan sensors
    • maintaining a daily environmental journal
    • support for visiting researchers
    • maintaining a directory of all research data and publications
    • continuation of seawater and salinity measurements for IOS
    • continuation of weather reporting for Environment Canada
    • assistance to Coast Guard staff when required
    • development of web based educational curriculum materials
    • extensive educational programming for educational institutions and the general public utilizing the Internet as much as possible
    • education programs for reserve users and liaison with commercial users
    • development of specific First Nations curriculum featuring the history of traditional uses in cooperation with local band leadership
    • education programs for First Nations youth including material in their own languages
    • showcasing the value of MPAâs with custom live web casts for DFO events and conferences
    • assisting in maintaining and enhancing vital community relationships
    • ongoing involvement in the Race Rocks Advisory Board

Why is the need for Race Rocks funding special?

Race Rocks is a unique Provincial asset with specific circumstances that qualify it to be deserving of a special funding allocation designated at the Ministerial level.
Race Rocks is:

  • an internationally recognized Marine Protected Area established jointly by the Federal and Provincial Governments.
  • Canadaâs first and only Marine Protected Area and therefore success is essential if others are to follow.
  • the Race Rocks Marine Education Centre has over $650,000 in physical building and equipment assets which clearly require security and routine maintenance.
  • over $25 million worth of extremely marketable sea-life that has prospered under 20 years of protection would be subject to immediate poaching without the presence of the resident eco-guardians.
  • Race Rocks has the most comprehensive accumulation of scientific data of any protected site on the West Coast. The continuous data chain, some of which dates back to 1926 must be sustained.
  • Race Rocks, through award winning web based education programming, is recognized as a word leader in environmental monitoring and education delivery.
  • partnerships with educational institutions such as schools, museums, science centres, and Ministries of Education provide direct benefit to Canadians.
  • the funding formula proposed is in accordance with recommendations of the Race Rocks Advisory Board and the intent of the MPA strategy.
  • DFO investment in Race Rocks will be directly matched at a two to one ratio by other independent funding sources.
  • when gift in kind contributions from our other sponsors are considered the ratio of private contribution is over ten times the DFO contribution level.
  • the involvement of DFO assures the project of stable funding. The lack of involvement by DFO will lead to immediate financial collapse.

Financial Proposal

The following operational budget provides details of projected minimum operational expenses at Race Rocks for the period April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002. The budget is based on our four years of experience in funding the Race Rocks project and the highly efficient operational format we have established. Pearson College guarantees to cover any cost over runs if they should occur.

It is proposed that the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, BC Parks, and Pearson College each contribute $50,000 to cover the 2001-2002 operating budget.

 

Race Rocks MPA/ER
Operating Budget April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002
Salaries
Eco-guardian(s)
42,000
Educator (1/2 time)
30,000
Shoreside support (1/3 time)
14,000
Benefits
9,460
95,460
Fuel
Generator
11,000
Heating
1,400
Boat
1,750
Lube/oils
2,000
16,150
Maintenance
Buildings
6,000
Generators
4,300
Water pumps
2,100
Desalinator
2,200
Winches
800
Boat and motor
4,700
Jetty
400
Fuel system
450
Radios
200
Diving equipment
2,500
23,650
Administration Costs
Phone
600
Insurance
1,800
Stationery/printing
1,150
3,550
Education Program
Classroom materials
4,500
Communication/outreach programs
2,500
First Nations’ program
5,000
Internet access
2,000
14,000
 
Total expenditures
$152,810

 

 Pearson College is a registered charity and as such is subject to an annual audit. Our auditors KPMG will provide fully audited accounting details of all Race Rocks expenditures to the partner agencies. In addition the College will file an annual operating report with DFO.

Conclusion

 We had not expected to operate the facility on an interim basis without any financial support from any government for the past four years. Our donors are experiencing fatigue and our largest private financial supporter has indicated their continued support is conditional upon governments entering into this cost sharing formula. A similar proposal has been forwarded to the Provincial Government. Race Rocks is an essential investment by DFO, a cost effective arrangement, a unique innovation in the field of environmental protection and education and a proud accomplishment for all Canadians. We ask that you agree to support the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area as it begins a new life.

Respectfully submitted,

Angus Matthews
Director of Special Projects
Lester B. Pearson College of the Pacific
650 Pearson College Drive
Victoria, BC

 

Release of Entangled Sea lion- DFO and Vancouver Aquarium

On December 13, 2009, Ryan Murphy reported to DFO that a sea lion on Middle Island was entangled in ropes. (See Ryan’s comments below) The ropes were snagged so it could not leave the rock. A rescue was mounted by DFO and the Marine Mammal Rescue Centre of the Vancouver Aquarium on December 16. This was the first time a sea lion had been successfully released from such an entanglement.

 

Further comments from resident marine scientist and ecoguardian at Race Rocks Ryan Murphy
: December 21 2009

Ryan was interviewed for this article in the Goldstream Gazette: Daring Sealion Rescue at Race Rocks

“Normally, neither DFO or the Vancouver Aquarium will intervene with entangled pinnipeds (seals and sea lions), but this case was special for a number of reasons.
1.  The sea lion was actually tethered to the rocks.  These animals are really tough and can often survive for years with their entanglements.  If tranquilized, these animals would take to the water and most likely drown before a rescue team could get to it.  This wasn’t the case here and so a rescue operation was a viable option.
2.  Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) like this one are listed as a species of special concern under SARA and as such are afforded a higher priority than other more abundant species like harbour seals and california sea lions.
3.  This animal was most likely spotted within 24 hours of its entanglement and was still in relatively good health.  Mike Demarchi of LGL who was on the island monitoring DND activity on nearby Bentinck Island and Rocky Point first spotted it on the morning of the 13th and his team and I were able to keep a very close eye on it during the daylight hours.  It was reported to DFO’s Observe, Record, Report (ORR) line (1-800-465-4336) and the Vancouver Aquarium Marine Mammal Rehabilitation Centre (at 604-258-SEAL (7325) or via the emergency phone at 604-862-1647).  A case like this on an offshore haul out would most likely have resulted in death by starvation, hypothermia, or drowning long before it was sighted.  In the 3 days between the first sighting (first photograph) and its successful rescue, this animal had further tangled its tether from about 10m to 3m and exacerbated the wound to its flipper.  The gale yesterday would have drowned it had it not been rescued.”

 

CANADA GAZETTE.. Xwayen ( Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area

Copy of Gazetting

Vol. 134, No. 44
Canada Gazette
Part I
OTTAWA, SATURDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2000
Vol. 134, n o 44
Gazette du Canada
Partie I
OTTAWA, LE SAMEDI 28 OCTOBRE 2000
page 3364
3364
XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area
Regulations
Statutory Authority
Oceans Act
Sponsoring Department
Department of Fisheries and Oceans
REGULATORY IMPACT
ANALYSIS STATEMENT
DescriptionThe Oceans Act (the Act) came into force on January 31, 1997. Part II of the Act authorizes the establishment of an Oceans Man-agement Strategy (OMS) based on the principles of sustainable development, integrated management and the precautionary ap-proach. This part of the Act also provides authority for the devel-opment of tools necessary to carry out the OMS, tools such as the establishment of Marine Protected Areas. Section 35 of the Act authorizes the Governor in Council to designate, by regulation, Marine Protected Areas for any of
the following reasons: (a) the conservation and protection of commercial and non-commercial fishery resources, including marine mammals and their habitats;
(b) the conservation and protection of endangered or threatened species and their habitats;
(c) the conservation and protection of unique habitats;
(d) the conservation and protection of marine areas of high biodiversity or biological productivity; and
(e) the conservation and protection of any other marine re-source or habitat as is necessary to fulfill the mandate of the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans.

In 1998, the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans announced four pilot Marine Protected Area initiatives on Canada’s Pacific Coast. One of these, Race Rocks in British Columbia, meets the criteria set out in paragraphs 35(1)(b), (d)and(e) above. This regulatory initiative proposes to formally designate, under the Oceans Act, the waters surrounding Race Rocks as XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area (MPA). In addition, the harvesting of liv-ing marine resources within the MPA will be prohibited subject to existing aboriginal or treaty rights. XwaYeN (pronounced shwai’yen) is located in the Juan de Fuca Strait, 17 kilometres off the coast of Vancouver Island,southwest of Victoria. The islets of XwaYeN (Race Rocks) form the most southerly part of Canada’s Pacific Coast. Named for its strong tidal currents and rocky reefs, the waters surrounding XwaYeN (Race Rocks) are a showcase for Pacific marine life, featuring whales, sea lions, seals, birds and a wide variety of underwater plants and animals. These waters are home to a thriving community of sub-tidal invertebrates, includ-ing sponges, anemones, hydroids and soft corals. Crowds of barnacles, tunicates, urchins and sea stars adorn the underwater cliffs. Fish such as sculpin, rockfish and lingcod seek refuge in the rocky crevices and undulating kelp forests.
The area’s high velocity tidal currents — up to seven knots — in combination with the climate and the temperature and salinity of the water in the area supplies a generous stream of nutrients and promotes high levels of dissolved oxygen. These factors con-tribute to the creation of an ecosystem of high biodiversity and biological productivity.
The waters surrounding XwaYeN (Race Rocks) are an impor-tant nursery and recruitment area for Northern abalone. In 1999, Northern abalone (Halliotis kamischatkana)wasdesignated as a threatened marine species by the Committee on the Status of En-dangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). Protecting this nursery and recruitment area will aid the nurturing of this species. Fur-thermore, efforts to conserve and protect the biodiversity and biological productivity of the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) marine ecosystem will also enhance the protection of this threatened species.
To provide long-term and comprehensive protection of the di-verse
species and to maintain the biological productivity of the
ecosystem, a prohibition of the harvesting of all living marine
resources in the waters surrounding XwaYeN (Race Rocks) is
being proposed. Although seasonal fisheries closures under the Fisheries Act have restricted all commercial fishing of finfish and shellfish in the area since 1990, recreational harvesting of salmon and halibut and harvesting of non-commercial species continues.
The prohibition of living marine resource harvesting under the Oceans Act will provide a longer-term commitment to the conser-vation and protection of the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) ecosystem. In 1980, the province of British Columbia, under the authority of the provincial Ecological Reserves Act, established the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve, which provides for the protection of the terrestrial natural and cultural heritage values (nine islets) and of the ocean seabed (to the 20 fathoms contour line). Ocean dumping, dredging and the extraction of non-renewable resources are not permitted within the boundaries of the Ecological Reserve.
However, the Ecological Reserve cannot provide for the con servation and protection of the water column or for the living resources inhabiting the coastal waters surrounding XwaYeN (Race Rocks). The federal government is using its authority to complement the protection afforded by the Ecological Reserve by prohibiting the harvesting of living marine resources. Adopting an integrated management approach within the Race Rocks area will provide for a more comprehensive level of con-servation and protection for the ecosystem than can be achieved by either an MPA or an Ecological Reserve on its own. Desig-nating a Marine Protected Area within the area corresponding to the Ecological Reserve will facilitate the integration and increase the synergy of conservation, protection and management initia-tives under the respective authorities of the two governments.
The Oceans Act mandates the Minister to lead and facilitate the
development and implementation of plans for the integrated man-agement of all activities with other ministers and agencies of the Government of Canada, with provincial governments and with affected Aboriginal organizations and coastal communities for the purposes of conservation and protection of Canada’s oceans.

This proposal to designate the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) area as a Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act provides the neces-sary foundation for the Minister to lead and facilitate the devel-opmentof an integrated, cooperative ecosystem-based manage-ment regime utilizing:
(a)acooperative, integrated management approach involving several federal and provincial government agencies using their
respective authorities to conserve and protect the area;
(b) compliance based on best practices, stewardship and vol-untary guidelines; and
(c) assessment of effectiveness of the voluntary initiatives and further restriction as warranted. Integrating the management of the terrestrial and marine com-ponents of the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) ecosystem will facilitate coordinated, effective and efficient management of the area. This cooperative management regime is the preferred approach to the conservation and protection of XwaYeN (Race Rocks) as deter mined through the consultation process. Candidate activities for cooperative management include marine mammal watching, guided diving, research and education, ballast water management, National Defence and Transport Canada programs in the area.
The designation of the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) as an MPA and the prohibition of harvesting of living marine resources are an important and necessary element in the overall conservation and protection of an ecosystem which is biologically diverse and highly productive.
Alternatives The status quo was considered unacceptable because even though the area is currently afforded some protection under the Fisheries Act, an MPA designated by regulation under the Oceans Act provides an opportunity to use integrated management tools for conserving and protecting the biodiversity and biological pro-ductivity of the area and the threatened Northern abalone.
The proposed option is the designation of the XwaYeN (Race
Rocks) MPA by regulation with a prohibition on the harvesting of all living marine resources. This option will provide the primary element required to manage the MPA while allowing the Minister to lead and facilitate the development of an integrated manage-ment approach to comprehensive ecosystem management of the area.
This alternative to comprehensive regulation conforms to Regulatory Policy by limiting regulatory burden on Canadians. However, should it become necessary, control of activities in the area by regulation would be considered.

Benefits and Costs The primary benefit of the proposed Regulations establishing the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area is that the foundation will be set for ensuring the conservation and protec-tion of a highly diverse and productive ecosystem of Canada’s oceans. It will aid in the prevention of potential ecological dete-rioration and protect the Northern abalone in that area. A subsidiary benefit of designating the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) MPA is the opportunity to initiate an integrated management regime based on a cooperative, integrated, ecosystem-based management approach to conserve and protect the area involving several federal and provincial government agencies using their respective authorities; and voluntary compliance through stewardship and cooperation with an alliance of stakeholder groups. The establishment of this MPA will also demonstrate Canada’s resolve to fulfill its commitments under the United NationsConference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (UNEP 1994), as well as Canada’s commit-ment to the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Program.
The costs related to the administration and management of he MPA will be managed within existing budgetary allotments. Consultation Since its announcement in 1998, the pilot Marine Protected Area process has identified and galvanized strong local support for designation of XwaYeN (Race Rocks) as an MPA. The con-sultative process has developed new trust-based relationships and the regulatory designation of the MPA will maintain the level of momentum and stakeholder confidence that have now beenestablished. To facilitate the consultative process, the Race Rocks Advisory
Board was established with representation from:
— the Department of National Defence
— Parks Canada
— Fisheries and Oceans Canada
— the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks of British
Columbia
— the Lester B. Pearson College of the Pacific
— Aboriginal groups through the Coast Salish Sea Council
— the Scientific community
— the Friends of Ecological Reserves
— the Dive community
— the Georgia Strait Alliance
— the Sport Fish Advisory Board — Victoria, representing the
recreational fishing community
— local marina operators
— the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society
— The Northwest Whale Watchers Association
The role of the Race Rocks Advisory Board role was to:
— represent key constituent groups or stakeholders;
— provide advice to Fisheries and Oceans Canada and British
Columbia Parks on the consultation process;
— collate and analyze feedback from consultations;
— make consensus-based, recommendations to Fisheries and
Oceans Canada and British Columbia Parks for the establish-ment
of a Marine Protected Area in the waters surrounding XwaYen (Race Rocks); and
— ensure community involvement in the establishment and on-going management of XwaYen (Race Rocks) MPA.

Four Coast Salish First Nations, Beecher Bay, T’souke, Song-hees
and Esquimalt Nations, claim the eastern end of the Strait of Juan de Fuca as part of their traditional territory. Although the creation of the MPA does not restrict harvesting by First Nations for food, social or ceremonial purposes, they volunteered to forego this activity in support of the designation of the MPA.

The Race Rocks Advisory Board provided an excellentforum for issue identification, discussion and resolution. It has func-tioned well and guided the development of the proposed coopera-tive management regime. The resulting commitment to steward-ship and cooperation in the protection of this area as an MPA has laid the groundwork for a management regime through voluntary compliance that is unprecedented. In discussing and developing recommendations for designation and management of the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area, all members of the Race Rocks Advisory Board and their constitu-ents clearly understood that, upon designation, the area would be closed to harvesting (commercial and recreational) of all living marine resources. It was also accepted that this would not prevent the removal of marine organisms for scientific or educational purposes as part of an ongoing research program to assess and monitor the long-term health of the XwaYen (Race Rocks) ma-rine ecosystem.
The most direct impact of this prohibition is on the recreational fishing community who have endorsed the implementation of a “no-take” zone within the boundaries of the proposed Marine Protected Area. There will be no impact on the commercial fish-ing sector as the area has been closed to commercial fishing since 1990 and there is no expectation on the part of the commercial sector that the area will be re-opened in the future. Aboriginal groups have indicated their support to the Race Rocks Advisory Board for the creation of the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area by voluntarily choosing not to fish in the area.

The recommendations reflect the outcome of a consensus-based process by the Race Rocks Advisory Board and directions expressed by the public, stakeholders and other partners through consultations conducted over a two-year period. In addition to sectoral consultations with stakeholders, two public sessions were conducted in February 2000. The public consultations were held to provide opportunities for information and discussion with those persons not represented by particular
interest groups. With an attendance of 101 persons, the consulta-tions provided useful fora for the discussion of both the MPA and Ecological Reserve aspects of the initiative. Results of these dis-cussions indicated a high level of support for establishment of a Marine Protected Area at Race Rocks to complement the area’s Ecological Reserve status. Media coverage since the initial announcement of the pilot ini-tiative XwaYeN (Race Rocks) has been regular, positive and resulted in continued public discussion and interest. Ranging from local newspapers to the Knowledge Network and the Discovery Channel, the coverage has highlighted the ecological values of the proposed MPA and public support for it. Compliance and Enforcement Principal stakeholder groups haveexpressed a keen interest in not only developing “best practices” but also working towards ensuring a high degree of compliance. The development of stew-ardship initiatives and “best practices” guidelines has already commenced.
The unanimous support for the creation of a Marine Protected Area in the waters surrounding XwaYeN (Race Rocks) suggests that enforcement interventions will rarely be required. XwaYeN (Race Rocks) has resident guardians and an Internet-based series of live video cameras strategically placed in the area. These provide the foundation for a strong community-based compliance environment. Therefore, management will be achieved through voluntary compliance/best practices guidelines for a number of activities, such as recreational boating, eco-tourism activities, including marine mammal viewing, and diving activity. Monitoring and assessment of the effectiveness of these guidelines will take place over a two-year period. Depending on the results, activity regula-tions can then be considered if necessary,

Contacts: Camille Mageau, Director, Marine Ecosystem Conservation, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, 200 Kent Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E6,

(613) 991-1285 (Telephone), (613) 998-3329
(Facsimile), mageauc@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (Electronic mail), or Mary

Ann Green, Director, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs, De-partment of Fisheries and Oceans, 200 Kent Street, Ottawa, On-tario K1A 0E6, (613) 990-0162 (Telephone), (613) 990-0120
(Facsimile), greenma@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (Electronic mail).

PROPOSED REGULATORY TEXT

Notice is hereby given that the Governor in Council, pursuant to subsection 35(3) of the Oceans Act a ,proposes to make the annexed XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area Regulations. Interested persons may make representations with respect to the proposed Regulations within 30 days after the date of publi-cation of this notice. All such representations must cite the Canada Gazette,Part I,andthedate ofpublication of this notice, and be addressed to

Camille Mageau, Director, Marine Ecosystem
Conservation, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 200 Kent Street,
Ottawa, ON, K1A 0E6. Telephone: (613) 991-1285; FAX: (613)
998-3329, E-mail: mageauc@dfo-mpo.gc.ca.
Ottawa, October 19, 2000

MARC O’SULLIVAN
Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council

XwaYeN (RACE ROCKS) MARINE PROTECTED
AREA REGULATIONS


DESIGNATION

1. The area within the 20-fathom (36.58 metre) contour line as shown on the chart set out in the schedule is hereby designated as the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area.

PROHIBITION

2. (1) The definitions in this subsection apply in this section. “fish” has the same meaning as in section 2 of the Fisheries Act.(poisson) “fish habitat” has the same meaning as in subsection 34(1) of the Fisheries Act.(habitat du poisson)
— a S.C. 1996, c. 31—

(2) No person shall remove from XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Ma-rine
Protected Area any
(a)fish;
(b) part of the fish habitat; or
(c) living marine organism that forms part of the ecosystem of
fish.
(3) Subsection (2) does not apply to removal for scientific re-search for the protection and understanding of the XwaYeN (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area.
COMING INTO FORCE 3.

These Regulations come into force on the day on which they
are registered.

Règlement sur la zone de protection marine XwaYeN
(Race Rocks)
Fondement législatif
Loi sur les océans
Ministère responsable
Ministère des Pêches et des Océans
RÉSUMÉ DE L’ÉTUDE D’IMPACT
DE LA RÉGLEMENTATION
DescriptionLa Loi sur les océans (la Loi) est entrée en vigueur le 31 jan-vier 1997. La partie II de la Loi permetl’établissement d’unestratégie de gestion des océans (SGO) basée sur les principes dudéveloppement durable, de la gestion intégrée et de la prévention.Cette partie de la Loi prévoit aussi l’élaboration d’outils nécessai-resà la SGO, notamment l’établissement de zones de protection marine.
L’article 35 de la Loi autorise le gouverneur en conseil à dé-signer,en vertu de la réglementation, des zones de protection marines pour l’une ou plusieurs des raisons suivantes :

a) la conservation et la protection des ressources halieutique commerciales ou autres, y compris les mammifères marins, et de leur habitat;
(b) la conservation et la protection des espèces en voie de dis-paritionet des espèces menacées et de leur habitat;
c) la conservation et la protection d’habitats uniques;
d) la conservation et la protection des espaces marins riches en biodiversité ou en productivité biologique;
e) la conservation et la protection d’autres ressources ou habitats marins, au besoin, pour la réalisation du mandat du ministre des Pêches et des Océans.
En 1998, le ministre des Pêches et des Océans a annoncé la création de quatre projets pilotes concernant des zones de protec-tion marine sur la Côte du Pacifique canadienne. L’une d’elles était la zone pilote de protection marine Race Rocks, qui satisfait aux exigences établies aux alinéas 35(1)b), d)ete) décrits ci-dessus.
Par le biais de cette initiative réglementaire, on propose de désigner formellement, en vertu de la Loi sur les océans, les eaux avoisinant le secteur de Race Rocks comme zone de protec-tion marine (ZPM) de XwaYeN. De plus, le prélèvement de res-sources
marines vivantes à l’intérieur de la zone sera défendu,
sauf si ce dernier est relatif à des traités ou droits autochtones.
XwaYeN (dont la prononciation est shwai’yen) est situé dans le détroit de Juan de Fuca, à 17 kilomètres de la côte de l’île de Vancouver, au sud-ouest de Victoria. Les îlots de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) forment la partie la plus méridionale de la Côte du Pacifi-que
canadienne.
XwaYeN (Race Rocks) doit son nom à ses courants de marée puissants et à ses récifs rocheux, et ses eaux avoisinantes abritent une riche vie marine : baleines, otaries, phoques, oiseaux et une grande diversité de plantes et d’animaux sous-marins. Les eau de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) accueillent une communauté foison-nante infralittorale d’invertébrés, notamment des éponges, des anémones de mer, des hydraires et des coraux mous. Des colonies
de cirripèdes, de tuniciers, d’oursins et d’étoiles de mer ornent les falaises sous-marines. Des poissons comme des chabots, des sé-bastes et des morues-lingues cherchent refuge dans les crevasses
rocheuses et les peuplements d’algues brunes ondulantes.
Les courants de marée à haute vitesse de la zone —jusqu’à sept noeuds — combinés au climat, à la température et à la salinité
de l’eau de la zone fournissent un apport généreux de nutriments et favorisent des niveaux d’oxygène dissous élevés. Ces facteurs contribuent à créer un écosystème dont la biodiversité et la pro-ductivité
sont importantes. Les eaux avoisinant XwaYeN (Race Rocks) constituent un secteur important pour la reproduction et le recrutement de l’or-meau
nordique. En 1999, l’ormeau nordique (Halliotis kamis-chatkana)
a été désigné espèce marine menacée par le Comité
sur le statut des espèces menacées de disparition au Canada
(CSEMDC). La protection de cette zone de reproduction et de
recrutement favorisera la conservation de l’espèce. De plus, les
efforts déployés pour conserver et protéger la biodiversité et la
productivité biologique des écosystèmes marins de XwaYeN
(Race Rocks) contribueront également à la protection de cette es-pèce
menacée.
Afin de fournir une protection complète et à long terme de ces
diverses espèces, et de maintenir la productivité biologique de
l’écosystème, on doit mettre un terme au prélèvement de toutes
les ressources marines vivantes dans les eaux avoisinant XwaYeN
(Race Rocks). Bien que les fermetures des pêches saisonnières en
vertu de la Loi sur les pêches aient restreint la pêche commerciale
des poissons et des mollusques et crustacés dans la zone depuis
1990, la pêche du saumon et du flétan à des fins récréatives et la
récolte d’espèces non commerciales se poursuit. L’interdiction de
prélever les ressources marines vivantes en vertu de la Loi sur les
océans correspondra à un engagement à long terme envers la con-servation
et la protection de l’écosystème de XwaYeN (Race
Rocks).
En 1980, la province de la Colombie-Britannique, en vertu de
l’Ecological Reserve Act, une loi provinciale, a institué la réserve
écologique de Race Rocks, qui assure la protection du patrimoine
naturel et culturel des neuf îlots terrestres et du fond océanique
(20 lignes de profondeur). Les rejets en mer, le dragage et l’ex-traction
des ressources non renouvelables sont interdits dans les
limites de la réserve écologique.
Toutefois, la réserve écologique actuelle n’assure pas la con-servation
et la protection de la colonne d’eau ou des ressources
vivantes des eaux côtières avoisinant XwaYeN (Race Rocks). Le
gouvernement fédéral exerce donc son autorité afin d’ajouter une
protection complémentaire à ce qu’offre déjà la réserve écologi-que
en interdisant le prélèvement des ressources marines vivantes.
L’adoption d’une approche de gestion intégréeau sein de la
zone de Race Rocks permettra de mieux conserver et protéger
l’écosystème qu’une seule zone de protection marine ou réserve
écologique. La désignation d’une zone de protection marine à
l’intérieur de la zone correspondant à la réserve écologique favo-risera
l’intégration et la synergie des initiatives de conservation,
de protection et de gestion en vertu des pouvoirs respectifs des
deux gouvernements.
La Loi sur les océans permet au ministre de guider et de facili-ter
l’élaboration et la mise en oeuvre de plans de gestion intégrée
de toutes les activités entreprises de concert avec les autres mi-nistères
et organismes fédéraux, les gouvernements provinciaux,
ainsi que les organisations autochtones et les collectivités côtières
concernées, en vue de la conservation et de la protection des
océans au Canada.

La proposition pour la désignation de XwaYeN (Race Rocks)
en tant que zone de protection marine en vertu de la Loi sur les
océans fournira le fondement nécessaire au ministre pour diriger
et favoriser la mise en oeuvre d’un régime de gestion intégrée et
coopératif fondé sur l’écosystème, et basé sur les éléments
suivants :
a) une approche de gestion intégrée et coopérative impliquant
plusieurs organismes fédéraux et provinciaux qui exercent leur
autorité respective pour conserver et protéger la zone;
b)le respect volontaire fondé sur les pratiques exemplaires,
l’intendance et les lignes directrices volontaires;
c) l’évaluation de l’efficacité des initiatives volontaires et
d’autres restrictions au besoin.
L’intégration de la gestion des composantes terrestres et mari-nes
de l’écosystème de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) contribuera à une
gestion coordonnée, efficiente et efficace de la zone. Ce régime
de gestion coopératif est l’approche privilégiée pour la conserva-tion
et la protection de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) tel qu’il a été éta-bli
par le processus de consultation. Les activités proposées pour
une gestion coopérative comprennent l’observation de mammi-fères
marins, la plongée guidée, la recherche et l’éducation, la
gestion des eaux de ballast et les programmes des ministères de
la Défense nationale et des Transports (niveau fédéral) dans le
secteur.
La désignation de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) comme ZPM et
l’interdiction de prélever les ressources marines vivantes repré-sentent
des éléments importants et nécessaires pour la conserva-tion
et la protection d’un écosystème très productif et riche en
biodiversité.
Solutions envisagées
Le statu quo était considéré inacceptable. En effet, même si la
zone est actuellement protégée d’une certaine façon en vertu de la
Loi sur les pêches,uneZPMdésignée par règlement en vertu de
la Loi sur les océans fournira l’occasion d’utiliser des outils de
gestion intégrée pour conserver et protéger la biodiversité et la
productivité biologique de la zone ainsi que l’ormeau nordique,
une espèce menacée.
La solution envisagée est la désignation de la ZPMde
XwaYeN (Race Rocks) par règlement, avec l’interdiction de pré-lever
toute ressource marine vivante. Cette solution apportera
l’élément clé requis pour gérer la ZPM tout en permettant au mi-nistre
de guider et de faciliter la création d’une approche de ges-tion
intégrée de l’écosystème dans son ensemble.
Cette solution proposée pour la réglementation est conforme à
la Politique de réglementation car elle réduit le fardeau régle-mentaire
des Canadiens. Cependant, si la situation l’exige, la so-lution
qui consiste à contrôler les activités par la réglementation
demeure possible.
Avantages et coûts
L’avantage principal du règlement proposé pour désigner
XwaYeN (Race Rocks) zone de protection marine est l’établis-sement
des fondements nécessaires pour veiller à la conservation
et à la protection d’un écosystème marin canadien fort productif
et riche en diversité. Ceci contribuera à prévenir la détérioration
écologique de la zone et à protéger l’ormeau nordique dans cette
zone.
Un avantage secondaire à la désignation de la ZPM de
XwaYeN (Race Rocks) est l’occasion d’instaurer un régime de
gestion intégrée qui sera fondé sur une approche de gestion éco-systémique,
coopérative et intégrée pour conserver et protéger
la zone, et qui impliquera plusieurs organismes fédéraux et

provinciaux aux pouvoirs distincts; de plus, la désignation favo-rise
la conformité volontaire au moyen d’activités d’intendance et
de coopération avec des groupes d’intervenants.
La création de cette ZPM démontrera aussi la volonté du Cana-da
à s’acquitter de ses engagements en vertu de la Conférence des
Nations Unies sur le droit de la mer (UNCLOS) et de la Conven-tion
sur la biodiversité (PNUE 1994), ainsi que ses responsabilités
dans le cadre du programme des aires protégées de l’Union mon-diale
pour la nature (IUCN).
Les sommes nécessaires à la gestionde la ZPMproviendront
des affectations budgétaires existantes.
Consultations
Depuis son annonce en 1998, le processusde la ZPMpilote a
recueilli et stimulé un appui local considérable pour la désigna-tion
de la ZPM de XwaYeN (Race Rocks). Le processus de con-sultation
a contribué à tisser des liens basés sur la confiance, et la
désignation réglementaire de la ZPM aidera à préserver l’élan et
la confiance des intervenants.
Le Conseil consultatif de Race Rocks a été créé afin de faciliter
le processus de consultation. Les représentants sont les suivants :
— le ministère de la Défense nationale
— Parcs Canada
— Pêches et Océans Canada
— le Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks de la
Colombie-Britannique
— le Collège du Pacifique Lester B. Pearson
— les groupes autochtones, par l’intermédiaire du Coast Salish
Sea Council
— la communauté scientifique
— les Friends of Ecological Reserves
— la communauté des plongeurs
— la Georgia Strait Alliance
— le Conseil consultatif de la pêche récréative — Victoria
(représentant la collectivité de la pêche récréative)
— les exploitants de marinas locales
— la Société pour la protection des parcs et des sites naturels
du Canada
— The Northwest Whale Watchers Association
Le Conseil consultatif de Race Rocks remplissait les fonctions
suivantes :
— représenter les groupes ou les intervenants clés;
— donner des avis à Pêches et Océans Canada et au ministère
des Parcs de la Colombie-Britannique sur le processus
consultatif;
— assembler et analyser les résultats du processus de
consultation;
— faire des recommandations consensuelles à Pêches et Océans
Canada et au ministère des Parcs de la Colombie-Britannique
sur l’établissement d’une zone de protection marine dans les
eaux avoisinant XwaYen (Race Rocks);
— veiller à la participation de la collectivité à l’établissement et à
la gestion continue de la ZPM de XwaYen (Race Rocks).
Quatre Premières nations Salish du littoral soit Beecher Bay,
T’souke, Songhees et Esquimalt revendiquent la partie est du
détroit de Juan de Fuca comme leur territoire traditionnel. Bien
qu’on ne prévoie pas limiter les activités des Premières nations en créant la ZPM, ces dernières ont offert, durant les consultations, de renoncer à leurs activités de pêche à des fins alimentaires et rituelles pour manifester leur appui à la désignation de la ZPM.

Le Conseil consultatif de Race Rocks représentait un excellent
forum pour la définition, la discussion et la résolution des pro-blèmes. Il a bien fonctionné et a guidé la mise sur pied du régime
de gestion coopératif proposé. L’engagement résultant en matière d’intendance et de coopération pour la protection de cette zone en tant que ZPM, a jeté les bases d’un régime de gestion par confor-mité volontaire sans précédent.
Au cours des discussions et de l’élaboration des recommanda-tions pour la désignation et la gestion de la Zone de protection
marine de Race Rocks, tous les membres du conseil consultatif et leurs commettants ont bien compris qu’avec la désignation, le
prélèvement de toute espèce marine vivante (commerciale et ré-créative) serait interdit. Ils ont aussi accepté que cette restriction
n’empêche pas le prélèvement d’organismes marins à des fins
scientifiques ou académiques dans le cadre d’un programme de
recherche continu pour évaluer et effectuer le suivi de la santé à
long terme de l’écosystème marin de XwaYen (Race Rocks).
L’impact le plus direct de cette interdiction porte sur la collec-tivité de pêche récréative, qui a accepté l’établissement de la zone sans prélèvement à l’intérieur des limites de la zone de protection marine proposée. Le secteur de pêche commerciale ne sera pas touché, car la zone est fermée à la pêche commerciale depuis 1990, et le secteur commercial ne s’attend pas à la réouverture de cette zone dans un avenir prochain. Les groupes autochtones ont manifesté au Conseil consultatif de Race Rocks leur appui envers lacréationde la zone deprotection marine de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) en optant volontairement pour ne pas exercer la pêche dans ce secteur.
Les recommandations traduisent le résultat du processus de
concertation mené par le Conseil consultatif de Race Rocks et les opinions exprimées par le public, les intervenants et les autres partenaires au moyen de consultations qui ont duré deux ans.
En plus des consultations sectorielles avec les intervenants,
deux séances publiques ont eu lieu en février 2000. Les consulta-tions
publiques ont été tenues afin de permettre aux personnes
non représentées par des groupes d’intérêt d’obtenir de l’in-formation
et de discuter sur ces questions. Les consultations, aux-quelles
ont participé 101 personnes, ont représenté un forum utile
pour la discussion sur divers aspects de la ZPM et de la réserve
écologique. Les résultats de ces discussions témoignent d’un ap-pui
considérable à la création d’une zone de protection marine à
Race Rocks comme complément au statut de réserve écologique.
Depuis l’annonce première de l’initiative pilote de XwaYeN
(Race Rocks), la couverture médiatique a été positive, continue et
a stimulé la discussion et l’intérêt de la part du public. Parmi les
médias qui ont traité du dossier, on comptait des journaux locaux
et des émissions de télévision éducatives (Knowledge Network et
Discovery Channel) qui ont souligné les avantages écologiques de
la ZPM proposée et l’appui du public.
Respect et exécution
Les principaux groupes d’intervenants ont manifesté un vif in-térêt,
non seulement envers l’élaboration de pratiques exemplai-res,
mais aussi envers l’atteinte d’un niveau élevé de conformité
aux exigences réglementaires. La mise sur pied d’initiatives
d’intendance et de lignes directrices visant des pratiques exem-plaires
a déjà commencé.
L’appui unanime à la création d’une zone de protection marine
dans les eaux avoisinant le secteur XwaYeN (Race Rocks) sug-gère
que des interventions coercitives seront rarement requises.
Le secteur de XwaYeN (Race Rocks) compte des gardiens ré-sidants
et abrite une série de caméras vidéo en ligne (liées à

Internet) disposées stratégiquement. Ces mesures contribuent à un
environnement local propice à la conformité.
Par conséquent, la gestion sera assurée au moyen de lignes di-rectrices
sur la conformité volontaire relative à un certain nombre
d’activités telles les bateaux plaisanciers, les activités liées à
l’écotourisme y compris l’observation de mammifères et la plon-gée.Le suivi et l’évaluation de l’efficacité de ces lignes directri-cesse feront sur une période de deux ans. Selon les résultats, des règlements relatifs aux activités seront alors considérés au besoin.
Personnes-ressources
Camille Mageau, Directrice, Conservation des écosystèmes
marins, Ministère des Pêches et des Océans, 200, rue Kent, Otta-wa
(Ontario) K1A 0E6, (613) 991-1285 (téléphone), (613) 998-
3329 (télécopieur), mageauc@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (courriel), ou Mary
Ann Green, Directrice, Affaires législatives et réglementaires,
Ministère des Pêches et des Océans, 200, rue Kent, Ottawa (Onta-rio)
K1A 0E6, (613) 990-0162 (téléphone), (613) 990-0120 (télé-copieur), greenma@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (courriel).

PROJET DE RÉGLEMENTATION
Avis est donné que la gouverneure en conseil, en vertu du pa-ragraphe
35(3) de la Loi sur les océans a ,sepropose de prendre
le Règlement sur la zone de protection marine XwaYeN (Race
Rocks),ci-après. Les intéressés peuvent présenter leurs observations au sujet du projet de règlement dans les 30 jours suivant la date de publica-tion
du présent avis. Ils sont priés d’y citer la Gazette du Canada
Partie I ainsi que la date de publication, et d’envoyer le tout à

Camille Mageau, Directrice, Conservation des écosystèmes ma-rins,
Ministère des Pêches et Océans, 200, rue Kent, Ottawa (On-tario)
K1A 0E6. Téléphone : (613) 991-1285, Télécopieur : (613)
998-3329, Courriel : mageauc@dfo-mpo.gc.ca
Ottawa, le 19 octobre 2000

Le greffier adjoint du Conseil privé,
MARC O’SULLIVAN

RÈGLEMENT SUR LA ZONE DE PROTECTION
MARINE XwaYeN (RACE ROCKS)

DÉSIGNATION
1. L’espace situé à l’intérieur de la ligne de contour de 20 bras-
ses (36,58 m) dont le tracé figure sur la carte hydrographique en
annexe est désigné comme la zone de protection marine XwaYeN (Race Rocks).
INTERDICTION
2. (1) Les définitions qui suivent s’appliquent au présent
article.
« habitat du poisson » S’entend au sens du paragraphe 34(1) de
la Loi sur les pêches.(fish habitat)
« poisson » S’entend au sens de l’article 2 de la Loi sur les pê-
ches.(fish)
———
a L.C. 1996, ch. 31

(2) Il est interdit d’enlever de la zone de protection marine
XwaYeN (Race Rocks) :
a) tout poisson;
b) tout élément de l’habitat du poisson;
c) tout organisme marin vivant faisant partie de l’écosystème
du poisson.
(3) Le paragraphe (2) ne s’applique pas à l’enlèvement aux fins
de recherche scientifique visant la protection et la compréhension
de la zone de protection marine XwaYeN (Race Rocks).

ENTRÉE EN VIGUEUR
3. Le présent règlement entre en vigueurà la date de son
enregistrement.

The complete text of the CANADA GAZETTE from which this has been copied may be found in PDF form at : http://canada.gc.ca/gazette/part1/pdf/g1-13444.pdf pages 112-120.
INCLUDED on page 119 and 120 are the charts of the proposed MPA area with coordinates defined also a copy of the English version facsimile is attached below
Return to the
Index of RRAB
racerocks.com home page
Sitemap Contact
webmaster:
Garry Fletcher
Copyright

Race Rocks Officially Designated as an MPA Sept 14, 2000

RACE ROCKS OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS AN MPA SEPT. 14, 2000

 

Table of Contents:PREAMBLE

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. BACKGROUND
    1. National, International and Provincial Context
    2. Legislative Authority for the Stewardship/Conservation of (Race Rocks)
    3. Marine Protected Area Strategy
  3. – A Place of Many Values
    1. Conservation Interests
    2. Historic Interests
    3. Socio-economic Interests
  4. PROPOSAL FOR (RACE ROCKS) MARINE PROTECTED AREA
    1. Process
    2. Issues Raised During Consultation
    3. A Vision for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area
    4. Objectives for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area
    5. Proposal to Designate
    6. Name
    7. Area Boundaries
    8. Designation
    9. Management Intentions
    10. Post Designation

LIST OF APPENDICES

I–Canada/BC Marine Protected Area Strategy MPA CriteriaII–IUCN Management Categories for Marine Protected Areas

III–Assessment of known conservation (Table 1) and socio-economic (Table 2) values in (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area according to IUCN criteria for the identification and selection of marine protected areas

IV–Consultative Process

V–Guiding Principles for Designation of Race Rocks Ecological Reserve as a Marine Protected Area

VI–Maps

VII–Bibliography

PREAMBLE

The purpose of this proposal is to demonstrate that the criteria outlined in the draft Canada/British Columbia Marine Protected Area Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast (Appendix I) for establishing marine protected areas have been met, thereby providing the rationale for proceeding with formal designation of Race Rocks Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act. Such designation will compliment the protected status of the existing provincial Ecological Reserve. In addition, designation of Race Rocks Marine Protected Area will also contribute to the World Conservation Union (IUCN) World Commission on Protected Areas initiative to create and manage a network of marine protected areas.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

In 1998, the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans announced four pilot Marine Protected Area initiatives on Canada’s Pacific coast. One of these areas was (pronounced “shwai’yen” (Race Rocks) (Appendix VI). Since then, a wide range of further studies and consultations has been undertaken to determine the feasibility of proceeding to final designation of this unique area under the Oceans Act.

Located at the eastern entrance of Juan de Fuca Strait, (Race Rocks) with its small rocky island system and high-current subtidal and intertidal areas is ecologically unique. The area contains ecologically significant and unique assemblages of benthic and pelagic invertebrates and provides haulout and feeding areas for California and Stellar sea lions during the winter. It is also the largest haulout and breeding areas for harbour seals in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and provides nesting habitat and resting areas for migratory seabirds.

Race Rocks has been managed as a provincial marine protected area for the past 20 years. The natural values of the (Race Rocks) area were recognized formally by the Province of British Columbia in 1980 in its designation of the area as an Ecological Reserve under the provincial Ecological Reserves Act. This designation provides for protection of the natural and cultural heritage values of the terrestrial (nine islets) and the ocean bottom (to a depth of 20 fathoms) lands.

(Race Rocks) is located 17 kilometres southwest of Victoria, and is the most southerly part of Canada’s Pacific Coast. One of its nine islets is the site of Race Rocks lightstation, the second oldest lighthouse in Western Canada.

The area’s remarkable tidal flow – up to seven knots – supplies a generous stream of nutrients to a thriving community of subtidal invertebrates, including sponges, anenomes, hydroids and soft corals. Crowds of barnacles, tunicates, urchins and sea stars adorn the underwater cliffs. Fish such as sculpin, rockfish and lingcod seek refuge in the rocky crevices and undulating kelp forests. Above water, the islets serve as nesting colonies for many seabirds, such as gulls, cormorants, pigeon guillemots and oystercatchers, and as a

stopover for migratory birds. They share the rocks with resting harbour seals, Stellar and California sea lions, and a few Northern Elephant seals. River otters patrol the shoreline and killer whales are frequent visitors. Gray whales, Dall’s and harbour porpoises occasionally pass by.

The (Race Rocks) area is traditional territory for at least four Coast Salish First Nations people; Beecher Bay, T’souke, Songhees and Esquimalt. The nutrient rich waters provided a wide diversity of food fishing opportunities year round. The Coast Salish people’s interaction with the area has been based on the First Nations “Thirteen Moons” calendar; a spiritual and temporal-based approach to sustainably harvesting and respecting the resources.

The exceptional diversity of marine life at (Race Rocks) – long recognized by First Nations in the area – makes it an ideal place for scientific and educational observation. It serves as a model for the transition zone between inner coastal waters and the open ocean, which is why nearby Lester B. Pearson College has supported the stewardship and protection of the area. In accordance with the management objectives for the Ecological Reserve, BC Parks is proposing to operate the lightstation facility as a research/education/guardian centre. It is proposed that Lester B. Pearson College will provide this service, under permit to BC Parks.

Designation as a Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act will be followed by a further consultation process leading to the preparation of a long-term integrated management plan for the joint federal/provincial marine protected area under the direction of Fisheries and Oceans Canada and BC Parks.

 

2.0 BACKGROUND:

 

2.1-International, National and Provincial Context

Canada and British Columbia are committed to the protection of marine biodiversity and ecological processes, and the sustainable use of marine resources. The commitment to establish Marine Protected Areas fulfils Canada’s international responsibilities and obligations to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and as a signatory to the Convention on Biological Diversity (UNEP 1994) and the major components of the Jakarta Mandate developed under that Convention. This commitment also provides a means of meeting obligations under the Convention on Migratory Species (Bonn Convention).

This commitment is reinforced by a national Fisheries and Oceans Canada policy for establishing Marine Protected Areas. This policy aims to establish a system of Marine Protected Areas under the Oceans Act throughout Canada’s oceans to protect areas that are examples of the major ecological regions and the communities of plants and animals they contain. Supported by a range of provincial and federal marine-related legislation and policy responsibilities, the Federal Committee on Oceans (Pacific Region and National) provides advice and input to assist in the co-ordination and integration of Marine Protected Area proposals at the broader regional and national level.

Section 35 of the Oceans Act specifically provides for the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans to establish Marine Protected Areas. The commitment of this Act and associated policy supports the above international responsibilities and obligations in addition to the World Conservation Union (IUCN) World Commission on Protected Areas program of promoting the establishment and management of a global representative system of Marine Protected Areas (Kelleher et al 1995). Appendix II lists the internationally accepted IUCN management categories for protected areas. These management categories were developed by the IUCN with input from agencies with protected area responsibilities from around the world to promote a consistent approach to protected area management. It is proposed that this MPA will have an appropriate management category assigned to it as part of the preparation, with stakeholders, of the management plan.

(Race Rocks) has been assessed against the IUCN’s and World Commission of Protected Areas (WCPA) criteria for selection and identification of Marine Protected Areas (see Appendix III for summaries of these assessments).

 

2.2 -Legislative Authority for designation and management of (Race Rocks)Stewardship of the (Race Rocks) area is entrusted to all Canadians. To ensure that the interests of all Canadians are fairly represented in management processes for the area, three lead steward groups will oversee the management of the (Race Rocks) area. The tri-partied management of will be comprised of the Coast Salish First Nations people; the provincial government through the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks; and the federal government through Fisheries and Oceans Canada. The legislative authorities under which these stewards are mandated (acknowledged) are as follows:

First Nations:

Aboriginal title to traditionally used territories is recognized and affirmed as an ‘existing Aboriginal right’ in Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. Aboriginal title is one manifestation of a broader-based conception of Aboriginal rights. Aboriginal title is based on occupation of traditional territory prior to the assertion of European sovereignty and takes into account the following aspects: right of exclusive use and occupation of the land; right to choose to what purposes the land can be put; and the economic aspect of the land. (Delgamuukw vs. British Columbia).

The Crown is required to give appropriate priority to Aboriginal interests in Aboriginal title lands, reflecting the exclusive nature of Aboriginal title. The Supreme Court has also affirmed the Crown’s obligation to accommodate participation by First Nations in decision-making with regard to development of lands subject to Aboriginal title.

The legal authority to establish a protected marine area flows from one or more provincial and federal statutes including: British Columbia’s Ecological Reserve Act, Park Act, Wildlife Act or Environment and Land Use Act, as well as the Fisheries Act of Canada, National Parks Act, Canada Wildlife Act, Migratory Birds Convention Act, Canada’s Oceans Act or the proposed new Marine Conservation Areas Act.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada has the mandate to manage specified marine resources under the Fisheries Act and the Oceans Act. Section 35 (2) of the Oceans Act states that the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada has a responsibility “to lead and co-ordinate the development and implementation of a national system of Marine Protected Areas on behalf of the Government of Canada”.

Section 35 (1) of the Oceans Act authorizes the Government of Canada to establish Marine Protected Areas for a number of reasons, including the conservation and protection of:

  1. commercial and non-commercial fisheries, including marine mammals and their habitats;
  2. endangered or threatened species and their habitats;
  3. unique habitats;
  4. marine areas of high biodiversity or biological productivity; or
  5. any other marine resource or habitat as is necessary to fulfil the mandate of the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans.

British Columbia ecological reserves are established by provincial order-in-council under the Ecological Reserves Act for the:

  1. preservation of representative samples of British Columbia’s ecosystems;
  2. protection of rare and endangered plants and animals in their natural habitat;
  3. preservation of unique, rare or outstanding botanical, zoological or geological phenomena;
  4. perpetuation of important genetic resources; and
  5. scientific research and educational uses associated with the natural environment.

 

2.3-Marine Protected Area Strategy

The governments of Canada and British Columbia are working together to implement a Marine Protected Areas strategy that will achieve co-ordinated marine protection and

conservation goals for the Pacific coast. As mentioned earlier, one of these areas is (Race Rocks).

The proposed designation of (Race Rocks) as a Marine Protected Area exemplifies the essential elements of a viable west coast Marine Protected Area draft strategy (Marine Protected Area Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast) in that:

  1. It uses a joint federal-provincial approach: all relevant federal and provincial agencies will work collaboratively to exercise their authorities to achieve the full level of protection expected by the public for the area.

2.-It provides for shared decision-making with the public: commits government agencies to employ an inclusive shared decision-making process with First Nations, stakeholders, coastal communities and the public.3.-It contributes to a comprehensive marine protected area system: seeks to build an extensive system of protected areas by the year 2010 through a series of coastal planning processes.

4. The (Race Rocks) area was selected as an MPA pilot under the federal provincial MPA Strategy initiative based on its status as a richly diverse and important ecosystem. Both levels of government recognized that the Oceans Act could provide new, complementary and longer-term opportunities for the protection of the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve.

Past collaboration between Fisheries and Oceans Canada and BC Parks has yielded Fisheries Act closures within the reserve for most species since 1990. The creation of an Oceans Act MPA within the water column above the provincial Ecological Reserve will facilitate the integrated management of the (Race Rocks) area under the respective authorities of the two levels of governments.

Management planning processes provide a mechanism for public review and support for management strategies. In this respect it will be important that the proposed management plan for the joint Ecological Reserve – Marine Protected Area make appropriate linkages with other land use planning strategies.

 

3.0- (Race Rocks) – a place of many values

(Race Rocks) is a place with many values. It is essential that these values be respected and managed holistically to enable optimum protection of (Race Rocks). It is because of the array of natural, cultural heritage, and recreation values that complementary federal and provincial designations and management activities are required to achieve the level of protection expected by the public.

These values have been categorized into three interest areas: Conservation, Cultural Heritage, and Socio-Economic.

While the Ecological Reserve and Marine Protected Area complement each other in contributing to the maintenance of biological diversity and the protection of genetic material, equally important is the historic significance of the area to First Nations people and mariners.

 

3.1-Conservation Values

The Ecosystem Overview of Race Rocks (Race Rocks Ecosystem Overview, G. Fletcher, 1999) and the Draft Management Plan for Race Rocks (BC Parks, 1998) identify a number of key conservation values for the (Race Rocks) area which are outlined below.

Geology:

The geological terrain that includes Race Rocks is known as the Crescent Terrain, with the most prominent feature being the Metchosin Igneous Complex. This package of rocks are fine grained basalts (extrusive ocean crust) and their coarse grained equivalent, gabbros (intrusive rocks). Still evident are the small erratics and scour marks from the last of three glaciations.

Climate:

Located in the rain shadow of the Olympic Mountains and influenced by a wind funnel effect over the Strait of Juan de Fuca, (Race Rocks) often experiences weather patterns quite different to southern Vancouver Island. It has an unusually high amount of sunshine in the winter months, very seldom recording freezing temperatures. In the summer, there is the occasional blanketing of fog. The winds in the Juan de Fuca Strait blow principally from the southeast and northwest. Outward blowing winds occur fifty percent of the time during the winter (October through to March) while the inward blowing winds predominate during the summer (April through to September).

Temperature and salinity:

Race Rocks lightstation staff have recorded salinity and temperature for the past sixty years, with some local records dating back to 1921. Salinity varies considerably and is seasonally affected by the large volumes of weakly stratified, freshwater from the Fraser River. Winter water temperatures average about 7.5° C. with summer peaks of about 11° C.

Physical oceanography:

The area features high velocity currents that can reach up to seven knots in some shallow rocky intertidal or subtidal locales. The currents create a turbulent regime that brings nutrients up from surrounding depths and thus support a highly localized and complex food web. The currents also mix the water column, inhibit stratification, and promote high dissolved oxygen and nutrient concentrations. Rocky intertidal and subtidal sites especially those with high current flow also attract many diverse species of fishes, marine mammals and seabirds and promote high levels of invertebrate larval recruitment.

Marine algae and vascular plants:

Forty-one taxa are found at Race Rocks. Approximately 50% of vegetation coverage consists of Brown Kelps in certain depths and months; 30-90% may be Coralline Algae in other locales. Their biomass may be significantly higher than in surrounding areas.

Phytoplankton and zooplankton:

Species information is available from collection stations in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, a highly dynamic but poorly studied area. About 130 known taxa of phytoplankton and 100 zooplankton occur. Diatoms are most abundant in spring and early summer; dinoflagellates high in later summer and early fall; microflagellates in winter. Chlorophyll ranges from 1 to 5 mg/m3, low in fall/winter, high in spring/summer. Calanoid copepods are a dominant group, up to 70 – 90% in spring and summer. Pseudocalanus are most common species in the Strait. Other important zooplankton include euphasids, arrow worms, and fish eggs and larvae. Zooplankton abundance reaches a high of about one million individuals per sq. metre in August.

Benthic Invertebrates:

Although the species list is incomplete, evidence indicates high abundance and species diversity with over 200 taxa listed. Germesia (soft-coral), Gorgonocephalus (brittle star), E. prolifera and M. senile (anemones) are extremely abundant. Pacific abalone is listed as threatened by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). Recent towed video surveys showed high occurrences of sea urchins and anemones.

Fishes:

Thirty-five species are found here. However, there are large knowledge gaps about the fish populations and their roles in this ecosystem. The area represents a critical habitat for many species of rockfish, lingcod, and kelp greenling. Some rockfish species are now considered a “Species of Concern” by Washington State (U.S.A.) and are of conservation concern in B.C.

Birds:

About 45 known species of marine associated birds use Race Rocks Area for feeding, roosting, and nesting. The area provides critical nesting habitat for Glaucous-winged Gulls, Pigeon Guillemots, Black Oystercatchers and possibly Brandt’s Cormorants. Twenty-three percent of the Pelagic Cormorant population in the eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca nests at Race Rocks.

Marine Mammals:

Species found at Race Rocks include five known species of pinnipeds and ten species of cetaceans, five of which are common. The area is primarily used as a stop-over and rafting site for California (>1,000) and Steller sea lions (>50) in the winter. Harbour seals are the primary year-round resident users for haulout, birthing, pupping, and weaning. Race Rocks is the largest haulout for harbour seals in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, the second largest in the Canadian waters of the Georgia Basin, and can represent up to 20% of the South Gulf Islands population.

3.2- Cultural Heritage Values

Traditional harvest:

Four Coast Salish First Nations, Beecher Bay, T’souke, Songees and Esquimalt Nations, claim the eastern end of the Strait of Juan de Fuca as part of their traditional territory. Other Coast Salish Nations may have used this area. Interviews with First Nations representatives indicate that a wide range of food was available from the coastal waters including gull’s eggs, sea cucumbers, sea urchins, chitons, snails, whelks, mussels, barnacles, seaweeds, crab and fish. Seafood was not only eaten but also traded with other First Nations including those from Washington State (U.S.A.).

Marine Navigation:

As part of the “Graveyard of the Pacific”, the area was named “Race Rocks” by officers of the Hudson’s Bay Company who noted the area as a severe hazard to navigation in the 19th century due to the dangers created by the rip tide. Numerous shipwrecks led to the establishment of a lighthouse station at Great Race Rock in 1860. This lighthouse is the second oldest on Canada’s West Coast and is protected with designation as a heritage structure. The Underwater Archaeological Society of British Columbia maintains an inventory of shipwreck sites within the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve.

 

3.3 -Socio-economic interests

The diversity and significance of natural, cultural heritage and recreational values of the Race Rocks area generates substantial and varied socio-economic interests. Under the provincial legislation however, there are significant limitations on the acceptable uses of the area. For instance, the primary purpose of the Ecological Reserve is the protection of the natural and cultural heritage values, and human use may only occur to the extent to which these values are not impaired. Ecological Reserves are not designated for recreational purposes. The socio-economic interests identified below should be considered in light of this restrictive legislation.

  1. Co-operation with First Nations:The (Race Rocks) pilot Marine Protected Area investigation and pre-designation process has provided a good opportunity to nurture significant relationships between all participants and improved understanding of First Nations’ interests (Appendix IV). The area has been a productive traditional use fishing area for First Nations.
  2. Education and research:The biodiversity of the (Race Rocks) area has strong value for the local naturalist and science communities. Lester B. Pearson College of the Pacific, as an international school of choice for many foreign students, has been engaged for more than twenty-five years with the “ living classroom”; providing benefits to thousands of people of all ages and from more than a hundred countries. Through its interactive internet site, www.racerocks.com, the college is promoting awareness of the marine environment to an international audience.The faculty and students of the Biology and Environmental Systems program at Pearson College are long-time volunteer ecological reserve wardens. They are actively involved in research and education activities and provide an important monitoring function. The College has been the principal research agency to date and has developed an excellent database for the ecological reserve and its values. Numerous opportunities exist to involve the education and research community in creative joint educational initiatives with First Nations, BC Parks and Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
  3. Eco-tourism:The following summarizes the forms of eco-tourism that currently occur in the Race Rocks area. It is recognized that these uses may be restricted as necessary to protect the natural and cultural heritage values of the area and ensure that these values are sustained.Marine wildlife viewing and diving are the predominant forms of eco-tourism in the Race Rocks area. As a result of a rapid and spontaneous growth of marine wildlife viewing in southern Vancouver Island, principally for orca whales, there has been increasing interest in Race Rocks for the diversity and availability of other marine mammals.British Columbia’s waters are renowned world-wide for their excellent diving value and Race Rocks exemplifies some of the world’s best diving opportunities. Strong currents, offer limited diving windows requiring experienced and “guided” diving. The dive industry is enjoying good growth and providing jobs and benefits to the tourism sector.
  4. Commercial Fishing:The area has been closed to commercial fishing for all species under the Fisheries Act since 1990.
  5. Recreational Fishing:Sport fishing for salmon and halibut is currently very popular in the area directly adjacent to the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve.
  6. Marine Navigation:Frequent heavy oil and crude tanker traffic (two supertankers per day on average) passes within two miles of the (Race Rocks) area. Recreational boating is somewhat limited because of tidal and current conditions.
  7. Mining and Petroleum:The authority for exploration for or extraction of any oil or gas reserves within the Georgia Region, including the (Race Rocks) area rests with the Province of British Columbia.Exploration and development of mineral and petroleum resources within the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve is prohibited under the British Columbia Ecological Reserve Act.
  8. Co-operation with non-government organizations:The process for consultations with stakeholders involved considerable and useful dialogue with non-government organizations. The volunteer Race Rocks Advisory Board (RRAB) included representation from the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Georgia Strait Alliance and Friends of Ecological Reserves. As a result, all participants developed better understanding of interests, values and common objectives with the establishment of a marine protected area.
  9. Co-operation Between Governments:

BC. Parks, Parks Canada, the Department of National Defence and Fisheries and Oceans Canada are committed to a coordinated and cooperative approach to the management of Race Rocks and providing the level of protection identified by the public and the RRAB. This pilot process has led to a greater understanding and improved collaboration between these agencies.

 

4.0 Proposal for (Race Rocks) Marine protected Area4.1-Process

To assist Canada and B.C. in working towards the formal designation of the (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act, a multi-stakeholder Race Rocks Advisory Board was established in 1999.

Membership on the Race Rocks Advisory Board was comprised of representatives from: Friends of Ecological Reserves, the local dive community, Georgia Strait Alliance, Pearson College, First Nations (Coast Salish Sea Council), Sport Fish Advisory Board – Victoria, Department of National Defence, Lester B. Pearson College of the Pacific, Parks Canada, the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, the local science community, Northwest Whale Watchers Association and Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

The function of the Advisory Board was to:

  • represent key stakeholders and partners who would provide advice to Fisheries and Oceans Canada and BC. Parks on the consultation process;
  • collate and analyze feedback from consultations;
  • provide consensus-based, recommendations to Fisheries and Oceans Canada and BC Parks for the establishment of a Marine Protected Area at

(Race Rocks) and recommendations for management of the MPA; and,

ensure community involvement in the establishment and on-going management of the (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area.

 

4.2 -A Vision for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area

“Based on a cooperative and integrated, multi-lateral relationship, Race Rocks Marine Protected Area – Ecological Reserve will conserve and protect a unique, high-energy marine ecosystem for the benefit of future generations.”

Source: Stakeholder Consultations 1999/2000
“Race Rocks Ecological Reserve will continue to protect the high energy marine system found in the eastern entrance of the Strait of Juan de Fuca.”

Source: Race Rocks Ecological Reserve, Draft Management Plan June 1998
4.3 Management Issues Raised During Consultation

Eco-tourism

As British Columbia’s eco-tourism and dive industries expand, it is anticipated that visits to (Race Rocks) will increase over the next few years. This will necessitate the development of “best practices” to ensure that the feeding, resident and breeding species in the area are not disturbed. To date, there has been excellent co-operation from the marine mammal viewing industry towards the development and maintenance of guidelines for operating in the (Race Rocks) area. Similarly, the dive industry has expressed strong interest in developing guidelines, training and stewardship models for managing activity within Marine Protected Areas.

Any restrictions to recreational use will be made in consultation with the Race Rocks Advisory Board and the affected interest groups and others. For example, through the public advisory group process, and with the support of the whale watching industry, voluntary guidelines for appropriate viewing procedures have been established. As the popularity of viewing activities increases, this use will be monitored and further restrictions may be applied if impacts on the resources exceed acceptable limits.

Recreational Fishing

There are conservation concerns related to bycatch of species of concern such as rockfish and lingcod in the recreational salmon and halibut fisheries directly adjacent to the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve. The Race Rocks Advisory Board recommended that the area be closed to all fishing activity. Although initially reluctant to consider a total recreational fishing closure within the boundary of the proposed (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area, the Sport Fish Advisory Board (SFAB) now supports this recommendation.

Recreational Boating

Proximity to a large population base and the geographic location of Race Rocks (transit between the “west coast” and Gulf Island communities) make the Marine Protected Area particularly vulnerable to boating use. The volume of traffic passing in close proximity to, or through the MPA, will likely continue to increase over time. This activity will need to be closely monitored and subject to marine safety considerations, further restrictions may be required if adverse impacts exceed acceptable limits.

Marine Navigation

Due to the isolated nature, and the small area encompassed by the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve and proposed Marine Protected Area, even a small oil spill could have a devastating impact on the Race Rocks area. Oil spill contingency resources are available in Victoria. There may be a requirement to consider special contingency arrangements during the development of the management plan for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area due to the area’s high-energy environment.

The Port of Vancouver’s draft Ballast Water Management Guidelines state that dumping of ballast water may take place west of the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve. The introduction of alien species and contamination could significantly impact the (Race Rocks) environment. A monitoring regime to address the potential introduction of alien species will need to be considered through the Federal Committee on Oceans — Pacific during the development of the management plan.

Federal Committee on Oceans (Pacific Region)

Members of the Federal Committee on Oceans (Pacific Region) were contacted by letter in mid-May to determine if there were any issues related to moving forward with designation of the Race Rocks MPA. No issues were raised.

4.4-Objectives for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area

The following objectives have been identified for the Oceans Act portion of the joint marine protected area. These objectives may be modified following an integrated management planning process for the joint Federal-Provincial Marine Protected Area.

The objectives for the (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area are as follows:

  1. To protect the conservation values associated with marine biological diversity, marine habitats and the marine ecosystem associated with the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve and surrounding waters (see Appendix III);
  2. To permit the awareness, appreciation, use and enjoyment of the Race Rocks area, its natural and cultural heritage values to the extent that these uses do not impact adversely on the values within the proposed Marine Protected Area;
  3. To support the sharing of traditional knowledge;
  4. To provide scientific research opportunities to further understanding of the area to the extent that the impact of these uses is within acceptable limits and do not impair the diversity, abundance and functioning of the marine ecosystem;
  5. To permit increased education and awareness of the marine environment to the extent that the impacts of these uses are within acceptable limits and do not impair the diversity, abundance and functioning of the marine ecosystem; and,
  6. To test Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s National Framework for Establishing and Managing Marine Protected Areas and the Canada/BC Marine Protected Areas Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast.

 

4.5-Proposal to designate

The recommendations, outlined below, reflect the outcome of a consensus-based process by the Race Rocks Advisory Board (RRAB) regarding the management of the (Race Rocks) area as an MPA. These recommendations also reflect the directions expressed by the public, stakeholders and other partners, through consultations over the past two years, in support of complementary management of the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve as a Marine Protected Area.

Over the past eighteen months, the pilot Marine Protected Area process has identified and galvanized strong support for the complementary designation of Race Rocks as a joint MPA under federal and provincial jurisdictions. The consultative process developed new, trust-based relationships between an array of stakeholders and user groups including First Nations, sports fishers, eco-tourism companies, dive charter operators, scientists, educators and environmental organizations. It also elevated expectations that federal follow-through will be expeditious. There is significant risk to these valuable relationships and stakeholders’ reputations should the designation be delayed.

The following recommendations for the area’s management are presented for consideration:

4.6 a-Designation

It is recommended that Race Rocks be a joint federal-provincial marine protected area, receiving a high level of protection through the complementary authorities of the Federal Oceans Act and the Provincial Ecological Reserve

Act.

4.6 b-Co-operative Management

It is recommended that a joint Management Committee consisting of First Nations, Fisheries and Oceans Canada and BC Parks be established to ensure that the planning and management of the area is co-ordinated, effective and efficient and that Fisheries and Oceans Canada and BC Parks, as the lead public agencies, are publicly accountable for achieving the area’s goals and objectives.

4.6 c-Name

It is recommended that the Marine Protected Area be named (Race Rocks) in respect for the Coast Salish Nations name in the Clallam language, which is translated as meaning “fast flowing waters”.

4.7-Area Boundaries

It is recommended that the boundary for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area coincide with the current Ecological Reserve boundary (1980); being all waters within the 36.5 metre (20 fathom) line as described on Canadian Hydrographic Chart 3641 [1980]. Total area 200 hectares. For maps, see Appendix VI.

 

4.8-Federal Oceans Act Designation

This proposal:

  • addresses the relevant objectives of Canada’s Oceans Act;
  • is consistent with the National Framework for Establishing and Managing Marine Protected Areas (March 1999);
  • addresses and is consistent with the “Marine Protected Areas: A Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast”, Guiding Principles for the Development of Marine Protected Areas (as outlined in Appendix V);
  • meets the “Marine Protected Areas: A Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast” suggested criteria for selection of Marine Protected Areas (Appendix I); and,
  • meets IUCN criteria for selection and identification of Marine Protected Areas (as outlined in Appendix III).

 

On this basis, it is recommended that (Race Rocks) be designated as a Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act Section 35.

An appropriate IUCN Management Category will be applied to the (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area as part of the establishment of a management plan. It will be recommended as part of this process that (Race Rocks) become an IUCN Category I Marine Protected Area.

 

4.8-Management Intentions

Managing human use and impacts are the principal issues for (Race Rocks) as a combined Oceans Act Marine Protected Area and Ecological Reserve. Human use including eco-tourism is compatible with the objectives of establishing and managing Marine Protected Areas, but is incompatible with the purpose and objectives of provincial ecological reserves.

In recognition of the historical significance of the area to First Nations, shared management of the (Race Rocks) will be addressed co-operatively by First Nations, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and BC Parks in consultation with the Race Rocks Advisory Board. The management plan to be developed by First Nations, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, BC Parks, in consultation with stakeholders, will address the issues of human use, environmental protection, governance and stewardship. The Race Rocks Advisory Board has developed a series of recommendations (Race Rocks Advisory Board Management Recommendations for (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area, March 2000) that outline a vision for the management of the MPA. This will form the basis for discussions leading toward the development of a management plan for the area.

Rather than develop a new regulatory framework for protection and conservation, existing regulatory mechanisms will be applied where necessary to support management objectives. There are strong indications that a voluntary compliance and stewardship program will achieve many of the resource protection goals and objectives, it is recognized, however, that some management objectives will require regulatory authority in order to be achieved. Principal stakeholder groups have expressed a keen interest in not only developing “best practices” but also working towards ensuring a high degree of compliance.

 

The recommended milestones and timing for designation appear below:

MILESTONES TIMING
Preparation of the Race Rocks Marine Protected Area Proposal June 30 ‘00
Agreement/support from key stakeholders, relevant provincial and federal agencies and committeesMinister (agreement-in-principle) July 31 ‘00August ‘00
Federal/Provincial announcement (of designation or the timing of designation and implementation of interim management arrangements) September ‘00
Commence management planning processCanada — B.C. approval of management plan

Regulatory regime completed

September 30 ‘00June 8 ’01

Dec. 1 ‘01

 

4.9-Post Designation

Following the designation, the Federal-Provincial Management Committee referred to in Section 4.6 b will work with key stakeholders on the development and implementation of management policies and practices for (Race Rocks). These policies and practices will remain in place until such time that a formal integrated management plan is finalized and agreed to by relevant stakeholders and government agencies. The Management Committee will have ongoing responsibility for management of the joint MPA.

 

List of Appendices:

 Appendix I–Canada/BC Marine Protected Area Strategy MPA Criteria

Appendix II –IUCN Management Categories for Protected Areas

Appendix III –Assessment of known conservation (Table 1) and socio-economic values (Table 2) in Race Rocks Marine Protected Area according to the IUCN criteria for the identification and selection of marine protected areas.

Appendix IV–Consultative Process
Consultative framework
First Nations
Stakeholder consultations

Public consultations

Appendix V–Guiding Principles for Designation of Race Rocks Ecological Reserve as a Marine Protected Area

Appendix VI–Maps

Appendix VII–Bibliography

 

 

APPENDIX I

 

Canada/BC Marine Protected Area Strategy MPA Criteria

MPA Protection Objectives Determining Criteria
To contribute to the protection of marine biodiversity, representative ecosystems and special natural features.
  • representativeness
  • degree of naturalness
  • areas of high biodiversity or biological productivity
  • rare and endangered species
  • unique natural phenomena
  • vulnerability
  • unique habitat
To contribute to the protection and conservation of fishery resources and their habitats.
  • areas of high biodiversity or biological productivity
  • rare and endangered species
  • vulnerability
  • areas supporting unique or rare marine habitats
  • areas supporting significant spawning concentrations or densities
  • areas important for the viability of populations and genetic stocks
  • areas supporting critical species, life stages and environmental support systems
To provide opportunities for increased scientific research on marine ecosystems, organisms and special features, and sharing of traditional knowledge.
  • value as a natural benchmark
  • value for developing a better understanding of the function and interaction of species, communities and ecosystems
  • value for determining the impact and results of marine management activities

 

 

APPENDIX II

 

IUCN Management Categories for Protected Areas

Management Categories

The World Conservation Union (IUCN) has been actively involved in the process for the establishment of marine protected areas since first promulgating guidelines in 1991. Through the efforts of the IUCN, governments and communities around the world have been spurred to conservation and protection initiatives that have, in effect, been harmonised by the development of an international context within which to operate. Dependent upon their objectives, the IUCN (’94) has provided six categories for all protected areas including marine protected areas:

Category I-Protected area managed mainly for science or

wilderness protection (Strict Nature Reserve/Wilderness Area);Category II -Protected area managed mainly for ecosystem

protection and recreation ( National Park);Category III-Protected area managed mainly for conservation of

–specific natural features (Natural monument);

Category IV-Protected area managed mainly for conservation

through management intervention (Habitat/SpeciesManagement Area);

Category V-Protected area managed mainly for landscape/seascape

–conservation and recreation (Protected Landscape/Seascape); and

Category VI-Protected area managed mainly for sustainable use of

natural resources (Managed Resource Protected Area) 

Given the uniqueness, diversity and size of the proposed Race Rocks Marine Protected area, the highest level of protection will be required – IUCN Category I Protected Area. Based on the results of previous consultations, it is anticipated that relevant stakeholders and partners will support this approach.

Appendix III

Table 1

Assessment of known conservation values in (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area according to the IUCN criteria for the identification and selection of marine protected areas.

CRITERIA FOR THE DENTIFICATION AND SELECTION OF AN MPA CONSERVATION VALUES
ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCEContains genetic diversity

Contains habitat (or refugia) for rare or endangered species; and

Contains one or more areas which is a biologically functional, self sustaining ecological unit

For a small area (less than 220 hectares), the area has one of the highest levels of biodiversity in Canada’s pacific waters. Contains diverse species assemblages in the terrestrial, intertidal and subtidal zones and habitat (or refugia) for two “threatened” marine species — Northern abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana) and killer whales (Orcinus orca).
UNIQUENESSContains unique geographic features, species, communities and ecosystems The area contains a geographic/physical oceanographic feature (a combination of shallow sills and island archipelago off a prominent headland with strong currents that is unique to the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The strength and speed of tidal currents at Race Rocks make it a unique feature in the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The area is characterized by turbulent and nutrient-rich waters, resulting in species assemblages both unique and ecologically significant to the Strait.
BIOGEOGRAPHICAL IMPORTANCEPresence of rare biogeographical qualities The combination of geographic/physical oceanographic features unique to the Strait of Juan de Fuca creates ecological conditions that yield important species assemblages.
INTERNATIONAL OR NATIONAL IMPORTANCEPotential to be or is listed on the World Heritage list (Race Rocks) has potential for consideration by the UNESCO World Heritage List as a site of international significance based on its natural heritage values.
VULNERABILITYDegree to which species or ecosystems are susceptible to natural processes Relative to more inland coastal waters (Strait of Georgia), water quality is high despite being located in waters contiguous to Victoria’s Inner Harbour and its sewage outfall. Oceanographic mixing, high flushing rates and proximity to the open Pacific, maintain good water quality. The marine system is vulnerable to oil spills (heavy tanker traffic in the Strait), commercial and recreational fishing and eco-tourism. Both terrestrial and marine systems are vulnerable to the introduction of non-indigenous species.
PRODUCTIVITYContains species, populations, or natural communities that have a high natural biological productivity Contains populations and species that flourish in high-energy, productive marine environments. The combination of rocky reefs and high-velocity currents create high levels of biological productivity and biodiversity
NATURALNESSDegree to which the area has been protected from, or not been subject to, human induced change The terrestrial environment has been heavily impacted through the construction and manning of a lightstation over many years. The marine environment likely has a high degree of naturalness, although there has been heavy fishing pressure on pelagics and groundfish over the years. Designation as an ecological reserve for more than twenty years, has provided a some protection, along with the stewardship of Pearson College.
REPRESENTATIVENESSDegree to which the area adds to the representativeness of a national MPA network Representative of the transitional zone between the open Pacific Ocean and coastal inshore waters
COMPREHENSIVENESSDegree to which the area covers the full range of ecosystems within the region The proposed area ranges from the terrestrial environment through an extensive sub-tidal zone to depths in excess of forty metres. Low energy, sand-dominated and freshwater habitats are not included.

 

 

TABLE 2

Assessment of socio-economic values in the (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area according to the IUCN criteria for the identification and selection of Marine Protected Areas.

 

Criteria for the identification and selection of an MPA Degree to which the proposed MPA satisfies each criterion
ECONOMIC INTERESTSDoes this site:

make an existing or potential contribution to economic value by virtue of its protection, e.g. for recreation or tourism, or as refuge or nursery area, or source of supply for economically valuable species-

have current or potential use for the extraction of, or exploration for resources-

have importance for shipping and/or trade-

have usage by traditional users including commercial fishers-

have value due to its contribution to local or regional employment and economic development-

Recreation — restricted under provincial legislationTourism — restricted under provincial legislation

Refugia — likely

Nursery areas — likely

Supply of key species — yes

Non-renewable resources — no

Proximity to busy shipping lanes — yes

Commercial fishing — no

Sports fishing — limited

Restrictions may be applied to tourism, recreation, education and research tht limit their contributions to employment and development of local community

FIRST NATIONS INTERESTShave traditional First Nation use and/or current economic value-

contain First Nation’s cultural values-

subject to Treaty and/or title considerations-

Traditional use — yesCultural values — yes

Treaty — yes

SOCIAL INTERESTSdoes the site have existing or potential value to the local, national or international communities because of its heritage, cultural, traditional, aesthetic, educational recreational or economic values- National and international communities have strong interests in the area’s educational, research, eco-tourism, cultural and traditional use values.

Appendix IV

Consultative Process

Consultative Framework

The pilot process for the establishment of a Marine Protected Area at (Race Rocks) recognized the importance of a comprehensive dialogue between those constituents whose interests might be affected. After identifying the key stakeholder groups or individuals, interests, issues and proposals for resolution were developed through facilitation and meetings. In some instances, this required a series of meetings to develop consensus. Overall, it is important to note that there was and continues to be a high level of support for the creation of Marine Protected Areas. The Race Rocks Advisory Board provided an excellent forum for discussion and issue resolution.

First Nations:

Engaging First Nations in the consideration of Race Rocks as a pilot MPA has been a priority. Initial discussions with T’souke and Beecher Bay First Nations revealed both common interests and issues requiring resolution.

From a First Nation’s perspective, the Race Rocks area has cultural significance with respect to traditional use and management of the area’s resources. There is recognition that, should a Marine Protected Area be established, it will not infringe on First Nations’ existing Treaty rights, traditional, food, ceremonial interests or relationship with the area. Further, a significant opportunity has developed for cooperative management and First Nation’s educational opportunities.

The Race Rocks Advisory Board included representation from the Coast Salish Sea Council. Active participation from First Nations ensured effective communications with local Bands and those in neighbouring Washington State U.S.A. Several events highlighted the First Nations’ participation. A “Thirteen Moon” seminar was conducted in December “which demonstrated the lunar cycle’s influence on traditional First Nations’ life and relationship to the ecosystem”. On March 9, 2000 the members of the Race Rocks Advisory Board were honoured to be invited by the Beecher Bay Band to a “Burning Ceremony” near Race Rocks. This event is highly spiritual and provides an offering to ancestors. It was a rare privilege to be invited to participate in such a ceremony and it provided a very meaningful opportunity to build relationships.

More recently, First Nations’ elders and youth are visiting (Race Rocks) to learn about traditional uses and relationship to the marine environment. These visits are assisting in the development of both a traditional use study and First Nations’ curriculum for elementary and junior secondary students.

 

The Race Rocks Advisory Board members expressed appreciation for the opportunity to develop a fuller understanding of First Nations’ relationship with marine ecosystems.

Through this process it became apparent that there was First Nations’ support for the creation of Marine Protected Areas such as (Race Rocks) and a willingness to participate in the management of MPA’s.

 

Stakeholder Consultations

Extensive consultations were conducted to determine interests, issues and support for the creation of a Marine Protected Area at Race Rocks. With most groups support was readily apparent and strong. A small minority of stakeholder groups expressed concerns and interests that were resolved. Issues regarding recreational fishing and eco-tourism interests required more detailed and protracted discussion.

Public Consultations

In addition to sector consultations with stakeholders, two public sessions were conducted in February 2000. The public consultations were held to ensure the widest range of information and discussion with those persons potentially not represented by particular interest groups.

 

 APPENDIX V

The following Guiding Principles for Marine Protected Area development have been adapted, in co-operation with BC Parks, from the draft Marine Protected Areas – A Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast 1998 – Guiding Principles for MPA Development.

 

 

Guiding Principles for the Designation of Race Rocks Ecological Reserve as a Marine Protected Area

Working Together: The full realization of Race Rocks as both and ER and MPA is dependent on the combined authorities of Canada and British Columbia, as well as the ongoing coordination of management actions by a range of federal and provincial agencies, non-government organizations and volunteers. DFO and BC Parks, representing Canada and British Columbia, will together provide the leadership that fosters this coordination, cooperation and partnership.

Learning by Doing: The outcomes and recommendations for management were based on stakeholders working together to develop the best solutions for a new initiative. Flexibility and adaptability will be required to meet the needs of all interests.

Respect First Nations and the Treaty Process: Canada and British Columbia consider First Nations’ support and participation in the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve and Marine Protected Area planning and management processes as essential. First Nations will be actively involved in all planning and management processes. The establishment of this MPA will not preclude options for settlement of treaties.

Managing for Sustainability: All resources within the Marine Protected Area require protection and conservation and must be managed for the benefit of future generations, with the emphasis on maintaining viable populations of all species and conserving a functioning ecosystem.

Precautionary approach: All management actions, including the regulation of appropriate uses, will be based on the precautionary approach. The precautionary approach means, “erring on the side of caution.” This principle puts the burden of proof on anyone conducting activities within Race Rocks MPA to demonstrate that there will be no damage to the marine ecosystem from the proposed activity.

Adaptive Planning and Management: The values protected within Race Rocks MPA will be subject to external influences and change over time. As such, the management direction and actions for the MPA component of the Race Rocks area will be adaptive and responsive to the changing environmental, social and economic conditions.

 

 

Fostering Ecosystem-Based Management: An ecosystem-based approach will be used to manage Race Rocks MPA. This means that management respects the integrity of the natural ecosystem and its key components structure and functions. This approach means that certain human activities will be managed in order to protect the natural environment.

Fostering Stewardship: Governments, stakeholders and local communities all play an equally important role in sustaining the activities, lifestyles, economics and health of the Race Rocks marine environment. Opportunities to actively involve others outside of Government in the stewarding of the Race Rocks area will be a foundation for the successful protection of the Race Rocks environment.

Open, Informed and Inclusive Decision-Making: Effective protection of Race Rocks’ values, as well as trust-based stewardship depends on open, transparent and informed decision-making. The management direction will be both inclusive of all interests and supported, to the greatest extent possible, by all affected organizations and individuals.

Appendix V1 MAPS

 

 

 

 

 Appendix VII

Bibliography

 

BC Parks (1999). The Management Plan for the Race Rocks Ecological Reserve –Draft. Unpublished. 26pp.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada (1999). National Framework for Establishing and Managing Marine Protected Areas. 25pp

Fletcher, G. (1999). The Race Rocks Ecological Overview

Governments of Canada and British Columbia (1998). Marine Protected Areas – A Strategy for Canada’s Pacific Coast. 28pp.

Kelleher, G. & A. Phillips (eds.) (1999). Guidelines for Marine Protected Areas. World Commission on Protected Areas of IUCN – The World Conservation Union. 28 pp.

Murgatroyd, L. (1999). Managing Tourism and Recreational Activities in Canada’s Marine Protected Areas: the Pilot Project at Race Rocks British Columbia. Dalhousie University graduate thesis.

Pakenham, M. (ed.) (2000). Race Rocks Advisory Board Management Recommendations for ( Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area. Unpublished. 20pp.

Pakenham, M. & K. Francis. (eds.) (2000). Regulatory Impact Assessment Statement – regulations to Designate (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area. Unpublished. 17 pp.

Pakenham, M. & K. Francis. (eds.) (2000). Proposal to Designate (Race Rocks) Marine Protected Area. Unpublished. 25pp.